Research Article

TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

Volume: 4 Number: 3 September 30, 2017
EN

TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

Abstract

Purpose- The aim of the work is to find out, which quality system application could be appropriate for different kind of health service providers by also introducing the new quality management system ISO 15224 . 

Methodology- The study has been done by comparing ISO 15224 Health Service Management System with ISO 9001-2008 quality management system, SKS and JCI accreditation systems by clause by clause. The summary of the findings are given as a table in the article. Findings- The most important difference between ISO Standards, and SKS and JCI comes up in product realization clause. ISO Standards define realization of a health service offering in general. At the stage of realizing a service offering, by emphasizing the critical points, a progress is made on the basis of ISO standards. Especially clinical risk assessment and patient safety should be ignored.

Conclusion- As a result, for large hospitals intending to expand in global markets, having an accreditation and having that certification internationally should make these institutions more competitive in global health sector. At the other hand, for health institutions intending to compete on a national scale only, preferring ISO 15224 Standard, considering the examples in the literature, would be more appropriate.    

Keywords

References

  1. Akyurt N. 2013, “Hastane Yönetimi” , Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, 1. Baskı, pp. 453-460.
  2. Çakır A. , 2007 , “Hasta Güvenlığ̇ ı ̇Kültürü ile Kalıṫ e Yönetıṁ Sıṡ temı ̇Arasindaki İlış̇ kıṅ ıṅ Analıż ı ̇Tezi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  3. Domittner B., 2013,”Quality Management”. Yazgan M., 2009, “Sağlık İşletmelerinde, Hizmet Kalitesinin Sağlık Hizmeti Sunan ve Sağlık Hizmeti Alan Taraflarca Değerlendirilmesi Tezi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  4. Rad A., 2005, “A Survey of total quality management in IRAN”, Leadersh Heal Serv [Internet] ,18(3):5–7. www.emeraldsight.com/13660756.htm
  5. Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu , 2013, “Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu Sağlık Uygulama Tebliği”.
  6. Taşçı D., Eroğlu E., Çabuk S., Duman G, Ağlargöz O. Erdemir E. , 2013, “KALİTE YÖNETİM SİSTEMLERİ”, Anadolu Üniversitesi, pp 20
  7. Uluslararası Hasta Hizmetleri Derneği, 2016, “JCI Akredite Hastaneleri” [Internet]. [cited 2016 Nov 2]. http://www.visitturkeyforhealthcare.com/19-jci-akredite-hastaneleri.html
  8. Budak M, 2014, “Akreditasyon Ders Notları”, Okan Üniversitesi

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Selden Coskun This is me

Publication Date

September 30, 2017

Submission Date

May 9, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 3

APA
Coskun, S., & Gulhan, Y. (2017). TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 410-416. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718
AMA
1.Coskun S, Gulhan Y. TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. RJBM. 2017;4(3):410-416. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718
Chicago
Coskun, Selden, and Yildirim Gulhan. 2017. “TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4 (3): 410-16. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718.
EndNote
Coskun S, Gulhan Y (September 1, 2017) TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. Research Journal of Business and Management 4 3 410–416.
IEEE
[1]S. Coskun and Y. Gulhan, “TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE”, RJBM, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 410–416, Sept. 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718.
ISNAD
Coskun, Selden - Gulhan, Yildirim. “TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4/3 (September 1, 2017): 410-416. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718.
JAMA
1.Coskun S, Gulhan Y. TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. RJBM. 2017;4:410–416.
MLA
Coskun, Selden, and Yildirim Gulhan. “TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 4, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 410-6, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718.
Vancouver
1.Selden Coskun, Yildirim Gulhan. TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. RJBM. 2017 Sep. 1;4(3):410-6. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annually and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.