Yıl 2020, Cilt 11 , Sayı 1, Sayfalar 9 - 14 2020-03-03

Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and the Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study
Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study

Fatma Ayşe ŞANAL [1] , Hamiyet KILINÇ [2]


Amaç:Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı renkte akrilik yapay dişin renk stabilitelerinin ve farklı protez temizleme yöntemlerinin renklenmeyi gidermedeki etkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesidir. 

Gereç ve Yöntem:50 adet A1 ve A2 renkte yapay dişin her biri için ilk renk ölçümleri spektrofotometre kullanılarak yapıldı. Örnekler 72 s boyunca renklendirici solusyonda bekletildi ve ikinci renk ölçümleri gerçekleştirildi. Renklenen A1 ve A2 yapay dişler, protez temizleme yöntemine göre Corega 5-dak (A1 için 1C5, A2 için 2C5 Grupları), Corega 3-dak (1C3 ve 2C3 Grupları), Protefix 3-dak (1P3 ve 2P3 Grupları), fırçalama (1B, 2B Grupları) ve distile su (1 kontrol, 2 kontrol Grupları) olarak rastgele 5 alt gruba ayrıldı. Renklenmiş dişlere ilgili protez temizleme işlemlerinin uygulanmasının ardından üçüncü renk ölçümleri gerçekleştirildi. İlk renk değişimi (ΔE1) değerleri ilk ve ikinci renk ölçümlerine göre hesaplanırken, ikinci renkdeğişimi (ΔE2) değerleri ikinci ve üçüncü renk ölçümlerine göre hesaplandı. A1 ve A2 renk grupların ΔEdeğerleri arasındaki farklılıklar Independent Samples Test ile analiz edildi. ΔEdeğerleri çift yönlü varyans analizi (2-way ANOVA) ile test edildi. Çoklu karşılaştırmalar Tukey HSD testi ile yapıldı. 

Sonuçlar:Tüm gruplarda ΔE1değerleri A2 renkli yapay dişler için daha yüksek iken, ΔEdeğerleri A1 renkli yapay dişler için daha yüksek idi (p<0.05). İncelenen protez temizleme yöntemleri hem A1 hem A2 renkli yapay dişler için kontrol grubundan daha yüksek ΔE2değerlerine neden oldu (p<0.05). A1 renkli yapay dişler için, en yüksek ΔEdeğerleri Grup 1C3 için elde edildi (p<0.05). A2 renkli yapay dişler için, test gruplarının ΔEdeğerleri benzer idi (p>0.05). 

Sonuç: Yapay diş rengi ve protez temizleme metodu ΔE değerleri üzerinde etkilidir. 

Objective:The objective of the present study is to evaluate color stability of two different shaded acrylic denture teeth and effectiveness of different cleansing methods on the stain removal.

Material-Method:Baseline color readings of 50 right maxillary central incisors of both A1 and A2 shaded denture teeth were performed with a spectrophotometer. Specimens were immersed in staining solution for 72 h and the second color readings were carried out. Stained A1 and A2 shaded denture teeth were randomly divided into five subgroups according to cleansing methods as Corega 5-min (Groups of 1C5 for A1, 2C5 for A2), Protefix 3-min (Groups of 1P3, 2P3), Corega 3-min (Groups of 1C3, 2C3), brushing (Groups of 1B, 2B), distilled water (Groups of 1control, 2control) (n=10). Third color readings were performed after the related denture cleaning procedures were applied to the stained teeth. First color change (ΔE1) values were calculated according to baseline and second color readings while second color change (ΔE2)values were calculated according to second and third color readings.Differences among ΔEvaluesof the A1 and A2 shaded groups were analyzed with Independent Samples Test. ΔE2values were analyzed with two way analysis of variance (2-way ANOVA). Multiple comparisons were made using the Tukey HSD test.

Results:ΔEvalues were higher for A2 shaded teeth, while ΔE2values were higher for A1 shaded denture teeth (p<0.05) for all groups. The investigated denture cleansing methods caused higher ΔEvalues than the control groups for both A1 and A2 shaded brands (p<0.05). For the A1 shaded brand, the highest ΔEvalue was observed for Group 1C3 (p<0.05). For the A2 shaded brand, ΔEvalues weresimilar among the test groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions:The shade of denture teeth and denture cleansing method had a significant effect on ΔE values.

