Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

DOĞANIN RİTMİYLE İNŞA ETMEK: EV-BAHÇE BÜTÜNLÜĞÜ ÜZERİNDEN EKOLOJİK VE DUYUSAL MİMARLIK YAKLAŞIMI

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 52 - 71, 31.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.56629/paud.1737661

Öz

Mimarlık, salt bir yapı disiplini değil, aynı zamanda insan-doğa ilişkisinin mekânsal ifadesidir. Bu ilişki işlevsel olduğu kadar çok katmanlı bir anlam dünyasını kapsayarak mimariyi ontolojik bir araca dönüştürmektedir. Bu çalışmada da, ev-bahçe ilişkisi fiziksel bitişkiliğin ötesinde varoluşsal, ekolojik ve bilişsel olarak bütünleşik iki mimari bileşen olarak ele alınmaktadır. Frank Lloyd Wright’ın doğayla bütünleşik yapı felsefesinden yola çıkan bu yaklaşım, mimariyi doğanın bir parçası olarak gören, iç ve dış mekân arasındaki sınırları ortadan kaldıran ve bireyin çevresiyle duyusal bir bağ kurmasını sağlayan bütüncül bir tasarım paradigması sunmaktadır. Makale, ev-bahçe bütünlüğünü mimari biçim, fraktal estetik, toprak sağlığı, su döngüsü, mikroiklim etkisi, hesaplamalı peyzaj teknikleri ve felsefi anlam üretimi gibi farklı başlıklarda değerlendirmektedir. Biyofilik tasarım ve duyarlı yüzey sistemleri gibi çağdaş yaklaşımlar aracılığıyla, organik mimarlığın sadece geçmişe değil; aynı zamanda teknoloji destekli bir geleceğe açılan yönü de vurgulanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak organik mimarlık, doğayla uyumlu bir yapısal estetikten öte; kullanıcıyı, çevresiyle ve kendi iç dünyasıyla bağ kurmaya çağıran bir yaşam biçimi olarak önerilmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Bachelard, G. (1994). The poetics of space (M. Jolas, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1958)
  • Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Garrett, H., Ferguson, J., and Amaranthus, M. (2012). Organic management for the professional: The natural way for landscape architects and contractors, commercial growers, golf-course managers, park administrators, turf managers, and other stewards of the land. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Harris, J. (2012). Fractal architecture: Organic design philosophy in theory and practice. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
  • Ito, T. (2022). Architecture of Nature: Fluid and Organic Approaches. Tokyo: Toto Publishing.
  • Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kuma, K. (2021). Kengo Kuma: Materials, Structures, Details. Thames & Hudson.
  • Levine, N. (1996). The architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright: A complete catalog. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Mansvelt, J. D., van der Lubbe, M. J. (1999). Checklist for sustainable landscape management: Final report of the EU concerted action AIR3-CT93-1210. Wageningen: Centre for Agriculture and Environment.
  • McHarg, I. L. (1992). Design with nature. New York: Wiley.
  • Oxman, N. (2020). Material Ecology. Museum of Modern Art.
  • Roesler, S. (2022). City, climate, and architecture: A theory of collective practice. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  • Rossi, M., and Buratti, G. (Eds.). (2018). Computational morphologies: Design rules between organic models and responsive architecture. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Salingaros, N. A. (2006). A theory of architecture. Solingen: Umbau-Verlag.
  • Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224 (4647), 420-421. doi:10.1126/science.6143402
  • Ültay, E., Akyurt, H., and Ültay, N. (2021). Descriptive content analysis in social sciences. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, (10), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.871703
  • Wang, S., Sanches de Oliveira, G., Djebbara, Z., and Gramann, K. (2022). The embodiment of architectural experience: A methodological perspective on neuro-architecture. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 833528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.833528
  • Weisser, W. W., Hensel, M., Barath, S., Culshaw, V., Grobman, Y. J., Hauck, T. E., Joschinski, J., Ludwig, F., Mimet, A., Perini, K., Roccotiello, E., Schloter, M., Shwartz, A., Hensel, D. S., and Vogler, V. (2023). Creating ecologically sound buildings by integrating ecology, architecture and computational design. People and Nature, 5, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10411
  • Wright, F. L. (1939). An organic architecture: The architecture of democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wright, F. L. (1954). The natural house. New York: Horizon Press.
  • Young, D. (2013). Philosophy in the garden: Eleven great authors and the ideas they discovered in parks, yards and pots. Carlton: Melbourne University Publishing.

BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 52 - 71, 31.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.56629/paud.1737661

Öz

Architecture is not merely a construction discipline, but a spatial expression of the human-nature relationship. This relationship, while functional, also encompasses a multilayered world of meaning, transforming architecture into an ontological medium. In this study, the house-garden relationship is considered not just as a matter of physical adjacency, but as two architecturally integrated components on existential, ecological, and cognitive levels. Inspired by Frank Lloyd Wright’s philosophy of integration with nature, this approach presents a holistic design paradigm that perceives architecture as a part of nature, dissolves the boundaries between interior and exterior space, and fosters a sensory connection between the individual and their environment. The article evaluates the house-garden integrity through various lenses such as architectural form, fractal aesthetics, soil health, water cycles, microclimatic effects, computational landscape techniques, and philosophical meaning-making. Through contemporary approaches such as biophilic design and responsive surface systems, the forward-looking dimension of organic architecture beyond its historical context is also emphasized. Ultimately, organic architecture is proposed not merely as a nature-compatible structural aesthetic, but as a way of life that invites users to connect with their environment and inner self.

Kaynakça

  • Bachelard, G. (1994). The poetics of space (M. Jolas, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1958)
  • Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Garrett, H., Ferguson, J., and Amaranthus, M. (2012). Organic management for the professional: The natural way for landscape architects and contractors, commercial growers, golf-course managers, park administrators, turf managers, and other stewards of the land. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Harris, J. (2012). Fractal architecture: Organic design philosophy in theory and practice. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
  • Ito, T. (2022). Architecture of Nature: Fluid and Organic Approaches. Tokyo: Toto Publishing.
  • Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kuma, K. (2021). Kengo Kuma: Materials, Structures, Details. Thames & Hudson.
  • Levine, N. (1996). The architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright: A complete catalog. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Mansvelt, J. D., van der Lubbe, M. J. (1999). Checklist for sustainable landscape management: Final report of the EU concerted action AIR3-CT93-1210. Wageningen: Centre for Agriculture and Environment.
  • McHarg, I. L. (1992). Design with nature. New York: Wiley.
  • Oxman, N. (2020). Material Ecology. Museum of Modern Art.
  • Roesler, S. (2022). City, climate, and architecture: A theory of collective practice. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  • Rossi, M., and Buratti, G. (Eds.). (2018). Computational morphologies: Design rules between organic models and responsive architecture. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Salingaros, N. A. (2006). A theory of architecture. Solingen: Umbau-Verlag.
  • Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224 (4647), 420-421. doi:10.1126/science.6143402
  • Ültay, E., Akyurt, H., and Ültay, N. (2021). Descriptive content analysis in social sciences. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, (10), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.871703
  • Wang, S., Sanches de Oliveira, G., Djebbara, Z., and Gramann, K. (2022). The embodiment of architectural experience: A methodological perspective on neuro-architecture. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 833528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.833528
  • Weisser, W. W., Hensel, M., Barath, S., Culshaw, V., Grobman, Y. J., Hauck, T. E., Joschinski, J., Ludwig, F., Mimet, A., Perini, K., Roccotiello, E., Schloter, M., Shwartz, A., Hensel, D. S., and Vogler, V. (2023). Creating ecologically sound buildings by integrating ecology, architecture and computational design. People and Nature, 5, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10411
  • Wright, F. L. (1939). An organic architecture: The architecture of democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wright, F. L. (1954). The natural house. New York: Horizon Press.
  • Young, D. (2013). Philosophy in the garden: Eleven great authors and the ideas they discovered in parks, yards and pots. Carlton: Melbourne University Publishing.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Yeşil Yapılar ve Çevreler
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Yahya Melikoğlu 0000-0002-9815-0925

Şevket Alp 0000-0002-9552-4848

Gönderilme Tarihi 8 Temmuz 2025
Kabul Tarihi 2 Ekim 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Melikoğlu, Y., & Alp, Ş. (2025). BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN. JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE RESEARCH AND PRACTICES (JOLARP), 7(2), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.56629/paud.1737661
AMA Melikoğlu Y, Alp Ş. BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN. JOLARP. Aralık 2025;7(2):52-71. doi:10.56629/paud.1737661
Chicago Melikoğlu, Yahya, ve Şevket Alp. “BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN”. JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE RESEARCH AND PRACTICES (JOLARP) 7, sy. 2 (Aralık 2025): 52-71. https://doi.org/10.56629/paud.1737661.
EndNote Melikoğlu Y, Alp Ş (01 Aralık 2025) BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN. JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE RESEARCH AND PRACTICES (JOLARP) 7 2 52–71.
IEEE Y. Melikoğlu ve Ş. Alp, “BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN”, JOLARP, c. 7, sy. 2, ss. 52–71, 2025, doi: 10.56629/paud.1737661.
ISNAD Melikoğlu, Yahya - Alp, Şevket. “BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN”. JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE RESEARCH AND PRACTICES (JOLARP) 7/2 (Aralık2025), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.56629/paud.1737661.
JAMA Melikoğlu Y, Alp Ş. BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN. JOLARP. 2025;7:52–71.
MLA Melikoğlu, Yahya ve Şevket Alp. “BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN”. JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE RESEARCH AND PRACTICES (JOLARP), c. 7, sy. 2, 2025, ss. 52-71, doi:10.56629/paud.1737661.
Vancouver Melikoğlu Y, Alp Ş. BUILDING WITH THE RHYTHM OF NATURE: ECOLOGICAL AND SENSORY ARCHITECTURE APPROACH THROUGH THE UNITY OF HOME AND GARDEN. JOLARP. 2025;7(2):52-71.