Systematic Examination of Educational Virtual Reality Studies: Google Cardboard
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the current situation viz. as of year 2024 in experimental educational studies conducted using Google Cardboard as a virtual reality tool. In the study, 36 articles published in journals indexed in Web of Science and Scopus databases and decided to be suitable for the research purpose were analyzed. The data were analyzed by content analysis method. According to the results obtained in the research, while the number of articles increased until 2020, it has been decreasing since this year reaching the year 2024. While the most preferred sample group was the undergraduate level, studies were carried out with the most participants between 11-30. While it is mostly used in STEM education, the number of in-school and out-of-school applications is close to each other. While survey/scale was the most preferred data collection tool, it was concluded that different media types were used in the studies. The advantages of the studies were summarized and analyzed in detail under 3 sub-themes: educational outcomes, affective outcomes and technical advantages. Whereas the most important educational outcome underlined in the articles is increases success (performance), the most important affective outcome is students develop positive attitudes. It is noteworthy that technical advantages are mentioned less frequently. On the other hand, it was concluded that some difficulties were encountered, such as eye strain and headaches.
Keywords
References
- Ahmed, T., & Hossain, M. J. (2020). VR chiriyakhana: A virtual zoo using Google cardboard. SN Computer Science, 1(6).
- Banerjee, S., Pham, T., Eastaway, A., Auffermann, W. F., & Quigley III, E. P. (2023). The use of virtual reality in teaching three-dimensional anatomy and pathology on CT. Journal of Digital Imaging, 36(3), 1279-1284.
- Bonetti, F., Warnaby, G., & Quinn, L. (2018). Augmented reality and virtual reality in physical and online retailing: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Augmented reality and virtual reality: Empowering human, place and business, 119-132.
- Brey, P. (2014). Virtual reality and computer simulation. In Ethics and emerging technologies (pp. 315–332). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Cardullo, V., & Wang, C.-H. (2022). Pre-service teachers perspectives of Google expedition. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(2), 173–183.
- Chin, K. Y., & Wang, C. S. (2024). The effectiveness of a VR-based mobile learning system for university students to learn geological knowledge. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4281-4296.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
- Cook, M., Lischer-Katz, Z., Hall, N., Hardesty, J., Johnson, J., McDonald, R., & Carlisle, T. (2019). Challenges and strategies for educational virtual reality: Results of an expert-led forum on 3D/VR technologies across academic institutions. Information Technology and Libraries, 38(4), 25-48.
- Darabkh, K. A., Alturk, F. H., & Sweidan, S. Z. (2018). VRCDEA‐TCS: 3D virtual reality cooperative drawing educational application with textual chatting system. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1677-1698.
- Ebadijalal, M., & Yousofi, N. (2022). ‘Take me to a virtual trip if you want me to write better!’: the impact of Google Expeditions on EFL learners’ writing motivation and performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1806–1828.
