Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 1 - 19, 01.06.2014
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.14.01.1.1

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Altun, M. B. (2008). Siber gerçeklikte kültür and iletisim sorunları. Yayımlanmamıs yüksek lisans tezi [Cyber culture and communication problems in reality. Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. [Marmara University Social Science Institute].
  • Aluja, A., Blanch, A.,(2004). Socialized personality, scholastic aptitudes, study habits, and academic achievement: exploring the link European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20 (3) (2004), pp. 157–165
  • Balcı, A. (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, teknik and ilkeler[Research in social science: Methods, techniques and principles]. Ankara: PegemA Yayınevi [PegemA Pub.].
  • Binark, M. & Bayraktutan-Sütcü, G. (2008). Silkroad Online’da Sanal Cemaat İnşası and Türk Klan Kimliği [Building Virtual Community in Silkroad Online and the Turkish clan Identity]. inet-tr’08 - XIII. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı Bildirileri [Proceedings of Internet inTurkey Conference], Ankara, 22-23 December. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi [Middle East Technical University], pp.133.
  • Brenner, V. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: the first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychological Reports, 80, pp. 879–882
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook for Social science data analysis]. Ankara: PegemA Yayınevi [PegemA Pub.].
  • Carmines, E.G, Zeller, R. A. (1982). Reliability and validity assessment. 5th ed. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Celkan, H.Y.(1991), Eğitim Sosyolojisi [Sociology of Education], Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları [Ataturk University Pub.], Erzurum.
  • Chana, W. M., Dicianno B. E. (2011).Virtual socialization in adults with spina bifida. PM&R, Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 219–225
  • Colwell J, Payne J.( 2000). Negative correlates of computer game play in adolescents. British Journal of Psychology , 91: 295-310.
  • Coser, L. & Nock, S. & Steffan, P. & Rhea, B. & Merton(editor), R. (1987) Introduction To Sociology, Second Edition, USA
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: Spss and Lisrel uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for the social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Ankara: PegemA Yayınevi [PegemA Pub.].
  • Dais, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17,187–195.
  • Davis,R. A., Flett, G. L., & Besser, A. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use; implications for pre-employment screening. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 15, 331–347
  • Doğan, İ.(2012), Eğitim Sosyolojisi [Sociology of Education], Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2.Baskı [Nobel Pub., 2nd Edition].
  • Doğan, N.(1993), İlk and Orta Dereceli Okul Ders Kitapları and Sosyalleşme (1876-1918) [Primary and Secondary School Textbooks and Socialization (1876-1918)], Bağlam Yay. [Bağlam Pub.], Ankara
  • Dönmezer S., (1984) Sosyoloji [Sociology], Savaş Yayınları [Savaş Pub.], Ankara
  • Dunne, A., Lawlor, M., Rowley, J. (2010). Young People's Use of Online Social Networking Sites Uses and Gratifications Perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 4, pp.46-58.
  • Eroğlu, A. (2008). Faktör analizi [Factor analysis]. Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri [](ss. 321-331) [SPSS Applied multivariate statistical techniques]. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım [Asil Pub.].
  • Erturgut, R. (2008). İnternet Temelli Uzaktan Eğitimin Örgütsel, Sosyal, Pedagojik and Teknolojik Bileşenler [Internet Based Distance Education’s Organizational, Social, and Technological Pedagogical Components]. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 1, 2 [Journal of Information Technology, 1, 2]
  • Evkuran, M.(2010), Değerler Eğitimi and Eğitimde İdeoloji Sorunu [Values Education and Ideology Problem in Education], Uluslar arası Eğitim Felsefesi Kongresi [International Congress of Philosophy of Education], 6-8 March, Eğitim Bir-Sen, Ankara, pp. 479-488.
  • Feng, Y., Xie, W.(2014). Teens’ concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior Volume 33, April, Pages 153–162
  • Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. (2002). Including students with special needs (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Ba¬con.
