The Effect of Technology Integration in Education on Prospective Teachers' Critical and Creative Thinking, Multidimensional 21st Century Skills and Academic Achievements

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 163 - 199, 01.04.2021

Adem Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.35.8.2

Cited By: 16

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to examine the critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21st century skills and the change in academic achievements as a result of technology integration of prospective teachers who have science education in pedagogy fields. Research was carried out in Turkey's western Black Sea region in a state university. 144 prospective teachers, who were educated in the faculty of education and who were in science, classroom and pre-school education departments, participated in the research. The research was carried out in 3 stages. In the first stage, technology integration is not provided. In the second stage, basic and medium level technology integration is provided. In the third stage, advanced technology integration is provided. Quantitative and qualitative approaches were used together in the research. Academic success test, critical and creative thinking test developed by the researcher as a means of quantitative data collection, and three different scales with validity and reliability were used previously. In addition, project, exam, homework, presentation and group work scores are included in the process. Semi-structured interview, observation and field notes, document review, were used as qualitative data collection tools. The quantitative data obtained were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. While doing these operations, SPSS 23.0 and LISREL 9.2 package programs were used. Qualitative data were subjected to descriptive analysis and content analysis. The results of the research show that gradual integration of technology into the education process provides a positive change in prospective teachers' critical and creative thinking, multi-dimensional 21st century skills and academic achievements.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technology integration, 21st century skills, critical and creative thinking, academic success, Online emergency remote education

Teşekkür

I thank all of the teacher candidates who supported this study during the Covid 19 - Pandemic period.

