Turkish Adaptation of Leisure Motivation Scale: A Sample of Turkish Adolescents Participating in Regularly Physical Activity

Öz

In the study, we aimed to evaluate the Turkish adaptation of the leisure motivation scale (LMS-A) for adolescents participating in recreational physical activities. We collected data from 331 people determined by the convenience sampling method, and conducted its Turkish adaptation with three different test phases after we performed Turkish language co-validation of the scale. Firstly, we determined the univariate and multivariate normality levels of the data. In the second stage we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the contextuality of the scale and in the third stage we utilized two types of construct validity, convergent and discriminant to evaluate the validity of the scale. The results revealed that the original structure of the scale fits well in the correlated factors model and best fit the data collected from the Turkish population. These results suggest that the leisure motivation scale could be a valid and reliable measurement tool for adolescents participating in recreational physical activities in Türkiye.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• adolescent
• leisure
• motivation
• physical activity
• validity and reliability

Rekreasyonel Amaçlı Fiziksel Aktiviteye Katılan Ergenler için Motivasyon Ölçeği: Türkçe Adaptasyon Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, rekreasyonel amaçlı fiziksel aktiviteye katılan ergenler için serbest zaman motivasyon ölçeğinin (SZMÖ-E) Türkçe adaptasyonunu test etmektir. Araştırmada veriler kolayda örneklem yöntemiyle belirlenen 331 kişiden toplanmıştır. Türkçe dil eş geçerliliği yapılan ölçeğin Türkçe adaptasyon üç farklı test aşaması ile yürütülmüştür. İlk olarak verilerin tek değişkenli normallik düzeyi ile çok değişkenli normallik düzeyleri belirlenmiştir. İkinci aşamada, ilgili ölçeğin kavramsallığını test etmek için Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) analizi test edilmiştir ve üçüncü aşamada, ölçeğin geçerliliğini test etmek adına yakınsak ve ayrıt edici olmak üzere iki tür yapı geçerliliği kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, ölçeğin orijinal yapısının ilişkili faktörler modelinde iyi uyum gösterdiği ve Türk popülasyonundan toplanan verilere en iyi şekilde uyduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Elde edilen bu sonuçlar, Türkiye'deki rekreasyonel amaçlı fiziksel aktiviteye katılan ergenler popülasyonu için geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olarak serbest zaman motivasyon ölçeğinin kullanılabilir olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ergen
• fiziksel aktivite
• geçerlilik ve güvenirlik
• serbest zaman
• motivasyon

Kaynakça

1. Akbulut, V., & Öncü, E. (2023). The adaptation of physical education motivation scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Sportive, 6(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.53025/sportive.1311231
2. Amorim, L. D. A. F., Fiaccone, R. L., Santos, C. A. S. T., Santos, T. N. dos, Moraes, L. T. L. P. de, Oliveira, N. F., Barbosa, S. O., Santos, D. N. dos, Santos, L. M. dos, & Matos, S. M. A. (2010). Structural equation modeling in epidemiology. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 26(12), 2251-2262.
3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
5. Baldwin, C. K., & Caldwell, L. L. (2003). Development of the free time motivation scale for adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(2), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2003.11949987
6. Beard, J. G., & Ragheb, M. G. (1983). Measuring leisure motivation. Journal of Leisure Research, 15(3), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1983.11969557
7. Belošević, M., & Ferić, M. (2022). Contribution of leisure context, motivation and experience to the frequency of participation in structured leisure activities among adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020877
8. Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Latent variables in structural equation modeling. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, 56-67.

