TÜRK MEDYASINDA AHLAK VE YASALLIĞIN DRAMATİZE EDİLMESİ: TV DİZİLERİ VE SUÇ REALİTE ŞOVLARI DÜNYASI

Öz

Farklı medya metinlerindeki adalet ve hukuk temsillerini anlamak, çok boyutlu olan tema ve konular ağını ve bunların kesişim noktalarını ilişkisel bir şekilde değerlendirmeyi gerektirir. Kanun yapma dünyasının medya tasvirleri ve 'doğru olanı yapma' biçimleri medya türleri arasında farklılık gösterir. Hukukun temsilleri, beklenmedik şekillerde birbiriyle kesişen siyasi ve popüler kültür pratiklerinin ifşa edici ürünleridir. Medyadaki ahlak ve yasallık kodları, böylesine karmaşık bir kesişmenin gözlemlenebileceği iki 'değerlendirme dünyasıdır' (Dromi ve Illouz, 2010). Hukuki yargıların resmi kriterlerine ilişkin anlatıların ve ahlaki argümantasyon tarzlarının iç içe geçmesi nedeniyle, popüler kültürdeki farklı türlerde bir dizi geçerlilik iddiası (Habermas) açıkça türetilebilir. Bu makale, ahlaki evrenin bir parçası olarak yasallığın temsillerinin değerlendirilmesinde iki türdeki ahlaki akıl yürütme meselesini ele almaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• televizyon sosyolojisi
• TV dizileri
• suç reality şovları

DRAMATIZATION OF MORALITY AND LEGALITY IN TURKISH MEDIA: THE WORLD OF TV SERIES AND CRIME REALITY SHOWS

Öz

Understanding the representations of justice and law in different media texts requires evaluating a web of multidimensional themes and issues, and their intersections, in a relational manner. Media portrayal of the world of law-making, as well as forms of ‘doing the right thing’, vary across media genres. The representations of law are revelatory products of political and popular cultural practices which intersect in unexpected ways. Codes of morality and legality in media are two ‘worlds of evaluation’ (Dromi and Illouz, 2010) where such a complicated intersection can be observed. Due to the ways in which narratives on formal legal criteria of judgements and moral argumentation styles are intertwined, one can clearly derive a series of validity claims (Habermas) in different genres in popular culture. This paper tackles the question of moral reasoning embedded in two genres in an evaluation of the representations of legality as part of moral universe.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sociology of television
• TV series
• crime reality shows

Kaynakça

1. Bond, C. D. (2012). We, the judges: The legalized subject and narratives of adjudication in reality television. UMKC L. Rev., 81, 1.
2. Dant, T. (2010). Morality and the phenomenology of television. Unpublished paper.
3. Dawson, P., & Mäkelä, M. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge companion to narrative theory. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
4. Dromi, S. M., & Illouz, E. (2010). Recovering morality: Pragmatic sociology and literary studies. New Literary History, 41(2), 351-369.
5. Farias, C., Seremani, T., & Fernández, P. D. (2021). Popular culture, moral narratives and organizational portrayals: A multimodal reflexive analysis of a reality television show. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 211-226.
6. Frank, A. W. (2002). Why study people's stories? The dialogical ethics of narrative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(1), 109-117.
7. Gilligan C, Ward JV and McLean Taylor J (1988) Mapping the Moral Domain: A Contribution of Women’s Thinking to Psychological Theory and Education. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Hunt, A. (2003).Risk and moralization in everyday life. In Eds. Ericson, R and Doyle, A., Risk and Morality. London: University of Toronto Press, 165–192.

9. Erol Işık, N. (2013). Parables as indicators of popular wisdom: The making of piety culture in Turkish Television Dramas. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(5), 565-581.
10. Erol Işık, N. & Yaman, B. (2017). Crime and media: The world of ‘reality show’ as a moral frame of reference. Milli Folklor, (113), 69-78.
11. Işık, N. E. (2019). Evaluating narrativization practices in Turkish TV serials as a venue of popular historiography. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (34), 183-195.
12. Grupp, S. (2003). Political implications of a discourse of fear; the mass mediated discourse of fear in the aftermath of 9/11. In IPC Annual Conference, 2003, J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main.
13. Hier, S. (2008) Thinking beyond moral panic: Risk, responsibility and the politics of moralization. Theoretical Criminology, 12(2): 173–190.
14. Illouz, E. (1999) That shadowy realm of the interior: Oprah Winfrey and Hamlet's glass. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(1), 109-131
15. Krijnen, T., Meijer, I. C. (2005). The moral imagination in primetime television. International Journal of Cultural Studies 8(3), 353-374.
16. Küçükcan, Ö. U. (2019). Şiddetin ve suçun kamusallaşması: Reality showlar ve toplumsal etkileri. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (34), 165-182.
17. Lavie, N. (2019). Justifying trash: Regulating reality TV in Israel. Television & New Media, 20(3), 219-240.
18. Mittell, J. (2006). Narrative complexity in contemporary American television. The Velvet Light Trap, 58(1), 29-40.
19. Pinseler, J. (2010). “Punitive reality TV: Televising punishment and the production of Law and Order” In Van Bauwel S and Carpentier N (eds) Trans-Reality Television: The Transgressions of Reality, Genre, Politics and Audience. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, pp. 125–147.
20. Robertson, A. (2001, September). Us, them and television news narratives. In Arts and Politics Conference on Narrative, Identity and Order at the University of Tampere (pp. 13-15).
21. Rorty, A. (2012). The use and abuse of morality. The Journal of Ethics, 16(1), 1-13.
22. Rose, N. (1996). “The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government”. Economy and Society. 25(3): 327-356.
23. Sideri, E. (2017). Bridging worlds: producing and imagining the transnational through TV narratives. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 9(2), 27-35.
24. Shweder, R., Much, N., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). Divinity and the “big three” explanations of suffering. Morality and Health, 119, 119-169.
25. Stiernstedt, F. & Jakobsson, P. (2017). Watching reality from a distance: Class, genre and reality television. Media, Culture & Society, 39(5), 697-714.
26. Tavener J (2000) Media, morality and madness: The case against Sleaze TV. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 17(1): 63-85.
27. Tokdoğan, N. (2019). Yeni Osmanlıcılık: Hınç, nostalji, narsisizm (Vol. 442). İletişim Yayınları.
28. Yaman, B. (2013). An analysis of crime-based reality TV shows: The case of Müge Anli ile Tatli Sert. Master's thesis, İzmir University of Economics.