  • Goldberg, I. (1997). Ivan Goldberg discusses “Internet addiction”. http://www.psycom.net/ Accessed 03.09.2013.
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Güvenç, B.(1995), Kültür and Eğitim [Culture and Education], Gündoğan Yayınları [Gündoğan Pub.], Ankara.
  • Hamburger-Amichai, Y., Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 71–80.
  • Horman JP, Hansen CE, Cochian ME, Lindsey CR(2005). Liar, liar: İnternet faking but not freguency of use affect social skills, self-esteem, social anxiety, and aggression. Cyber Psychol Behav., 8(1): 1-6.
  • Hovardaoğlu, S. (2000). Davranış Bilimleri İçin Araştırma Teknikleri [Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences]. Ankara: Ve-Ga yay. [Ve-Ga Pub.]. MEF(2011). http://www.imef.org.tr acces date: 13.03.2014
  • Jarvis, P., (1983). Professional Education. Croom Helm, London.
  • Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 45–60.
  • Josept F., Çev Çelebi N., (1994). Sosyoloji Nedir [What is sociology], Atilla Kitapevi [Atilla Pub.], Ankara,
  • Kelleci , M(2008). İnternet, Cep Telefonu, Bilgisayar Oyunlarının Çocuk and Gençlerin Ruh Sağlığına Etkileri [Internet, Cell Phones, Computer Games’ Effects on Children and Youth’s Mental Health] , Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni [Turkish Armed Forces Preventive Medicine Bulletin] , 7(3):253-256
  • Keller, J. M., (2007). Motivation and performance. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Deinpsey (Eds ), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd Ed.) (pp. R2-92). Columbus: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Khasawneh, O. M., & Al-Awidi, H. M. (2008). The effect of home computer use on Jordanian children: A parental perspective, J. Educational Computing Research, 39(3), 267-284.
  • Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Kraut, R., M. Patterson, V. Landmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukophadhyay, W. Scherlis. (1998), Internet paradoxa social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well being? American Psychologist, 53, pp. 1017–1031.
  • Kurt, İ. ( 2013). Virtualization In Terms of Community from the View of Students’ Feedback, Beder University Journal of Educational Sciences, Volume 2, No:1, April, Tirana, Albania.
  • Kurt, İ. (2012). Toplumsallaşma Sürecinin ‘Toplumsanallaşma’ Bağlamındaki Yolculuğu. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of the Faculty of Education], VII,1, June, ISSN:1307-1076, Bayburt Üniversitesi [Bayburt University].
  • Kuzu, A.(2011). İnternet and Aile [Internet and Family], Aile and Toplum [Family and Society], 7(27):9-31
  • Marshall, G.(1999). Sosyoloji Sözlüğü [A Dictionary of Sociology], Translator: Osman Akınhay, Derya Kömürcü, Bilim and Sanat Yay [Bilim and Sanat Pub.], Ankara.
  • Mittal, V. A., Tessner, K. D., & Walker, E. F. (2007). Elevated social internet use and schizotypal personality disorder in adolescents. Schizophrenia Research, 94,50–57.
  • Morahan-Martin, J. (1999). The relationship between loneliness and Internet use and abuse. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 2 pp. 431–440.
  • Nie, N. H., Hillygus, D. S., & Erbring, L. (2008). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability: A time diary study. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 215–243). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  • Odabaşı, F. H. (2009). 21. yüzyıl öğreneni (Davetli konuşmacı) [21st century learner (Guest speaker)], 25. Yıl Etkinlikleri [25th Anniversary Events]: AR-GE Konferansı [R&D Conference], 14 March, Ankara: Özel Arı Okulları [Arı Private Schools].
  • Ozankaya, Ö.(1986). Toplumbilim [Social science], Tekin Yayınevi [Tekin Pub.], Ankara.
