Developing the Skills of Students with Mild Intellectual Disabilities Using Interactive Map Applications in a Social Studies Course: An Action Research

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 198 - 214, 01.12.2021

Ufuk Karakuş , Elif İnci Varalan

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.86.8.4

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this research is developing the skills of students with mild intellectual disabilities using interactive map applications (Google Maps, Yandex Maps), determining how to implement the applications, and revealing the problems encountered in practice and possible solutions in detail. The research is designed in an action research model. The study group of the research consists of three students who were diagnosed with mild intellectual disability by the Counseling Research Center (CRC) and study in the special education class of a secondary school in Ankara. In the research, "Observation Form Concerning the Use of Interactive Map Applications" was used in the pre-application, post-application and permanence application. researcher’s diary, video and photograph records are other data collection tools used in the research. At the end of the study, the students' ability to use interactive map applications on the phone, computer and smart board was measured and it was determined that the students' skills were improved. The development of interactive map use skills of students with mild intellectual disabilities in social studies lessons contributed to the development of students' direction finding and map literacy skills. In addition, it has been observed that developing these skills contributes to the life skills of students as it increases their self-confidence and improves their abstract thinking skills.

Keywords

special education, mild intellectual disability, google maps, yandex maps, action research

References

• Alshamri, K.H. (2020). Challenges and experiences of high school teachers with students having intellectual disabilities in inclusive classrooms in Saudi Arabia, Univers. J. Educ. 8 (5), pp. 2191-2196, DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080559.
• Ayas, C., Kaya, H., Taştan, B. & Özder, A. (2015). The Use of Google Earth Images and QGIS Open-Source Software in Social Studies Education, lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, 0 (32), pp.43-60. DOI: 10.14781 / mcd.96368.
• Başkale, H. (2016). Determination of Validity, Reliability and Sample Size in Qualitative Studies, E-journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty, 9 (1), pp. 23-28, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/753041.
• Bell, S. M., Cihak, D. F., & Judge, S. (2010). A preliminary study: Do alternative certification route programs develop the necessary skills and knowledge in assistive technology?, International Journal of Special Education, 25(3), pp.111-119, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ909041.
• Berson, M., Diem, R., Hicks, D., Mason, C., Lee, J. & Dralle, T. (2000). Guidelines for Using Technology to Prepare Social Studies Teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), pp.107-116. https://citejournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/v14i4socialstudies1.pdf.
• Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri.[Scientific research methods] Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Cogan, J.J., Grossman, D., & Lei, M. (2000). Citizenship: The democratic imagination in a global context. Social Education, 64(1), pp.48-52. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ620650.
• Costello, P. J. M. (2003). Action research. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.
• Creswell, J.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and Qualitative research. USA: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Çavuş, E. İ. (2019). Developing Map Literacy Skills of Special Education Students in Social Studies Education. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common Knowledge: the Development of Joint Understanding in the Classroom. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Edyburn, D. L. (2001). Models, theories, and frameworks: Contributions to understanding special education technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 4(2), pp.16-24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237677288_Models_Theories_and_Frameworks_Contributions_to_Understanding_Special_Education_Technology
• Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research. LAB at Brown University The Education Alliance.
• Flecha, R. (2000). Sharing Words: Theory and Practice of Dialogic Learning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. USA: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Gezer-Demirdağlı, Ş. (2017). Özel eğitimde sosyal bilgiler eğitimi ve önemi[Social studies education and its importance in special education] M. Sönmez Kartal, Ö. Toper Korkmaz (Eds.), Özel eğitimde fen bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi [Teaching science and social studies in special education] pp.128-149, Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Gierrach, J., & Stindt, K. (2009). Assistive technology for activities of daily living. J. Gierach(Ed.), Assessing Students' Needs for Assistive Technology (ASNAT), 5th Edition. pp.1-16.