Kaynakça

• Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2010). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
• Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52(1), 154-168.
• Area, M., & Ribeiro, M. T. (2012). From solid to liquid: New literacies to the cultural changes of Web 2.0. Communicator, 38, 13-20.
• Artun, H., & Günüç, S. (2016). Student’s perception scale about instructors’ technology integration competence: Validity and reliability study. YYU Journal Of Education Faculty, 13(1), 544-566.
• Aybek, B., Aslan, S., Dinçer, S., & Coşkun-Arısoy, B. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarına yönelik eleştirel düşünme standartları ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 21(1), 25-50. Doi: 10.14527/kuey.2015.002
• Ashrafzadeh, A., & Sayadian, S. (2015). University instructors’ concerns and perceptions of technology integration. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 62-73.
• Baek, Y., Jung, J., & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting the facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50, 224-234.
• Batdı, V. (2019). Meta-tematik analiz. V. Batdı (Edt.), Meta-tematik analiz örnek uygulamalar, içinde (1-76). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Beaumont-Walters, Y., & Soyibo, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students’ performance on five integrated science process skills. Journal of Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 133-145. Doi:10.1080/02635140120087687
• Bittman, M., Rutherford, L., Brown, J., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Digital natives? New and old media and children’s outcomes. Australian Journal of Education, 55(2), 161-175.
• Brito, R., Dias, P., & Oliveira, G. (2018). Young children, digital media and smart toys: How perceptions shape adoption and domestication. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 807-820. Doi:10.1111/bjet.12655
• Burgess, S., & Sievertsen, H. H. (2020). Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on education. CEPR Policy Portal. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/article/impact-covid-19-education
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (20. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 30-35.
• Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 31–51.
• ChanLin, L. (2005). Development of a questionnaire for determining the factors in technology integration among teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(4), 287-292.
• Conejar, R. J., & Kim, H. K. (2014). The effect of the future mobile learning: Current state and future opportunities’. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications 8(8), 193–200.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2016). Öğretim teknolojilerinin öğrenme ortamlarına entegrasyonu. K. Çağıltay & Y. Göktaş (Eds.), Öğretim teknolojilerinin temelleri: Teorileri, araştırmalar, eğilimler, içinde (2. Baskı, 571-588). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Çevik, M., & Şentürk C. (2019). Multidimensional 21th century skills scale: Validity and reliability study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(1), 11–28.
• Demir, (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bilimsel süreç becerileriyle ilgili yeterliliklerini etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Demirel, Ö. (2004). Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde program geliştirme. (6. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Dewitt, D., & Siraj, S. (2010). Learners’ perceptions of technology for design of a colloborative m-learning modüle. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(3), 169-185.
• Downing, J. E., & Filer, J. D. (1999). Science process skills and attitudes of preservice elementary teachers. Journals of Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 57-64.
• Duran, M., & Özdemir, O. (2010). The effects of scientific process skills–based science teaching on students’ attitudes towards science. US-China Education Review, 7(3), 17- 28.
• Durnalı, M., & Ayyıldız, P. (2019). The relationship between faculty members’ job satisfaction and perceptions of organizational politics. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 6(2), 169-188.
• Farsakoğlu, Ö. F., Şahin. Ç., Karslı, F., Akpınar, M., & Ultay, N. (2008). A study on awareness levels on prospective science teachers on science process skills in science education. World Applied Sciences Journal, 4(2), 174-182.
• Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. (Fourth Edition). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Fraenkel, W., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. (8th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Georgina, D. A., & Olson, M. R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 1-8.
• Gibson, K. S. (2012). Student teachers of technology and design: Can short periods of STEM-related industrial placement change student perceptions of engineering and technology? Design and technology education: An International Journal, 17(1), 18-29.
• Göktaş, Y. (2017). Karma yöntemle makale yazım süreci. Sözbilir, M. (Edt.). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına giriş, içinde (93-102). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Gray, L. (2008). Effective practice with e-portfolios. Bristol, UK: JISC Innovation Group.
• Güçlü, İ. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Teknik, yaklaşım, uygulama. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Günüç, S. (2017). Eğitimde teknoloji entegrasyonunun kuramsal temelleri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Günüç, S., Odabaşı, F., & Kuzu, A. (2012). Yaşam boyu öğrenmeyi etkileyen faktörler. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11, 309-325.
• Hussain, I., & Safdar, M. (2008). Role of information technologies in teaching learning process: Perception of the faculty. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 46-56.
• Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010) "Get out of MySpace". Computers & Education, 54(3), 776-782.
• Jorde, D., & Dillon, J. (2012). Science education research and practice in Europe: Retrosspective and prospective. (D. Jorde & J. Dillon, Eds.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Kemp, S. (2020). Digital around the World in April 2020. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/blog/2020/04/digital-around-the-world-in-april-2020
• Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A.C., (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245.
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore preservice teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 563-573.
• Kolikant, Y. B. D. (2010). Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1384-1391.
• Korkmaz, Ö., & Öztürk, Ç. (2020). The effect of gamification activities on students' academic achievements in social studies course, attitudes towards the course and cooperative learning skills. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 7(1), 1-15. Doi: 10.17275/per.20.1.7.1
• Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., & Buuren., H. (2013). What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 217–225.
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis an introduction to its methodology. (Second edition). Thousands Oaks, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Langenberg, D. N., & Spicer, D. Z. (2001). The modern campus. Technology leadership communication and information systems in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 115, 3-15.
• Lai, E. R., & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: Integrating research findings. Pearson.
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575.
• Liu, G., Wu, N., & Chen, Y. (2013). Identifying emerging trends for implementing learning technology in special education: A state-of-the-art review of selected articles published in 2008–2012. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 3618-3628.
• Lombardo, T. (2010). Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to futures education. Journal of Future Studies, 14(4), 121-134.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2009). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th edt.). London: Pearson.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
• Mor-Dirlik, E. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme konulu doktora tezlerinin test ve ölçek geliştirme standartlarına uygunluğunun incelenmesi. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 5(2), 62-78.
• Naish, R. (2008). The digital ages of man. E-learning age. ABI/FORMA Global, 10-11.
• National Education Association (NEA). (2008). 21st century skills, education & competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/21st_century_skills_education_and_competitiveness_guide.pdf
• OECD (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Ozan, Ö. (2013). Bağlatıcı mobil öğrenme ortamlarında yönlendirici destek. (Doktora tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
• Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi 1. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitapevi.
• Özer, M. (2020). Educational policy actions by the Ministry of National Education in the times of COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(3), 1124-1129. Doi:10.24106/kefdergi.722280
• Özkan, U. B. (2019). Eğitim bilimleri araştırmaları için doküman inceleme yöntemi. (1.Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Palak, D., & Walls, R. T. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and technology practices: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417-441.
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Eds.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Perkmen, S., & Tezci, E. (2011). Eğitimde teknoloji entegrasyonu. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Pugh, K. L., Liu, L., & Wang, P. (2018). Technology integration in a K-12 frontier district. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.). Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2117-2122). Washington, D.C. United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
• Robin, B. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. The college of education and human ecology. The Ohio State University, 47 (3), 220-228.
• Sebetci, Ö., Topal, A., Hanaylı, M. C., & Gürel Dönük G. (2018). Perceptions of university students on whatsapp in educational settings. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 5(6), 63-76.
• Shen, C. X., Liu, R. D., & Wang, D. (2013). Why are children attracted to the internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 185–192.
• Sözbilir, M. (2017). Bir karma yöntem araştırma çalışmasının tanıtımı. Sözbilir, M. (Edt.). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına giriş, içinde (67-77). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Şahin, M. (2015). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri. İstanbul: Seçenek Yayınları.
• Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302–312.
• Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2016). Yeni nesil öğrenme kültürü: Sürekli değişen bir dünya için hayal gücü yetiştirmek. (H. Uysal, Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Tifi, A., Natale, N., & Lombardi, A. (2006) Scientists at play: Teaching science process skills. Science in School, 1, 37-40.
• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. CA: Jossey-Bass Publication.
• Turaç, N., Çalışkan, N., & Gülnar, E. (2017). Psikomotor beceri öğretiminde tam öğrenme modeli ve whatsApp destekli öğretim yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması: Bir triangülasyon çalışması. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2601-2615. Doi:10.14687/jhs.v14i3.4769
• Tüzel-İşeri, E. (2018). Eğitimde nereden geldik? Nereye gidiyoruz? 21. yüzyıl sürerken 22. yüzyıl insanını düşünme zorunluluğu üzerine bir tartışma. Tüzel-İşeri, E. (Edt.). 22. yüzyılda eğitim, içinde (s. 1-13). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• UNESCO (2020). How are countries addressing the Covid-19 challenges in education? A snapshot of policy measures. Global Education Monitoring Reports. France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers perspectives. Journal of Science of Education Technology, 20, 17–25.
• Yılmaz, A., & Aydın, S. (2019). Determination of quality standards for the content of science education teacher training programs and the admission of students: The study of scale development and application. Online Science Education Journal, 4(1), 44 - 65.
• Yılmaz, A., Gülgün, C., Çetinkaya, M., & Doğanay, K. (2018). Initiatives and new trends towards STEM education in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(11a), 1-10.
• Yılmaz, A., & Yanarateş, E. (2020). Determination of Metaphorical Perceptions of Prospective Teachers on the Concept of “Water Pollution” Through Triangulation. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1500-1528. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.722554
• Zawacki-Richter, O. (2009). Research areas in distance education: A delphi study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-17. Doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.674