  • Özdemir, S. & Usta, E. (2007) İlköğretim Sınıf Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin İnternet Kullanım Amaçlarının İncelenmesine İlişkin Bir Araştırma [A Research on the Investigation of Internet Usage Purposes of Primary School Teacher Candidates]. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi [Journal of Social Research in Turkey]. TSA / Year: 11, volume: 3, December.
  • Özgüven M., (1996). Toplum Bilimlerine Giriş [Introduction to Social Sciences], Ekin Kitapevi [Ekin Pub.], Bursa,
  • Palfrey, J. and Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. NY: Basic Books.
  • Parke, R.D., Leidy, M.S., Schofield, T.J., Miller, M.A., Morris, K.L. (2008). Socialization, Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development Pages 224–235
  • Plummer, K.(2010). Sociology: The Basics, Routledge, London.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-5.
  • Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Learning in the Digital Age, 63(4), 8-13.
  • Rainie, L., Purcell, K., & Smith, A. (2011). The social side of the internet [Report]. Retrieved February 16, 2011 from Pew Internet & American Life Project http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Social_Side_of_the_Internet.pdf.
  • Scherer, R. F., Wiebe F. A., Luther, D. C. and Adams J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of Coping: Factor Stability Using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire, Psychological Reports 62(3), 763-770. PubMed PMID: 3406294.
  • Shapira, N. A., Goldsmith, T. D., Keck, P. E., Khosla, U. M., & McElroy, S. L. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57,267–272.
  • Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A. (2004). How do English language learners learn to read? Educational Leaders¬hip, 61(6), 52-57.
  • Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil. Doubleday, New York.
  • Şan, M. K., Hira, İ. (2005). Bilgi Toplumu:Bir Risk Olarak Özel Alanın Kayboluşu [Information Society: The disappearance of private sphere as a risk.]. IV. Ulusal Bilgi-Ekonomi and Yönetim Kongresi [IV. National Knowledge Economy and Management Congress], Kocaeli.
  • TUİK (Turkish Statistical Institute). (2007). Hane Halkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanımı Araştırması [Household Use of Information Technology Survey]. Retrived on 20.03.2014 News Bulletin. http://www.tuik.gov.tr
  • TUİK(2011). Hane halkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması [Household Use of Information Technology Survey]. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=8572
  • Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, pp. 50–57.
  • Yang, C. K., Choe, B. M., Baity, M., Lee, J. H., & Cho, J. S. (2005). SCL–90-R and 16PF profiles of senior high school students with excessive internet use. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50,407–414.
  • Young, K., & Rodgers, R. (1998). The relationship between depression and internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1,25–28.
  • Yüksel, S. (2009). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin İnformal Etkileşimleri and Akademik Başarılarıyla İlişkinin İncelenmesi [Informal Interactions of Education Faculty Students and Examination of the Relationship with Their Academic Achievement]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi[Journal of Ahi University Faculty of Education], 10(2), 119-127
  • Zeichner, K.M. & Tabachnick, B.R. (1985), The Development of Teacher Perspectives: Social Strategies and Institutional Control in The Socialization of Beginning Teachers. Journal of Education of Teaching. Vol. 11, No.1, pp.1-25.

A Validity and Reliability Study of the SocioVirtualization Perception Scale (SVPS)

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 1 - 19, 01.06.2014
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.14.01.1.1

Öz

Individuals
are socialized by embracing material and spiritual cultural characteristics
that a society possesses. This process is put into practice with socialization
factors such as family, peers, school and media. Interaction and communication
in social life have started to carry socialization factors to different levels
with contribution by virtual environments in our day. Since determination of
the level of interaction and relationships shifting from real life to virtual
life is not yet a sufficiently discussed issue in the body of literature, we
could not come across an instrument of measurement, whose reliability and
validity have been proved, for measuring levels of what sort of transformations,
advancements and developments have been experienced in terms of socialization
factors after society’s beginning of turning to virtual environments. In this
respect, the research objective is to develop a scale for determining levels
for relationships of individuals in social life shifting to virtual
environments. 294 individuals constitute the research study group. Exploratory
and confirmatory factor analysis, item-factor total correlation, adjusted
correlation and distinguishing features of items were calculated for
investigating validity of the scale. Internal consistency coefficient and
stability levels of the scale were calculated for investigating reliability of
the scale. As a result, the SVPS is a 5-point Likert scale that can be grouped
under three factors and consists 30 items. Analyses put forward that this scale
is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring levels of socio-virtualization
perception of a society’s individuals in virtual environments.

