Strüktür Bilgisi Dersinin Bloom Taksonomisi Çerçevesinde Uygulanabilirliği: Selçuk Üniversitesi Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Strüktür Bilgisi ders içeriğinin Bloom Taksonomisinde yer alan anlama, hatırlama, değerlendirme, analiz etme, yaratma ve uygulama düzeylerine göre Bologna ders bilgi paketine uygunluğunu araştırmaktır. Literatür taramasında bibliyometrik analiz kullanılmıştır. Anket 5'li Likert tipi ölçme modeli kullanılarak tasarlanmıştır. 95 katılımcı üzerinde psikometrik ölçüm tekniği kullanılmıştır. Veriler bağımsız t-testi, frekans analizi, normallik testi ve Cronbach Alpha güvenilirlik analizi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Anket sonuçlarının ders yönetim yöntemini geliştirdiği ve Yapısal Bilgi dersinin anlama, hatırlama ve değerlendirme düzeylerini temsil eden ders içeriklerindeki bilgi aktarımını güncellediği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca dersin uygulama kısmındaki müfredat dışı uygulamaların düzeyinin artırılması ve dersin AKTS değerinin yükseltilmesi gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bologna Sistemi
• Bloom Taksonomisi
• Strüktür Bilgisi
• İç Mimarlık.

Etik Beyan

Etik Beyan kararı ek dosya olarak yüklenmiştir.

Applicability of Structure Knowledge Course within The Framework of Bloom's Taxonomy: The Case of Selçuk University

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the conformity of Structured Knowledge applied course content to the Bologna course information package according to the levels of understanding, remembering, evaluating, analysing, creating and applying in Bloom's Taxonomy. Bibliometric analysis was used in the literature review. The questionnaire was designed using a 5-point Likert-type measurement model. On 95 participants, psychometric measurement technique was used. Data were analysed using independent t-test, frequency analysis, normality test and Cronbach Alpha reliability analysis. It was found that the results of the questionnaire improved the course management method and updated the knowledge transfer in the course contents representing the comprehension, recall and evaluation levels of the Structural Knowledge course. It was also concluded that the level of extra-curricular applications in the application part of the course should be increased and the ECTS value of the course should be increased.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bologna System
• Bloom
• Structural Knowledge
• Interior Architecture

Etik Beyan

The Ethics Statement decision has been uploaded as an additional file.

Kaynakça

1. Adijaya, M. A., Widiana, I. W., Agung Parwata, I. G., Suwela Antara, I. G. (2023). Bloom’s taxonomy revision-oriented learning activities to improve procedural capabilities and learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 261-270.
2. Akay, A. & Erbil, Z. C. (2023) Landscape Desıgn and Implementatıon Process of Selçuk Unıversıty Merve Mercan Park. International Research and Reviews in Architecture, Planning and DesignEdition: First EditionChapter: 11Publisher: Serüven Yayınevi
3. Anderson, L. W. (2005). Objectives, evaluation and the ımprovement of education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 102-113.
4. Aytekin, Ç., & Aktı, B. B. (2015). Hacettepe university child development department undergraduate program update studies within the scope of bologna studies. H.U. Journal of the Faculty of Health Sciences, 2(3), 19-25.
5. Azizah, F. R. (2023). Bloom's taxonomical learning theory and educational development in indonesia. ATTAQWA: Journal of Islamic Education and Early Childhood, 2(3), 110-124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58355/attaqwa.v2i3.47
6. Diamond, M. (2012). Bologna process: implementation or failure to implement. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(3), 137-141.
7. Erginer, E. (2006). Planning, ımplementing and evaluating ınstruction. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
8. Short, N., Kavak, Y., & Uysal, F. (2020). Student-centered learning dimension of the bologna process: reflections on the curriculum of the faculty of education. Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.19.014

9. Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. OnlineTheory Into Practice Elementary Education, 41(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip41042
10. Mohanty, S., & Mishra, P. C. (2019). Bologna education reforms. Lessons for indian knowledge economy. Revista ESPACIOS, 40, 21.
11. Momen, A., Ebrahimi, M., & Hassan, A. (2022). Importance and ımplications of theory of bloom’s taxonomy in different fields of education. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems, 515-525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20429-6_47
12. Ömeroğlu, E. (2018). A resesarch on the turkish language course taught in universities in the Bologna process. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences. 13(27), 1055-1085.
13. Sağlam, P. D., Özüdoğru, O. F., & Çıray, F. (2011). European union education policies and their effects on the turkish education system. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(1), 87-109.
14. Stevani, M. & Tarigan, K. (2022). Evaluating english textbooks by using bloom’s taxonomy to analyze reading comprehension question. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 4(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v0i0.526
15. Şen, Z., Uludağ, , G., Kavak, Y., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). A review of the bologna process: comparison of course evaluation system and student workload. Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.16.008
16. Terzi, S., Solak, B., & Şen,, İ. K. (2013). The effect of the bologna process on accounting education: a review on the curricula of business departments of universities. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 83-100.
17. Üstün, O. K. (2011). Line balancing approach to creating a lesson plan in the bologna harmonization process. Dumlupınar University Journal of Science and Technology (26), 1302-1310.
18. Yunida, H., & Arthur, R. (2023). Bloom's taxonomy approach to cognitive space using classic test theory and modern theory. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) , 2(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/https://10.55927/eajmr.v2i1.2331