Estimation of the Parameters in One-Way Analysis of Covariance with the RAMML Method

Öz

The main purpose of the experimental design is to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference among the means of the treatments defined as the levels of the factor of interest. In addition to the effect of the controllable factor on the response variable (y), in some cases, there may also be an effect of the uncontrolled covariate. In this case, the analysis should be performed by eliminating the effect of the uncontrolled covariate on the response variable in order to reduce the experimental error. For this purpose, the uncontrolled covariate (x) is included in the model. This method is called analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) in experimental design. ANCOVA, which is a combination of analysis of variance and regression analysis techniques, is sensitive to both y- and x-outliers. Although there are studies on ANCOVA models robust to y-direction outliers in the literature, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study in the context of ANCOVA based on robust adaptive modified maximum likelihood (RAMML) estimators that are also resistant to x-direction outliers. In this study, we address the presence of outliers not only in the response variable (y-direction outliers) but also in the covariate (i.e., x-direction outliers), and obtain RAMML estimators for the model parameters in one-way ANCOVA.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Covariance analysis
• x- and y-outliers
• RAMML method
• robustness

Bir-Yönlü Kovaryans Analizinde Parametrelerin RAMML Yöntemi ile Tahmini

Öz

Deney tasarımında temel amaç, ilgilenilen faktörün düzeyleri olarak tanımlanan denemelerin ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık olup olmadığının belirlenmesidir. Yanıt değişkeni (y) üzerinde kontrol edilebilen faktörün etkisinin yanı sıra bazı durumlarda kontrol edilemeyen ortak değişkenin de etkisi söz konusu olabilir. Bu durumda, deneysel hatayı azaltmak amacıyla kontrol edilemeyen ortak değişkenin yanıt değişkeni üzerindeki etkisi arındırılarak analizin yapılması gerekir. Bu amaçla, kontrol edilemeyen ortak değişken (x) modele dahil edilir. Bu yöntem, deney tasarımında kovaryans analizi (analysis of covariance – ANCOVA) olarak adlandırılır. Varyans analizi ile regresyon analizi tekniklerinin bir birleşimi olarak ifade edilen ANCOVA hem y-yönlü hem de x-yönlü aykırı değerlere karşı duyarlıdır. Literatürde y-yönlü aykırı değerlere karşı dayanıklı ANCOVA ile ilgili çalışmalar bulunmasına rağmen bilindiği kadarıyla x-yönlü aykırı değerlere karşı dayanıklı adaptif uyarlanmış en çok olabilirlik (robust adaptive modified maximum likelihood – RAMML) tahmin edicilerine dayanan ANCOVA bağlamında herhangi bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, y-yönlü aykırı değerlere ek olarak ortak değişkende aykırı değerler olması, bir başka ifade ile x-yönlü aykırı değerler olması durumu ele alınmış ve bir-yönlü ANCOVA’da model parametrelerinin RAMML tahmin edicileri elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kovaryans analizi
• x-yönlü ve y-yönlü aykırı değerler
• RAMML metodu
• dayanıklılık

Kaynakça

1. Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 4th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd Ltd.
2. Cochran, W. G. (1957). Analysis of covariance: Its nature and uses. Biometrics, 13, 261–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527916
3. Cox, D. R., & McCullagh, P. (1982). Some aspects of analysis of covariance. Biometrics, 38, 541–561. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530040
4. Smith, J. H., & Lewis, T. O. (1982). Effects of intraclass correlation on covariance analysis. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 11(1), 71–80.
5. Silknitter, K. O., Wisnowski, J. W., & Montgomery, D. C. (1999). The analysis of covariance: A useful technique for analysing quality improvement experiments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 15, 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199907/08)15:4<303::AID-QRE253>3.0.CO;2-G
6. Şenoğlu, B., & Acıtaş, Ş. (2020). İstatistiksel Deney Tasarımı: Sabit Etkili Modeller, 4. Basım. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
7. Şenoğlu, B. (2007). Estimating parameters in one-way analysis of covariance model with short-tailed symmetric error distributions. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 201, 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2006.02.019
8. Şenoğlu, B., & Avcıoğlu. M. D. (2009). Analysis of covariance with non-normal errors. International Statistical Review, 77(3), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00090.x

9. Birch, J. B., & Myers, R. H. (1982). Robust analysis of covariance. Biometrics, 38, 699–713. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530050
10. Tiku, M. L., & Suresh, R. P. (1992). A new method of estimation for location and scale parameters. Journal Statistical Planning and Inference, 30, 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(92)90088-A
11. Tiku, M. L., Islam, M. Q., & Selçuk, A. S. (2001). Nonnormal regression. II. Symmetric distributions. Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods, 30(6), 1021–1045. https://doi.org/10.1081/STA-100104348
12. Islam, M. Q., & Tiku, M. L. (2005). Multiple linear regression model under non-normality. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 33, 2443–2467. https://doi.org/10.1081/STA-200031519
13. Acıtaş, Ş., & Şenoğlu, B. (2018). Robust factorial ANCOVA with LTS error distributions. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 47(2), 347-363.
14. Tiku, M. L. (1967). Estimating the mean and standard deviation from a censored normal sample. Biometrika, 54, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/54.1-2.155
15. Tiku, M. L. (1968). Estimating the parameters of normal and logistic distributions from censored samples. Australian Journal of Statistics, 10, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1968.tb00216.x
16. Bhattacharyya, G. K. (1985). The asymptotics of maximum likelihood and related estimators based on type II censored data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1985.10478130
17. Vaughan, D. C., & Tiku, M. L. (2000). Estimation and hypothesis testing for a non-normal bivariate distribution and applications. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 32, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00119-9
18. Tiku, M. L., & Sürücü, B. (2009). MMLEs are as good as M-estimators or better. Statistics and Probability Letters, 79, 984–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2008.12.001
19. Dönmez, A. (2010). Adaptive estimation and hypothesis testing methods, (Tez No: 269583). [Doktora Tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi]
20. Acıtaş, Ş., Filzmoser, P., & Şenoğlu, B. (2019). A robust adaptive modified maximum likelihood estimator for the linear regression model [Conference presentation]. Olomoucian Days Applied Mathematics. Olomouc, Czech Republic; 2019.
21. Acitas, S., Filzmoser, P., & Senoglu, B. (2021). A robust adaptive modified maximum likelihood estimator for the linear regression model. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 91(7), 1394-1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2020.1856847
22. Puthenpura, S., & Sinha, N. K. (1986). Modified maximum likelihood method for the robust estimation of system parameters from very noisy data. Automatica, 22, 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(86)90085-3
23. Vaughan, D. C. (2002). The generalized secant hyperbolic distribution and its properties. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 31(2), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1081/STA-120002647
24. Fritz H, Filzmoser P., & Croux C. (2012). A comparison of algorithms for the multivariate L1-median. Computational Statistics, 27, 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-011-0262-4
25. Maronna, R. A., Martin, R. D., & Yohai, V. J. (2006). Robust Statistics: Theory and Methods. Chichester: Wiley.
26. Montgomery, D. C. (2013). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 8th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.