A Design Education Framework Proposal for Sustainability

Öz

The rapid production and consumption of design knowledge presents a challenge for integrating up-to-date information into design education, particularly when it comes to Design for Sustainability knowledge. With over fifteen unstructured sustainability approaches and numerous strategies used in design, educators must decide which strategies to teach without a clear criterion. However, a pattern emerges among these approaches, with common and permanent strategies repeating themselves across different approaches. This study aims to identify these carrier pillars of sustainability approaches to establish a basis for Design for Sustainability education. Six main sustainability approaches targeting product design are selected and a comprehensive literature review is conducted to identify explanatory publications containing information about these approaches. By conducting keyword scanning and semantic analysis, the researchers identified common sustainability strategies and linked them to Design for Sustainability strategies. The result is a determination of permanent strategies that can form the basis of a Design for Sustainability education course.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainability
• Sustainability Strategies
• Design
• Design Education

Bir Sürdürülebilirlik için Tasarım Eğitimi Çerçevesi Önerisi

Öz

Çağımızda sadece ürünler değil, tasarım bilgisi de hızla üretilip tüketilir duruma gelmiştir. Bu durum güncel bilgilerin tasarım eğitimine hızla entegre edilmesini zorlaştırmakta, hangi bilgilerin tasarım eğitimine dahil edilip hangilerinin çıkarılacağı konusunda kafa karışıklığına yol açmaktadır. Sürdürülebilirlik için Tasarım bilgisi de bu bilgiler arasındadır. Sürdürülebilirlik için Tasarım bilgisinin kaynağını oluşturan on beşten fazla yapılandırılmamış sürdürülebilirlik yaklaşımı, tasarımda kullanılan sayısız stratejiye sahiptir. Bu çok sayıdaki stratejilerden hangilerinin öğretilmesi gerektiğine yönelik ise bir ölçüt bulunmamakta, karar dersi veren eğitimciye bırakılmaktadır. Yaklaşımlar incelendiğinde bu çok sayıdaki stratejiler arasında bir örüntüye rastlamak mümkündür. Farklı yaklaşımlarda kendini tekrar eden belli başlı, ortak ve kalıcı stratejiler bulunmaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı sürdürülebilirlik yaklaşımlarının taşıyıcı sütunları görevi gören bu ortak ve kalıcı stratejileri belirleyerek Sürdürülebilirlik için Tasarım eğitimi için bir temel oluşturmaktır. Bu stratejileri belirlemek adına ürün tasarımını hedefleyen altı ana sürdürülebilirlik yaklaşımı seçilmiştir. Seçilen yaklaşımlar ile ilgili tanımlayıcı bilgileri içeren yayınları belirlemek için kapsamlı bir literatür taraması yapılmış ve seçilen yayınlar ortak sürdürülebilirlik stratejileri bağlamında incelenmiştir. Ortak stratejiler, anahtar kelime taraması ile tespit edilmiş, ardından, anahtar kelimelerin aynı kavrama atıfta bulunup bulunmadığını doğrulamak için semantik analiz yapılmıştır. Doğrulanmış anahtar kelimeler, Sürdürülebilirlik için Tasarım stratejileriyle bağlantılandırılmıştır. Böylece, Sürdürülebilirlik için Tasarım eğitimi için bir ders temeli oluşturabilecek kalıcı stratejiler belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Sürdürülebilirlik Stratejileri
• Tasarım
• Tasarım Eğitimi

Kaynakça

1. Akar, H. (2019). Durum çalışması. A. Saban & A. Ersoy (Ed.), Eğitimde nitel araştırma desenleri içinde (ss. 139-178). Ankara: Anı
2. Altinay, L., & Paraskevas, A. (2007). Planning research in hospitality & tourism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080555942
3. Anastasiadis, S., Perkiss, S., Dean, B. A., Bayerlein, L., Gonzalez-Perez, M., Wersun, A., Acosta, P., Hannah, J., & Gibbons, B. (2021). Teaching sustainability: complexity and compromises. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2020-0029
4. Andrews, D. (2015). The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Economy, 30(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094215578226
5. Bakker, C., Wang, F, Huisman, J., & Den Hollander M. (2014). Products that go round: Exploring product life extension through design. J. Clean. Prod., 69, 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.028
6. Balbay, S., Sarihan, A., & Avsar, E. (2021). “Circular economy / industrial sustainability” Approach in the world and in Turkey, European Journal of Science and Technology, 27, 557-569. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.971172
7. Berkhout, F., & Hertin J. (2004). De-materialising and re-materialising: Digital technologies and the environment. Futures, 36(8), 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2004.01.003
8. Boulos, S., Sousanoglou, A., Evans, L., Lee, J., King, N. C., Facheris, C., & Donelli, M. (2015). The durability of products: standard assessment for the circular economy: Eco-Innovation Action Plan. Report for European Commission, DG Environment. EU Publications Office. ISBN: 9279520083, 9789279520082

9. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
10. Chang, M. M. L., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2017). Approaches and challenges in product disassembly planning for sustainability. Procedia Cirp, 60, 506-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.013
11. Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, İ. (2019). Design for sustainability: a multi-level framework from products to socio-technical systems. Routledge. ISBN: 9781032089959
12. Chapman, J. (2017). Routledge handbook of sustainable product design. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 9780367200312
13. Dawe, G., Jucker, R., & Martin, S. (2005). Sustainable development in higher education: current practice and future developments. A report to the Higher Education Academy. York (UK). https://documents.advance-he.ac.uk/download/file/document/1893
14. Deniz, D. (2016). Sustainable thinking and environmental awareness through design education. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 34(2016), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.008
15. Doğan, Ç., Turhan, S., & Bakırlıoğlu Y. (2016). Evolving paths: Undergraduate design education through graduate and generative research with a particular focus on sustainability. The Design Journal, 19(4), 85-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1177318
16. Faludi, J., & Gilbert, C. (2019). Best practices for teaching green invention: interviews on design, engineering, and business education J. Clean. Prod., 234, 1246-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.246
17. Faludi, J., Acaroglu, L., Gardien, P., Rapela, A., Sumter, D., & Cooper, C. (2023). Sustainability in the future of design education. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 9(2), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2023.04.004
18. Formentini, G., Favi, C., Moroni, F., & Pirondi, A. (2021). Engineering design in food-packaging industry: The case study of a tuna canning machine. Procedia CIRP, 100, 229-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.060
19. Haines-Gadd, M., Chapman, J., Lloyd, P., Mason, J., & Aliakseyeu, D. (2018). Emotional durability design nine—A tool for product longevity. Sustainability, 10(6), 1948. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061948
20. Heiskanen, E., & Jalas M. (2000). Dematerialization through services-a review and evaluation of the debate. Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of the Environment. ISBN 952-11-0787-1
21. Hyvönen, H., Saarela, P., & Marttila T. (2017). Creative sustainability: The role of (design) education. C. Vezzoli, C. Kohtala, A. Srinivasan, L. Xin, M. Fusakul, D. Sateesh, & J. Diehl (Ed.), Product-service system design for sustainability içinde (ss. 441-449). London: Routledge. ISBN: 9781906093679
22. Joore, P., Crul, M., Celik, S., Lazzarini, B., Obiols Sales, A., Santamaría Molina, M., ... ve Wever, R. (2019). Circular design handbook: A learning guide for design professionals. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/179149/Handbook-in-IDfS.pdf
23. Karslı, U. T. (2013). Integrating sustainability in interior design studio. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1532-1539.
24. Kasulaitis, B. V., Babbitt, C. W., Kahhat, R., Williams, E., & Ryen, E. G. (2015). Evolving materials, attributes, and functionality in consumer electronics: Case study of laptop computers. Resources, conservation and recycling, 100, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.03.014
25. Kaya, N. A. (2020). Planlı eskime, tüketici, tamir eylemi ve tamir topluluğu ilişkisi. Ege Mimarlık, 4(108), 154-159. https://www.egemimarlik.org/cevirim-ici-okuma/108/1525
26. Khan, A. Z., Vandevyvere H., & Allacker, K., (2013) Design for the ecological age: Rethinking the role of sustainability in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 67(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2013.817155
27. Loy, J. (2008). Strategies for teaching sustainable design practice with product design students. DS 46: Proceedings of E&PDE 2008, the 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, içinde (ss. 491-496). Barcelona, Spain.
28. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press. ISBN: 0865475873, 978-0865475878
29. Mohamed, K. E., & Elias Özkan, S. T. (2019). Sustainable architectural design education: A pilot study in a 3rd year studio. The Academic Research Community Publication, 2(3), 126–135. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/92054
30. Ozis, F., Parks, S.L.I., Sills, D.L., Akca, M., & Kirby, C. (2022), Teaching sustainability: Does style matter? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 23(8), 194-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2021-0392
31. Park, H. Y., Licon, C. V., & Sleipness, O. R. (2022). Teaching sustainability in planning and design education: A systematic review of pedagogical approaches. Sustainability, 14(15), 9485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159485
32. Pompeii, B., Yi-Wen, C., Neill, D., Braun, D., Fiegel, G., Oulton, R., Ragsdale, J., & Singh, K. (2019). Identifying and overcoming barriers to integrating sustainability across the curriculum at a teaching-oriented university. Sustainability, 11(9), 1-17, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092652
33. Ramirez, M. (2006). Sustainability in the education of industrial designers: The case for Australia. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370610655959
34. Ramirez, M. (2007). Sustainability integration in industrial design education: A worldwide survey. ConnectED International Conference on Design Education içinde (ss.1-5). University of New South Wales.
35. Richardson, M. (2011). Design for reuse: Integrating upcycling into industrial design practice. International Conference on Remanufacturing içinde (ss. 1-13). University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
36. Sanchez, R. (2002). Using modularity to manage the interactions of technical and industrial design. Academic Review, 2(1), 8-19.
37. Sassanelli, C., Pezzotta, G., Rossi, M., Terzi, S., & Cavalieri, S. (2015). Towards a lean product service systems (PSS) design: State of the art, opportunities and challenges. Procedia CIRP, 30, 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.123
38. Seliger, G. (2007). Sustainability in manufacturing: recovery of resources in product and material cycles. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN: 978-3-540-49871-1
39. Seyhan, M., & Yavuzcan, H. G. (2022). The effects of planned obsolescence strategies on dust bagless vacuum cleaner designs in the local market of Turkey. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 10(4), 375-386.
40. Sevgül, Ö., Eren, G. H., & Yavuzcan, H. G. (2021). Design for the circular economy: A case study with industrial design students. H. G. Yavuzcan, & N. N. Öztürk (Ed.), Design Research for Social Innovation içinde (ss. 59-82). İstanbul: Artikel Akademi. ISBN: 978-605-70582-3-2
41. Sung, K. (2015). A review on upcycling: Current body of literature, knowledge gaps and a way forward. ICECESS 2015 17th int. conf. environ. cult. econ. soc. sustain., World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (WASET) içinde (ss. 28-40). Venice, Italy
42. Şahan, H. H., & Uyangör, N. (2022). Bilimsel araştırmalarda örneklem seçimi. M. Çelebi (Ed.), Nitel araştırma yöntemleri içinde (ss. 118-148). Ankara: Pegem. ISBN: 978-625-8044-16-4
43. Terzioğlu, N., & Wever, R. (2021). Integrating repair into product design education: Insights on repair, design and sustainability. Sustainability, 13(18), 10067. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su131810067
44. UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO global action programme on education for sustainable development. Erişim Adresi: https://unesdoc-beta.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246270/PDF/246270eng.pdf.multi. [Erişim Tarihi 10 Mayıs 2022]. van der Voet, E., van Oers, L., & Nikolic, I. (2005). Dematerialization, not just a matter of weight. J Ind Ecol, 8 (4), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198043630432
45. Wandl, A., Balz, V., Qu, L., Furlan, C., Arciniegas, G., & Hackauf, U. (2019). The circular economy concept in design education: Enhancing understanding and innovation by means of situated learning. Urban Planning, 4(3), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2147
46. Watkins, M., Casamayor, J. L., Ramirez, M., Moreno, M., Faludi, J., & Pigosso, D. C. (2021). Sustainable product design education: Current practice. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 7(4), 611-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2021.11.003
47. Watkins, M. A., & Lofthouse, V. (2010). A Review of sustainability within product and industrial design courses in British universities, DS62: Proceedings of E&PDE 2010, the 12th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Institute of Engineering Designers içinde (ss.346–51). NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
48. Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Nash, N. (2017). Who is reducing their material consumption and why? A cross-cultural analysis of dematerialization behaviours. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160376. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0376
49. Yıldırım, L. (2017). Geri dönüşüm/ileri dönüşüm/tekrar kullanım kapsamında ikinci el giysiler ve sürdürülebilirlik. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, 10(20), 484-503. https://doi.org/10.21602/sduarte.305698
50. 2013/55/AB, 2013. Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013L0055&from=EN [Erişim Tarihi 10 Mayıs 2022].