Modern Hava Trafik Yönetimi Bağlamında Esnek Hava Sahası Kullanımı: Kavramlar, Uygulama ve Sürdürülebilirlik Boyutları

Öz

Esnek Hava Sahası Kullanımı (FUA) konsepti, sivil–asker koordinasyonuna dayalı hava sahası kullanımını esas alarak emniyetin, operasyonel verimliliğin ve çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin artırılmasını amaçlayan modern hava sahası yönetiminde önemli bir evrimi temsil etmektedir. Bu çalışma, FUA kavramını ve onun gelişmiş formu olan AFUA’yı hem düzenleyici hem de operasyonel perspektiften incelemekte; özellikle farklı hava sahası ortamlarında pratik uygulanabilirliğine odaklanmaktadır. Karşılaştırmalı bir vaka analizi yaklaşımı benimsenmiş olup, düşük ve orta yoğunluklu trafiğe sahip küçük ölçekli bir hava sahası olarak Bosna-Hersek ile büyük, karmaşık ve operasyonel açıdan yoğun bir hava sahası sistemi olan Türkiye örnek olay olarak ele alınmıştır. Analiz, kurumsal yapılanmalar, hava sahası yapıları ve uygulama mekanizmalarındaki farklılıkları ortaya koyarken, FUA’nın etkin uygulanmasını mümkün kılan ortak ilkeleri de belirlemektedir. Özellikle optimize edilmiş rota planlaması ve hava sahası erişilebilirliğinin artırılması yoluyla sağlanan CO₂ emisyonu azaltımları başta olmak üzere çevresel faydalara özel önem verilmiştir. Bulgular, operasyonel ölçek ve kısıtlar farklılık gösterse de, güçlü sivil–asker koordinasyonu, gelişmiş hava sahası yönetim araçları ve uyumlaştırılmış düzenleyici çerçevelerin varlığı halinde FUA’nın farklı hava sahası bağlamlarına etkin şekilde uyarlanabileceğini göstermektedir. Çalışma, devam eden dijitalleşme süreci ve güçlendirilmiş pre-taktik planlama mekanizmalarının, gelecekte hava sahası yönetiminde FUA/AFUA’nın rolünü daha da pekiştireceği sonucuna varmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Esnek Hava Sahası Kullanımı
• Hava Trafik Yönetimi
• Sivil-Asker İş Birliği
• Gelişmiş FUA
• Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik

Flexible Use of Airspace in the Context of Modern Air Traffic Management: Concepts, Implementation, and Sustainability Aspects

Öz

The Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) concept represents a key evolution in modern airspace management, aiming to enhance safety, operational efficiency, and environmental sustainability through coordinated civil–military use of airspace. This paper examines the FUA and its advanced form (AFUA) from both regulatory and operational perspectives, with particular emphasis on their practical applicability across different airspace environments. A comparative case study approach is adopted, focusing on Bosnia and Herzegovina as a small, low-to-medium traffic airspace and Türkiye as a large, complex, and operationally demanding airspace system. The analysis highlights differences in institutional arrangements, airspace structures, and implementation mechanisms, while identifying common principles underpinning effective FUA application. Special attention is given to environmental benefits, notably reductions in CO₂ emissions achieved through optimized routing and improved airspace availability. The results demonstrate that, despite differing operational scales and constraints, FUA can be effectively adapted to diverse airspace contexts, provided that robust civil–military coordination, advanced airspace management tools, and harmonized regulatory frameworks are in place. The paper concludes that ongoing digitalization and enhanced pre-tactical planning will further strengthen the role of FUA/AFUA in future airspace management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Flexible Use of Airspace
• Air Traffic Management
• Civil-Military Cooperation
• Advanced FUA
• Environmental Sustainability