9. Bosacki, S., Sitnik, V., Pissoto Moreira, F., & Talwar, V. (2022). Emotion recognition, self-knowledge, and perceptions of leisure time activities in emerging adolescents: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(5), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1937993
10. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (31. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
12. Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
13. Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (2017). Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1716-1735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1
14. Campbell, D., Brislin, R., Stewart, V., & Werner, O. (1970). Back-translation and other translation techniques in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 681-692.
15. Collings, P. J., Wijndaele, K., Corder, K., Westgate, K., Ridgway, C. L., Dunn, V., Goodyer, I., Ekelund, U., & Brage, S. (2014). Levels and patterns of objectively-measured physical activity volume and intensity distribution in UK adolescents: The ROOTS study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-23
16. Cooper, A. R., Goodman, A., Page, A. S., Sherar, L. B., Esliger, D. W., van Sluijs, E. M., Andersen, L. B., Anderssen, S., Cardon, G., Davey, R., Froberg, K., Hallal, P., Janz, K. F., Kordas, K., Kreimler, S., Pate, R. R., Puder, J. J., Reilly, J. J., Salmon, J., … Ekelund, U. (2015). Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in youth: the International children’s accelerometry database (ICAD). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0274-5
17. Cosma, A., Pavelka, J., & Badura, P. (2021). Leisure time use and adolescent mental well-being: Insights from the COVID-19 Czech spring lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12812. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312812
18. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38(1), 237–288.
20. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
21. Dimitri, P., Joshi, K., & Jones, N. (2020). Moving more: physical activity and its positive effects on long term conditions in children and young people. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 105(11), 1035-1040. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318017
22. Eime, R. M., Young, J. A., Harvey, J. T., Charity, M. J., & Payne, W. R. (2013). A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10(98), 1-21. http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/10/1/98
23. Epskamp, S. (2015). semPlot: Unified visualizations of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937847
24. Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Journal of Uludağ University Medical Faculty, 30(3), 211–216.
25. Estevan, I., Bardid, F., Utesch, T., Menescardi, C., Barnett, L. M., & Castillo, I. (2021). Examining early adolescents’ motivation for physical education: Associations with actual and perceived motor competence. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(4), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1806995
26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
27. Gana, K., & Broc, G. (2019). Structural equation modeling with lavaan. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119579038
28. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
29. Güngörmüş, H. A. (2012). The study of validity and reliability of Turkish version of leisure motivation scale. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1209–1216.
30. Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2018). Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. The Lancet Global Health, 6(10), e1077–e1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7
31. Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2020). Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2
32. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L., Barkoukis, V., Wang, C. K., & Baranowski, J. (2005). Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.376
33. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
34. Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
35. Hallal, P. C., Andersen, L. B., Bull, F. C., Guthold, R., Haskell, W., & Ekelund, U. (2012). Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet, 380(9838), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1
36. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
37. Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004
38. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
39. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
40. Irby, M., & Tolman, J. (2002). Rethinking leisure time: Expanding opportunities for young people and communities. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment.
41. Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Clair, B. St. (2000). Toward a theory of exercise motivation. Quest, 52(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2000.10491706
42. Jak, S., Jorgensen, T. D., & Rosseel, Y. (2021). Evaluating cluster-level factor models with lavaan and mplus. Psych, 3(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3020012
43. Jose, K. A., Blizzard, L., Dwyer, T., McKercher, C., & Venn, A. J. (2011). Childhood and adolescent predictors of leisure time physical activity during the transition from adolescence to adulthood: A population based cohort study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-54
44. Kalajas-Tilga, H., Koka, A., Hein, V., Tilga, H., & Raudsepp, L. (2020). Motivational processes in physical education and objectively measured physical activity among adolescents. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 9(5), 462-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.001
45. Kandola, A., Lewis, G., Osborn, D. P. J., Stubbs, B., & Hayes, J. F. (2020). Depressive symptoms and objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour throughout adolescence: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30034-1
46. Kerner, C., Burrows, A., & McGrane, B. (2019). Health wearables in adolescents: implications for body satisfaction, motivation and physical activity. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 57(4), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2019.1581641
47. Kyle, G., Landon, A., Vaske, J., & Wallen, K. (2020). Tools for assessing the psychometric adequacy of latent variables in conservation research. Conservation Biology, 34(6), 1353–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13625
48. Larson, R. W., & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701–736. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.701
49. Li, F. (1999). The exercise motivation scale: Its multifaceted structure and construct validity. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402953
