PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

B. Dilek Özbezek

doi:10.17753/sosekev.1104180

TR EN

PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Günümüzün dinamik iş dünyasında, bilgi bir örgütün sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajına katkıda bulunan en önemli örgütsel kaynaktır. Bununla birlikte, bilgi sadece çalışanlar paylaşmaya istekli olduğu sürece örgüt tarafından kullanılabilir. Bilgi paylaşımı, en az iki taraf arasındaki sürekli ve karmaşık etkileşim sürecidir. Bu çalışanlar ve işverenler veya örgütler arasındaki istihdam ilişkisinin şart ve koşulları belirleyen karşılıklı yükümlülüklerle dolu bir psikolojik sözleşmeye dayalı karşılıklı bir süreç olarak ele alınabilir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, psikolojik sözleşme türlerinin bilgi paylaşımı üzerine etkisini incelemektedir. Önceki çalışmalara dayanarak, psikolojik sözleşme kavramı, ilişkisel ve işlemsel psikolojik sözleşme olmak üzere iki temel boyutta ele alınmıştır. Bilgi paylaşımı ise, tek boyutla incelenmiştir. Bu araştırma için Gaziantep Üniversitesi’nde görev yapan 320 akademik personelden anket yöntemiyle veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler çoklu regresyon analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, işlemsel psikolojik sözleşmenin bilgi paylaşımı üzerinde anlamlı ve negatif etkisi olduğunu, ancak ilişkisel psikolojik sözleşmenin bilgi paylaşımı üzerinde anlamlı ve pozitif etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilgi paylaşımı, Psikolojik sözleşme, İşlemsel psikolojik sözleşme, İlişkisel psikolojik sözleşme.

A Research on The Effect of PsychologicalContract on Knowledge Sharing

Öz

In today’s dynamic business world, knowledge is the most important organizational resource that contributes to an organization's sustainable competitive advantage. However, knowledge can only be used by the organization as long as employees are willing to share it. Knowledge sharing is a continuous and complex process of interaction between at least two parties. It can be viewed as a reciprocal process based on a psychological contract filled with mutual obligations that sets the terms and conditions of the employment relationship between employees and employers or organizations. The purpose of this research was to examine the impact of psychological contract types on knowledge sharing. Based on previous work, the psychological contract has been discussed in two basic dimensions as relational and transactional psychological contract. relational and operational psychological contracts. Knowledge sharing was examined in one dimension For this research, data were collected from 320 academicians working in Gaziantep University by survey method. The obtained data were evaluated with multiple regression analysis. The findings of the research shows that transactional psychological contract has a significant negative effect on knowledge sharing, but relational psychological contract has a significant positive effect on knowledge sharing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Knowledge sharing, Psychological contract, Relational psychological contracts, Transactional psychological contracts.

Kaynakça

Abdullah, N. L., Hamzah, N., Arshad, R., Isa, R. M., & Ghani, R. A. (2011). Psychological contract and knowledge sharing among academicians: mediating role of relational social capital. International Business Research, 4(4), 231-241. https://www.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n4p231
Aggarwal, U., & Bhargava, S. (2010). Predictors and outcomes of relational and transactional psychological contract. Psychol. Stud, 55(3), 195–207. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s12646- 010-0033-2
Akram, M. (2017). The effect of knowledge sharing behavior on the relationship of psychological contract, Creativity and Innovative Behaviors, J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 7(9), 10-17. https://www.textroad.com/pdf/JBASR/J.%20Basic.%20Appl.%20Sci.%20Res.,%207(9)10- 17,%202017.pdf
Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: SPSS uygulamalı (Geliştirilmiş 3. baskı). Sakarya Kitabevi.
Anderson, N., & Schalk, R. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(7), 637−647.
Anvari, R., Mansor, N.N.A., Aisyah Bt. S., Rahman, P.A., Rahman, R.H.B.A., & Chermahini, S.H. (2014). Mediating effects of affective organizational commitment and psychological contract in the relationship between strategic compensation practices and knowledge sharing, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences 129, 111-118. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.655
Arnold, J. (1996). The psychological contract: A concept in need of closer scrutiny?, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 511-520. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414876
Bal, P.M., De Lange, A.H. Jansen, P.G.W., & Van Der Velde, M.E.G. (2008). Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1), 143-158. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.005
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://www.doi.org/0092-0703/88 / 1601-0074
Bartol, K.M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems, Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 9(1), 64-76. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900105

Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Bock, G.-W., & Kim, Y-G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing, Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21. https://www.doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2002040102
Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, Social-Psychological Forces,and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/25148669
Büyükbeşe, T. (2012). Güçlendirici liderliğin çalışan performansı ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkisi: bir model önerisi (Tez No. 326064) [Doktora tezi, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Cabrera, E.F., & Cabrera, A. (2005) Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720-735. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020
Castaneda, D. I.., & Cuellar, S. (2019). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review, Knowl Process Manag., 1-15. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637
Cai, Z., Liu, H., Huang, Q., Kang, Y., & Liang, L. (2020). Encouraging client’s knowledge sharing in enterprise system post-implementation through psychological contract and entrepreneurial orientation, Information Technology & People, 33(2), 689-709. https://www.doi.org/I 10.1108/ITP-11-2018-0510
Chambel, M.J., & Fontinha, R., (2009). Contingencies of contingent employment: psychological contract, job ınsecurity and employability of contracted workers, Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 25(3), 207-217.
Chambel, M.J., Lorente, L., Carvalho, V., & Martinez, I.M. (2016). Psychological contract profiles among permanent and temporary agency workers, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 79-94. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2014-0070
Cullinane, N., & Dundon, T. (2006). The psychological contract: A critical review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 113–129. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 2370.2006.00123.x
Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey, Journal of Management Studies, 37, 903–930. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00210
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Kessler, I. (2002). Exploring reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract: Employee and employer perspectives, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(1), 69-86. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000852
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A-M., & Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships: examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 774– 781. https://www.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.774
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Shore, L. M. (2007). The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here?, Human Resource Management Review, 17, 166–179. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.008
Conway, N., & Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M. (2011). The reciprocal relationship between psychological contract fulfilment and employee performance and the moderating role of perceived organizational support and tenure, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 277–299. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02033.x
Dabos, G. E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 52–72. https://www.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.52
Dai, L.T., & Wang, L. (2016) Psychological contract, reciprocal preference and knowledge sharing willingness. Open Journal of Social Sciences 4, 60-69. https://www.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.48008
Demirel, Y. (2007). Bilgi ve bilgi paylaşımının işletme performansına etkisi üzerine bir araştırma, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 199-215. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/comuybd/issue/4113/54137
Fidan, T. (2021). Üniversite idari personelinin psikolojik sözleşme algısının iş doyumlarına etkisi: kamu hizmeti güdüsünün aracı rolü, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(1), 175-203. https://www.doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.569385
Gupta, B., Agarwal, A., Samaria, P., Sarda, P., & Bucha, R. (2012). Organizational commitment & psychological contract in knowledge sharing behavior. Indian J. Ind. Relat. 47, 737–749. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23267374
Guest, D. E. (2004). The psychology of the employment relationship: An analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 541–555. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00187.x
Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review 25, 161–178.
Hansen, S., & Avital, M. (2005). Share and share alike: the social and technological ınfluences on knowledge sharing behavior. sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations 5, 1-19. http://sprouts.case.edu/2005/050101.pdf
Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing, Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91–100. https://www.doi.org/1092- 4604/99/020091-10$17.50
Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework, Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337-359. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1534484303257985
Kamaşak, R., & Bulutlar, F. (2010). The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation, European Business Review, 22(3), 306-317. https://www.doi.org/10.1201/b16700-19
Kessel, M., Carsten, J.K., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams, Creativıiy and Innovation Management, 21(2), 147-157. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00635.x
Khalil, O.E.M., & Shea, T. (2012). Knowledge sharing barriers and effectiveness at a higher education ınstitution, International Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 43-64. https://www.doi.org/10.4018/jkm.2012040103
Kumaraswamy, S.K., & Chitale, C.M. (2012). Collaborative knowledge sharing strategy to enhance organizational learning, Journal of Management Development, 31(3), 308-322. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/02621711211208934
Köseoğlu, M.A., Gider, Ö., & Ocak, S. (2011). Bilgi paylaşımı tutumunu etkileyen faktörler nelerdir? Bir kamu hastanesi örneği, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(1), 215‐ 243.https://www.ajindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423880304.pdf
Lan, J., Wang, B., Hu, B., & Lei, H. (2020). Impact of psychological contract in knowledge sharing: A case study from Industrial Cluster Enterprises, E3S Web of Conferences 143, 1-6. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/03/e3sconf_arfee2020_02053.pdf
Law, C.C.H., & Ngai, E.W.T. (2008). An empirical study of the effects of knowledge sharing and learning behaviors on firm performance, Expert Systems with Applications 34, 2342–2349. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.03.004
Lee, G.J., & Faller, N. (2005). Transactional and relational aspects of the psychological contracts of temporary workers, South African Journal of Psychology, 35(4), 831-847. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/008124630503500412