Kaynakça

1. Birdal, E. O., & Üzümcü, S. (2019, August). Usage of machine learning algorithms in flexible use of airspace concept. In Digital Aviation Systems Conference. San Diego, CA, United States.
2. Bosnia and Herzegovina Directorate of Civil Aviation (BHDCA). (2023). Regulation on establishing rules for flexible use of airspace. Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 43–45.
3. Commission of the European Communities. (2005, December 23). Commission Regulation (EC) No 2150/2005 laying down common rules for the flexible use of airspace. Official Journal of the European Union, 1–6.
4. DGCA (2014). Regulation on the Flexible Use of Airspace (SHY-FUA) (No. 28976).
5. Elenkov, M. P., Beriša, H. A., & Barišić, I. I. (2019). Challenges of the implementation of the concept of flexible use of airspace in the Republic of Serbia. Vojnotehnički Glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 67(3), 638–658. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg67-19982 EUROCONTROL. (2009). EUROCONTROL specification for the application of the flexible use of airspace (FUA) (EUROCONTROL-SPEC-112, Version 1.1).
6. EUROCONTROL. (2010). Flexible use of airspace handbook. Brussels, Belgium.
7. EUROCONTROL. (2015a). Advanced FUA concept.
8. EUROCONTROL. (2015b). Airspace management handbook. Brussels, Belgium.

9. EUROCONTROL. (2019). MUAC civil–military cooperation and flexible use of airspace. Brussels, Belgium.
10. EUROCONTROL. (2021, December). COVID-19 impact on European aviation: Comprehensive assessment.
11. EUROCONTROL. (2022a). Think Paper #15: Charting the European aviation recovery – 2021 COVID-19 impacts and 2022 outlook.
12. EUROCONTROL. (2022b). EUROCONTROL civil/military cooperation – Airspace management/Flexible use of airspace. https://www.eurocontrol.int/archive_download/all/node/13665
13. EUROCONTROL. (2022c). EUROCONTROL – AEM: Advanced emissions model – Flight emissions assessments (Innovation Hub Event presentation).
14. EUROCONTROL. (2022d). Local Single Sky Implementation (LSSIP) – Bosnia and Herzegovina.
15. EUROCONTROL. (2023). LSSIP of ATM implementation reporting in Europe: Bosnia and Herzegovina – Local Single Sky Implementation.
16. ICAO. (2018a). Manual on civil–military cooperation in air traffic management (Doc 10088). International Civil Aviation Organization.
17. ICAO. (2018b). What is flexible use of airspace (FUA)? ICAO ACAC Civil/Military Workshop, Algiers, Algeria. https://www2023.icao.int/MID/Documents/2018/ACAC-ICAO%20Civ-Mil%20WS/6-%20Session%201.3-4.pdf
18. Kodera, M., Hospodka, J., & Chleboun, M. (2014). Flight planning and flexible use of airspace in free route airspace area. MAD – Magazine of Aviation Development, 2(7), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.14311/MAD.2014.07.01
19. Kökhan, A., Kökhan, S., & Gökdalay, M. H. (2023). An algorithmic application with flexible airspace approach. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 95(7), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-06-2022-0147 Luppo, O., Argunov, G., & Mohyla, A. (2016). Concept of advanced flexible use of airspace. In Proceedings of the National Aviation University (pp. 23–28).
20. Mainini, M. J., Lee, P. U., Homola, J. R., & Lee, H. E. (2011). Flexible airspace management operator roles, task distribution, and coordination mechanisms. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
21. Mihetec, T., Steiner, S., & Odić, D. (2013). Utilization of flexible airspace structure in flight efficiency optimization. Promet – Traffic & Transportation, 25(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.7307/PTT.V25I2.1292
22. Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications, & Ministry of National Defence. (2014, April 18). Regulation on the flexible use of airspace (SHY-FUA) (Official Gazette No. 28976). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr
23. Rogošić, T., Antulov-Fantulin, B., Juričić, B., & Andraši, P. (2022). Environmental benefits of flexible use of airspace. Transportation Research Procedia, 64, 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.09.043
24. SKYbrary Aviation Safety. (2026a). Conditional route. https://skybrary.aero/articles/conditional-route
25. SKYbrary Aviation Safety. (2026b). Flexible use of airspace. https://skybrary.aero/articles/flexible-use-airspace
26. Steiner, S., Mihetec, T., & Rezo, Z. (2019, May). Resolution of operational constraints imposed by fragmentation of European airspace. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: Science and Traffic Development (ZIRP 2019) (pp. 385–395). Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb.
27. Van Dam (PDF) Ecological Interface Design of Airborne Conflict Support in Flexible Use Airspace
28. TU Delft. (2017). Effects of flexible use of airspace availability and plannability on flight efficiency. Delft University of Technology.