A Systematic Review of Digital Mathematics Game Articles Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals in Türkiye From 2005 to 2023

Year 2023, Volume: 7 Issue: Special Issue 2 - Education and Psychology Research in the 100th Anniversary of the Republic, 332 - 361, 25.10.2023

Seher Avcu

https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1352845

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The current study aimed to provide a detailed synthesis of the literature on digital mathematics games and to gain an in-depth understanding of the current status of research on digital mathematics games. For this purpose, digital mathematics game articles published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2023 were systematically reviewed. To locate these articles, the following keywords were searched in TR Index, DergiPark Academic, and Google Scholar: “digital game”, “video game”, “computer game”, “interactive game”, “mobile game”, and “serious game”. The articles retrieved from the search were subjected to a two-stage screening process. First, the titles and abstracts of the articles were examined. Second, their full texts were examined. After the screening process, 26 articles that suited the purpose of the study were determined. Relevant data from the selected articles were extracted manually, recorded in an Excel spreadsheet, and finally synthesized. The findings were reported using the following research trends: (i) research aims, (ii) research methodologies, (iii) research participants, (iv) sample sizes, (v) designers of the digital mathematics games, (vi) environments used for designing digital mathematics games, and (vii) learning domains of the digital mathematics game topics. The findings are discussed based on the literature and implications for stakeholders are presented.

Keywords

Digital mathematics games, Peer-reviewed journal articles, Systematic literature reviews

References

• Aldemir Engin, R. (2023). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının dijital oyun tasarlama deneyimleri, görüş ve değerlendirmeleri: Draw Your Game örneği. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1103234
• Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education (9th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
• Avcu, R., & Avcu, S. (2022). The methodological quality of experimental STEM education articles published in scholarly journals from 2014 to 2020. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 290–318. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.946743
• Bai, H., Pan, W., Hirumi, A., & Kebritchi, M. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of a 3-D instructional game on improving mathematics achievement and motivation of middle school students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01269.x
• Becker, K. (2017). Choosing and using digital games in the classroom: A practical guide. Springer.
• Beserra, V., Nussbaum, M., Zeni, R., Rodriguez, W., & Wurman, G. (2014). Practicing arithmetic using educational video games with an interpersonal computer. Educational Technology and Society, 17(3), 343–358.
• Borman, G. D., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A. M., Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2005). Success for all: First-year results from the national randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027001001
• Byun, J., & Joung, E. (2018). Digital game-based learning for K–12 mathematics education: A meta-analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 118, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12271
• Carr, J. M. (2012). Does math achievement h’APP’en when iPads and game-based learning are incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 269–286.
• Cheung, C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
• Corbin, J., & Straus, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2023). Common core state standards. Retrieved August 16, 2023, from https://learning.ccsso.org/common-core-state-standards-initiative
• Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2019). Writing the literature review: A practical guide. The Guilford Press.
• Foster, A., & Shah, M. (2020). Principles for advancing game-based learning in teacher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(2), 84e95. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1695553
• Fox, B. (2000). Conclusion. In B. Fox, A. Montague-Smith, & S. Wilkes (Eds.), Using ICT in primary mathematics: Practice and possibilities (pp. 139–142). David Fulton Publishers.
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw Hill LLC.
• Garneli, V., Giannakos, M., & Chorianopoulos, K. (2017). Serious games as a malleable learning medium: The effects of narrative, gameplay, and making on students’ performance and attitudes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 842–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12455
• Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510
• Gredler, M. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 571–581). Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Greetham, B. (2021). How to write your literature review. Red Globe Press.
• Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.508029
• Hedges, L.V., & Schauer, J. (2018). Randomised trials in education in the USA. Educational Research, 60(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1493350
• Hsu, C. Y., Liang, J. C., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Exploring preschool teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge of educational games. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(4), 461e479. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.49.4.c
• Hu, H., & Sperling, R. A. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of adopting digital games in education: A mixed methods investigation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 103876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103876
• Hussein, M. H., Ow, S. H., Elaish, M. M., & Jensen, E. O. (2022). Digital game-based learning in K-12 mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 2859–2891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10721-x
• Jensen, E. O., & Skott, C. K. (2022). How can the use of digital games in mathematics education promote students’ mathematical reasoning? A qualitative systematic review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8(2), 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00100-7
• Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Joung, E., & Byun, J. (2021). Content analysis of digital mathematics games based on the NCTM content and process standards: an exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics, 121(3), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12452
• Kahn, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2011). Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine (2nd ed.). Royal Society Medicine Press. Hodder & Stoughton Ltd.
• Ke, F. (2008a). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: Cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(5/6), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9086-5
• Ke, F. (2008b). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers & Education, 51(4), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.003
• Ke, F. (2008c). Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2
• Ke, F. (2009). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1–32). Hershey.
• Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9418-1
• Ke, F., & Abras, T. (2013). Games for engaged learning of middle school children with special learning needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01326.x
• Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Game playing for mathematics learning: Cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00593.x
• Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers and Education, 55(2), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.007
• Kim, S., & Chang, M. (2010). Computer games for the mathematics achievement of diverse students. Educational Technology and Society, 13(3), 224–232.
• Kolovou, A., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Köller, O. (2013). An intervention including an online game to improve grade 6 students’ performance in early algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(3), 510–545. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.3.0510
• Lamb, J. H. (2014). Angry Birds mathematics: Parabolas and vectors. The Mathematics Teacher, 107(5), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.5.0334
• Larkin, K. (2015). “An app! An app! My kingdom for an app”: An 18-month quest to determine whether apps support mathematical knowledge building. In T. Lowrie & R. Jorgensen (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning: Potentials, promises and pitfalls (pp. 251–276). Springer.
• Lopez-Morteo, G., & Lopez, G. (2007). Computer support for learning mathematics: A learning environment based on recreational learning objects. Computers & Education, 48, 618–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.014
• Lowrie, T., & Jorgensen, R. (2015). Digital games and learning: What’s new is already old? In T. Lowrie & R. Jorgensen (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning: Potentials, promises and pitfalls (pp. 1–9). Springer.
• Mavridis, A., Katmada, A. & Tsiatsos, T. (2017). Impact of online flexible games on students’ attitude towards mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development 65(6), 1451–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9522-5
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Computer games for learning: An evidence-based approach. MIT Press.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Ministry of National Education. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar). Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
• Ministry of National Education. (2023). Öğretim programları. Retrieved August 16, 2023, from https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx
• Monaghan, J. (2016). Games: Artefacts in gameplay. In J. Monaghan, L. Trouche, & J. Borwein (Eds.), Tools and mathematics: Instruments for learning (pp. 417–431). Springer.
• Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large data sets. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 137–162). Altamira Press.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
• Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application (pp. 3–22). Springer VS.
• Pan, Y., Ke, F., & Xu, X. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning games in fostering mathematics education in K-12 settings. Educational Research Review, 36, 100448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100448
• Pareto, L., Haake, M., Lindström, P., Sjödén, B., & Gulz, A. (2012). A teachable-agent-based game affording collaboration and competition: Evaluating math comprehension and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 723–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9246-5
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
• Poçan, S. (2023). Matematik eğitiminde dijital oyun tabanlı öğrenme üzerine bibliyometrik analiz. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 648-669. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1215903
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.
• Purushotma, R. (2005). Commentary: You’re not studying, you’re just…. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 80–96.
• Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). Sage.
• Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Gunter, E. (2010). Survey of commercial off-the-shelf video games, benefits and barriers in formal educational settings. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(5), 255–262.
• Rodrigues, M., & Carvalho, P. S. (2013). Teaching physics with Angry Birds: Exploring the kinematics and dynamics of the game. Physics Education, 48(4), 431. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2013PhyEd..48..431R/doi:10.1088/0031-9120/48/4/431
• Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
• Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education—What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08314117
• Starkey, D. (2015). Department of Education believes video games are the future of learning. GameSpot. Retrieved June 8, 2023, from http://www.gamespot.com/articles/department-ofeducation-believes-video-games-are-t/1100-6426600/
• Tokaç, U., Novak, E., & Thompson, C. G. (2019). Effects of game-based learning on students’ mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12347
• Torgerson, C. (2003). Systematic reviews. Continuum International Publishing Group.
• TÜBİTAK. (2023a). TR Dizin nedir? Retrieved July 21, 2023, from https://trdizin.gov.tr/yardim/
• TÜBİTAK. (2023b). About TR Index. Retrieved July 21, 2023, from https://trdizin.gov.tr/en/about/
• TÜBİTAK. (2023c). TR Dizin Kabul Dergi Listesi’ndeki dergi, doçentlik kriterlerinde yer alan ULAKBİM tarafından taranan dergi midir? Retrieved July 21, 2023, from https://trdizin.gov.tr/yardim/
• TÜBİTAK. (2023d). DergiPark hakkında. Retrieved July 21, 2023, from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/page/about
• TÜBİTAK. (2023e). TR Dizin ve DergiPark farkı nedir? Retrieved July 21, 2023, from https://trdizin.gov.tr/yardim/
• Uluçay, İ. S., & Çakır, H. (2014). İnteraktif oyunların matematik öğretiminde kullanılması üzerine araştırmaların incelenmesi. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 4(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.21297
• Van Eck, R. (2015). SAPS and digital games: Improving mathematics transfer and attitudes in schools. In T. Lowrie & R. Jorgensen (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning (pp. 141–173). Springer.
• Wang, Z. (2006). Video games: A new approach to language acquisition. Paper presented at the Summer 2006 Institute: Linking Research to Professional Practice, Calgary, Alberta.
• Wouters, P., Van der Spek, E. D., & Van Oostendorp, H. (2009). Current practices in serious game research: A review from a learning outcomes perspective. In T. Connolly, M. Stansfield, & L. Boyle (Eds.), Games-based learning advancements for multi-sensory human computer interfaces: Techniques and effective practices (pp. 232–250). IGI Global.
• Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., & Van Der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031311
• Yeo, S., Rutherford, T., & Campbell, T. (2022). Understanding elementary mathematics teachers’ intention to use a digital game through the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11515–11536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11073-w
• Yığ, K. G., & Sezgin, S. (2021). An exploratory holistic analysis of digital gamification in mathematics education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(2), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.888096
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. bs.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yıldız Durak, H., & Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. G. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimine yönelik eğitsel dijital oyun tasarımlarının ve tasarım sürecine ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 20(1), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.439146
• Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312436980