The Road to Ecological University: A Metaphor Analysis from the Perspectives of Academicians and External Stakeholders

Abstract

This study sought to explain the idea of the university from the perspectives of academicians and external stakeholders through metaphors. The study was designed as a qualitative phenomenological study. Semi-structured interviews were held with 33 key people, 11 of whom were from the university and 22 of whom were external stakeholders, notably experts on the industry, natural environment, and culture of Gaziantep province in Turkey. The findings of this study revealed that participants used metaphors such as mother, factory, scientist, and conductor, emphasizing the university's role as a center of research, teaching, and the leader in the region. The most significant finding of the study, however, is that the participants in the study produced metaphors such as octopus, forest, and brain that point out the interconnectedness of the university with its surrounding ecologies, just as indicated in the ecological university model, which tries to develop the many surrounding ecosystems with which the university is interconnected, and which works systematically with the other institutions in its eco-system.

Keywords

• Ecological university
• idea of the university
• metaphor

Kaynakça

1. Akbulut Yıldırmış, M., ve Seggie, F. N. (2018). Yükseköğretim çalışmalarının akademik bir alan olarak gelişimi: uluslararası ve ulusal düzeyde alanyazın incelemesi. Yüksekogretim Dergisi, 8(3), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.027
2. Alan, G. A. E. (2016). New generation universities in Turkey. Maltepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 105–118. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iled/issue/29371/314269
3. Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (Eds.). (2011). The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8805-1
4. Aybarç, S. (2018). Regional development dynamics: University-industry collaboration strategies. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(1), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v15i1.5266
5. Barblan, A., Ergüder, Ü., Erguder, U., Gürüz, K., & Guruz, K. (2008). Case studies higher education in Turkey: institutional autonomy and responsibility in a modernizing society. Bononia University Press.
6. Barnett, R. (2011a). The idea of the university in the twenty-first century: Where’s the imagination. Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.11.088
7. Barnett, R. (2011b). The coming of the ecological university. Oxford review of Education, 37(4), 439-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.595550
8. Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible utopia. Routledge