Lee, J-N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success, Information & Management 38, 323-335. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00074-4
Liao, S.-H., & Chen, C.-C. (2018). Leader-member exchange and employee creativity: Knowledge sharing: the moderated mediating role of psychological contract, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 419-435. https://www.doi.org/1108/LODJ-05-2017-0129
Luu, T.T. (2016). Psychological contract and knowledge sharing: CSR as an antecedent and entrepreneurial orientation as a moderator, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(1), 2-19. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2014-0058
Macfarlane, B. (2011) Professors as intellectual leaders: formation, identity and role, Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 57-73. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03075070903443734
Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Mooradian, T., von Krogh, G., & Mueller, J. (2011). Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(02), 296-310. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.540156
McDonald, D.J., & Makin, P.J. (2000). The psychological contract, organisational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21(2), 84-91. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/01437730010318174
Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011), Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay.
Millward, L.J., & Hopkins, L. J. (1998). Psychological contracts, organizational and job commitment, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(16), 1530-1556. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01689.x
Mimaroğlu, H., (2008). Psikolojik sözleşmenin personelin tutum ve davranışlarına etkileri: Tıbbi satış temsilcileri üzerinde bir araştırma (Tez No. 217052) [Doktora tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organızatıon Science, 5(1), 14-37.
O’Donohue, W., & Nelson, L. (2009). The role of ethical values in an expanded psychological contract, Journal of Business Ethics 90, 251–263. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009- 0040-1
O’Neill, B.S., & Adya, M. (2007). Knowledge sharing and the psychological contract: Managing knowledge workers across different stages of employment, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(4), 411-436. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/02683940710745969
Puspa, T., & Wijaya, N.J. (2018). Analysis the dimension of CSR towards the relationship between psychological contract and knowledge sharing, Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 2(2), 107–120. https://www.doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v2i2.51
Ramadian, A., Eliyana, A., Hamidah., Buchdadi, A.D., & Rakawuri, R., (2020). The effect of compensation strategy implementation on knowledge sharing through affective Commitment and Psychological Contracts, Sys Rev Pharm, 11(9), 699-712. https://www.doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.9.101
Renzl, B. (2008). Trust in management and knowledge sharing: the mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega, 36(2), 206-220. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.005
Rousseau, D.M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942
Rousseau, D.M., (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts, Journal of Organızational Behavior, 11, 389-400. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110506
Rousseau, D.M., & Tijoriwala, S.A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, Special Issue: The Psychological Contract at Work, 679-695. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3100284
Rousseau, D.M. (2004), Psychological contracts in the workplace: Understanding the ties that motivate, Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 120-127. https://www.doi.org/10.5465/AME.2004.12689213
Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 137–152. https://www.doi.org/10.2307/256773
Robinson, S.L., (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574-599. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393868
Rutten, W., Blaas-Franken, J., & Martin, H. (2016). The impact of (low) trust on knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 199-214. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10- 2015-0391
Schalk, R., & Roe, R.E. (2007). Towards a dynamic model of the psychological contract, Journal for the Tlieory of Social Behaviour, 37(2), 167-182. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 5914.2007.00330.x
Sulistiawan, J., & Andyani, D. (2020). Psychological contracts, innovative work behavior, and knowledge sharing ıntention: the role of work engagement and job resources, Journal Aplikasi Manajemen, 18(4), 741-753. https://www.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2020.018.04.13
Shore, L.M., & Tetrick, L.E. (1994). The Psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship, In Trends in Organizational Behavior: Chichester; Cooper, C.L., Rousseau, D., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-98115-007
Turnley, W.H., & Feldman, D.C. (2000). Re-examining the effects of psychological contract violations: Unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediators, Journal of Organizational Behavior 21, 25-42. https://www.doi.org/0894±3796/2000/010025±18$17.50
Wang, S., & Noe, R.A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research, Human Resource Management Review 20, 115–131. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
Wu, C-M., & Chen, T-J. (2015). Psychological contract fulfillment in the hotel workplace: Empowering leadership, knowledge exchange, and service performance, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 48, 27–38. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.04.008
Xiao, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021). Positive reciprocity belief moderates the effects of trust and felt trust on knowledge-sharing intention, Social Behavior and Personality, 49(12), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.10956
Xiaojun, L., Zongkui, Z., & Yumei, Z. (2011). The influence of the university teachers’ psychological contract on knowledge sharing, Electrical Power Systems and Computers, LNEE 99, 253–258. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21747-0_31
Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Detay. van den Hooff, B., & Huysman, M. (2009). Managing knowledge sharing: Emergent and engineering approaches, Information & Management 46, 1-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.09.002
Zaim, H., Gürcan, Ö.F., Tarım, M., Zaim, S., & Alpkan, L. (2015). Determining the critical factors of tacit knowledge in service ındustry in Turkey, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 759-767. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.156
Zhou, J., Plaisent, M., Zheng, L. & Bernard, P. (2014). Psychological contract, organizational commitment and work satisfaction: survey of researchers in chinese state-owned engineering research ınstitutions. Open Journal of Social Sciences 2, 217-225. https://www.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.29037

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

B. Dilek Özbezek ^*
0000-0001-7176-1534
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Nisan 2022

Kabul Tarihi

16 Eylül 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Sayı: 92

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1104180

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA35UL77AG

APA

Özbezek, B. D. (2022). PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 92, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1104180

AMA

1.Özbezek BD. PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. EKEV Akademi Dergisi. 2022;(92):1-21. doi:10.17753/sosekev.1104180

Chicago

Özbezek, B. Dilek. 2022. “PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, sy 92: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1104180.

EndNote

Özbezek BD (01 Aralık 2022) PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. EKEV Akademi Dergisi 92 1–21.

IEEE

[1]B. D. Özbezek, “PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA”, EKEV Akademi Dergisi, sy 92, ss. 1–21, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.17753/sosekev.1104180.

ISNAD

Özbezek, B. Dilek. “PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. EKEV Akademi Dergisi. 92 (01 Aralık 2022): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1104180.

JAMA

1.Özbezek BD. PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. EKEV Akademi Dergisi. 2022;:1–21.

MLA

Özbezek, B. Dilek. “PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, sy 92, Aralık 2022, ss. 1-21, doi:10.17753/sosekev.1104180.

Vancouver

1.B. Dilek Özbezek. PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. EKEV Akademi Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2022;(92):1-21. doi:10.17753/sosekev.1104180

PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

A Research on The Effect of PsychologicalContract on Knowledge Sharing

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster