The Views of Undergraduate Students and Faculty Members: Distance Education during COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the views of undergraduate students studying in and their faculty members teaching in distance education during COVID-19 pandemic. The sample consisted of 35 undergraduate students and 34 faculty members. The 'typical case sampling' method was used for selection of participants from different faculties of a foundation trust university in Türkiye. Sampling continued until theoretical saturation (until no new information was obtained from participants). Data was collected through online focus group interviews. Data was analyzed inductively by repetitive data collection cycles, data coding with multi-step processes and comparative analysis. Findings revealed negative, neutral and positive metaphors which described distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, these metaphors indicated the existence of a continuum in the form of three higher order categories including the Experience of Loss, Transformation and Neutrality under which a number of themes and sub-themes were present. The present findings present a user-derived evidence base for improving distance education and therefore these findings could be considered as targets for systems aiming at improving distance education that would be delivered in the future in similar difficult circumstances.

Keywords

• COVID-19 Pandemic
• Distance education
• Faculty members
• Grounded Theory
• Metaphors
• Undergraduate students

References

1. Almossa S. Y. (2021). University students' perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10554-8
2. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Young, B., Jones, D. & Sutton A. (2004). Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence. London: Health Development Agency. UK.
3. Glaser, R., & Strauss. A.L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
4. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
5. Han, F., & Demirbilek, N. (2021). University students’ views on compulsory distance education in the times of COVID-19. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 182-203.
6. Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 83(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x
7. Himat, A. N., Takal, M. H., & Hakimi, M. F. (2021). Afghan students’ satisfaction from online learning during COVID-19 at Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan. American International Journal of Social Science Research, 6(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.46281/aijssr.v6i1.931
8. Kaleli Yilmaz, G., & Guven, B. (2015). Ogretmen adaylarının uzaktan egitime yonelik algilarının metaforlar yoluyla belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.16949/turcomat.75936

9. Kedraka, K., & Kaltsidis, C. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on university pedagogy: Students’ experiences and considerations. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i8.3176
10. Khalil, R., Mansour, A. E., Fadda, W. A., Almisnid, K., Aldamegh, M., Al-Nafeesah, A., ... & Al-Wutayd, O. (2020). The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02208-z
11. Krespi Boothby, M.R. (2011). ‘Insiders’ Views of Their Role: Towards Their Training.’ Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 53, 424–448. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.53.4.424
12. Krespi, R., Bone, M., Ahmad, R., Worthington, B., & Salmon, P. (2004). Haemodialysis Patients’ Beliefs about Renal Failure and Its Treatment. Patient Education and Counselling, 53, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00147-2
13. Krespi, M.R., Bone, M., Ahmad, R., Worthington, B., & Salmon, P. (2008). Hemodialysis patients’ evaluation of their life. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 19, 365-372.
14. Krespi, M.R., Acarturk, C., Akduman, I., Sahin Dagli, F., Dagli, T. (2017a). Towards better child protection programs: A qualitative evaluation of Youth Disseminating Life Skills Program. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2017.1306662
15. Krespi, M.R., Tankurt, A., Acarlı, K., Yankol, Y., Kalayoglu, M., & Kanmaz, T. (2016). Post-donation evaluation of life of donors of liver transplantation. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1262724. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1262724
16. Krespi, M.R., Tankurt, A., Acarlı, K., Kanmaz, T., Yankol, Y., & Kalayoğlu, M. (2017b). Beliefs of living donors about recipients’ end-Stage liver failure and surgery for organ donation. Transplantation Proceedings, Original Works, 49, 1369-1375.
17. Lassoued, Z., Alhendawi, M., & Bashitialshaaer, R. (2020). An exploratory study of the obstacles for achieving quality in distance learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 10, 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090232
18. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Miller, W.I., & Crabtree, B.F. (1992). Primary care research: a multimethod typology and qualitative road map. Doing Qualitative Research. B.F. Crabtree, W.I. Miller, editors. Sage Publications.
20. Nimavat, N., Singh, S., Fichadiya, N., Sharma, P., Patel, N., Kumar, M., Chauhan, G., & Pandit, N. (2021). Online medical education in India - Different challenges and probable solutions in the age of COVID-19. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 237–243. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S295728
21. Ng, L., Seow, K. C., MacDonald, L., Correia, C., Reubenson, A., Gardner, P., Spence, A. L., Bunzli, S., & De Oliveira, B. (2021). eLearning in physical therapy: lessons learned from transitioning a professional education program to full elearning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physical Therapy, 101(4), pzab082. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab082
22. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage Publications. Porter, J.E., Barbagallo, M.S., Peck, B., Allen, L., Tanti, E., & Churchill, A. (2020). The academic experiences of transitioning to blended online and digital nursing curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 87, 104361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt
23. Roy, D., Tripathy, S., Ka, S.K., Sharma, N., Verma, S.K., & Kaushal, V. (2020). Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety and perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102083
24. Salmon, P. (2002). How do we recognize good research when we see it? Anarchism, methologism and the quantitative vs. qualitative debate. Psychologist, 16, 24-27.
25. Stiles, W.B. (1993). Quality Control in Qualitative Research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(93)90048-Q
26. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Tankurt, A., Krespi Boothby, M.R., Acarlı, K., Kalayoglu, M., Kanmaz, T., & Yankol, Y. (2016). Liver transplantation: recipients’ evaluation of life from the perspective of living donors. Transplantation Proceedings, 48, 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.11.013
28. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L.G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Tedeschi, R.G., & Calhoun, L.G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1 – 18.
30. Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C.S., & Ho, R.C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
31. van der Meer, G. H., Milota, M., de Jonge, R.R., & Jansen, R.S. (2021). Practical guidelines to build sense of community in online medical education. Medical Education, 55(8), 925–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14477
32. Yardley, L. (1997). Chapter 2: Introducing discursive methods. In L Yardley, editor. Material discourses of health and illness. Routledge: London.
33. Zimmermann, M., Bledsoe, C., & Papa, A. (2020). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on college student mental health: a ongitudinal examination of risk and protective factors. Preprint https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2y7hu