BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 54 - 63, 01.05.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Altan, Z. M. (2003). Language Learning Strategies And Foreign Language Achievement. Eğitim ve Bilim, 28(129), 25-31.
  • Barut, A. (2015). Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğrenen Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kullandıkları Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Üzerine thesis.bilkent.edu.tr/0006895.pdf (May, 5th, 2017). (Unpublished
  • Dissertation). Retrieved from
  • Baskın, S., İşcan, A., Karagöz, B. & Birol, G. (2017). The use of vocabulary teaching strategies in teaching Turkish as a second language. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9), 126-134.
  • Biçer, N. & Polatcan N. (2015). Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğretiminde Kelime Öğrenme Stratejilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. A. Ü. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi [TAED], 54, 811-828.
  • Bristi, N. L. (2015). Exploring vocabulary learning strategies used by Bangladeshi undergraduate EFL learners: A comparative analysis of three proficiency level learners. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 15(12), 1-13.
  • Catalan, J. M. R. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54–77. doi:10.1111/1473-4192.00037
  • Chamot, A.U. (1987). The Learning Strategies of ESL Students. In: Wendenm A. and Rubin, J., Eds., Learner Strategies for Second Language Acquisition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 71-83.
  • Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26. doi: 10.12691/education-4-9-3
  • Clarke, M. (1980). The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203-209. doi:10.2307/325304
  • Çelik, S. & Toptaş, V. (2010). Vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 62–71.
  • Dornyei, Z. and Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 275-298. doi:10.1017/S0272263100009979
  • Ehrman, M. & Oxford, R.L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 1-13. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 4781.1989.tb05302.x
  • Grace, C. A. (2000). Gender differences: Vocabulary retention and access to translations for beginning language learner. Modern Language Learner, 84(2), 214-24. doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00063
  • Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297. doi:10.2307/3587625
  • Griffiths, C. 2003. Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367–83. doi:10.1016/S0346- 251X(03)00048-4
  • Griffiths, C. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83–98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Griffiths, C. (2010). Strategies of successful language learners. JELS, 1(3), 1-18.
  • Griffiths, C. & Oxford, R. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.12.009
  • Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35-54. doi: 10.1177/003368820203300102
  • Hamzah, M. Sahandr G., Kafipour R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 39-50.
  • Kavvadia, K. (2016). Investigating vocabulary learning strategies of EFL young learners in the Greek primary school. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 88-104.
  • Kocaman, O. (2015). Effects of Computer Assisted Vocabulary Instruction on Vocabulary Learning and Vocabulary Learnıng https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp on May 5th, 2017. (Doctoral
  • Dissertation). Retrieved from
  • Kocaman, O. & Kızılkaya Cumaoğlu, G. (2014). Developing a Scale for Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Foreign Languages. Education and Science, 39(176), 293-303. doi:10.15390/EB.2014.3611
  • Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
  • Little, A. & Kobayashi, K. (2014). Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Japanese Life Science Students. Tesol Journal, 6(1). 81–111. doi:10.1002/tesj.141
  • Nacera, A. (2010). Languages learning strategies and the vocabulary size . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4021 – 4025
  • Nematollahi, B., Behjat, F. & Kargari, A. A. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Vocabulary Learning Strategies of EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 10 (5), 1-10. doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n5p1
  • Nosratinia, M., Eftekhari, N., & Sarabchian, E. (2013). An Exploration of the Relationship between and Autonomy Vocabulary Learning Strategies. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(3), 71-80. doi:10.17507/tpls.0509.22
  • Nyikos, M. (1987). The effect of color and imagery as mnemonic strategies on learning and retention of lexical items in German. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Purdue University, USA.
  • Nyikos, M. & Fan, M. (2007). A Review of Vocabulary Learning Strategies: Focus on Language Proficiency and Learner Voice. In Cohen, A. D. & Macaro, E. (Eds.)Language Learner Strategies.(pp.251-273). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Oxford, R.L. & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291-300. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Park, J. (2000). Korean EFL learners’ vocabulary learning strategies. English Teaching. 56(4), 3-30.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” can teach us. Tesol Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
  • Schmitt, N. (2000). Researching on vocabulary. A vocabulary research manual. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schmitt, N. (2007). Vocabulary learning strategies. In McCarthy, M. & N. Schmitt (Eds). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N. (2010). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press: United Kingdom.
  • Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making Sense of Cronbah’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
  • Tılfarlıoğlu, F. F. Y. & Bozgeyik, Y. (2012). The Relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary proficiency of English language Learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(2), 91-101. doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.2p.91
  • Tok, M. ve Yıgın, M. (2014). Türkçenin ikinci dil olarak öğretiminde öğrencilerin kullandıkları kelime öğrenme stratejileri. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 41, 265-276.

Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Turkish as a Foreign Language Context

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 54 - 63, 01.05.2018

Öz

Since the 15th century, when the Turkish language initiated its adventure as a taught foreign language, we have come a long way. In a parallel way, with the increasing demand of Turkish as a Foreign Language TFL , Turkish language pedagogy has been continuing to improve adjusting to the new trends in language teaching in the world. The ultimate aim of learning a language is that effective communication cannot be actualised without knowledge of substantial vocabulary. Vocabulary learning and teaching, from a ‘grammaticalized lexis Lewis, 1993 ’ perspective forms a crucial part of foreign language development, and thus, Vocabulary Learning Strategies VLS - rooted in cognitive and psycholinguistic research paradigms - are of utmost importance Lewis, 1993; Nyikos and Fan, 2007 . With all these in mind, this study aims to investigate the vocabulary learning strategies employed by 155 international students studying Turkish preparatory year programme at the Turkish Language Learning Centre TÖMER of a state university in Turkey. Descriptive results reveal that lower proficiency groups A1 and A2 employ VLS strategies more than B2 level group does. Memory, Affective and Social Strategies are found to be the most frequently used strategies. One-way ANOVA results reveal that there is a statistically significant difference among proficiency levels of the participants. With respect to gender, t-test results show a difference for one type of strategy employed. The results are discussed in terms of significance and association with previous research. In the end, suggestions and implications are given for stakeholders of learning and teaching TFL.

