PERİYODİK SAĞLIK MUAYENELERİ İLE İŞ SAĞLIĞI VE GÜVENLİĞİ İKLİMİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: BİR SAĞLIK KURUMU ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Bu araştırma, bir üniversite hastanesinde görev yapmakta olan çalışanların (n:229) periyodik sağlık muayeneleri ile iş sağlığı ve güvenliği iklimini değerlendirmek amacıyla gerçekleştirildi. Veriler, literatür doğrultusunda araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan anketler kullanarak iki aşamada toplandı. Birinci aşamada çalışanların periyodik sağlık verileri incelenirken ikinci aşamada çalışanların iş sağlığı ve güvenliğiyle ilgili görüşleri değerlendirildi. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde tanımlayıcı istatistiksel yöntemlerin yanı sıra nicel verilerin analizinde One Way Anova, Mann Whitney U ve Kruskal Wallis Testi’nden yararlanıldı. Anlamlılık p<0,05 ve p<0,001 düzeyinde değerlendirildi. Çalışanların; %71,6’sının takip etmesi gereken periyodik sağlık muayeneleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olduğu ve %74,7’sinin bu muayeneleri düzenli olarak yaptırdığı belirlendi. Ayrıca çalışanların, %63,3’ünün periyodik sağlık muayenelerini sağlığın korunmasında etkili buldukları ve orta düzeyin üzerinde bu muayeneleri gerekli gördükleri tespit edildi. Bu araştırmada çalışanların periyodik sağlık muayenelerine karşı genel yaklaşımlarının ve bilinç düzeylerinin önemli bir sağlık yönetimi farkındalığı olarak karşımıza çıktığı söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İş sağlığı
• örgüt kültürü
• sağlık muayeneleri

EVALUATION OF PERIODIC HEALTH EXAMINATIONS AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY CLIMATE: A CASE STUDY FROM A HEALTHCARE INSTITUTION

Öz

This study was conducted to evaluate the periodic health examinations and the occupational health and safety climate experienced by employees (n = 229) working in a university hospital. Data were collected in two stages using questionnaires prepared by the researchers in line with the literature. In the first stage, the employees’ periodic health data were reviewed, while in the second stage, their opinions on occupational health and safety were evaluated. Descriptive statistical methods were used for data analysis, and One Way ANOVA, Mann Whitney U, and Kruskal Wallis tests were employed for quantitative data analysis. Statistical significance was evaluated at the levels of p<0.05 and p<0.001. It was found that 71.6% of the participants were informed about the periodic health examinations they needed to undergo, and 74.7% underwent these examinations regularly. Additionally, 63.3% of the employees perceived periodic health examinations as effective in protecting their health and considered them necessary at a level above moderate. The general approach and awareness levels of employees toward periodic health examinations can be considered an important indicator of health management awareness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Occupational Health
• Organizational Culture
• Health Examinations.

Kaynakça

1. Alpar, R. (2020). Spor Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilimlerinden Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik - Güvenirlik. Detay Yayıncılık.
2. Alzahrani, A.M., Felix, H.C., ve Al-Etesh, N.S. (2023). Characteristics associated with knowledge about periodic health examinations among adults in al-jouf region, KSA. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 18(3), 652-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.11.005
3. Chien, S.Y., Chuang, M.C., ve Chen, I.P. (2020). Why people do not attend health screenings: factors that influence willingness to participate in health screenings for chronic diseases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103495
4. Daniels, K., Watson, D., Nayani, R., Tregaskis, O., Hogg, M., Etuknwa, A., ve Semkina, A. (2021). Implementing practices focused on workplace health and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 277, 113888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113888
5. Foncubierta-Rodríguez, M.J., Poza-Méndez, M., ve Holgado-Herrero, M. (2024). Workplace health promotion programs: The role of compliance with workers' expectations, the reputation and the productivity of the company. Journal of Safety Research, 89, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.02.008
6. Gamal, N.L., Taneo, S.Y.M., ve Halim, L. (2022). Job satisfaction as a mediation variable in the relationship between work safety and health (k3) and work environment to employee performance. Journal Aplikasi Manajemen, 16(3), 486-493. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.03.13
7. Ginsburg, O., Yip, C., Brooks, A., Cabanes, A., Caleffi, M., Dunstan Yataco, J.A., Gyawali, B., McCormack, V., McLaughlin De Anderson, M., Mehrotra, R., Mohar, A., Murillo, R., Pace, L.E., Paskett, E.D., Romanoff, A., Rositch, A.F., Scheel, J.R., Schneidman, M., Unger‐Saldaña, K., Vanderpuye, V., ...ve Anderson, B.O. (2020). Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation. Cancer, 126(10), 2379–2393. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32887
8. Hakro, S., ve Jinshan, L. (2019). Workplace employees' annual physical checkup and during hire on the job to increase health-care awareness perception to prevent disease risk: A work for policy-implementable option globally. Safety and Health at Work, 10(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.08.005

9. Magalhães, L.M.C.A., Silva Costa, K.T.D., Capistrano, G.N., Leal, M.D., ve de Andrade, F.B. (2022). A study on occupational health and safety. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14584-w
10. Passey, D.G., Brown, M.C., Hammerback, K., Harris, J.R., ve Hannon, P.A. (2018). Managers’ support for employee wellness programs: An integrative review. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32(8), 1789-1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118764856
11. Rabiei, H., Akbari, H., Davoudi, N., ve Bahrami, A. (2020). Changes in the results of periodic occupational examinations in four years: A longitudinal study in a steel industry. Occupational Hygiene and Health Promotion. https://doi.org/10.18502/ohhp.v4i1.2994
12. Roczniewska, M., Tafvelin, S., Nielsen, K., von Thiele Schwarz, U., Miech, E. J., Hasson, H., ... ve Sørensen, O.H. (2024). Simple roads to failure, complex paths to success: An evaluation of conditions explaining perceived fit of an organizational occupational health intervention. Applied Psychology, 73(3), 1103-1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12502
13. Schaller, A., Stassen, G., Baulig, L., ve Lange, M. (2024). Physical activity interventions in workplace health promotion: objectives, related outcomes, and consideration of the setting a scoping review of reviews. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1353119. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1353119
14. Setyawati, R., Astuti, A., Utami, T.P., Adiwijaya, S., ve Hasyim, D.M. (2024). The importance of early detection in disease management. Journal of World Future Medicine, Health and Nursing, 2(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.55849/health.v2i1.692
15. Shan, B., Liu, X., Gu, A., ve Zhao, R. (2022). The effect of occupational health risk perception on job satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042111
16. Tayoun, A.A. (2025). Determinants of periodic health examination uptake: insights from a Jordanian cross-sectional study. JMIRx Med, 6(1), e57597. https://doi.org/10.2196/57597
17. Vu, T.V., Vo-Thanh, T., Nguyen, N.P., Van Nguyen, D., ve Chi, H. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic: Workplace safety management practices, job insecurity, and employees’ organizational citizenship behavior. Safety Science, 145, 105527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105527