Right-Wing and Left-Wing Populism: A Comparative Analysis of Rhetoric, Ideology, and Policy Practices

Öz

This study focuses on populism’s rhetoric, target audience, and policy practices. The aim of the study is to analyze the differences and commonalities in the rhetoric, target audience, and ideological foundations of both right-wing and left-wing populism. In this context, both types of populism are systematically compared in terms of their discursive, ideological, and common dynamics. Drawing on theoretical discussions in the populism literatüre, this study also seeks to develop a conceptual framework for right-wing and left-wing populism. The main method of the study, which utilizes qualitative data collection techniques, is theoretical-comparative analysis. Additionally, sysematic literature analysis and qualitative content analysis were utilized for daya classification, while qualitative-descriptive analysis was used for data evaluation. The main findings of the study are as follows: The flexible nature of populism becomes evident in the ideology, rhetoric, and target audience elements of both right-wing and left-wing populism. While populist actors ideological foundations, rhetoric, and target audience manifest in their attitudes towards globalization and economic approaches, the differences between rigth-wing and left-wing populism become more pronounced. In both types of populism, charismatic leadership, anti-elitism, anti-establishment, and the politics of simplicity stand out as common dynamics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Populism
• Right-Wing Populism
• Left-Wing Populism
• Populist parties
• Populist Leadership

Sağ ve Sol Popülizm: Retorik, İdeoloji ve Politika Pratikleri Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışma popülizmin retorik, hedef kitle ve politika pratiklerine odaklanmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı sağ ve sol popülizmin; retorik, hedef kitle ve ideolojik temellerindeki farklılık ve ortak unsurların analiz edilmesidir. Bu bağlamda her iki popülizm türü söylemsel, ideolojik ve ortak dinamikler açısından sistematik bir şekilde karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışmada popülizm literatüründeki teorik tartışmalardan hareket edilerek sağ ve sol popülizm için kavramsal bir çerçeve geliştirilmesi hedeflenmektedir. Nitel veri toplama tekniklerinden yararlanılan çalışmanın ana yöntemi teorik-karşılaştırmalı analizdir. Bununla birlikte sistematik literatür analizi ve verilerin sınıflandırılmasında nitel içerik analizi yönteminden; verilerin değerlendirilmesinde ise nitel-betimsel analiz yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Bu bilgiler ışığında çalışmada ulaşılan başlıca bulgular şu şekildedir: Popülizmin esnek doğası sağ ve sol popülizmin ideoloji, retorik ve hedef kitle unsurlarında belirginlik kazanmaktadır. Popülist aktörlerin ideolojik temelleri retorik ve hedef kitle, küreselleşmeye karşı tutum ve ekonomik yaklaşımlarda ortaya çıkarken sağ ve sol popülizm arasındaki farklılıklar belirginleşmektedir. Her iki popülizm türünde karizmatik liderlik, antielitizm, antikurumsallık ve basitlik siyaseti ortak dinamikler olarak dikkat çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Popülizm
• Sağ Popülizm
• Sol Popülizm
• Popülist Partiler
• Popülist Liderlik

Kaynakça

1. Abts, K. & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55, 404-424.
2. Agustin, O. G. (2020). Left- wing populism. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
3. Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre. In Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (Eds.), Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 1-14) Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Alonso, S., & Fonseca, S. C. D. (2012). Immigration, left and right. Party Politics, 18(6), 865-884.
5. Aydın, K. & Hanağası, U. B. (2017). Sosyoloji ve siyasal araştırmalarda karşılaştırmalı yöntem. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 33, 57-86.
6. Bajo-Rubio, O., & Yan. H-D. (2019). Globalization and populism. In F.-L. Yu & D. Kwan (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in International Political Economy (pp. 229-252), Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, Retrieved June 20, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333298292_Globalization_and_Populism
7. Barr, R. R. (2009). Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics, 15(1), 29-48.
8. Belge, M. (2018). “Siz isterseniz…” Popülizm üzerine yazılar. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

9. Betz, H-G. (1994). Radical right- wing populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
10. Betz, H-G. & Johnson, C. (2004). Against the current-stemming the tide: The nostalgic ideology of the contemporary radical populist right. Journal of Political Ideologies. 9(3), 311-327.
11. Bischof, D. & Senninger, R. (2018). Simple politics for the people? Complexity in campaign messages and political knowledge. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 473-495.
12. Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right: The significance of a political distinction. (Trans. Allan Cameron) Chicago: The Universitiy of Chicago Press.
13. Bolton, Kerry R. (2014). Perón and Perónism: The life and thougts of Juan Domingo Perón. London: Black House Publishing.
14. Boztaş, Ş. (2023). Offensive, hostile and unrepentant: Geert Wilders in his own words. The Guardian. Retrieved September 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/24/offensive-hostile-and-unrepentant-geert-wilders-in-his-own-words?
15. Böhmelt, T. (2021). Populism and environmental performance. Global Environmental Politics, 21(3), 97-123.
16. Bulduklu, Y. (2019). Eleştirel çalışmalarda nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak gömülü teori. Kritik İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 1-14. Cambridge Dictionary. (2025). “Populism” Retrieved July 12, 2025, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/populism.
17. Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. New York and London: Harcourt Publisher.
18. Canovan, M. (1984). People, politicians and populism. Government and Opposition, 19(3), 312-327.
19. Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2-16.
20. Carlisle, R.P. (2005). Introduction. In Carlisle, R. P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Politics: The left and the righ: The right (pp. vii-ix), California: Sage Publications.
21. Chávez, H. (2004). Discurso de toma de posesion presidencial. Democracia Sur. Retrieved September 26, 2025, from https://democraciasur.com/2004/08/02/hugo-chavez-discurso-de-toma-de-posesion-presidencial/
22. Çin, G. (2024). Bir sendrom olarak popülizm: Popülist antagonizmanın siyaset psikolojisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 79(1), 89-110.
23. Craig, A, (1976). Perón and Peronism: Personalism personified. International Journal, 31(4), 703-714.
24. Decker, F. (2008). Germany: Right-wing populist failures and left-wing successes. In Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (Eds.), Twenty-first century populism: the spectre of western European democracy (pp. 119-134), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. De Cleen, B. (2017). Populism and nationalism. In Kaltwasser, C.R, Taggart, P., Espejo, P.O. & Ostiguy, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 342-362), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Della Porta, D., Fernandez, J., Kouki, H., & Mosca, L. (2017). Movement parties againts austerity. Cambridge: Politiy Press.
27. De Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423-438.
28. Di Tella, T. S. (1965). Populism and reform in Latin America. In C. Veliz (Ed.), Obstacles to change in Latin America (pp. 47-74), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Dornbusch, R. & Edwards, S. (1991). The macroeconomics of populism. In Dornbusch, R. & Edwards, S. (Eds.), The macroeconomics of populism in Latin America (pp. 7-13), Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
30. Dyer, Witheford, N. (2020). Left populism and platform capitalism. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 18(1), 116-131.
31. Eatwell, R. & Goodwin, M. (2018). National populism: The revolt against liberal democracy. London: Penguin.
32. Eklundh, E., Stengel, F. A. & Wojczewski, T. (2024). Left populism and foreign policy: Bernie Sanders and Podemos. International Affairs, 100(5), 1899-1918.
33. Finchelstein, F. (2021). Faşizmden popülizme. (Çev. Ali Karatay, 2. Baskı), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
34. Frank, T. (2020). The people, no: A brief history of anti-populism. New York: Metropolitan Books.
35. Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Fuentes, J. F. (2020). Populism: The timeline of a concept. Contributions to the History of Concepts, 15(1), 47-68.
37. Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The Future of radical politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38. Gidron, N. & Bonikowski, B. (2013). Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda. (Working Paper No. 13-0004). Cambridge, MA: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. Retrieved July 20, 2025, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2459387
39. Glare, P.G.W. (Ed.). (1968). Oxford Latin dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
40. Hedges, J. (2021). Juan Perón: The life of the people’s colonel. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
41. Heywood, A. (2017). Political ideologies: An Introduction (6th ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Ignazi, P. (2006). Extreme right parties in Western Europe. Oxford: Paperback Edition.
43. Inglehart, R. F. & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. (Working Paper Series No. RWP16-026). Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. Retrieved June 20, 2025, from https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/trump-brexit-and-rise-populism-economic-have-nots-and-cultural-backlash
44. Ionescu, G. & Gellner, E. (Eds.). (1969). Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics. Letchworth: The Garden City Press.
45. Kaya, M. (2019). ABD-Çin ticaret savaşları ve Türkiye, Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, 18-30.
46. Khoros, V. (1984). Populism: Its past, present and future. Moskow: Progress Publisher.
47. Kıvrak Köroğlu, E. (2020). Farklı popülizm yaklaşımları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 39, 73-87.
48. Kjeldgaard- Christiansen, J. (2024). The voice of the people: Populism and Donald Trump’s use of informal voice. Society, 61(1), 41-53.
49. Knapp, A. & Wright, W. (2006). The government and politics of France (5th Ed.). New York: Routledge.
50. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London and New York: Verso.
51. Löfflmann, G. (2019). America first and the populist impact on us foreign policy. Survival, 61(6), 115-138.
52. March, L. (2007). From vanguard of the proletariat to vax populi: Left-populism as a ‘shadow’ of contemporary socialism. SAIS Review, 27(1), 63-77.
53. March, L. (2017). Left and right populism compared: The British case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 282-303.
54. McKay, Ben M. & Colque, G. (2024). Populism and ıts authoritarian tendencies: The politics of division in Bolivia, Latin American Perspectives, 259(51), 51-67.
55. Moffitt, B. (2014). How to perform crisis: A model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism. Government and Opposition. 50(2), 189-217.
56. Moffitt, B. (2021). Popülizmin küresel yükselişi: Performans, siyasi üslup ve temsil. (Çev. Onur Özgür, 2. Baskı), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
57. Mouffe, C. (2005). The ‘end of politics’ and the challenge of right- wing populism. In Panizza, F. (Ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 50-71), London ve New York: Verso.
58. Mouffe, C. (2019). Sol popülizm. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
59. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 543-544.
60. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radikal right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). Populism and (liberal) democracy: A framework for analysis. In Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. (Eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Thread or corrective for Democracy? (pp. 1-27), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Mudde, C. (2017). Populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. In Mudde, C. (Ed.), The Populist Radical Right (pp. 424-439), London and New York: Routledge.
64. Müller, J-W. (2018). Popülizm nedir?. (Çev. Onur Yıldız, 2. Baskı), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
65. Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism: A socio-cultural approach. In Kaltwasser, C.R, Taggart, P., Espejo, P.O., & Ostiguy, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 73-97), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. Pelinka, A. (2013). Right-wing populism: concept and typology. In Wodak, R. & Khosravinik, Mral, B. (Eds.), Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse (pp. 3-22), London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
68. Ramiro, L & Gómez, R. (2017). Radical-left populism during the great recession: Podemos and ıts competition with the established radical left. Political Studies, 65(1_suppl), 108-126.
69. Roberts, K. (2017). Populism and political parties. In Kaltwasser, C.R, Taggart, P., Espejo, P.O. & Ostiguy, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 287-304), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Rodrik, D. (2021). Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. Annual Review of Economics, 13(1), 133-170.
71. Rossi, F. M. (2013). Perónism, In Snow, D., Della Porta, D., Klandermans, B., & McAdam, D. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 925-928), Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
72. Röth, L., Afonso, A. & Spies, D. C. (2018). The impact of populist right parties on socio-economic policies. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 325- 350.
73. Salmela, M. & Von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567-595.
74. Spike, J. (2023). Orbán blasts Europea Union on the anniversary of Hungary’s 1956 anti-Soviet uprising. AP News, Retrieved September 26, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/hungary-orban-compares-eu-to-soviet-union-da27ae5e15df87712422a567ceac7e9b
75. Stavrakakis, Y. & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119-142.
76. Stavrakakis, Y., Kioupkiolis, A., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., & Siomos, T. (2016). Contemporary Left-wing populism in Latin America: Leadership, horizontalism, and postdemocracy in Chávez’s Venezuela, Latin American Politics and Society, 58(3), 51-76.
77. Taggart, P. (2000). Concept in the social sciences populism. Buckingam- Philadelphia: Open University Press.
78. Taguieff, P-A. (1995). Political science confronts populism: From a conceptual mirage to a real problem. Telos, 103, 9-43.
79. The White House. (2021). Immigration. The White House, Retrieved September 26, 2025, from https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/issues/immigration/
80. Tierno, P. C. (2020). Left-wing populism and feminist politics: The case of Evo Morales Bolivia (2006-2018). (Doctoral Dissertation). Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona. Retrived June, 20, 2025, from http://hdl.handle.net/10803/670445
81. Toprak, Z. (1992). Popülizm ve Türkiye’deki Boyutları. In Tarih ve Demokrasi: Tarık Zafer Tunaya’ya Armağan (ss. 41-65). İstanbul: Cem Yayınları.
82. Tushnet, M. (2019). Varieties of populism. German Law Journal, 20(3), 382-389.
83. Uslu, C. (2021). Bir ideoloji olarak popülizm, Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 217-230.
84. Verdú, D. (2024). Marine Le Pen: “I am deeply Euroskeptic; The way the EU Works is anti-democratic and anti-national”, El País. Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://english.elpais.com/international/2024-12-19/marine-le-pen-i-am-deeply-euroskeptic-the-way-the-eu-works-is-anti-democratic-and-anti-national.html?
85. Weyland, K. (2001). “Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American Politics”, Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1-22.
86. Wilcox, B. (2015). Stanford scholar unpacks the rhetoric behind extremist politician’s mainstream success, Stanford News, Retrieved September 26, 2025 from, https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2015/04/extremism-france-alduy-041615?
87. Wiles, P. (1969). A syndrome, not a doctrine. In Ionescu, G. & Gellner, E. (Eds.), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics (pp. 166-179), Letchworth: The Garden City Press.