Forensic comparison of Soil Samples in Omerli Dam by FTIR and ICP-OES

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4, 794 - 803

Soner Kızıl İkra Sedef Boler Sevil Atasoy

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1453097

Öz

Soil is a one of the important physical evidence that could be encountered in any objects including car tire, shoes, or clothes. This study presents the comparison of the soils in Ömerli Dam, Istanbul-Türkiye. 35 of soil samples from 7 different regions have been collected around the lake. FTIR and ICP-OES have been utilized for structural analysis and detection of metal contect in soil samples. Moreover, textural analysis, pH, sedimentation, color tests have been systematically investigated. The image of soil samples is also captured under different light of sources by VSC 8000. The outcome shows that discrimination of soil samples could be studied using various techniques including FTIR, textural analysis, metal concentrations and their color. ICP-OES analysis showed that the soil have various elements such as Si, Fe, Mg, Ca, Cu with a different amounts which provide discrimination for soil samples. The natural pH of the samples varied between 6.1 and 8.3 that are from slightly acidic to moderately alkaline character.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Forensic soil, ICP-OES, Soil texture, FTIR, Crime scene

Etik Beyan

Etik beyana ihtiyaç yoktur.

Destekleyen Kurum

We thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBITAK for the support of this work through Grant 1919B012307270 (2209-A University Students Domestic Research Projects Support Program).

Proje Numarası

1919B012307270

Teşekkür

The authors would like to thank Melike KIZIL for ICP-OES analysis

Kaynakça

• S. C. A. Uitdehaag, T. H. Donders, I. Kuiper, F. Wagner-Cremer, M. J. Sjerps, “Use of Bayesian networks in forensic soil casework,” Science Justice, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2022.
• N. A. N. B. Mohd Rosdi, N. Abd Hamid, S. F. Mohd Ali, H. Sino, L. C. Lee, “A Critical Review of Soil Sampling and Data Analysis Strategies for Source Tracing of Soil in Forensic Investigations,” Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, pp. 1–39, 2023.
• A. Ruffell, “Forensic pedology, forensic geology, forensic geoscience, geoforensics and soil forensics,” Forensic Science International, vol. 202, no. 1–3, pp. 9–12, 2010.
• L. A. Dawson, R. W. Mayes, “Criminal and environmental soil forensics: soil as physical evidence in forensic investigations,” Forensic Sciences, vol. 2 no.5 pp. 457–486, 2022.
• L. C. Lee, A. A. Ishak, A. A. Nai Eyan, A. F. Zakaria, N. S. Kharudin, N. A. M. Noor, “Forensic profiling of non-volatile organic compounds in soil using ultra-performance liquid chromatography: a pilot study,” Forensic Science Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 761–773, 2022.
• D. O. Carter, D. Yellowlees, M. Tibbett, “Moisture can be the dominant environmental parameter governing cadaver decomposition in soil,” Forensic Science International, vol. 200, no. 1–3, pp. 60–66, 2010.
• R. C. Murray, J. C. F. Tedwow, “Soil in trace evidence analysis,” 13th Interpol Forensic Science Symposium, Lyon, France, 2001, pp. 75–78.
• E.-J. Won, H.-Y. Yun, D.-H. Lee, K.-H. Shin, “Application of compound-specific isotope analysis in environmental forensic and strategic management avenue for pesticide residues,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 15, p. 4412, 2021.
• A. Cachada, T. Rocha-Santos, A. C. Duarte, “Soil and pollution: an introduction to the main issues,” in Soil pollution, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 1–28. Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024.
• J. Rodrigo-Comino, J. M. Senciales, A. Cerdà, E. C. Brevik, “The multidisciplinary origin of soil geography: A review,” Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 177, pp. 114–123, 2018.
• A. Zwolak, M. Sarzyńska, E. Szpyrka, K. Stawarczyk, “Sources of Soil Pollution by Heavy Metals and Their Accumulation in Vegetables: a Review,” Water, Air, Soil Pollution, vol. 230, no. 7, p. 164, 2019.
• L. A. Stern, J. B. Webb, J. Ingham, S. Monteith, I. Saginor, “Soil survey laboratory grain count data to substantiate the rarity of mineral grains in forensic soil reports of examination,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2413–2423, 2021.
• S. A. Testoni, V. F. Melo, L. A. Dawson, F. A. S. Salvador, P. A. Kunii, “Validation of a standard operating procedure (SOP) for forensic soils investigation in Brazil,” Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, vol. 43, no.44, pp.1-30, 2019.
• C. E. Dong, J. B. Webb, M. C. Bottrell, I. Saginor, B. D. Lee, L. A. Stern, “Strengths, limitations and recommendations for ınstrumental color measurement in forensic soil characterization,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 438–449, 2020.
• M. A. S. Laidlaw, G. M. Filippelli, S. Brown, J. Paz-Ferreiro, S. M. Reichman, “Case studies and evidence-based approaches to addressing urban soil lead contamination,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 83, pp. 14–30, 2017.
• U. Barman, R. D. Choudhury, “Soil texture classification using multi class support vector machine,” Agriculture, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 318–332, 2020.
• X. Xu, C. Du, F. Ma, Y. Shen, J. Zhou, “Forensic soil analysis using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) and Fourier transform infrared total attenuated reflectance spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR): Principles and case studies,” Forensic Science International, vol. 310, p. 110-222, 2020.
• P. Sangwan, T. Nain, K. Singal, N. Hooda, N. Sharma, “Soil as a tool of revelation in forensic science: a review,” Anal Methods, vol. 12, no. 43, pp. 5150–5159, 2020.
• B. G. Rawlins, S. J. Kemp, E. H. Hodgkinson, J. B. Riding, C. H. Vane,C. Poulton, K. Freeborough “Potential and pitfalls in establishing the provenance of earth-related samples in forensic investigations,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 832–845, 2006.
• M. B. Alexander, T. K. Hodges, J. Bytheway, J. A. Aitkenhead-Peterson, “Application of soil in forensic science: residual odor and HRD dogs,” Forensic Science International, vol. 249, pp. 304–313, 2015.
• C. Brasseur, J. Dekeirsschieter, E. M. J. Schotsmans, S. Koning, A. S. Wilson, E. Haubruge, J. F. Focant, “Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the forensic study of cadaveric volatile organic compounds released in soil by buried decaying pig carcasses,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1255, pp. 163–170, 2012.
• R. Chauhan, R. Kumar, V. Kumar, K. Sharma, V. Sharma, “On the discrimination of soil samples by derivative diffuse reflectance UV–vis-NIR spectroscopy and chemometric methods,” Forensic Science International, vol. 319, p. 110-655, 2021.
• D. Pirrie, “Testing the efficiency of soil recovery from clothing for analysis by SEM-EDS,” Forensic Science International, vol. 289, pp. 83–91, 2018.
• Y. Marumo, “Forensic examination of soil evidence,” Japanese Journal of Forensic Science vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 95–111, 2003.
• J. Sheffield, G. Goteti, F. Wen, E. F. Wood, “A simulated soil moisture based drought analysis for the United States,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 109, no. 24, p. 2004-5182, 2004.
• Z. Fan, J. Herrick, J. Zee, “Measurement of Soil Color: A Comparison Between Smartphone Camera and the Munsell Color Charts,” Soil Science Society America Journal, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1139–1146, 2017.
• R. W. Fitzpatrick, “Soil: forensic analysis,” Wiley Encyclopedia Forensic of Science, A. Moenssens, Forensic Consultant, USA, Wiley-Blackwell, 2009 pp. 1–14.
• B. Turner, P. Wiltshire, “Experimental validation of forensic evidence: a study of the decomposition of buried pigs in a heavy clay soil,” Forensic Science International, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 1999.
• Y. Tkachenko, P. Niedzielski, “FTIR as a method for qualitative assessment of solid samples in geochemical research: A review,” Molecules, vol. 27, no. 24, p. 88-109, 2022.
• M. A. Shirazi, L. Boersma, “A Unifying Quantitative Analysis of Soil Texture,” Soil Science Society America Journal, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 142–147, 1984.
• P. A. Bull, A. Parker, R. M. Morgan, “The forensic analysis of soils and sediment taken from the cast of a footprint,” Forensic Science International, vol. 162, no. 1–3, pp. 6–12, 2006.
• A. H. Munsell, Munsell soil color charts. New Windsor: Gretagmacbeth, 2000.
• C. Peltre, E. G. Gregorich, S. Bruun, L. S. Jensen, J. Magid, “Repeated application of organic waste affects soil organic matter composition: evidence from thermal analysis, FTIR-PAS, amino sugars and lignin biomarkers,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 104, pp. 117–127, 2017.
• F. Gökmen, “Evaluation of the effect of tillage methods on soil quality,” Master’s Thesis, Institute of Science, 2011.