50. Li, F., Harmer, P., & Acock, A. (1996). The task and ego orientation in sport questionnaire: construct equivalence and mean differences across gender. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607949
51. Lonsdale, C., Sabiston, C. M., Raedeke, T. D., Ha, A. S., & Sum, R. K. (2009). Self-determined motivation and students' physical activity during structured physical education lessons and free choice periods. Preventive Medicine, 48(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.09.013
52. Lubans, D. R., Plotnikoff, R. C., & Lubans, N. J. (2012). A systematic review of the impact of physical activity programmes on social and emotional well‐being in at‐risk youth. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 17(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00623.x
53. Marianti, S., Rufaida, A., Hasanah, N., & Nuryanti, S. (2023). Comparing item-total correlation and item-theta correlation in test item selection: A simulation and empirical study. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 27(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i2.61477
54. Markland, D., & Hardy, L. (1993). The Exercise Motivations Inventory: Preliminary development and validity of a measure of individuals' reasons for participation in regular physical exercise. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(3), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90219-S
55. Markland, D., & Ingledew, D. K. (2007). Exercise participation motives: A self-determination theory perspective. In H. MS & C. NL (Eds.), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Exercise and Sport. Human Kinetics.
56. McDavid, L., Cox, A. E., & Amorose, A. J. (2012). The relative roles of physical education teachers and parents in adolescents’ leisure-time physical activity motivation and behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.10.003
57. Molanorouzi, K., Khoo, S., & Morris, T. (2014). Validating the physical activity and leisure motivation scale (PALMS). BMC Public Health, 14(1), 909. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-909
58. Morris, T., & Rogers, H. (2004). Measuring motives for physical activity. Sport and Chance of Life: Proceedings of 2004 International Sport Science Congress, 242–250.
59. Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self‐determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158497
60. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory New York. NY: McGraw-Hill.
61. Pääkkönen, H. (2002). Mihin koululaisten aika kuluu. Hyvinvointikatsaus, 4, 2–9.
62. Papadakis, S., Gözüm, A. İ. C., Kalogiannakis, M., & Kandır, A. (2022). A comparison of Turkish and Greek parental mediation strategies for digital games for children during the COVID-19 pandemic. In STEM, Robotics, Mobile Apps in Early Childhood and Primary Education: Technology to Promote Teaching and Learning (pp. 555–588). Springer.
63. Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.17.1.35
64. Raykov, T. (1998). Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated nonhomogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169802200407
65. Rogers, H., & Morris, T. (2003). An overview of the development and validation of the Recreational Exercise Motivation Measure (REMM). In New approaches to exercise and sport psychology: Theories, methods and applications. XIth European Congress of Sport Psychology (22-27 July), Book of Abstracts. Copenhagen (Vol. 144).
66. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan : An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
67. Roychowdhury, D. (2018). A comprehensive measure of participation motivation: Examining and validating the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS). Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2018.131.20
68. Ryan, J. A.-M. (2000). Predicting positive youth development outcomes using the social development model. University of Washington.
69. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
70. Ryan, R. M., Williams, G. C., Patrick, H., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Self-determination theory and physical activity: The dynamics of motivation in development and wellness. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 107-124.
71. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
72. Schmidt, S. C., Anedda, B., Burchartz, A., Eichsteller, A., Kolb, S., Nigg, C., Niessner, C., Oriwol, D., Worth, A., & Woll, A. (2020). Physical activity and screen time of children and adolescents before and during the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany: A natural experiment. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 21780. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78438-4
73. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2020). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları.
74. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self‐determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22359
75. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Boston, MA.
76. Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V, Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 1–30.
77. Tekkurşun Demir, G., & Cicioğlu, H. İ. (2022). Developing the motivation for participation in physical education lesson scale (MFPPELS): Validity and reliability study. Balıkesir Health Sciences Journal, 12(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1078077
78. Telama, R., Yang, X., Viikari, J., Välimäki, I., Wanne, O., & Raitakari, O. (2005). Physical activity from childhood to adulthood. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(3), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.003
79. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
80. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). American time use survey summary. https://doi.org/https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/atus_06252008.pdf
81. Üstün, Ü. D. (2016). Investigating the motivational factors that motivate adolescents to recreation activities in the extent of serious leisure perspective [Doctoral thesis] Dumlupınar University, Turkey.
82. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 271–360). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
83. Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and a look at the future. Handbook of Sport Psychology, 59-83.
84. Wang, L. (2017). Using the self‐determination theory to understand Chinese adolescent leisure‐time physical activity. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1276968
85. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136.
86. World Health Organization. (2022). Physical activity. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity