POLİTİK SEÇİM TARİHLERİ ETRAFINDA ANORMAL GETİRİ HAREKETLERİ: BORSA İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Genel Seçimler, Olay Çalışması, BIST-100, Getiri, Anormal Getiri.
Kaynakça
- Ada, S.S., Bolak, M. ve Süer, Ö. (2013). Politik seçimler, referandumlar ve hisse senedi getirileri: İMKB örneği, Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 50(579), 23-40.
- Anthony, A. (2001). Social fractionalization, political ınstability, and the size of the government, IMF Staff Papers, 48, (3/4), 564-565.
- Bekaert, G., Harvey, C.R., Lundblad, C.T. ve Siegel, S. (2016). Political risk and international valuation, Journal of Corporate Finance, 37, 1-23.
- Bento,J.L.(1999).Jump risk in the US stock market: Evidence using political ınformation, Review of Financial Economics, 8, 149-163.
- Chen, A.H. ve Siems, T.F. (2004). The effects of terrorism on global capital markets, European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 349-366.
- Christos, P., Stangeland, D.A. ve Turtle, H.J. (2000). Political elections and resolution of uncertainity: The international evidence, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24(10), 1575-1604.
- Diogo, F.M. (2011).An analysis of the political risks environment inAmerican developing countries, International Journal of Academic Research, 3 (4,) 287-291.
- Dolores, F., ve Pardo, A. (2012). Partisan politics theory and stock market performance: Evidence for Spain, Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, XLI(155), 371-392.
- Fama, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work, The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
- Fama, E.F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II, The Journal of Finance, XLVI(5), 1575- 1617.