Investigating the Backwash Effect of Higher Education Exam (YGS) on University Students’ Attitudes

Öz

The application of high-stakes tests to choose students for higher education in Turkey has been considered as a reliable and effective way of assessment for so long. However, the application of a multiple-choice test in testing various skills could bring a number of side-effects with itself. This study aimed to investigate the backwash effect of the university exam on university students’ attitudes. To be able to collect data from participants, it was first aimed to develop an attitude scale to examine the washback effect of Higher Education Exam (YGS). Considering the views of 5 academicians from educational sciences, ELT and testing disciplines, a preliminary version of the washback scale was developed. Next, the new scale was piloted in order to do its exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Third, the scale’s internal reliability was measured and the scale which had 3 factors and 13 items was proven to be a valid and reliable tool to collect data including university students’ views towards the washback effect of the university exam on their attitudes. Data of this study were collected from 5 state universities with the contribution of 1617 students from different grades and disciplines. The results showed that YGS had negative washback effects on university students in terms of test anxiety and study habits but considering its impact on students’ time management skills, YGS was reported to have a positive impact on participants

Anahtar Kelimeler

• High-stakes tests
• scale development
• university entrance exam
• washback effect
• YGS

Kaynakça

1. Aydın, S. (2009). Test Anxiety among Foreign Language Learners: A Review of Literature. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 5/1.
2. Baran, G., & Şimşek, Ş. (2000). Üniversite Giriş Sınavlarına Hazırlanan Gençler ve Kaygı. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 25 (265), 29–34.
3. Baştürk, S. (2011). Üniversiteye Giriş Sınavına Hazırlanma Sürecinin Öğrencilerin Matematik Öğrenmeleri Üzerine Olumsuz Yansımaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40 (40), 69-79. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/hunefd/issue/7796/102057
4. Browen, C. B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 4/2,101- 116.
5. Brown, J. D. (1998). Testing in Language Programs. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
6. Brown, H.D. (2004). Language Assessment, Principles and Classroom Practices. USA: Longman.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem. Cimbricz, S. (2002). State-mandated testing and teachers' beliefs and practice. Education Policy Analysis Archives, (3)1,1-22.
8. Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.

9. Çapulcuoğlu, U., & Gündüz, B. (2013). Öğrenci Tükenmişliğini Yordamada Stresle Başaçıkma, Sınav Kaygısı, Akademik Yetkinlik ve Anne-Baba Tutumları. Journal of Educational Sciences research. 3/1.
10. Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Next Generation Assessment. Wiley. Retrieved from: http://www.ebrary.com Created from anadolu on 2016-06-13.
11. Doğan, İ., & Doğan, N. (2014). Adım Adım Çözümlü Parametrik Olmayan İstatistiksel Yöntemler. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
12. Ekici, G. (2005). Lise öğrencilerinin öğrenci seçme sınavına (ÖSS) yönelik tutumlarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28: 82-90. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/hunefd/issue/7808/102423
13. Fırat, H.B., & Yaratan, H. (2013). Impact of external examinations on high school curricula: Perceptions of teachers and students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53/A, 1-18.
14. Gardner, P. D. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relation to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. London.
15. Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Retrieved in April, 2019 from: http://hosted.jalt.org/test/PDF/Dunkley2.pdf
16. Hafalir, I. E., Hakimov, R., Kübler, D., & Kurino, M. (2018). College admissions with entrance exams: Centralized versus decentralized. Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Vol. 176(C), 886-934.
17. Horwitz, M. B. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, (5)1,125-132.
18. Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Lincolnwood, USA: Scientific Software International, Inc.
20. Karabulut, A. (2007). Micro Level Impacts of Foreign Language Test (University Entrance Examination) in Turkey: A Washback Study. (MA thesis). ProQuest Information and Learning Company. UMI: 1448691. Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=15883&context=rtd
21. Kelecioğlu, H. (2002). Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Üniversiteye Giriş Sınavları ve Sınavın Öğrenimlerine Etkisi Hakkındaki Görüşleri. Hacettepe Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 23:135-144.
22. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.
23. Kocaman, O., & Cumaoğlu, G. K. (2014). Developing a Scale for Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Foreign Languages. Education and Science. (39)176, 293-303.
24. Kutlu, Ö. (2001). Ergenlerin Üniversite Sınavına İlişkin Kaygıları. Eğitim ve Bilim. 26/101:12-23.
25. Külekçi, E. (2016). A concise analysis of the Foreign Language Examination (YDS) in Turkey and its possible washback effects. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 3(4), 303-315. Retrieved in March, 2019 from: http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/141/143
26. Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29, 4-16.
27. Özdamar, K. (2013). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Eskişehir, 2013.
28. Özmen, K.S. (2011). Washback Effects of Inter University Foreign Language Examination on Foreign Language Competences of Candidate Academics. Novitas Royal (Research on Youth and Language), 5(2), 215-228.
29. Palmer, L. F. (1996). Language testing in practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Sağlam, G., A., L. (2018). Can exams change how and what learners teach? Investigating the washback effect of a university English language proficiency test in the Turkish context. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 155-176. doi: 10.32601/ejal.464094
31. Sevimli, S. E. (2007). The Washback Effects of Foreign Language Component of the University Entrance Examination on the Teaching and Learning Context of English Language Groups in Secondary Education: A Case Study (Master’s thesis), Gaziantep University, Gaziantep. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/.
32. Smith, K. F. (1987). Effects of Testing on Teaching and Learning. James Cook University of North Queensland.
33. Stobart, G. (2013). The impact of assessment: Intended and unintended consequences. Assessment in Education. 16, 139-140.
34. Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2014). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel.
35. Şenel, E, & Tütüni̇ş, B. (2011). The washback effect of testing on students’ learning in EFL writing classes. Dil Dergisi, (153), 43-52. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/dilder/issue/47688/602335
36. Wall, J. C. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, (9)3, 115-129. Wilson, H. D. (1991). Testing, reform and rebellion. Norwood.
37. Vieira, A. L. (2011). Preparation of the analysis. Interactive LISREL in practice. London: Springer.
38. Yavuzer, H., & Göver, D. H. (2012). Akademik personelin yabancı dil durumu ve yabancı dil sınavlarına bakısı: Nevsehir örneği. NEÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(2), 136-158.