Katılımcı Yaklaşım ve Halk Katılımlı Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri

Öz

Katılımcı yaklaşım peyzaj araştırmalarında son 30 yılda uluslararası yazında oldukça ilerleme kaydeden bir konudur. Ülkemizde ise, katılımcı yaklaşımın kabul gördüğü ancak uygulama aşamasında bazı zorluklarla karşılaşıldığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada katılımcı yaklaşımı coğrafi bilgi sistemleri (CBS) ile birleştiren bir yöntem olan halk katılımlı coğrafi bilgi sistemleri PPGIS (Public Participatory Geographical Information System) konusunda teorik ve uygulamaya yönelik bilgiler verilerek PPGIS prosedürü tanımlanmıştır. Söz konusu prosedürün içerdiği uygulama aşamaları, kullanım alanları ve elde edilen verilere ilişkin analiz yöntemleri açıklanarak uygulayıcılar için bir kılavuz olması ve uygulamanın ülkemiz mekânsal planlama çalışmalarında kullanılmasının teşviği amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Katılımcı yaklaşım
• CBS
• katılımcı haritalama
• Participatory approach
• Participatory mapping

Participatory Approach and Public Participatory Geographical Information System

Öz

Participatory approach is a subject that has made great progress in the global literature in the last 30 years in landscape research. But some challenges in practice although there are most of studies in our country. In this study, the PPGIS procedure defined by giving theoretical and practical information on PPGIS (Public Participatory Geographical Information System), which is a method that combines participatory approach with geographical information systems (GIS). It is aimed to provide practical information about the implementation of the method like, research areas and analysis methods, to be a guide for practitioners and to encourage the use of the application in spatial planning studies in our country.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Participatory approach
• GIS
• Participatory mapping

Kaynakça

1. Alessa, L., Kliskey, A., Lammers, R., Arp, C., White, D., Hinzman, L., & Busey, R. (2008). The arctic water resource vulnerability index: An integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater. Environmental management, 42(3), 523-541.
2. Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., & Fagerholm, N. (2013). Child-friendly urban structures: Bullerby revisited. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 110-120.
3. Brown, G. (2004). Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management: Methods and Applications. Society & Natural Resources, 18(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590881853
4. Brown, G., & Fagerholm, N. (2015). Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 13, 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007
5. Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
6. Bryan, B. A., Raymond, C. M., Crossman, N. D., & Macdonald, D. H. (2010). Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(2), 111-122.
7. Fagerholm, N., García-Martín, M., Torralba, M., Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (2022). Public participation geographical information systems (PPGIS): Participatory research methods for sustainability ‐ toolkit #1. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(1), 46-48. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.1.10
8. Fagerholm, N., Raymond, C. M., Olafsson, A. S., Brown, G., Rinne, T., Hasanzadeh, K., Broberg, A., & Kyttä, M. (2021a). A methodological framework for analysis of participatory mapping data in research, planning, and management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1-28.

9. Fagerholm, N., Raymond, C. M., Olafsson, A. S., Brown, G., Rinne, T., Hasanzadeh, K., Broberg, A., & Kyttä, M. (2021b). A methodological framework for analysis of participatory mapping data in research, planning, and management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35(9), 1848-1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1869747
10. Fagerholm, N., Torralba, M., Burgess, P. J., & Plieninger, T. (2016). A systematic map of ecosystem services assessments around European agroforestry. Ecological Indicators, 62, 47-65.
11. ISPM. (2022). Software & Tools – International Society for Participatory Mapping. the International Society of Participatory Mapping. http://landscapevalues.org/ispm/software-tools/
12. Rambaldi, G., & Weiner, D. (2004). Track on International Perspectives: Summary Proceedings. 18-20.
13. Raymond, C. M., Gottwald, S., Kuoppa, J., & Kyttä, M. (2016). Integrating multiple elements of environmental justice into urban blue space planning using public participation geographic information systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.005
14. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
15. Ryan, R. L. (2011). The social landscape of planning: Integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 361-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.015
16. Sherrouse, B. C., Clement, J. M., & Semmens, D. J. (2011). A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied geography, 31(2), 748-760.
17. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491-507.
18. Silverman, B. W. (2018). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Routledge.