Reflections on the Value of Mixed Focus Groups with Adult Learner Research Participants: Exploring Gender Disparities and Gendered Relationships
Abstract
The purpose of this article is two-fold. Firstly, we consider whether the setting up of mixed-gender focus group sessions has the potential as a research process to contribute to transforming people’s understandings of their gendered relationships. Secondly, we relate our discussion to the question of the mutability of stereotypical thinking in the context in question, taking into account the idea that cultures in different contexts can be seen as “in the making” through the way in which people together create meaning. We explain how the first author of the article organized focus groups which were mixed in terms of gender with the purpose that the adult learner participants could develop their perceptions as they related to each other around the topic of gender inequalities.). The sessions were conducted in two adult learning Centers located in a rural and an urban area respectively – Xola and Zodwa – within the Cacadu District of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Two mixed focus groups took place in 2016 (one in each Center, with 19 females and 5 males altogether), and a follow up took place in 2018, to further discuss recommendations. In 2022, another set of focus group sessions was arranged in the same Centers, with 10 females and 6 males who were asked to participate and agreed. As part of a related discussion on gendered relationships, they were asked specific questions regarding how they understood the value of the mixed-gender conversations. Results from the various sets of groups suggest that focus groups can indeed help people to explore and rethink gender disparities and to think of ways forward in terms of enriched understandings. We recommend that mixed-gender focus group sessions should be regarded by researchers as a potential space to fruitfully set up a way for people to develop their sense of interdependence in their social relations.
Keywords
African feminist thinking, gendered relationships, gender inequalities, relational existence, transformative research
Supporting Institution
University of South Africa
Project Number
There is no project number - this was research done initially towards a doctoral degree and then with follow up research
References
- Adyanga F. A. (2019). Ancient governance in Africa. In N. Wane (Ed.), Gender, democracy and institutional development in Africa (pp. 37-65). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Ahlung, S. (2017). Deconstructing gender: Interdisciplinary degree project. Gothenburg: Göterborgs Universitet.
- Amaefula, R. C. (2021). African feminisms: paradigms, problems and prospects. Feminism/s, 37, 289-305.
- Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 5(2), 272-281.
- Buswell, C., & Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (2018). Precarious liaisons: Gender, moral authority and marriage in colonial Kenya. In J. J. McIntyre-Mills, N. R. A. Romm & Y. Corcoran-Nantes (Eds.), Balancing Individualism and collectivism (pp. 395-414). Cham: Springer.
- Chilisa, B. (2009.) Indigenous African-centered ethics: Contesting and complementing dominant models. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 407–426). London: Sage.
- Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. London: Sage Publications.
- Chilisa, B. (2020.) Indigenous research methodologies (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
- Chilisa, B., Major, T. E., & Khudu-Petersen, K. (2017). Community engagement with a postcolonial, African-based relational paradigm. Qualitative Research, 17(3), 326-339.
- Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). London: Harper Collins.