Kaynakça

  • Altun, M. B. (2008). Siber gerçeklikte kültür and iletisim sorunları. Yayımlanmamıs yüksek lisans tezi [Cyber culture and communication problems in reality. Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. [Marmara University Social Science Institute].
  • Aluja, A., Blanch, A.,(2004). Socialized personality, scholastic aptitudes, study habits, and academic achievement: exploring the link European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20 (3) (2004), pp. 157–165
  • Balcı, A. (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, teknik and ilkeler[Research in social science: Methods, techniques and principles]. Ankara: PegemA Yayınevi [PegemA Pub.].
  • Binark, M. & Bayraktutan-Sütcü, G. (2008). Silkroad Online’da Sanal Cemaat İnşası and Türk Klan Kimliği [Building Virtual Community in Silkroad Online and the Turkish clan Identity]. inet-tr’08 - XIII. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı Bildirileri [Proceedings of Internet inTurkey Conference], Ankara, 22-23 December. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi [Middle East Technical University], pp.133.
  • Brenner, V. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: the first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychological Reports, 80, pp. 879–882
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook for Social science data analysis]. Ankara: PegemA Yayınevi [PegemA Pub.].
  • Carmines, E.G, Zeller, R. A. (1982). Reliability and validity assessment. 5th ed. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Celkan, H.Y.(1991), Eğitim Sosyolojisi [Sociology of Education], Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları [Ataturk University Pub.], Erzurum.
  • Chana, W. M., Dicianno B. E. (2011).Virtual socialization in adults with spina bifida. PM&R, Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 219–225
  • Colwell J, Payne J.( 2000). Negative correlates of computer game play in adolescents. British Journal of Psychology , 91: 295-310.
  • Coser, L. & Nock, S. & Steffan, P. & Rhea, B. & Merton(editor), R. (1987) Introduction To Sociology, Second Edition, USA
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: Spss and Lisrel uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for the social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Ankara: PegemA Yayınevi [PegemA Pub.].
  • Dais, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17,187–195.
  • Davis,R. A., Flett, G. L., & Besser, A. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use; implications for pre-employment screening. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 15, 331–347
  • Doğan, İ.(2012), Eğitim Sosyolojisi [Sociology of Education], Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2.Baskı [Nobel Pub., 2nd Edition].
  • Doğan, N.(1993), İlk and Orta Dereceli Okul Ders Kitapları and Sosyalleşme (1876-1918) [Primary and Secondary School Textbooks and Socialization (1876-1918)], Bağlam Yay. [Bağlam Pub.], Ankara
  • Dönmezer S., (1984) Sosyoloji [Sociology], Savaş Yayınları [Savaş Pub.], Ankara
  • Dunne, A., Lawlor, M., Rowley, J. (2010). Young People's Use of Online Social Networking Sites Uses and Gratifications Perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 4, pp.46-58.
  • Eroğlu, A. (2008). Faktör analizi [Factor analysis]. Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri [](ss. 321-331) [SPSS Applied multivariate statistical techniques]. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım [Asil Pub.].
  • Erturgut, R. (2008). İnternet Temelli Uzaktan Eğitimin Örgütsel, Sosyal, Pedagojik and Teknolojik Bileşenler [Internet Based Distance Education’s Organizational, Social, and Technological Pedagogical Components]. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 1, 2 [Journal of Information Technology, 1, 2]
  • Evkuran, M.(2010), Değerler Eğitimi and Eğitimde İdeoloji Sorunu [Values Education and Ideology Problem in Education], Uluslar arası Eğitim Felsefesi Kongresi [International Congress of Philosophy of Education], 6-8 March, Eğitim Bir-Sen, Ankara, pp. 479-488.
