THE CRISIS OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN THE MODERN SOCIETY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE WORKS OF MARX, DURKHEIM AND WEBER

Öz

With the onset of capitalist economy and industrialization, one can argue that a new era has begun with its peculiar characteristics and huge impact on the all spheres of life. As the individual is increasingly exposed to constant changes taking place in the modern society, he becomes astounded by the ceaseless movement in it and he goes through an individual crisis in that society where traditional ways of living, thought and conceptualizing do not work anymore. This paper aims to provide a definition of modern society at first and then to touch upon the works of prominent scholars in social theory such as Marx, Durkheim and Weber in order to find out how the concept of individual crisis is elaborated on in these works.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Alienation,Rationalization,Anomie,Modern Society,Social Theory

Modern Toplumda Bireyin Krizi: Marx, Durkheim ve Weber’in Eserlerinin Bir İncelemesi

Öz

Kapitalist ekonomi ve sanayileşmenin hızla ortaya çıkmasıyla, kendine has özellikleri olan ve hayatın tüm alanlarını etkileyen yeni bir çağ başlamış oldu. Birey, modern toplumdaki durmaksızın devam eden yeniliklere daha fazla maruz kaldıkça, toplumdaki hareketin ivmesinden başı döndü ve geleneksel yaşam tarzı, düşünce ve değerlerin artık işlemediği bu durumda bir kriz içine girdi. Bu makale, öncelikle modern toplumun tanımını vermeyi ve daha sonra Marx, Durkheim ve Weber gibi önemli düşünürlerin eserlerinde bireylerin deneyimlediği bu krizin nasıl ele alındığını göstermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, yabancılaşma, anomi ve rasyonelleşme gibi önemli kavramlar incelenecek, birbirleri ile olan benzerlikleri ve farklılıkları ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yabancılaşma,Rasyonelleşme,Anomi,Modern Toplum,Sosyal Teori

Kaynakça

1. AİKEN, H. D. (1956). The Age Of İdeology. New York: New American Library.
2. BAUDELAİRE, C. (1964). The Painter Of Modern Life. The Painter Of Modern Life And Other Essays, 2.
3. BELLAH, R.N. (1959). Durkheim And History. American Sociological Review, (24), 447-60.
4. BOTTOMORE, T. (1981). A Marxist consideration of Durkheim. Social Forces, 59(4), 902-17.
5. CARROLL, A. J. (2011). Disenchantment, Rationality And The Modernity Of Max Weber. Forum Philosophicum, 16(1), 117-37.
6. COHEN, G.A. (1978). Karl Marx’s theory of history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. FRİSBY, D. (1985). Fragments Of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
8. GİDDENS, A. (1971). Capitalism And Modern Social Theory: An Analysis Of The Writings Of Marx, Durkheim And Max Weber. London: Cambridge University Press.

9. GREİSMAN, H.C. (1976). Disenchantment Of The W orld: Romanticism, Aesthetics And Sociological Theory. The British Journal Of Sociology, 27(4), 495-507.
10. HİRSCHMAN, A.O. (1982). Rival İnterpretations Of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, Or Feeble?. Journal Of Economic Literature, 20(2), 146384.
11. ISRAEL, J. (1971). Alienation From Marx To Modern Society. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. KAHLER, E. (1957). The Tower And The Abyss. New York: Braziller, p.43.
13. MARX, K., & Engels, F. (1967). The Communist Manifesto. 1848. Trans. Samuel Moore. London: Penguin.
14. MARX, K. (2005). Early Writings. Penguin UK.
15. NİETZSCHE, F. (2003). Beyond good and evil. Penguin.
16. NİSBET, R. (1953). The Quest For Community. New York: Oxford, p.15.
17. PALUMBO, A., & Scott, A. (2005). Classical Social Theory I: Marx and Durkheim. In A. Harrington, Modern Social Theory (pp. 40-62). Oxford University Press: Oxford.
18. RİTZER, G. (2010). Sociological theory. McGraw Hill: New York.
19. ROUSSEAU, J. J. (1920). The Social Contract: & Discourses (No. 660). JM Dent & Sons.
20. SCRİBNER, R.W . (1993). The Reformation: Popular Magic, And The Disenchantment Of The World. The Journal Of Interdisciplinary History, 23(3), 475-94.
21. TİRYAKİAN, E.A. (1975). Neither Marx Nor Durkheim... Perhaps Weber. American Journal Of Sociology, 81(1), 1-33.
22. WEGNER, E.L. (1975). The Concept Of Alienation: A Critique And Some Suggestions For A Context Specific Approach. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(2), 171-93.
23. ZEİTLİN, I. M. (1968). Ideology And The Development Of Sociological Theory. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.