Avülsiyon Yaralanmalarının Acil Müdahalesinde Hasta Bilgi Kaynağı Olarak Türkçe YouTube™ Videolarının Güvenilirliği: Kesitsel İçerik Analizi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 583 - 589, 25.12.2023

Gülçin Cagay Sevencan , Zeynep Şeyda Yavşan

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1329768

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, avülsiyonun acil müdahalesinde Türkçe YouTube™ videolarının hasta bilgi kaynağı olarak, içerik ve kalitesinin değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: YouTube™ videolarının değerlendirilmesi için ‘avülsiyon, diş travması, diş yaralanmaları ve dişin yerinden çıkması’ anahtar kelimeleri kullanıldı. Videolar dahil edilme ve hariç tutulma kriterlerine göre titizlikle incelendi. Seçilen videoların içerikleri, Uluslararası Dental Travmatoloji Derneği’nin son tedavi rehberinin avülsiyon yaralanmalarında uygulanması gereken önermelere göre, 9 puanlık bir yararlılık skoru ile puanlandı. Yararlılık skoruna göre video içeriği; zayıf (0-3), orta (4-6) ve mükemmel (7-9) şeklinde üç gruba ayrıldı. Videoların kalitesinin değerlendirilmesinde, videoların genel kalitesini derecelendiren Küresel Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) kullanıldı. Videoların güvenilirliği DISCERN güvenirlik aracına göre puanlandı. İstatistiksel analizler yapıldı.
Bulgular: Toplam 240 video analiz edildi ve dahil edilme kriterlerine uyan 33 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. Video yükleme kaynağının en çok özel klinik/özel hastaneler olduğu (% 36.4; n=12), fakat bu kuruluşlar tarafından yüklenen videoların çoğunun zayıf içerikli olduğu görüldü (% 66.7; n=8). Videoların hedef kitlesinin çoğunlukla hastalar (% 78.8; n=26) olduğu görüldü. Videoların yararlılık skoruna göre, % 45.5’i zayıf, % 30.3’ü orta ve % 24.2’si mükemmel olarak sınıflandırıldı.
Sonuç: YouTube™ genellikle avülse dişlerin yönetimi ile ilgili düşük yararlılığa sahip videolar sunmaktadır. Bu nedenle, diş hekimleri bu kaynağın farkında olmalı ve hastaları/ebeveynleri YouTube™ videolarındaki bilgilerin güvenilirliği ve yanıltıcı içerik barındırabileceği konusunda uyarmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Acil Müdahale, Avülsiyon, Travma, YouTube™

Anahtar Kelimeler

Acil Müdahale, Avülsiyon, Travma, YouTube™

Reliability of Turkish YouTube™ Videos as a Source of Patient Information in the Emergency Management of Avulsion Injuries: A Cross-Sectional Content Analysis

Öz

Background: To evaluate the content and quality of Turkish YouTube™ videos as a source of patient information in the emergency intervention of avulsion.
Methods:The key words 'avulsion, dental trauma, dental injuries and tooth dislocation' were used to evaluate the YouTube™ videos. Videos were rigorously reviewed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The content of the selected videos was scored with a usefulness score of 9 points according to there commendations for avulsion injuries in the latest treatment guidelines of the International Association of Dental Traumatology. According to the usefulness score, video content was divided into threegroups: poor (0-3), moderate (4-6) and excellent (7-9). The quality of thevideos was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), which rates the overall quality of the videos. The reliability of the videos was scored according to the DISCERN reliability tool. Statistical analyses were performed.
Results: A total of 240 videos were analyzed and 33 videos that met the inclusion criteria were included. The most common source of video uploads was private clinics/private hospitals (36.4 %, n=12), but most of the videos uploaded by these organizations had poor content (66.7 %, n=8). According to the usefulness score of the videos, 45.5 % were classified as poor, 30.3 % as fair and 24.2% as excellent.
Conclusion:YouTube™ generally hosts videos with low usefulness with regard to the management of avulsed teeth. Therefore, dentists should be aware of this resource and warn parents/carers regarding the reliability of information and the misleading content which is available on YouTube™ videos.
Keywords: Avulsion, Emergency intervention, Trauma, YouTube™

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avulsion, Emergency intervention, Trauma, YouTube™

Kaynakça

• 1. Andreasen JO, Borum MK, Jacobsen HL, Andreasen FM. Replantation of 400 avulsed permanent incisors. 2. Factors related to pulpal healing. Dent Traumatol. 1995;11(2):59-68. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1995.tb00462.x
• 2. Tzigkounakis V, Merglová V, Hecová H, Netolický J. Retrospective clinical study of 90 avulsed permanent teeth in 58 children. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24(6):598-602. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00674.x
• 3. Bastos JV, Ilma De Souza Côrtes M, Andrade Goulart EM, Colosimo EA, Gomez RS, Dutra WO. Age and timing of pulp extirpation as major factors associated with inflammatory root resorption in replanted permanent teeth. J Endod. 2014;40(3):366-371. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.009
• 4. Kargul B, Welbury R. An audit of the time to initial treatment in avulsion injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25(1):123-125. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00732.x
• 5. Barrett EJ, Kenny DJ. Avulsed permanent teeth: A review of the literature and treatment guidelines. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1997;13(4):153-163. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00031.x
• 6. Petrovic B, Marković D, Peric T, Blagojevic D. Factors related to treatment and outcomes of avulsed teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26(1):52-59. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00836.x
• 7. Fouad AF, Abbott P V., Tsilingaridis G, et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(4):331-342. doi:10.1111/edt.12573
• 8. Andersson L. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries. J Endod. 2013;39(3 SUPPL.):S2. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.021
• 9. Jain A, Kulkarni P, Kumar S, Jain M. Knowledge and attitude of parents towards avulsed permanent tooth of their children and its emergency management in Bhopal city. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(5):ZC40-ZC44. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/24953.9855
• 10. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-194. doi:10.1177/1460458213512220
• 11. Deniz S. Investigation of Individuals’ E-Health Literacy and Cyberchondria Levels. İnsan ve İnsan Derg. 2020;5(24):84-96.
• 12. McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1-2):24-28. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006
• 13. Hutchison CMD, Cave V, Walshaw EG, Burns B, Park C. YouTubeTM as a source for patient education about the management of dental avulsion injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(2):207-211. doi:10.1111/edt.12517
• 14. Paul M, Dredze M. You Are What You Tweet: Analyzing Twitter for Public Health. Proc Int AAAI Conf Web Soc Media. 2021;5(1):265-272. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14137
• 15. Al Mamun M, Ibrahim HM, Turin TC. Social media in communicating health information: An analysis of facebook groups related to hypertension. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12(1):1-10. doi:10.5888/pcd12.140265
• 16. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23(4):e463-e468. doi:10.4317/medoral.22447
• 17. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):202-208. doi:10.1111/odi.12434
• 18. Steinberg PL, Wason S, Stern JM, Deters L, Kowal B, Seigne J. Prostate Cancer Information. URL. 2010;75(3):619-622. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059
• 19. Tozar KN, Yapıcı Yavuz G. Reliability of information on YouTubeTM regarding pediatric dental trauma. Dent Traumatol. 2021;37(6):772-778. doi:10.1111/edt.12708
• 20. Kandemir Demirci G, Dindaroğlu F. Travmatik Dental Yaralanmaların Acil Tedavisi Hakkında Bilgi Kaynağı Olarak YouTubeTM: Kesitsel İçerik Analizi. Selcuk Dent J. 2021;816:808-816. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1030191
• 21. Google Trends. Published 2023. https://trends.google.com/trends/
• 22. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):8-13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082469
• 23. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111. doi:10.1136/jech.53.2.105
• 24. Özbay Y, Çırakoğlu NY. YouTube as an information source for instrument separation in root canal treatment. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(1):6-12. doi:10.5395/rde.2021.46.e8
• 25. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016;49(12):1194-1200. doi:10.1111/iej.12575
• 26. ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube as a source for parents’ education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27(6):437-443. doi:10.1111/ipd.12277
• 27. Duman C. YouTubeTM quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18(3):261-267. doi:10.1111/idh.12445
• 28. Korkmaz YN, Buyuk SK. YouTube as a Patient-Information Source for Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2020;57(3):327-332. doi:10.1177/1055665619866349
• 29. Fortuna G, Schiavo JH, Aria M, Mignogna MD, Klasser GD. The usefulness of YouTubeTM videos as a source of information on burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;(December 2018):657-665. doi:10.1111/joor.12796
• 30. Egil E. Although the content of patient education YouTube videos in various subjects and disciplines has been studied , 12-16 to the best of our knowledge there has not been any study investigating the usefulness of YouTube videos as a source of patient informati. 2020;53(June):292-301.
• 31. Ozer S, Yilmaz EI, Bayrak S, Tunc E Sen. Parental knowledge and attitudes regarding the emergency treatment of avulsed permanent teeth. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(4):370-375. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1698974
• 32. Delikan E, Koçak N. Travmatik Dental Yaralanmalar Konusunda Hazırlanan Eğitici Broşürün Ebeveyn Bilgi Düzeyi ve Tutumu Üzerine Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;29:23-29. doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.472771
• 33. Soğukpınar Önsüren A, Mutluay M, Mutluay At. Ebeveynlerin Çocuklarda Süt ve Daimi Diş Yaralanmaları Hakkındaki Bilgi Düzeyi ve Tutumunun Değerlendirilmesi. Published online 2022:1-9.
• 34. Levin L, Zadik Y. Education on and prevention of dental trauma: It’s time to act! Dent Traumatol. 2012;28(1):49-54. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01060.x
• 35. Osmanovic A, Halilovic S, Hadziabdic N. Evaluation of periodontal ligament cell viability in different storage media based on human PDL cell culture experiments — A systematic review. 2018;(September):384-393. doi:10.1111/edt.12437
• 36. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FKL. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):196-201. doi:10.1111/odi.12404
• 37. Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP, Gaş S. Potential patient education of YouTube videos related to wisdom tooth surgical removal. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(5):E481-E484. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005573
• 38. Paksoy T, Gaş S. Quality and Content of YouTubeTM Videos Related to Sinus Lift Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surgery, Med Pathol. 2021;33(1):48-52. doi:10.1016/j.ajoms.2020.08.015
• 39. Holmes C. Mouth protection in sport in Scotland - A review. Br Dent J. 2000;188(9):473-474. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4800514a
• 40. Azami-Aghdash S, Ebadifard Azar F, Pournaghi Azar F, et al. Prevalence, etiology, and types of dental trauma in children and adolescents: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015;29(1):591-596.
• 41. Council ADA, Access ON, Relations I, Council ADA, Scientific ON. Using mouthguards to reduce the incidence and severity of sports-related oral injuries. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(12):1712-1720. doi:10.14219/jada. archive.2006.0118