The Effect of Distance Education Students' Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement

Erdi Okan Yılmaz

doi:10.17275/per.25.46.12.4

EN

The Effect of Distance Education Students' Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement

Abstract

This study examines the effects of distance education students' virtual classroom participation on their course achievement. The sample of this study, designed in the survey model, consists of 953 higher education students in a university in Turkey. Within the scope of the study, the students' virtual classroom participation status was examined. The students’ only watched synchronous or asynchronous, both synchronous and asynchronous, and no course-watching statuses were compared with the Turkish Language Course achievement scores. In addition, it was investigated whether the common effect of students' gender and virtual course-watching status affected course achievement. The average achievement scores of the students who watched course videos synchronously and asynchronously were significantly higher than those who watched only synchronously or asynchronously and did not watch at all. It was found that the achievement averages of the students who never attended/watched their virtual classrooms were significantly lower than all the other groups. In addition, it was concluded that the status of those watching virtual lessons, and the gender of these students created a significant difference in their course achievement. Still, the common effect of the status of these students watching virtual lessons and gender on their course achievement was not significant. The research findings were discussed and reported in light of the literature.

Keywords

distance education, course participation, achievement

Ethical Statement

Regarding this research, Uşak University, Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee approval numbered 2024-164 was received.

References

Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları: sık kullanılan istatistiksel analizler ve açıklamalı SPSS çözümleri [SPSS applications in social sciences: commonly used statistical analyses and annotated SPSS solutions]. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür & Publishing.
Alger, M. & Eyckmans, J. (2022). “I took physical lessons for granted”: A case study exploring students’ interpersonal interactions in online synchronous lessons during the outbreak of COVID-19. System, 105, 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102716
Aoki, K. (2023). Embracing synchronicity in distance education: unraveling the paradox. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. 1068-1070. doi:10.58459/icce.2023.1502
Armah, S.E., Akayuure, P., Armah, R.B. (2021). A comparative study of male and female distance learners’ mathematics achievement. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 2(1), 1-8. doi:10.30935/conmaths/9288
Baddeley, A.D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8. 47-89.
Buadu, Y. S., Kear, K., & Donelan, H. (2024). Web conferencing: the technical and social challenges. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning, 14(1). doi:10.54337/nlc.v14i1.8043
Borup, J. (2016). Teacher perceptions of learner-learner engagement at a cyber high school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 231-250. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2361
Bunayah, B. (2022). Manajemen waktu belajar mahasiswa selama pembelajaran jarak jauh. Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI), 5(1), 31-40. doi:10.31539/joeai.v5i1.3455
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Van, D.T.H. & Thi, H.H.Q. (2021). Student barriers to prospects of online learning in Vietnam in: The context of Covid-19 pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 110-123. doi:10.17718/tojde.961824

