Mandibular parametreler ile yaş ve cinsiyet arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması: Retrospektif çalışma

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 328 - 334, 11.11.2019

İmge Sapancı Hüseyin Ozan Şahin Özgür Doğan

Öz

Amaç: Panoramik radyograflarda ölçülen mandibular parametreler (gonial açı,
bigonial genişlik ve ramus yüksekliği) ile bireyin yaşı ve cinsiyeti arasındaki
ilişkinin saptanması hedeflenmektedir.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada 19-69 yaşları arasındaki 230 kadın ve erkeğe ait panoramik
radyograflar üzerinde gonial açı, bigonial genişlik ve ramus yüksekliği olmak
üzere üç parametre ölçülmüştür. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak
değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: Tüm yaş gruplarında kadın ve erkek arasında gonial açı değerlerinde
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmazken, ramus yüksekliği ve bigonial
genişlik değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmaktadır.

Sonuç: Bu çalışma adli diş hekimliğinde mandibular parametreler kullanılarak
yaş ve cinsiyet tayini yapılmasında yardımcı olabilir.

ANAHTAR
KELİMELER

Bigonial
genişlik, gonial açı, panoramik radyograf, ramus yüksekliği

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bigonial genişlik, gonial açı, panoramik radyograf, ramus yüksekliği

Kaynakça

• 1. Scheuer L. Application of osteology to forensic medicine. Clin Anat. 2002;15:297–312. 2. Krogman WM. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Springfield, MO: Charles C. Thomas, 1962. 3. Durić M, Rakocević Z, Donić D. The Reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147:159–64 4. Mays S, Cox M. Sex determination in skeletal remains. In: Cox M, Mays S, editors. Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. London: Greenwich Medical Media Ltd. 2000; p 117–130. 5. Ronning O, Barnes SA, Pearson MH, Pledger DM. Juvenile chronic arthritis: a cephalometric analysis of the facial skeleton. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:53–62. 6. Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I. Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of Indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 179: 84.e1-5. 7. Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat. 1999;195:491–513. 8. Xie, Q., Soikkonen, K., Wolf, J., Mattila, K., Gong, M., & Ainamo, A. Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 1996; 25(2), 61-66. 9. Razi, T., Moslemzade, S. H., & Razi, S. Comparison of linear dimensions and angular measurements on panoramic images taken with two machines. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2009; 3(1), 7. 10. Shahabi M, Ramazanzadeh BA, Mokhber N. Comparison between the external gonial angle in panaromic radiographs and lateral cephalographs of adult patients with class I malocclusion. J Oral Sci. 2009; 51: 425–9 11. Jensen E. and Palling M. The gonial angle: A Survey, Amer. J. Orthod. 40.120-133,1954 12. Zangouei-Booshehri M, Aghili HA, Abasi M, Ezoddini-Ardakani F. Agreement between panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs for measuring the gonial angle. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9: 178-82. 13. Mattila K, Altonen M, Haavikko K. Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantogram. Angle orthod. 1997;47(2):107-10. 14. Al-Shamout R, Ammoush M, Alrbata R, AL-Habahbah A. Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pak Oral Dental J. 2012; 32: 81–7. 15. Bhardwaj, D., Kumar, J.S., Mohan, V. Radiographic evaluation of mandible topredict the gender and age. J. Clin. Diagn. Res.2014; 8, ZC66–ZC69. 16. Bhuyan, R., Mohanty, S., Bhuyan, S. K., Pati, A., Priyadarshini, S., & Das, P. Panoramic radiograph as a forensic aid in age and gender estimation: Preliminary retrospective study. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology: JOMFP, 2018, 22(2), 266. 17. Chole, R.H., Patil, R.N., Balsaraf Chole, S., Gondivkar, S., Gadbail, A.R., Yuwanati, M.B.,2013. Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: aradiographic study. ISRN Radiol. 2013; 453763. 18. Gungor, K., Sagir, M., Ozer, I. Evaluation of the gonial angle in the Anatolian populations: from past to present. Coll. Antropol. 2007; 31, 375–378. 19. Larrazabal-Moron, C., & Sanchis-Gimeno, J. A. Gonial angle growth patterns according to age and gender. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, 2018; 215, 93-96. 20. Leversha, J., McKeough, G., Myrteza, A., Skjellrup-Wakefiled, H., Welsh, J., & Sholapurkar, A. Age and gender correlation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2016; 8(1), e49. 21. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(Suppl1):S13–6. 22. Dutra, V., Yang, J., Devlin, H., Susin, C. Mandibular bone remodelling in adults:evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2004; 33, 323–328. 23. Upadhyay, R.B., Upadhyay, J., Agrawal, P., Rao, N.N. Analysis of gonial angle inrelation to age, gender, and dentition status by radiological and anthropometricmethods. J. Forensic Dent. Sci. 2012; 4, 29–33. 24. Indira, A. P., Markande, A., & David, M. P. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination-A digital radiographic study. Journal of forensic dental sciences, 2012; 4(2), 58. 25. Damera, A., Mohanalakhsmi, J., Yellarthi, P. K., & Rezwana, B. M. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular ramus for gender estimation: Retrospective study. Journal of forensic dental sciences, 2016;8(2,74).