Kaynakça

  • Altan, Z. M. (2003). Language Learning Strategies And Foreign Language Achievement. Eğitim ve Bilim, 28(129), 25-31.
  • Barut, A. (2015). Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğrenen Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kullandıkları Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Üzerine thesis.bilkent.edu.tr/0006895.pdf (May, 5th, 2017). (Unpublished
  • Dissertation). Retrieved from
  • Baskın, S., İşcan, A., Karagöz, B. & Birol, G. (2017). The use of vocabulary teaching strategies in teaching Turkish as a second language. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9), 126-134.
  • Biçer, N. & Polatcan N. (2015). Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğretiminde Kelime Öğrenme Stratejilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. A. Ü. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi [TAED], 54, 811-828.
  • Bristi, N. L. (2015). Exploring vocabulary learning strategies used by Bangladeshi undergraduate EFL learners: A comparative analysis of three proficiency level learners. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 15(12), 1-13.
  • Catalan, J. M. R. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54–77. doi:10.1111/1473-4192.00037
  • Chamot, A.U. (1987). The Learning Strategies of ESL Students. In: Wendenm A. and Rubin, J., Eds., Learner Strategies for Second Language Acquisition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 71-83.
  • Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26. doi: 10.12691/education-4-9-3
  • Clarke, M. (1980). The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203-209. doi:10.2307/325304
  • Çelik, S. & Toptaş, V. (2010). Vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 62–71.
  • Dornyei, Z. and Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 275-298. doi:10.1017/S0272263100009979
  • Ehrman, M. & Oxford, R.L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 1-13. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 4781.1989.tb05302.x
  • Grace, C. A. (2000). Gender differences: Vocabulary retention and access to translations for beginning language learner. Modern Language Learner, 84(2), 214-24. doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00063
  • Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297. doi:10.2307/3587625
  • Griffiths, C. 2003. Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367–83. doi:10.1016/S0346- 251X(03)00048-4
  • Griffiths, C. (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 83–98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Griffiths, C. (2010). Strategies of successful language learners. JELS, 1(3), 1-18.
  • Griffiths, C. & Oxford, R. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.12.009
  • Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35-54. doi: 10.1177/003368820203300102
  • Hamzah, M. Sahandr G., Kafipour R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 39-50.
  • Kavvadia, K. (2016). Investigating vocabulary learning strategies of EFL young learners in the Greek primary school. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 88-104.
  • Kocaman, O. (2015). Effects of Computer Assisted Vocabulary Instruction on Vocabulary Learning and Vocabulary Learnıng https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp on May 5th, 2017. (Doctoral
  • Dissertation). Retrieved from
  • Kocaman, O. & Kızılkaya Cumaoğlu, G. (2014). Developing a Scale for Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Foreign Languages. Education and Science, 39(176), 293-303. doi:10.15390/EB.2014.3611
  • Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
  • Little, A. & Kobayashi, K. (2014). Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Japanese Life Science Students. Tesol Journal, 6(1). 81–111. doi:10.1002/tesj.141
  • Nacera, A. (2010). Languages learning strategies and the vocabulary size . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4021 – 4025
  • Nematollahi, B., Behjat, F. & Kargari, A. A. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Vocabulary Learning Strategies of EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 10 (5), 1-10. doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n5p1
  • Nosratinia, M., Eftekhari, N., & Sarabchian, E. (2013). An Exploration of the Relationship between and Autonomy Vocabulary Learning Strategies. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(3), 71-80. doi:10.17507/tpls.0509.22
  • Nyikos, M. (1987). The effect of color and imagery as mnemonic strategies on learning and retention of lexical items in German. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Purdue University, USA.
  • Nyikos, M. & Fan, M. (2007). A Review of Vocabulary Learning Strategies: Focus on Language Proficiency and Learner Voice. In Cohen, A. D. & Macaro, E. (Eds.)Language Learner Strategies.(pp.251-273). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Oxford, R.L. & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291-300. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Park, J. (2000). Korean EFL learners’ vocabulary learning strategies. English Teaching. 56(4), 3-30.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the “Good Language Learner” can teach us. Tesol Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
  • Schmitt, N. (2000). Researching on vocabulary. A vocabulary research manual. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schmitt, N. (2007). Vocabulary learning strategies. In McCarthy, M. & N. Schmitt (Eds). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N. (2010). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press: United Kingdom.
  • Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making Sense of Cronbah’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
  • Tılfarlıoğlu, F. F. Y. & Bozgeyik, Y. (2012). The Relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary proficiency of English language Learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(2), 91-101. doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.2p.91
  • Tok, M. ve Yıgın, M. (2014). Türkçenin ikinci dil olarak öğretiminde öğrencilerin kullandıkları kelime öğrenme stratejileri. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 41, 265-276.
Toplam 42 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Orhan Kocaman Bu kişi benim

Merve Yıldız Bu kişi benim

Büşra Kamaz

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Kocaman, O., Yıldız, M., & Kamaz, B. (2018). Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Turkish as a Foreign Language Context. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(2), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2018.02.007