Local Adaptation Towards Climate Change: A Case Study of Iranian Immigrants

Öz

This research paper throws light on a unifying theoretical framework for better understanding the relationship between climate change and income. Different case studies prove that not only poor states but also rich states are affected by climate change, the most vulnerable among them being resource-less countries who have limited financial resources to cope with disasters. Extreme weather conditions threaten lives in these front-line communities, driving people from their homes and jeopardizing food sources and livelihoods, all of them increasing likelihood of more conflict, hunger, and poverty. As an estimate, researchers found that the climate change will lessen average income by 75 percent in 2100 in deprived countries while the richest 20 percent of countries may experience trivial expansion because of their action towards climate change (University of Cambridge, 2019). It will be a unique contribution in a research pool in terms of individual’s behavior towards climate change on the basis of their monthly income because in past many researches are conducted on income inequality and climate change at country level. The core interest of this study is to investigate that; how earning will contribute to inactions of an individual towards climate change. Online and offline questionnaire-based survey was conducted on a sample of 445 comprises of all gender (Iranian Immigrants) in Sweden. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. The study reveals that Income contributed a lot towards buying behaviors in relation of climate change.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Climate Change
• GDP
• GNP
• TRA
• TBP
• PPI

Kaynakça

1. Adams, H. (2016). Why populations persist: mobility, place attachment and climate change. Population and Environment, 37, 429-448. [Online Available at]: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-015-0246-3
2. Amnesty International. Climate Change. [Online Available at]: https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/climate-change/
3. Amadae, S. M., n.d. Rational Choice Theory. Encyclopedia Britannica [Online Available at]: https://www.britannica.com/topic/rational-choice-theory#ref307955
4. Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive Theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1- 60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [Online Available at]: https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1989ACD.pd
5. Carson, R. T., (2009). The environmental Kuznets curve: seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Review of environmental Economics and Policy, 4(1), pp.3-23. [Online Available at]:https://econweb.ucsd.edu/~rcarson/papers/Reep2010.pdf
6. Colarossi, J., (2015). The World’s Richest People Emit the Most Carbon. Our World. United nation University [online available at]: https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/the-worlds-richest-people- also-emit-the-most-carbon
7. Dalen, M. H., Halvorsen, B., (2011). Gender differences in environmental related behavior. Statistisksentralbyrå. Statistics Norway. [Online Available at]: https://www.ssb.no/a/english/publikasjoner/pdf/rapp_201138_en/rapp_201138_en.pdf
8. Ganti, A. (2019). Rational Choice Theory. Investopedia. [Online Available at]: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rational-choice-theory.asp

9. Hourticq, J., Megevand, C., Tollens, E., Wehkamp, J., & Dulal, H., (2013). Deforestation Trends in the Congo Basin Reconciling Economic Growth and Forest Protection. Africa Region The World Bank [Online Available at]: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/865081468010199196/pdf/779380NWP0P1160Agr iculture0Sectoral.pdf
10. Klein, N. (2015). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Simon and Schuster.[Online Available at]: This Changes Everything: Capitalism Vs. The Climate - Naomi Klein - Google Books
11. Lippke, S., (2017) Self-Efficacy Theory. In: Zeigler-Hill V., Shackelford T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. [Online Available at]: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1167-1
12. LaMorte, Wayne W., The Theory of Planned Behavior. Behavioral change Model. [Online Available at]: https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/sb/behavioralchangetheories/BehavioralChangeTheories3.html#headingtaglink_1
13. Lopez-Garrido., G. (2020). Self-Efficacy Theory. Simply Psychology. [Online Available at]: https://www.simplypsychology.org/self-efficacy.html
14. McLeman, R. A., & Hunter, L. M. (2010). Migration in the context of vulnerability and adaptation to climate change: insights from analogues. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 450-461. [Online Available at]: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.51
15. McLeman, R. (2013). Developments in modelling of climate change-related migration. Climatic change, 117, 599-611. [Online Available at]: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0578-2
16. Morris, J., Marzano, M., Dandy, N., & O’Brien, L., (2012). Theories and models of behaviour and behaviour change. Forest Research: Surrey, United Kingdom. [Online Available at]: https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/documents/1409/behaviour_review_theory.pdf
17. Oxfam International. (2015). World’s richest 10 % produce half of carbon emissions while poorest 3.5 billion account for just a tenth. [Online Available at]: https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2015-12-02/worlds-richest-10-produce-half- carbon-emissions-while-poorest-35
18. Ogu, M. I., (2013). Rational choice theory: Assumptions, strengths, and greatest weaknesses in application outside the western milieu context. Nigerian Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 62(1087), 1-10. [Online Available at]: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/RATIONAL-CHOICE-THEORY%3A-ASSUMPTIONS%2C-STRENGHTS%2C-AND-Ogu/88f85e51aad54ef5a564e270bf54cc5ba8fdf3da?p2df
19. Ryan, S., Carr, A. (2010). Theory of Planned Behavior. Science Direct. [Online Available at]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/theory-of-planned-behavior
20. Swim, J. K., Clayton, S. and Howard, G. S., (2011). Human behavioral contributions to Climate change: Psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66(4), p.251. [Online Available at]:https://sci-hub.se/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023472
21. Temple, James. (2019). Climate change has already made poor countries poorer and rich countries richer. MIT Technology Review. [Online Available at]: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/613386/climate-change-has-already-made-poor-countries-poorer-and-rich-countries-richer/
22. University of Cambridge. (2019, August 19). Climate change to shrink economies of rich, poor, hot and cold countries alike unless Paris Agreement holds. Science Daily. [Online Available at]: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/08/190819082450.html
23. Uchoa, Pablo. (2019). How global warming has made the rich richer. BBC World Service. [Online Available at]: http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20190502-how-global-warming-has- made-the-rich-richer
24. World Bank. n.d. Theories of Behavior Change. Communication for Governance and Accountability Program [Online Available at]: https://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTGOVACC/Resources/BehaviorChangeweb.pdf
25. Warner, K., & Afifi, T. (2014). Where the rain falls: Evidence from 8 countries on how vulnerable households use migration to manage the risk of rainfall variability and food insecurity. Climate and Development, 6(1), 1-17. [Online Available at]: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2013.835707