Demirtaş, B., & Türk, U. (2022). Student performance under asynchronous and synchronous methods in distance education: a quasi-field experiment. International Review of Economics Education, (41), 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2022.100244
Doğan, M. & Arslan, H. (2023). Perspectives of faculty members on distance education. TÜBA Higher Education Research/Review, 13(1), 33-40, doi:10.2399/yod.23.1168541
Dinh, L., & Nguyen, T. (2020). Pandemic, social distancing, and social work education: Students’ satisfaction with online education in Vietnam. Social Work Education, 39(8), 1074-1083. doi:10.1080/02615479.2020.1823365
Erkut, E. (2020). Covid-19 sonrası yükseköğretim [Higher education after Covid-19]. Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 125-133. doi:10.2399/yod.20.002
Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., Alberto Lencastre, J., & Figueiras, M. J. (2024). Cross-national comparison of gender discrepancies in distance education. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(2), 1-18. doi:10.30935/ojcmt/14408
Frank, M. (2008). Synchronous and asynchronous learning environments. Encyclopaedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration, 815-822. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-881-9.ch128
Göçer, A. (2020). Uzaktan öğretimde senkron (eş zamanlı) derslerle eşgüdümlü asenkron (eş zamansız) etkinliklerin planlanıp uygulanmasında bütünleyici çalışmalar/tamamlayıcı görevler [Supplementary studies/complementary tasks in planning and implementing asynchronous activities coordinated with synchronous courses in distance education]. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 1(1), 91-96.
Gaspay, A., Legorreta, L., & Dardan, S. (2009). Flexibility of asynchronous distance learning: reaching diverse cultures. Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 2(2), 47.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step a simple guide and reference. New York: Routledge.
Hung, C., Wu, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). The evaluation of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: student experience, learning outcomes, and cognitive load. BMC Med Educ, (326). doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05311-7
Hyde, J.S., & Linn, M.C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314(5799), 599-600. doi:10.1126/science.1132154
Kamaludin, F. S., Ulum, B., Faizuddin, A., & Azizan, N. A. (2023). Asynchronous learning method: prospects and challenges among undergraduate students at higher Islamic institution in Indonesia. International Journal of Islamic Studies Higher Education, 2(2), 77–93. doi:10.24036/insight.v2i2.142
Katane, I. and Katans, E. (2015). Distance education in historical aspect. Society Integration Education Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 309. doi:10.17770/sie2012vol1.51
Kirali, F.N., & Alci, B. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitim algısına ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of university students on the perception of distance education]. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi [Istanbul Aydin University Journal], 8, 55-83.
Lam, J. (2018). The pedagogy-driven, learner-centred, objective-oriented and technology-enable (plot) online learning model. Pupil International Journal of Teaching Education and Learning, 2(2), 66-80. doi:10.20319/pijtel.2018.22.6680
Le, M., & Tran, K. (2023). Synchronous virtual learning students' experience and the prospect in Vietnam. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 3(9), 163-177. doi:10.17718/tojde.1099129
Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169-179. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3881614
McFerrin, K. (1999). Incidental learning in a higher education asynchronous online distance education course. Educational Resources Information Centre, 1-7.
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (1984). Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction. Boston, USA: Little Brown.
McVey, M. (2017). Distance education: statewide, institutional, and international applications of distance education. International Review of Education, 64(2), 269-272. doi:10.1007/s11159-017-9673-y
Mert, M. (2016). SPSS Stata yatay kesit veri analizi bilgisayar uygulamaları [SPSS Stata cross-section data analysis computer applications]. Ankara: Detay Publishing.
Midkiff, S., & Dasilva, L. (2000). Leveraging the web for synchronous versus asynchronous distance learning. International Conference on Engineering Education, 14-18. Taipei, Taiwan.
Nieuwenhuyse, K.V. (2021). Synchronous interactive live lectures versus asynchronous individual online modules. a comparative analysis of students' perceptions and performances. Yesterday and Today, 24, 55-70. doi:10.17159/2223-0386/2020/n24a4
Nieuwoudt, J. (2020). Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 15-25. doi:10.14742/ajet.5137
Oguguo, B., Ocheni, C., & Adebayo, F. (2021). Students' achievement in online test and measurement course in synchronous and asynchronous e-learning platform. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 6(2), 137-151. doi:10.46827/ejoe.v6i2.3966
Özgül, E. & Ocak, M.A. (2023). The effect of internet of things education through distance education on student success and motivation. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 6(2), 403-420. doi:10.31681/jetol.1241362
Padaguri, V., & Pasha, S.A. (2021). Synchronous Online Learning Versus Asynchronous Online Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Learning Effectiveness. AUBH E-Learning Conference 2021: Innovative Learning & Teaching - Lessons from COVID-19, 1-9. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3878806
Persada, S. F., Prasetyo, Y. T., Suryananda, X. V., Apriyansyah, B., Ong, A. K. S., Nadlifatin, R., Setiyati, E. A., Putra, R. A. K., Purnomo, A., Triangga, B., Siregar, N. J., Carolina, D., Maulana, F. I., & Ardiansyahmiraja, B. (2022). How the education industries react to synchronous and asynchronous learning in covid-19: multigroup analysis insights for future online education. Sustainability, 14(22), 15288. doi:10.3390/su142215288
Phaire, C. B. (2022). In the zoom where it happens: from overwhelmed to overcome, collegiate students’ experiences during the covid-19 pandemic. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 95(5), 220–229. doi:10.1080/00098655.2022.2105782
Pullen, J., & Snow, C. (2007). Integrating synchronous and asynchronous internet distributed education for maximum effectiveness. Education and Information Technologies, 12, 137-148. doi:10.1007/s10639-007-9035-7
Richardson, J.T.E. (2013). The attainment of white and ethnic minority students in distance education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 4-20. doi:1080/02602938.2011.631298
Rush, P. (2015). Isolation and connection: the experience of distance education. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 30(2). doi:10.4000/dms.2509
Saluky, & Bahiyah, N. (2023). Revolutionizing education: unlocking the potential of asynchronous video for interactive online learning. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(2), 187-196. doi:10.58557/(ijeh).v3i2.149
Scheiderer, J. (2022). What's the difference between asynchronous and synchronous learning? Ohio State Online: https://online.osu.edu/resources/learn/whats-difference-between-asynchronous-and-synchronous-learning
Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., & Dorman, D. (2021). Effect of delivery format on student outcomes and perceptions of a veterinary medicine course: synchronous versus asynchronous learning. Veterinary Sciences, 8(2), 13. doi:10.3390/vetsci8020013
Schullo, S., Siekmann, S., & Szydlo, S. (2003). Synchronous distance education systems, choosing the right solution? E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Arizona, USA.
Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ž., Valantinaitė, I., & Asakavičiūtė, V. (2022). ‘Should i turn on my video camera?’ the students’ perceptions of the use of video cameras in synchronous distant learning. Electronics, 11(5), 813. doi:10.3390/electronics11050813
Tonga, E.S., & Şahin, S. (2023). Interaction in distance education: meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. E-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 52-75. doi:10.30900/kafkasegt.1139201
Truong, T.C. & Diep, Q.B. (2023). Technological spotlights of digital transformation in tertiary education. IEEE Access, 11, 40954-40966.
Trust, T., Goodman, L. (2023). Cameras optional? Examining student camera use from a learner-centered perspective. TechTrends. doi:10.1007/s11528-023-00855-9
Themelis, C. (2014). Synchronous video communication for distance education: the educators’ perspective. Open Praxis, 6(3), 245. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.6.3.128
Üstün, A.G. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim merkezlerinin uygulama deneyimlerine dayalı kampüs tabanlı çevrim içi derslerin yürütülme sürecinin incelenmesi [Examining the process of conducting campus-based online courses based on the application experiences of distance education centers]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Atatürk University, Erzurum.
Wang, Z. (2023). Research on strategies for the development of higher education teaching in the internet age. The Educational Review Usa, 7(8), 1203-1207.
Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23-32.
Wright, M.A., & Osler, J.E. (2020). The measurement of connectivist and constructivist learning modalities using triostatistical analytical methods: comparing online asynchronous and synchronous instructional strategies via in-depth tri–squared analysis and analytics. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 35-49. doi:10.26634/jet.17.1.15110
Yılmaz, E., Uzman, B., Güner, B., & Doğanay, G. (2020). Veli algısına göre pandemi döneminde uzaktan eğitimin niteliği [The quality of distance education during the pandemic according to parents' perception]. Konya: Palet Publishing.
Yin, H., Shi, L. (2022). Which type of interpersonal interaction better facilitates college student learning and development in China: face-to face or online? ECNU Review of Education, 5(1), 9-36. doi:10.1177/20965311211010818
Yorkovsky, Y. & Levenberg, I. (2022). Distance learning in science and mathematics - Advantages and disadvantages based on pre-service teachers’ experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103883
YÖK. (2023). Yükseköğretim kurumlarında uzaktan öğretime ilişkin usul ve esaslar [Procedures and principles regarding distance education in higher education institutions]. Turkish Higher Education Council: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Uzaktan_ogretim/yuksekogretim-kurumlarinda-uzaktan-ogretime-iliskin-usul-ve-esaslar.pdf
Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Specialist Studies in Education (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Erdi Okan Yılmaz ^*
0000-0002-7423-725X
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

