MTA Fillapex ile kontamine olmuş dentin yüzeylerine uygulanılan çeşitli kanal patı çözücülerinin adeziv rezinlerin bağlanma dayanımına etkisi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, MTA Fillapex kök patı ile kontamine olmuş dentin yüzeylerine uygulanan farklı çözücülerin, adeziv rezinlerin pulpa odasındaki dentine mikrotensile bağlanma dayanımı (μTBS) üzerine etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma da pulpa odası açılmış ve pulpa artıkları temizlenmiş 50 adet insan üçüncü azı dişi kullanıldı. Tüm dentin yüzeylerine 5 dk MTA Fillapex uygulandı, örnekler 5 gruba ayrıldı, kanal patı farklı solüsyonlarla temizlendi (n = 10). (Solüsyonun uygulanmadığı kontrol grubu, Kloroform, Metil etil keton, Etil asetat, Endosolv R). Örnekler kullanılan adeziv sisteme göre iki alt gruba ayrıldı. Clearfil Tri-S Universal Bond (Kuraray), üreticinin talimatlarına göre self etch ve total etch olarak uygulandı. Daha sonra dişler kompozit rezin ile restore edildi ve mikrotensile bağlanma dayanımı testi için kullanılacak çubukları üretmek üzere kesitler alındı. Elde edilen veriler ANOVA ve Tukey testi ile analiz edildi. Bulgular: Tüm total etch adeziv gruplarındaki ortalama μTBS değerleri, tüm self etch adeziv gruplarından istatistiksel olarak daha yüksekti (p <0.05). Kloroform + self-etch grubun μTBS'si diğer self etch gruplarından anlamlı derecede düşükken, Endosolv R + self etch grubunun μTBS diğer self etch gruplarına göre anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksekti. Kloroform + total etch grubunun μTBS'si diğer total etch gruplarından anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p <0.05). Endosolv R + total-etch grubunun μTBS'si metil etil keton + total-etch grubuna göre anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu görüldü (p <0.05). Diğer materyaller arasında µTBS açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu (p> 0.05). Sonuç: MTA Fillapex ile kontamine dentin yüzeylerine uygulanılan çözücüler self etch ve total etch adeziv rezinlerin bağlanma dayanımını etkilemektedir.

Keywords

• Adeziv
• MTA Fillapex
• makaslama bağlanma dayanımı
• solvent

The effect on the bond strength of adhesive resins of various resin sealer solvents applied to dentin surfaces contaminated with MTA Fillapex

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different endodontic solvents applied to the dentin surfaces contaminated with MTA Fillapex root canal paste on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of adhesive resins to pulp chamber dentin. Materials and methods: 50 human third molars pulp chamber was perforated and the pulp residues were cleaned. MTA Fillapex was applied to all dentin surfaces for 5 min, the samples were divided into 5 groups, the paste was removed with different solutions. (n=10) (Without solution, Chloroform, Methyl ethyl ketone, Ethyl acetate, Endosolv R). The samples were divided into two subgroups according to the adhesive system used. Clearfil Tri-S Universal Bond (Kuraray) applied either self-etch mode and total-etch mode according to the manufacturer's instructions. The teeth were restored with a composite and sectioned to sticks for microtensile bond testing. Data were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey test. Results: The mean μTBS values in all total etch adhesive groups was statistically higher than the all self etch adhesive groups (p<0.05). μTBS of the group (chloroform+self-etch) was significantly lower than,whereas μTBS of the group(Endosolv R+self etch) was significantly higher than the other self etch groups. μTBS of the group (chloroform+ total-etch) was significantly lower than the other total-etch groups (p<0.05). μTBS of the group(Endosolv R+total-etch) was significantly higher than the methyl ethyl ketone+total-etch group (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in μTBS between the other materials (p>0.05). Conclusion: Treating methods affect the dentin bonding strength of self etch and total etch adhesives.

Keywords

• Adhesive
• MTA Fillapex
• microtensile bond strength
• solvent

References

1. 1. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 1998; 85:86-93.
2. 2. Heling I, Gorfil C, Slutzky H, Kopolovic K, Zalkind M, Slutzky-Goldberg I. Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorative procedures: review and treatment recommendations. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2002; 87:674-8.
3. 3. Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN, Alves FR, Campos LC. Periradicular status related to the quality of coronal restorations and root canal fillings in a Brazilian population. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2005; 100:369-74.
4. 4. Wolanek GA, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Volkmann KR. In vitro bacterial penetration of endodontically treated teeth coronally sealed with a dentin bonding agent. Journal of Endodontics. 2001; 27:354-7.
5. 5. Ray H, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. International endodontic journal. 1995; 28:12-8.
6. 6. Apicella M, Loushine R, West L, Runyan D. A comparison of root fracture resistance using two root canal sealers. International Endodontic Journal. 1999; 32:376-80.
7. 7. ØRstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: technical, biological and clinical testing. Endodontic topics. 2005; 12:25-38.
8. 8. Roberts S, Kim JR, Gu L-s, Kim YK, Mitchell QM, Pashley DH, et al. The efficacy of different sealer removal protocols on bonding of self-etching adhesives to AH Plus–contaminated dentin. Journal of endodontics. 2009; 35:563-7.

9. 9. Ferreira I, Soares S, Sousa J, Barros J, Braga AC, Lopes MA, et al. New Insight into the Dissolution of Epoxy Resin–based Sealers. Journal of endodontics. 2017; 43:1505-10.
10. 10. Kuga MC, Faria G, Rossi MA, do Carmo Monteiro JC, Bonetti‐Filho I, Berbert FLCV, et al. Persistence of epoxy‐based sealer residues in dentin treated with different chemical removal protocols. Scanning: The Journal of Scanning Microscopies. 2013; 35:17-21.
11. 11. Schäfer E, Zandbiglari T. A comparison of the effectiveness of chloroform and eucalyptus oil in dissolving root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 93:611-6.
12. 12. IARC. International Agency for Research on Cancer monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Tobacco smoking. 1986; 38:168-70.
13. 13. Flick EW. Industrial Solvents Handbook. 5th ed. Westwood, NJ, USA, Noyes Data Corporation1998.
14. 14. Kaufman D, Mor C, Stabholz A, Rotstein I. Effect of gutta-percha solvents on calcium and phosphorus levels of cut human dentin. Journal of endodontics. 1997; 23:614-5.
15. 15. Doğan H, Taşman F, Cehreli Z. Effect of gutta‐percha solvents at different temperatures on the calcium, phosphorus and magnesium levels of human root dentin. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2001; 28:792-6.
16. 16. Assmann E, Scarparo RK, Böttcher DE, Grecca FS. Dentin bond strength of two mineral trioxide aggregate–based and one epoxy resin–based sealers. Journal of endodontics. 2012; 38:219-21.
17. 17. Reyhani MF, Ghasemi N, Rahimi S, Milani AS, Mokhtari H, Shakouie S, et al. Push-out bond strength of Dorifill, Epiphany and MTA-Fillapex sealers to root canal dentin with and without smear layer. Iranian endodontic journal. 2014; 9:246.
18. 18. McDonald MN, Vire DE. Chloroform in the endodontic operatory. Journal of endodontics. 1992; 18:301-3.
19. 19. Ma P-C, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J-K. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2010; 41:1345-67.
20. 20. Erdemir A, Eldeniz AÜ, Belli S. Effect of gutta-percha solvents on mineral contents of human root dentin using ICP-AES technique. Journal of endodontics. 2004; 30:54-6.
21. 21. Rotstein I, Dankner E, Goldman A, Heling I, Stabholz A, Zalkind M. Histochemical analysis of dental hard tissues following bleaching. Journal of Endodontics. 1996; 22:23-6.
22. 22. Erdemir A, Eldeniz A, Belli S. Effect of the gutta‐percha solvents on the microhardness and the roughness of human root dentine. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2004; 31:1145-8.