Abstract

Örgütsel davranış alanının önemli konularından sayılan örgütsel sosyalleşme, örgütsel bağlılık ve iş yeri romantizmi konuları bu çalışmanın konularını oluşturmaktadır. Sosyalleşmenin büyük bölümünün iş yerinde gerçekleştiği düşünüldüğünde, insanların benzer ilgi alanları ve özelliklere sahip olan diğer çalışanlarla yakın ilişki kurmak istemeleri kaçınılmazdır. Örgütsel sosyalleşme süreci, örgüt ile çalışanlar arasındaki etkileşimi kapsamaktadır ve temel amacı çalışanların işlerine adapte olmalarını ve işlerinde uzmanlaşmalarını sağlamaktır. Sosyalleşme sonucu çalışanlar örgütsel bağlılık göstererek örgütleri için özverili çalışmaktadırlar. Yazında daha önce yapılan çalışmalarda örgütsel sosyalleşmenin iş yeri romantizmiyle doğrudan bir ilişkisinden söz edilmediği ve örgütsel bağlılığın böylesi bir ilişkide aracılık etkisinin olduğu bulunduğundan bu çalışmada bu aracılık etkisinin ortaya çıkartılması amaçlanmıştır. 1. GİRİŞ

THE EFFECT OF WORKPLACE ROMANCE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SOCIALIZATION AND THE BROKERAGE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT

Abstract

Regarded as one of the major topics in the field of organizational behavior, organizational socialization, organizational commitment, romance and workplace issues are the subjects of this study. Socialization thought to be at work when the majority of people who have similar interests and abilities they want to establish close relationships with other employees is inevitable. Organizational socialization process involves interaction between the organization and working with the main purpose to adapt to their jobs and businesses is to provide specialization in. Socialization as a result of dedicated employees are working for the organization by demonstrating organizational commitment. In studies conducted in the summer before a direct relationship with organizational socialization workplace romance is not mentioned and the mediating effect of organizational commitment in a relationship such as that found in this study is intended to demonstrate the mediating effect.

Keywords

• Organizational socialization,workplace romance,organizational commitment,romanticism,brokerage

References

1. Allen, Natalie J. ve Meyer, John P. (1990), “The measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to The Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, No: 63, s. 1-18.
2. Allen, Natalie J. ve Meyer, John P. (1990), “Organizational Socialization Tactics: A Longitudinal Analysis of Links to
3. Newcomers’ Commitment and Role Orientation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No:4,s. 847-858. Anderson, C. M., Riddle, B. L. ve Martin, M. M. (1999), Socialization processes in groups. In L. R. Frey, D. S.
4. Gouran & M. S. Poole (eds), The handbook of group communication: Theory and research (139–163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Araza, A., Aslan, G. ve Bulut, Ç. (2013). Örgütsel Sosyalleşme: Bir Literatür Taraması, Journal of Yasar University 2013 8(32) 5556-5582
5. Ashforth, B.E., Sluss, D.M. ve Harrison, S.H. (2007), “Socialization in organizational contexts”, International
6. Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 1-70. Bauer, T.N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D.T. ve Tucker, J.S. (2007), “Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, pp. 707-21.
7. Chao, G.T., O’leary-Kelley, A.M., Wolf, S., Klein, H.J. ve Gardner, P.D. (1994), “Organizational Socialization: Its
8. Content and Consequences”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 730–43. Cooper-Thomas, Helena - Anderson, Neil, (2002), “Newcomer Adjustment: The Relationship Between

9. Organizational Socialization Tactics, Information Acquisition and Attitudes”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 75, s. 423-437. Feldman, D. C. (1976), “A Contingency Theory of Socialization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 433-452.
10. Filstad, Cathrine, (2011), “Organizational Commitment Through Organizational Socialization Tactics”, Journal of
11. Workplace Learning, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 376-390
12. Güner Çöl, (2004), Örgütsel Bağlılık Kavramı ve Benzer Kavramlarla İlişkisi, İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan
13. Kaynakları Dergisi, Cilt: 6, Sayı: 68 Hymowitz, C. ve E. J. Pollock (1998), “Corporate Affairs: The One Clear Line in İnteroffice Romance Has Become
14. Blurred”, Wall Street Journal, 4 February, A1, A8. King, R. C., X,a, W., Quiıck, J. C., ve Sethi, V. (2005), “Socialization and Organizational Outcomes of Information
15. Technology Professionals”, Career Development International, 10(1), 26–51. Kristof, A. L. (1996), “Person–Organization Fit: an Integrative Review of İts Conceptualizations, Measurement And İmplications”, Personnel Psychology, 49, 1−49.
16. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R.D., ve Johnson, E. C. (2005), “Consequences of İndividuals' Fit at Work: a
17. Meta-Analysis of Person–Job, Person–Organization”, Person–Group, and Person–Supervisor Fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281−342. Lickey, Nolan C., Berry, Gregory R., ve Whelan-Berry, Karen S., (2009), “Responding To Workplace Romance: A
18. Proactive And Pragmatic Approach”, The Journal of Business Inquiry , 8, 1,100-119
19. Madlock, Paul E. ve Chory, Rebecca M. (2011), “Socialization as a Predictor of Employee Outcomes”,
20. Communication Studies, 65:1, 56-71, Mainiero, Lisa A. (1986), “A Review and Analysis of Power Dynamics in Organizational Romances”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 750-762
21. Meyer, J.P. ve Allen, N.J. (1997), Commitment In The Workplace, Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE Publications.
22. Meyer J, Becker T ve Van Dick R., (2006), “Social Identities and Commitments at Work: Toward an Integrative
23. Model”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27, pp. 665-683. Mobley, W.H., Horner, S.O., ve Hollingsworth, A.T. (1978), “An Evaluation of Precursors of Hospital Employee
24. Turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4):408. Nelson, D.L. ve Quick, J.C. (1997), Organizational Behaviour – Foundations, Realities and Challenges. U.S.A. : West Publishing.
25. Parsons, T. (1951), The social system. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26. Powell, G. N. (1986), “What Do Tomorrow’s Managers Think About Sexual Intimacy in the Workplace?” Business Horizons, 29 (4), 30-35
27. Pierce, C.A., D. Byrne, ve H. Aguinis. (1996), “Attraction in Organizations: a Model of Workplace Romance”,
28. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 17, 5-32
29. Pierce, C. A., ve H. Aguinis. (2003), “Romantic Relationships in Organizations: A Test of a Model of Formation and Impact Factors”, Management Research, Vol. 1 (2): 161-169.
30. Saks, A.M., Uggerslev, K.L. ve Fassina, N.E. (2007), “Socialization Tactics and Newcomer Adjustment: a Meta
31. Analytic Review and Test of a Model”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 70, pp. 413-46. Schein, E. H. (1979). Career Dynamics: Matching İndividual and Organizational Needs, Reading, Massachusetts:
32. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. Schor, J. B. (1991), The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.
33. Takahashi, K.; Watanabe, N. (1997). The emergence and development of a psychodinamic approach to Japanese managerial operations. In search of hidden relationships: the unconscious process of organizational socialization.
34. İnternet’ten 26.12.2013’de elde edilmiştir:http://www.sba.oakland.edu/ispso/html/takah.html.
35. Taormina, R. J. (1994), “The Organizational Socialization Inventory”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2 (3), 133-145.
36. Wanous, J. P. (1992), Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection, Orientation, and Socialization of Newcomers
37. (2nd ed.) . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Van Maanen, John ve Schein, Edgar H. (1979), “Towards A Theory of Organizational Socialization”, MIT Sloan working paper, s. 1-89.
38. Yang, Jen-Te, (2008), “Effect of Newcomer Socialization and Organizaitonal Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention in The Hotel Industry”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 28, 56-71.