9. Barnett, R., & Bengtsen, S. (2017). Universities and epistemology: From a dissolution of knowledge to the emergence of a new thinking. Education Sciences, 7(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010038
10. Barnett, R. (2015). Understanding the University: Institution, Idea, Possibilities. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678245.
11. Batko, R. (2014). Liquid university. Liquid Oganization, Abingdon: Routledge, 104-119.
12. Brennan, J., Cochrane, A., Lebeau, Y., & Williams, R. (2018). The University in its Place: social and cultural perspectives on the regional role of universities. Springer.
13. Burkle, M., & Cobo, C. (2018). Redefining knowledge in the digital age. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 79-80. http://dx.doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.294
14. Chou, C. M., Shen, C. H., Hsiao, H. C., & Shen, T. C. (2018). Industry 4.0 manpower and its teaching connotation in technical and vocational education: Adjust 107 curriculum reform. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2018.01.002
15. Craig, T.P., Fischer, A., & Lorenzo-Arribas, A. (2018). Shopping versus nature? An exploratory study of everyday experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(9), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00009
16. Conrad, I. M. (2007). Education reform at the" edge of chaos": Constructing ETCH (an education theory complexity hybrid) for an optimal learning education environment (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh). http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10339
17. Covelli, B. J., Morrissette, S. G., Lindee, C. A., & Mercier, R. (2020). Forming a university-based business incubator for student and community entrepreneurs: A case study. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2019.1680269
18. Dimitrova, V. (2016). The Modern Universities as a Regional Development Factor. Balkan and Near EasternJournal of Social Sciences. 02(02), 524-531.
19. Donovan, C. (2013). Beyond the 'Postmodern University.' The European Legacy, 18(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2013.748119
20. Ekici, G., & Akdeniz, H. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının “sınıfta disiplin sağlamak” kavramına ilişkin algılarının belirlenmesi: Bir metafor analizi çalışması. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 26-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1854
21. Etzkowitz, H., Webster A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100040500
22. Francisco, M. (2008). The Contribution of Universities to Regional Development: Social, Cultural and Environmental Issues. March 2021. Available at http://www.guninetwork.org/articles/contribution-universities-regional-development-social-cultural-and-environmental-issues
23. Gumus, A. (2015). Türkiyede eğitim politikaları. Nobel Yayınları.
24. Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334
25. Harrop, J. A., Casey, R., & Shelton, M. E. (2018). Knowles, Kolb, & Google: Prior learning assessment as a model for 21st-century learning. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(2), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2018.1469079
26. Hayes, D. (Ed.). (2017). Beyond McDonaldization: visions of higher education. Taylor & Francis.
27. Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox? Journal of public administration research and theory, 14(3), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh019
28. Ingleby, E. (2015). The house that Jack built: neoliberalism, teaching in higher education and the moral objections. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1036729
29. Jones, D. R. (2013). “The Biophilic University”: A de-familiarizing organizational metaphor for ecological sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.019
30. Kaku, M. (2012). Physics of the future: How science will shape human destiny and our daily lives by the year 2100. Anchor.
31. Laurillard, Diana. (2005). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. Routledge, London.
32. Levine, P. M. (2005). Metaphors and images of classrooms. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41(4), 172-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2005.10532066
33. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California, CA: Sage Publications
34. Loaiza, M., Andrade Abarca, P., & del Cisne Salazar, Á. (2017). Determination of the Innovative Capacity of Ecuadorian Universities. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 57-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2016.8.174
35. Mbao, W. (2020). Perplexing the liquid university. English Studies in Africa, 63(1), 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138398.2020.1780753
36. McMillan, J.H. (2012). Educational research. Fundamentals for the consumer (6th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson
37. Mengual-Andrés, S. (2013). Rethinking the role of Higher Education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 2(1), 1-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2.1.1-2
38. Moon, K., Brewer, T.D., Januchowski-Hartley, S.R., Adams, V.M., & Blackman, D.A. (2016). A guideline to improve qualitative social science publishing in ecology and conservation journals. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08663-210317
39. Moser, K. S. (2000, June). Metaphor analysis in psychology—Method, theory, and fields of application. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1090
40. Moutsios, S. (2012). University: the European particularity. Working Papers on University Reform, 18.
41. Newlands, D. (2003). The role of universities in learning regions. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/116149
42. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of education policy, 20(3), 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718
43. Olssen, M. (2016). Neoliberal competition in higher education today: Research, accountability and impact. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1100530
44. Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of nursing scholarship, 33(1), 93-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
45. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
46. Popescu, A. I. (2011). The university as a regional development catalyst: Frameworks to assess the contribution of higher education to regional development. European Economic Recovery and Regional Structural Transformations. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1875874
47. Rip, A. (2008). Towards post-modern universities. Georgia Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/36821
48. Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., & Benneworth, P. (2019). Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance. Technological forecasting and social change, 141, 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.017
49. Saunders, D. B. (2010). Neoliberal ideology and public higher education in the United States. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8(1), 41-77.
50. Savigny, H. (2013) The political idea of a university and neolibearlism in English higher education. European Consortium for Research.European Political Science. 12(4), 432-439. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2013.23
51. Scott. J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1-39.
52. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
53. Steen, G. (2011). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik. de, 21, 83-110.
54. Streubert, H. J. (2007). Designing data generation and management strategies. In H. J. Streubert & D. R. Carpenter (Eds.) Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (fourth edition). (pp.33-55). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
55. Tekeli (2007). Türkiye'nin Yükseköğretim Stratejisi. YÖK Yayinlari.
56. Yusifzada, T.(2021). Regional Socio-Economic Development in the Light of Universities' and Ministries' Relocation. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349497172
57. Wolfe, D. A. (2016). 10. The Role of Universities in Regional Development and Cluster Formation. In Creating knowledge, strengthening nations (pp. 167-194). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442673564-013
58. Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the Third Generation University. Managing the University in Transition. Cheltenham. Edward Elgar Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/36821
59. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık