ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE KİMLİK BOYUTLARININ KENDİNİ NESNELEŞTİRME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Yıl 2023, , 192 - 200, 15.09.2023

Meva Demir Kaya , Hilal Fatma Vural

https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1336984

Öz

Kendini nesneleştirme, bireylerin bedenlerinin başkaları tarafından nasıl değerlendirildiğine odaklanan bir kavramdır. Özellikle kadın çalışmalarında incelenen kendini nesneleştirmede, kadınların kendilik algılarının bedenlerine ilişkin değerlendirmelerini etkilediği bilinmektedir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada kimlik boyutlarının kendini nesneleştirme üzerindeki etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Katılımcılar 18-39 yaş arası (ortalama=21.77, ss=3.88) 215 üniversiteli kadın öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Kimlik Gelişimi Boyutları Ölçeği ve Kendini Nesneleştirme İnanç ve Davranışları Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Korelasyon analizi sonucuna göre, kendini nesneleştirme ile içsel yatırım, içsel yatırımla özdeşleşme, seçeneklerin genişlemesine araştırılması ve seçeneklerin derinlemesine araştırılması arasında olumsuz ilişkiler vardır. Bununla birlikte, kendini nesneleştirme ile seçeneklerin saplantılı araştırılması arasında pozitif bir ilişki vardır. Çoklu regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre içsel yatırım, içsel yatırımla özdeşleşme ve seçeneklerin genişlemesine araştırılmasının kendini nesneleştirmeyi negatif olarak yordadığı, ancak seçeneklerin derinlemesine araştırılmasının kendini nesneleştirme üzerindeki etkisinin anlamlı olmadığı bulunmuştur. Ayrıca seçeneklerin saplantılı araştırılmasının kendini nesneleştirme üzerindeki etkisi pozitif bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar, kimlik ve kendini nesneleştirme literatürü bağlamında tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kimlik boyutları, Kendini nesneleştirme, Kadın

The Effect of Dimensions of İdentity on Self-Objectification in University Students

Öz

Self-objectification is a concept that focuses on how individuals' bodies are evaluated by others. It is known that women's self-perceptions affect their evaluations of their bodies, especially in self-objectification, which is studied in women's studies. In this context, it was aimed to investigate the effects of identity dimensions on self-objectification in this study. The participants consisted of 215 university women students between the ages of 18-39 (mean = 21.77, sd=3.88). Personal Information Form, The Dimensions of Identity Development Scale, and Self-Objectification Beliefs and Behaviors Scale were used as data collection tools. According to correlation analysis, there were nagative relationships between self-objectification and commitment, identification with commitment, exploration in breadth, and exploration in depth. However, there was a positive relationship between self-objectification and ruminative exploration. According to the results of multiple regression analysis, it was found that commitment, identification with commitment, and exploration in breadth negatively predicted self-objectification, but the effect of exploration in depth on self-objectification was not significant. In addition, the effect of ruminative exploration on self-objectification was found to be positively. The results are discussed in the context of identity and self-objectification literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Identity dimensions, Self-objectification, Women

Kaynakça

• Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University.
• Aubrey, J. S. (2006a). Exposure to sexually objectifying media and body self-perceptions among college women: An examination of the selective exposure hypothesis and the role of moderating variables. Sex Roles, 55(3–4), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9070-7
• Aubrey, J. S. (2006b). Effects of Sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56(2), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00024.x
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (19. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Calogero, R. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 392–398. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0956797612452574
• Cary, K. M., Maas, M. K., & Nuttall, A. K. (2021). Self-objectification, sexual subjectivity, and identity exploration among emerging adult women. Self and Identity, 20(7), 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1772358
• Daniels, E. A., & Gillen, M. M. (2015). Body image and identity: A call for new research. In K. C. McLean & M. Syed (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 406–422). Oxford University.
• Demir Kaya, M., & Çok, F. (2022). Kimlik gelişiminin boyutları ölçeğinin okul dışı genç kadınlar üzerinde geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 25(49), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120220311m000046
• Demir Kaya, M., & Çok, F. (2023). Gender, self-silencing, and identity among school and out of school emerging adults. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(2), 561–574.
• Erikson, E. H. (1987). Childhood and society. Paladin Grafton Books. (Reprinted from Childhood and society, 1963, New York: Norton)
• Erikson, E. H. (1994). Identity, youth and crisis. Norton. (Reprinted from Identity, youth and crisis, 1968, New York: Norton)
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997a). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997b). Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
• Harrison, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Women’s sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in black and white adolescent females. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/53.2.216
• Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
• Lambert, H. (2011). The relationship among identity development, sociocultural ideals of beauty, and self-objectification among females in early adulthood. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 71(10-B), 6443.
• Laney, E. K., Carruthers, L., Lewis Hall, M. E., & Anderson, T. (2013). Motherhood and identity development in faculty women. Journal of Family Issues, 35(9), 1227–1251.
• Lindner, D., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2017). The development and psychometric evaluation of the self-objectification beliefs and behaviors scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(2), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317692109
• Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2006). Unpacking commitment and exploration: Preliminary validation of an integrative model of late adolescent identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 29(3), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.03.008
• Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Goossens, L., & Pollock, S. (2008). Employment, Sense of coherence, and identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23(5), 566–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558408322146
• Moradi, B. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63(1–2), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9824-0
• Morsünbül, Ü. (2011). Ergenlikte özerkliğin ve kimlik biçimlenmesinin öznel iyi oluş üzerine etkisi (Tez no. 302897) [Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
• Sherman, A. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2014). “Boys can be anything”: Effect of Barbie play on girls’ career cognitions. Sex Roles, 70(5–6), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0347-y
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. Talu, E. (2020). Ergenlerde beden imajı algısının kimlik gelişimi sürecine etkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 1116–1135. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.766776
• Vankerckhoven, L., Raemen, L., Claes, L., Eggermont, S., Palmeroni, N., & Luyckx, K. (2023). Identity formation, body image, and body-related symptoms: Developmental trajectories and associations throughout adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(3), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01717-y
• Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678