• Hand, B., Therrien, W., & Shelley, M. (2013). The effectiveness of argument based teaching & learning approach for improving the vocabulary, reading, writing ability of students with special needs in inclusive education. Korean J. Spec. Educ. 48, pp.301–317. DOI: 10.3389 / fpsyg.2018.01744
• Heward, W.L. (2009). Exceptional children. An introduction to special education. (Ninth Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Hubbard, R., & Power, B. (1993). The art of classroom inquiry. A handbook for teacherresearchers (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
• Johnson, A. P. (2015). Eylem araştırması el kitabı. [A Short Guide to Action Research] Ankara: Anı Publishing.
• Karakuş, U., & Oğuz, S. (2013). Using Google Earth in Geography Topics in Social Studies Lesson and Teachers Opinions. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 4 (12), pp.110-125. http://www.ijoess.com/Makaleler/1402185016_110-125%20sibel%20o%c4%9fuz.pdf
• McKenzie J, McConkey R, & Adnams C. (2013). Health conditions and support needs of persons living in residentuial facilities for adults with intellectual disability in Western Cape Province. S. Afr. Med. J. (103), 481-484. DOI: 10.7196 / samj.6491
• Mocanu, L., Pradaiș P., & Crina, C. (2020). Psycho-Pedagogical Characteristics of Children with Intellectual Disabilities, European Integration - Realities and Perspectives. Proceedings, 15 (1), pp. 362-367.http://proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/2052/2094
• Öğütveren, M. (2014). The influence of Google Earth Software on the success of teaching geographical topics for the 6th grade students, (Unpublished master’s thesis). Giresun University Institute of Social Sciences, Giresun.
• Önger, S. (2019). The authentic learning approach in social studies teaching: An action research study (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Özgür, İ. (2015). Engelli çocuklar ve eğitimi özel eğitim. [Children with disabilities and their education special education] Adana: Karahan Publishing.
• Patterson, T.C. (2007). Google earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography, 0 (106), 145-152. DOI: 10.1080/00221340701678032.
• Pan B., Crotts J.C., & Muller B. (2007) Developing Web-Based Tourist Information Tools Using Google Map. In: Sigala M., Mich L., Murphy J. (Eds.) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2007. Springer, Vienna. DOI: 10.1007 / 978-3-211-69566-1_46
• Pena-Shaff, J.B & Nicholls, S.C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions, Computers & Education, 42 (3), pp. 243-265. DOI: doi: 10.1016 / j.compedu.2004.02.002
• Petcu, S. D., Yell, M., & Fletcher, T. (2014). Assistive technology: Legislation and legal issues. Exceptionality, (22), pp.226-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2013.865538.
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford: Oxford University Publishing.
• Schützwohl M., Koch A., Koslowski N., Puschner B., Voß E., Salize H.J., Pfennig A. &Vogel A. (2016). Mental illness, problem behaviour, needs and service use in adults with intellectual disability. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, (51), pp.767-776. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-016-1197-4.
• Sönmez Kartal, M., & Toper Korkmaz, Ö. (Ed.). (2017). Özel eğitimde fen bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi. [Science and social studies teaching in special education] Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Tekin İftar, E. & Kırcaali İftar, G. (2004). Özel eğitimde yanlışsız öğretim yöntemleri. [Correct teaching methods in special education] Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• Tsai, M, J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40 (1), pp. 43-50, DOI: 10.1080 / 1355800032000038822.
• Verma, P., & Bhatia J.S. (2013). Desing And Development og GPS-GSM Based Trackig System With Google Map Based Monitoring. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Applications (IJCSEA) 3 (3). DOI: 10.5121 / IJCSEA.2013.3304
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language, (Ed.), A. Kozulin, Cambridge, MA: MIT Pupbilshing. DOI: 10.1037/11193-000
• Wehmeyer M.L., Tassé M.J., Davies D.K., & Stock, S. (2012). Support needs of adulrts with intellectual disability across domains: The role of Technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27, pp.11-22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192661/
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Publishing. DOI: 10.1017/ CBO9780511605895
• Williams, P. (2005). Using information and communication technology with special educational needs students: The views of frontline professionals. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 57(6), 539-553. DOI: 10.1108 / 00012530510634262
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.