  • 1. Köksal T, Dikbaş İ. Color stability of different denture teeth materials against various staining agents. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 139-44.
  • 2. Mutlu-Sagesen L, Ergun G, Ozkan Y, Bek B. Color stability of different denture teeth materials: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci 2001; 43: 193-205.
  • 3. Alam M, Jagger R, Vowles R, Moran J. Comparative stain removal properties of four commercially available denture cleaning products: an in vitro study. Int J Dent Hyg 2011; 9: 37–42.
  • 4. Jagger DC, Harrison A. Denture cleansing – the best approach. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 413–17.
  • 5. Jagger DC, Al-Akhazam L, Harrison A, Rees JS. The effectiveness of seven denture cleansers on tea stain removal from PMMA acrylic resin. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 549–52.
  • 6. Al-Huraishi H, Moran J, Jagger R, MacDonald E. Evaluation of stain removal and inhibition properties of eight denture cleansers: an in vitro study. Gerodontology 2013; 30: 10–7.
  • 7. Kurtulmuş-Yılmaz S, Deniz ST. Evaluation of staining susceptibility of resin artificial teeth and stain removal efficacy of denture cleansers. Acta Odont Scandinavica 2014; 72: 811-8.
  • 8. Moon A, Powers JM, Kiat-amnuav S. Color stability of denture teeth and acrylic base resin subjected daily to various consumer cleansers. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 247-55.
  • 9. Haruyama O, Kameyama A, Ono T, Baba Y, Sugiyama T, Sugiyama S, et al. Combined effects of electric toothbrushing and dentifrice on artificial stain removal: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10: 200-5.
  • 10. Zoidis P, Polychronakis N, Lagouvardos P, Polyzois G, Ngo H C. Evaluation of a realistic cleansing protocol for preventing discoloration of denture resins. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 89-95.
  • 11. Hollis S, Eisenbeisz E, Versluis A. Color stability of denture resins after staining and exposure to cleansing agents. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 144: 709-14.
  • 12. Yamanel K. Farklı İçeceklerin Diş Rengindeki Restoratif Materyallerin Renk Stabiliteleri Üzerine Etkisi. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Derg 2018; 9: 26-31.
  • 13. Güler AU, Güler E, Yücel AÇ, Ertaş E. Effects of polishing procedures on color stability of composite resins. J Applied Oral Sci 2009; 17: 108-12.
  • 14. Garcia-Godoy F, Ellacuria J. Effectiveness of Sonicare power too¬thbrush to remove chlorhexidine stains. Am J Dent. 2002; 15: 290-2.
  • 15. Terézhalmy GT, He T, Walters PA, Grender JM, Biesbrock AR. Clinical assessment of extrinsic stain removal efficacy with a new pul¬sonic toothbrush. J Clin Dent. 2009; 20: 71-4.
  • 16. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 200–8.
  • 17. Kuehni RG, Marcus RT. An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences. Col Res Appl 1979; 4: 83–91.
  • 18. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1760-4.
  • 19. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 819–22.
  • 20. Alghazali N, Burnside G, Moallem M, Smith P, Preston A, Jarad FD. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth. J Dent 2012; 40: 10–7.
  • 21. Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987; 3: 246–51.
  • 22. Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 254–60.
  • 23. Regain JC Jr, Johnston WM. Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers. Col Res Appl 2000; 25: 278–85.
  • 24. Gregorius WC, Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre CJ, Roggenkamp CL, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Effects of ageing and staining on color of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Dent 2012; 40: 47-54.
Birincil Dil en
Konular Sağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetleri
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-2864-6589
Yazar: Fatma Ayşe ŞANAL (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0001-8055-3470
Yazar: Hamiyet KILINÇ
Kurum: BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.
Ülke: Turkey


Destekleyen Kurum -
Proje Numarası -
Teşekkür -
Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 3 Mart 2020

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { sdusbed593979, journal = {Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi}, issn = {2146-1937}, eissn = {2146-247X}, address = {}, publisher = {Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi}, year = {2020}, volume = {11}, pages = {9 - 14}, doi = {}, title = {Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study}, key = {cite}, author = {ŞANAL, Fatma Ayşe and KILINÇ, Hamiyet} }
APA ŞANAL, F , KILINÇ, H . (2020). Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi , 11 (1) , 9-14 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sdusbed/issue/52830/593979
MLA ŞANAL, F , KILINÇ, H . "Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 11 (2020 ): 9-14 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sdusbed/issue/52830/593979>
Chicago ŞANAL, F , KILINÇ, H . "Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 11 (2020 ): 9-14
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study AU - Fatma Ayşe ŞANAL , Hamiyet KILINÇ Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - DO - T2 - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 9 EP - 14 VL - 11 IS - 1 SN - 2146-1937-2146-247X M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study %A Fatma Ayşe ŞANAL , Hamiyet KILINÇ %T Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study %D 2020 %J Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi %P 2146-1937-2146-247X %V 11 %N 1 %R %U
ISNAD ŞANAL, Fatma Ayşe , KILINÇ, Hamiyet . "Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 11 / 1 (Mart 2020): 9-14 .
AMA ŞANAL F , KILINÇ H . Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 11(1): 9-14.
Vancouver ŞANAL F , KILINÇ H . Staining Susceptibilities of Two Different Shaded Acrylic Denture Teeth and Effectiveness of Brushing Versus Denture Cleansers on the Stain Removal: An in Vitro Study. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 11(1): 14-9.