Are YouTube Videos a Reliable Source of Information for Patients Considering Zygomatic Dental Implants? A Cross-Sectional Study

Öz

Abstract Objective The present study aimed to critically assess the quality and reliability of information presented in YouTube videos concerning zygomatic dental implants (ZDIs), which represent an alternative therapeutic approach for patients with severe maxillary bone resorption in whom conventional implant placement is not feasible. Materials and Methods A systematic search was performed on the YouTube platform using the keyword “Zygomatic dental implant.” The first 158 videos retrieved from the search results were screened, and 75 videos meeting the predetermined inclusion criteria were subjected to analysis. Each video was independently evaluated in terms of informational accuracy, educational quality, and presentation coherence, and subsequently categorized as poor, moderate, or good based on a predefined scoring system. Quantitative parameters, including video duration, number of views, likes, dislikes, and comments, were recorded. Videos were further classified according to their source (universities/hospitals, healthcare professionals, companies, individual users, or others) and content type (educational, patient experience, scientific, or miscellaneous). Data distribution normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and intergroup comparisons were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results Videos categorized as poor exhibited significantly lower mean values for view counts, duration, and likes compared with those classified as good (p<0.001, p=0.005, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). Although the number of comments was lowest in the poor-quality group and highest in the good-quality group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.07). Similarly, no significant difference was found among the three groups with respect to the interaction index (p=0.52). Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate substantial variability in the educational value and reliability of YouTube videos related to zygomatic dental implants. The results underscore the necessity for content produced by qualified professionals and grounded in scientific evidence, which could transform YouTube into a credible, accessible, and effective medium for patient education and dissemination of oral implantology knowledge.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dental implant
• Maxillary edentulism
• YouTube analysis
• Zygomatic implant

YouTube Videoları Zigomatik Dental İmplant Planlanan Hastalar İçin Güvenilir Bir Bilgi Kaynağı Olabilir Mi? Kesitsel Bir Araştırma

Öz

Öz Amaç Bu çalışmanın amacı, maksillada ileri derecede kemik kaybı nedeniyle standart implant protokolünün uygulanamadığı olgularda alternatif bir tedavi yöntemi olarak kullanılan zigomatik dental implantlara (ZDİ) ilişkin YouTube videolarının içerik kalitesi ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler YouTube platformunda “Zygomatic dental implant” anahtar kelimesiyle yapılan aramada elde edilen ilk 158 video incelenmiştir. Kullanışlılık kriterlerini karşılayan 75 video çalışma kapsamına alınmıştır. Videolar; içerik kalitesi, sunum düzeni ve bilgilendirici değerleri açısından değerlendirilmiş ve elde edilen puanlara göre zayıf, orta veya iyi olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Ayrıca her videonun süresi, izlenme, beğeni, beğenmeme ve yorum sayıları kaydedilmiştir. Videolar kaynaklarına (üniversite/hastane, sağlık profesyoneli, şirket, bireysel kullanıcı vb.) ve içerik türlerine (eğitim, hasta deneyimi, bilimsel vb.) göre kategorize edilmiştir. Verilerin normal dağılıma uygunluğu Shapiro–Wilk testi ile, grup karşılaştırmaları ise Kruskal–Wallis testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Anlamlılık düzeyi p<0,05 olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar Video içerik değerlendirmesi açısından kötü olan grupta izlenme sayısı, video süresi, beğenme ve görüntülenme sayısı en düşük iken, iyi olan grupta ise en yüksek saptandı ve bu parametreler açısından gruplar arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı farklılık saptandı (sırasıyla p<0,001, p=0,005, p<0,001 ve p<0,001). Yorum sayısı açısından kötü olan grupta en az, iyi olan grupta en yüksek sayıda olduğu görülse de istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı (p=0,07). İnteraction indeksi açısından ise üç grup arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı (p=0,52). Tartışma Bu çalışma, zigomatik implantlara yönelik YouTube videolarının eğitimsel değerini ve güvenilirliğini incelemekte; uzmanlarca hazırlanmış bilimsel içeriklerin paylaşımının, platformun hastalar için güvenilir ve erişilebilir bir bilgi kaynağına dönüşmesini sağlayabileceğini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dental implant
• Maksiller dişsizlik
• YouTube analizi
• Zigomatik implant

Kaynakça

1. Abukaraky, A., Hamdan, A. A., Ameera, M. N., Nasief, M., & Hassona, Y. (2018). Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 23(4), e463.
2. Al‑Nawas, B., Aghaloo, T., Aparicio, C., Bedrossian, E., Brecht, L., Kammerer, P. W., ... Jung, R. (2023). ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants: Indications, evaluation of surgical techniques and long‑term treatment outcomes. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9, 28/89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9
3. Aparicio, C., Manresa, C., Francisco, K., Claros, P., Alández, J., González‐Martín, O., & Albrektsson, T. (2014). Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code. Periodontology 2000, 66(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12038
4. Atkinson, N., Saperstein, S., & Pleis, J. (2009). Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. Journal of medical Internet research, 11(1), e1035.
5. Boyes-Varley, J. G., Howes, D. G., Lownie, J. F., & Blackbeard, G. A. (2003). Surgical modifications to the Branemark zygomaticus protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 18(2), 232-237.
6. Brennand Roper, M., Vissink, A., Dudding, T., Pollard, A., Gareb, B., Malevez, C., Balshi T., Brecht L., Kumar V., Wu Y., & Jung, R. (2023). Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of implant dentistry, 9(1), 21.
7. Desai, T., Shariff, A., Dhingra, V., Minhas, D., Eure, M., & Kats, M. (2013). Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLOS one, 8(12), e82469.
8. Doğramacı, E. J., & Rossi-Fedele, G. (2016). The quality of information on the Internet on orthodontic retainer wear: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Orthodontics, 43(1), 47-58.

9. Gaş, S., Zincir, Ö. Ö., & Bozkurt, A. P. (2019). Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism?. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 77(9), 1776-1783.
10. Helming, A. G., Adler, D. S., Keltner, C., Igelman, A. D., & Woodworth, G. E. (2021). The content quality of YouTube videos for professional medical education: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 96(10), 1484–1493. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004121
11. Kammerer, P. W., Fan, S., Aparicio, C., Bedrossian, E., Davo, R., Morton, D., ... Al‑Nawas, B. (2023). Evaluation of surgical techniques in survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: A systematic review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00478-y
12. Kocyigit, B. F., Cetin, E., & Öztürk, G. Y. (2024). Youtube As A Source Of Health Informatıon: Qualıty And Relıabılıty Analysıs Of Sarcopenıa-Related Vıdeos. Anti-Aging Eastern Europe, 3(4), 216-220.
13. López-Jornet, P., Pons-Fuster, E., & Ruiz-Roca, J. A. (2017). YOUTUBE videos on oral care of the organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 25(4), 1097-1101.
14. Lorusso, F., Conte, R., Inchingolo, F., Festa, F., & Scarano, A. (2021). Survival rate of zygomatic implants for fixed oral maxillary rehabilitations: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between zygomatic and regular implants. Dentistry Journal, 9(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9040038
15. Moraschini, V., de Queiroz, T. R., Sartoretto, S. C., de Almeida, D. C. F., Calasans‑Maia, M. D., & Louro, R. S. (2023). Survival and complications of zygomatic implants compared to conventional implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow‑up period of at least 5 years: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 25(1), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13153
16. Osman, W., Mohamed, F., Elhassan, M., & Shoufan, A. (2022). Is YouTube a reliable source of health‑related information? A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 410. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909‑022‑03446‑z
17. Polido, W. D., Machado‑Fernandez, A., Lin, W.‑S., & Aghaloo, T. (2023). Indications for zygomatic implants: A systematic review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00480-4
18. Tayan, E., Gökmenoğlu, C., & Büyük, S. K. (2024). YouTube™ as an Education Platform for Dental Implants. Journal of International Dental Sciences (Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi), 10(3), 159-166.
19. Wadde, K., Kokitkar, S., Venkatakrishnan, L., Ranganath, S., & Khaire, S. (2024). Comparative evaluation of sinus complication and survival rates of quad zygoma versus bizygoma in combination with two regular implants in atrophic maxilla: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 23(3), 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02136-1
20. Zhaksylyk, A., Yessirkepov, M., Akyol, A., & Kocyigit, B. F. (2024). YouTube as a source of information on public health ethics. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 39(7).
21. Zielinski, R., Okulski, J., Piechaczek, M., Łoś, J., Sowiński, J., Sadowska-Sowińska, M., Kołkowska, A., Simka, W., & Kozakiewicz, M. (2025). Five-year comparative study of zygomatic and subperiosteal implants: Clinical outcomes, complications, and treatment strategies for severe maxillary atrophy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(3), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030661