EVALUATION OF LOCATION SELECTION PROCESS OF LOGISTICS VILLAGES USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND ELECTRE METHODS: A CASE STUDY FOR TURKEY

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 4, 1897 - 1910, 05.10.2021

Berna Aksoy , Mustafa Gursoy

Öz

The need for logistics has been one of the biggest issues to be resolved for all settlements in all eras of humanity. Infrastructure problems are likely to occur over time in cities that have grown more than expected. It is accepted all over the world today that the solution of the logistics problem in such settlements is to improve the infrastructure and balance the transportation demand between different modes of transportation and to establish special centers where integrated activities will be carried out. Choosing the location of these logistics centers by decision makers raises a “prioritized” cost problem. A subject became widespread in the last decade in Turkey has been selected. The current situation of the logistic villages has been evaluated and a construction ranking has been obtained.This study constituted a verification for the state-ordered construction sequence. It is believed that simple and understandable construction needs can guide decision makers in the logistics village study area

Anahtar Kelimeler

Urban planning, logistics, urban freight transport, logistics village, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), sustainability.

Kaynakça

• ⦁ Önden, İ., Eldemir, F. ve Çancı, M., (2015). ‘Metropol Bölgelerde Lojistik Tesislerin Merkezileştirilmesi Kararının Çevresel Etkileri’, [Environmental Effects of Decision of Centralizing Logistics Facilities in Metropolitan Regions], 27-29 May 2015, 11th Transportation Congress, Istanbul.
• ⦁ Lambert, D.M, Stock, J.L. and Ellram, L.M., (1998). ‘Fundamentals of Logistic Management’, International Edition, Mc Graw Hill Co., New York.
• ⦁ Wagner, T., (2010). ‘Regional Traffic Impacts of Logistics-Related Land Use’, Transport Policy 17: 224–229.
• ⦁ Korpela, J., Tuominen, M., (2003). ‘A Decision Aid in Warehouse Site Selection’, Int. J. Production Economics, 45:169-180.
• ⦁ Dablanc, L., (2007). ‘Goods Transport in Large European Cities: Difficult To Organize, Difficult To Modernize’, Transportation Research Part A, 41(3): 280-285.
• ⦁ Gursoy M., (2010). ‘A Decision Supportive Method For Multimodal Freight Transport Mode Choice: An Example From Turkey, Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction B: Engineering, Vol. 34, No. B4, pp 461-470.
• ⦁ Gursoy, M., (2010). A Method for Transportation Mode Choice. Scientific Research and Essays, vol.5, 613-624.
• ⦁ Rimienė, K., Grundey, D., (2007). ‘Logistics Centre Concept through Evolution and Definition’, Engineerıng Economics: Commerce Of Engineerıng Decisions 4(54):87-95.
• ⦁ Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S., and Goyal, S.K., (2011). ‘A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach For Location Planning For Urban Distribution Centers Under Uncertainty’, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53:98–109.
• ⦁ Pham Y.T, Ma H.M., Yeo G.T, (2017). Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to Locate Logistics Centers in Vietnam: The Logisticians’ Perspective, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Volume 33, Issue 4, December 2017, Pages 211-219.
• ⦁ Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Li Y., Liu S.and Yang J.,(2017). ‘A Study of Rural Logistics Center Location Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS’, Hindawi Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2017, Article ID 2323057, 7 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2323057
• ⦁ Agrebi M., Abed M. and Omri M. N., (2017) ‘ELECTRE I Based Relevance Decision-Makers Feedback to the Location Selection of Distribution Centers’, Hindawi Journal of Advanced Transportation Volume 2017, Article ID 7131094, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7131094
• ⦁ Pramanik, S., Dalapati, S., Roy,T.K. (2018) ‘Neutrosophic multi-attribute group decision making strategy for logistics center location selection’. Neutrosophic Operational Research, 3, 13-32.
• ⦁ Li Y., Yang J., Liu F., (2019). ‘DEA Based Efficiency Analysis of the Logistics Industry in Wuhan’, CISAT 2018 IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1168 032021 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1168/3/032021
• ⦁ Yazdani M., Chatterjee P., Pamucar D., Chakraborty S., (2020). ‘Development of an integrated decision making model for location selection of logistics centers in the Spanish autonomous communities’, Expert Systems With Applications 148, 113208
• ⦁ Yıldırım, B.F., Önder, E., (2014). ‘Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri’, [Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods], 2nd Edition, Dora Publishing House, Bursa.
• ⦁ Vural D., Köse E., (2015). ‘Selection of Alternative Filling Material in The Bed Production with AHP and Electre Methods’, Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering.
• ⦁ Żak J., Kruszyński M., (2015). ‘Application of AHP and ELECTRE III/IV methods to multiple level, multiple criteria evaluation of urban transportation projects’, Transportation Research Procedia 10, 820 – 830, 18th Euro Working Group on Transportation, EWGT 2015, 14-16 July 2015, Delft, The Netherlands
• ⦁ Akmaludin A., Hartati T., Purwanto H., Sukendar T., Latifah F., Septiana L., (2020). ‘ The Best Selection of Programmers in Generation 4.0 Using AHP and ELECTRE Elimination Methods’, Journal of Physics Conference Series 1477:032001 DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1477/3/032001
• ⦁ Erdoğan N. K., Altınırmak S., & Karamaşa Ç. (2016). ‘Comparison of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with respect to performance of food firms listed in BIST’, Copernican Journal.
• ⦁ Saaty, T.L., (1990). ‘How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process’, European Journal of Operational Research 48: 9-26, North Holland.
• ⦁ Saaty, T.L., (2008). ‘The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Measurement Processes: Applications to Decisions under Risk The Analytic Hierarchy Process’, Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis, 1(1):122-196.
• ⦁ Tanyaş, M., Ar, İ.M., (2011). ‘Lojistik Merkez Kurulma Öncelikleri Açısından İllerin Sıralanması: TR90 Alt Bölgesi Örneği’, [Ranking of the Cities in Terms of Logistics Center Establishment Priorities: TR90 Sub-Region Example], Eastern Black Sea Development Agency, Trabzon.
• ⦁ Erdem, M., (2012). ‘Türkiye’de Kombine Taşımacılık İçin Liman Yerinin Bulanık Ahp İle Seçimi’, [Selection of the Port Place for Combined Transport in Turkey with the Fuzzy AHP], Master Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul.
• ⦁ Uysal, H.T., Yavuz, K., (2014). ‘Selection of Logistics Centre Location via ELECTRE Method: A Case Study in Turkey’, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(9): 276-289.
• ⦁ Terzi, N., Bölükbaş, Ö., (2016). ‘An Analysis of Logistics Villages in Turkey: Halkalı and Yenice’, Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics, 3(3):190-204.
• ⦁ Karadeniz, V., Akpınar, E., (2011). ‘Türkiye’de Lojistik Köy Uygulamaları ve Yeni Bir Lojistik Köy Önerisi’, [Logistics Village Applications and A New Proposal for Turkey], Marmara Geographical Journal, 23: 49-71, Istanbul.
• ⦁ Turkey Statistical Institute (TSI), 31 January 2017. 2016 Address Based Population Registration System Results, Publication No. 24638, Ankara.
• ⦁ Li, Y., Liu, X. and Chen Y., (2011). ‘Selection of Logistics Center Location Using Axiomatic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS Methodology in Logistics Management’, Expert Systems With Applications 38:7901–7908.