  • Feng, Y., Xie, W.(2014). Teens’ concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior Volume 33, April, Pages 153–162
  • Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. (2002). Including students with special needs (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Ba¬con.
  • Goldberg, I. (1997). Ivan Goldberg discusses “Internet addiction”. http://www.psycom.net/ Accessed 03.09.2013.
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Güvenç, B.(1995), Kültür and Eğitim [Culture and Education], Gündoğan Yayınları [Gündoğan Pub.], Ankara.
  • Hamburger-Amichai, Y., Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 71–80.
  • Horman JP, Hansen CE, Cochian ME, Lindsey CR(2005). Liar, liar: İnternet faking but not freguency of use affect social skills, self-esteem, social anxiety, and aggression. Cyber Psychol Behav., 8(1): 1-6.
  • Hovardaoğlu, S. (2000). Davranış Bilimleri İçin Araştırma Teknikleri [Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences]. Ankara: Ve-Ga yay. [Ve-Ga Pub.]. MEF(2011). http://www.imef.org.tr acces date: 13.03.2014
  • Jarvis, P., (1983). Professional Education. Croom Helm, London.
  • Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 45–60.
  • Josept F., Çev Çelebi N., (1994). Sosyoloji Nedir [What is sociology], Atilla Kitapevi [Atilla Pub.], Ankara,
  • Kelleci , M(2008). İnternet, Cep Telefonu, Bilgisayar Oyunlarının Çocuk and Gençlerin Ruh Sağlığına Etkileri [Internet, Cell Phones, Computer Games’ Effects on Children and Youth’s Mental Health] , Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni [Turkish Armed Forces Preventive Medicine Bulletin] , 7(3):253-256
  • Keller, J. M., (2007). Motivation and performance. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Deinpsey (Eds ), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd Ed.) (pp. R2-92). Columbus: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Khasawneh, O. M., & Al-Awidi, H. M. (2008). The effect of home computer use on Jordanian children: A parental perspective, J. Educational Computing Research, 39(3), 267-284.
  • Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Kraut, R., M. Patterson, V. Landmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukophadhyay, W. Scherlis. (1998), Internet paradoxa social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well being? American Psychologist, 53, pp. 1017–1031.
  • Kurt, İ. ( 2013). Virtualization In Terms of Community from the View of Students’ Feedback, Beder University Journal of Educational Sciences, Volume 2, No:1, April, Tirana, Albania.
  • Kurt, İ. (2012). Toplumsallaşma Sürecinin ‘Toplumsanallaşma’ Bağlamındaki Yolculuğu. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of the Faculty of Education], VII,1, June, ISSN:1307-1076, Bayburt Üniversitesi [Bayburt University].
  • Kuzu, A.(2011). İnternet and Aile [Internet and Family], Aile and Toplum [Family and Society], 7(27):9-31
  • Marshall, G.(1999). Sosyoloji Sözlüğü [A Dictionary of Sociology], Translator: Osman Akınhay, Derya Kömürcü, Bilim and Sanat Yay [Bilim and Sanat Pub.], Ankara.
  • Mittal, V. A., Tessner, K. D., & Walker, E. F. (2007). Elevated social internet use and schizotypal personality disorder in adolescents. Schizophrenia Research, 94,50–57.
  • Morahan-Martin, J. (1999). The relationship between loneliness and Internet use and abuse. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 2 pp. 431–440.
  • Nie, N. H., Hillygus, D. S., & Erbring, L. (2008). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability: A time diary study. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 215–243). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  • Odabaşı, F. H. (2009). 21. yüzyıl öğreneni (Davetli konuşmacı) [21st century learner (Guest speaker)], 25. Yıl Etkinlikleri [25th Anniversary Events]: AR-GE Konferansı [R&D Conference], 14 March, Ankara: Özel Arı Okulları [Arı Private Schools].
  • Ozankaya, Ö.(1986). Toplumbilim [Social science], Tekin Yayınevi [Tekin Pub.], Ankara.
  • Özdemir, S. & Usta, E. (2007) İlköğretim Sınıf Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin İnternet Kullanım Amaçlarının İncelenmesine İlişkin Bir Araştırma [A Research on the Investigation of Internet Usage Purposes of Primary School Teacher Candidates]. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi [Journal of Social Research in Turkey]. TSA / Year: 11, volume: 3, December.
  • Özgüven M., (1996). Toplum Bilimlerine Giriş [Introduction to Social Sciences], Ekin Kitapevi [Ekin Pub.], Bursa,
  • Palfrey, J. and Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. NY: Basic Books.
  • Parke, R.D., Leidy, M.S., Schofield, T.J., Miller, M.A., Morris, K.L. (2008). Socialization, Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development Pages 224–235
  • Plummer, K.(2010). Sociology: The Basics, Routledge, London.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-5.
  • Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Learning in the Digital Age, 63(4), 8-13.
  • Rainie, L., Purcell, K., & Smith, A. (2011). The social side of the internet [Report]. Retrieved February 16, 2011 from Pew Internet & American Life Project http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Social_Side_of_the_Internet.pdf.
  • Scherer, R. F., Wiebe F. A., Luther, D. C. and Adams J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of Coping: Factor Stability Using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire, Psychological Reports 62(3), 763-770. PubMed PMID: 3406294.
  • Shapira, N. A., Goldsmith, T. D., Keck, P. E., Khosla, U. M., & McElroy, S. L. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57,267–272.
  • Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A. (2004). How do English language learners learn to read? Educational Leaders¬hip, 61(6), 52-57.
  • Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil. Doubleday, New York.
  • Şan, M. K., Hira, İ. (2005). Bilgi Toplumu:Bir Risk Olarak Özel Alanın Kayboluşu [Information Society: The disappearance of private sphere as a risk.]. IV. Ulusal Bilgi-Ekonomi and Yönetim Kongresi [IV. National Knowledge Economy and Management Congress], Kocaeli.
  • TUİK (Turkish Statistical Institute). (2007). Hane Halkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanımı Araştırması [Household Use of Information Technology Survey]. Retrived on 20.03.2014 News Bulletin. http://www.tuik.gov.tr
  • TUİK(2011). Hane halkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması [Household Use of Information Technology Survey]. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=8572
  • Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, pp. 50–57.
  • Yang, C. K., Choe, B. M., Baity, M., Lee, J. H., & Cho, J. S. (2005). SCL–90-R and 16PF profiles of senior high school students with excessive internet use. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50,407–414.
  • Young, K., & Rodgers, R. (1998). The relationship between depression and internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1,25–28.
  • Yüksel, S. (2009). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin İnformal Etkileşimleri and Akademik Başarılarıyla İlişkinin İncelenmesi [Informal Interactions of Education Faculty Students and Examination of the Relationship with Their Academic Achievement]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi[Journal of Ahi University Faculty of Education], 10(2), 119-127
  • Zeichner, K.M. & Tabachnick, B.R. (1985), The Development of Teacher Perspectives: Social Strategies and Institutional Control in The Socialization of Beginning Teachers. Journal of Education of Teaching. Vol. 11, No.1, pp.1-25.
Toplam 66 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Özgen Korkmaz

Ertuğrul Usta

İbrahim Kurt Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2014
Kabul Tarihi 14 Mayıs 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Korkmaz, Ö., Usta, E., & Kurt, İ. (2014). A Validity and Reliability Study of the SocioVirtualization Perception Scale (SVPS). Participatory Educational Research, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.14.01.1.1