June 26, 2025

Publication Date

July 1, 2025

Submission Date

August 19, 2024

Acceptance Date

April 12, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 12 Number: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.46.12.4

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA77XH36PN

APA

Yılmaz, E. O. (2025). The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement. Participatory Educational Research, 12(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.46.12.4

AMA

1.Yılmaz EO. The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement. PER. 2025;12(4):1-18. doi:10.17275/per.25.46.12.4

Chicago

Yılmaz, Erdi Okan. 2025. “The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement”. Participatory Educational Research 12 (4): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.46.12.4.

EndNote

Yılmaz EO (July 1, 2025) The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement. Participatory Educational Research 12 4 1–18.

IEEE

[1]E. O. Yılmaz, “The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement”, PER, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–18, July 2025, doi: 10.17275/per.25.46.12.4.

ISNAD

Yılmaz, Erdi Okan. “The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement”. Participatory Educational Research 12/4 (July 1, 2025): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.46.12.4.

JAMA

1.Yılmaz EO. The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement. PER. 2025;12:1–18.

MLA

Yılmaz, Erdi Okan. “The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 12, no. 4, July 2025, pp. 1-18, doi:10.17275/per.25.46.12.4.

Vancouver

1.Erdi Okan Yılmaz. The Effect of Distance Education Students’ Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement. PER. 2025 Jul. 1;12(4):1-18. doi:10.17275/per.25.46.12.4

27707

Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 International Lisance

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoicGVyIHNjb3B1cyBpc3RhdHRpc3Rpay5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiOTg5Ni9mN2E1LzU3ZDcvNmEyMmIyZmFlMGJkYjYuMDUyNjIyMDMucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzgwNjYyNTM5LCJub25jZSI6IjcxYzczMjhhOTdkOWYxM2ExZjE2NWExYjQyMzMyOWJhIn0.g4uvJoi6Oy8W0gRoUNW-d5FO9m4u30pEA0l1h8DwzSE

Abstract

The Effect of Distance Education Students' Virtual Classroom Participation Status on Their Course Achievement

Abstract

Keywords

Ethical Statement

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Early Pub Date

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite