Performance Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Frame System According ‎to TBEC-2018 ‎

Öz

In Turkey located on active earthquake zone, earthquake resistant ‎building design becomes more important with the rapidly increasing ‎population and urbanization. In the great earthquakes occurred in our ‎country for centuries, many people lost their lives after the earthquake ‎damaged the buildings and this also increase the importance of ‎building an earthquake resistant structure. The performance based ‎seismic design evaluates how the buildings are likely to implement ‎under an earthquake motion and is comprised linear elastic and ‎nonlinear elastic methods in recent seismic codes. In this study, the ‎performance based design of a four-storey and three-span reinforced ‎concrete frame system is performed according to the Turkish Building ‎Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018). The nonlineer static pushover ‎analysis of the reinforced concrete (RC) frame system carried out for ‎DD-2 level earthquake and it has been determined whether it has the ‎performance criteria targeted in the code.‎

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Earthquake ‎Resistant Structures ‎Design,Pushover Analysis,Performance Based ‎Design,TBEC-2018‎

Kaynakça

1. Allahabadi R., 1987, Drain 2DX – Seismic Response and Damage Assessment for 2D ‎Structures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, California.‎
2. ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, 1996, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete ‎Buildings, Volume 1-2, Redwood City, California‎
3. Behnam B., 2017., Post-earthquake fire analysis in Urban Structures: Risk management ‎strategies, CRC Press, Taylor& Francis Group, US
4. Bracci J.M., Kunnath S.K. and Reinhorn A.M., 1997, Seismic Performance and Retrofit ‎Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, ‎Vol. 123, 3-10.‎
5. Chaudhari D.J. and Dhoot G.O., 2016. Performance Based Seismic Design of Reinforced ‎Concrete Building, Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 6, 188-194‎
6. Chpopra A.K. and Goel R.K., 2001, A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic ‎demands for buildings: Theory and preliminary evaluation, Report No PEER 2001/03, ‎Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, ‎California.‎
7. COLA, City of Los Angeles, 1995, Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Reinforced ‎Concrete Buildings and Concrete Frame Buildings with Masonry Infills, January 31, 1995.‎
8. Çavdar Ö., 2019. Investigation of the earthquake performance of a reinforced concrete shear ‎wall hotel using nonlinear methods, International Journal of Science and Engineering ‎Applications, 8-12, 509-516‎

9. Eberhard M.O. and Sözen M.A., 1993, Behavior-Based Method to Determine Design Shear in ‎Earthquake Resistant Walls, Journal of the Structural Division, American Society of Civil ‎Engineers, New York, Vol. 119, No.2, 619-640.‎
10. Fajfar P. and Fischinger M., 1987, Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of R/C Buildings: Implications of ‎a Case Study, European Earthquake Engineering, 31-43.‎
11. FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000, Pre-standard and Commentary for ‎Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington DC
12. Gupta B., 1999, Enhanced Pushover Procedure and Inelastic Demand Estimation for ‎Performance-Based Seismic Evaluation of Buildings, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of ‎Central Florida, Orlando, FL.‎
13. Kim S. and D’Amore E., 1999. Push-over analysis procedures in earthquake engineering. ‎Earthq. Spectra. ISGL August. 417-434.‎
14. Krawinkler H. and Seneviratna G.D.P.K., 1998, Pros and Cons of a Pushover Analysis of ‎Seismic Performance Evaluation, Engineering Structures, Vol.20, 452- 464‎
15. Inel M. and Ozmen H.B., 2006. Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of ‎reinforced concrete buildings, Engineering Structures 28, 494–1502‎
16. Moghadam A.S., 2002., A Pushover Procedure for Tall Buildings, 12th European Conference on ‎Earthquake Engineering, Paper Reference 395.‎
17. Mwafy A.M. and Elnashai A.S., 2001, Static Pushover versus Dynamic Analysis of R/C ‎Buildings, Engineering Structures, Vol. 23, 407-424.‎
18. Oğuz S., 2005, Evaluatıon of pushover analysıs procedures for frame structures, Master Thesis, ‎Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
19. Response 2000, Sectional Analysis Program, University of Toronto, Toronto
20. SAP2000 V21.1.0, 2019: Structural Analysis Program, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, ‎California
21. Sasaki F., Freeman S. and Paret T., 1998, Multi-Mode Pushover Procedure (MMP)- A Method to ‎Identify the Effect of Higher Modes in a Pushover Analysis, Proc. 6th U.S. National ‎Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, CD-ROM, EERI, Oakland.‎
22. TBEC-2018, (Turkish Building Earthquake Code), Specifications for buildings to be built in ‎seismic areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey