KÜRESELLEŞEN DÜNYA’DA OKULLAR İÇİN VE DİĞER ÖRGÜTLER İÇİN SOSYAL SORUMLULUĞUN ÖNEMİ

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 62, 531 - 548, 30.04.2015

Önder Şanlı Mehmet Altun Çetin Tan

Öz

Hem ülkemizde hem de tüm Dünya’da sürekli olarak değişim ve gelişmeler
yaşanmaktadır. Bu değişim ve gelişmeler örgütlerin yapılarında da olmaktadır. Günden güne
değişen şartlara göre toplumun hem eğitim kurumlarından hem de diğer örgütlerden olan
beklentileri de değişiklik göstermektedir. Bu durumlarında asıl nedeni yine bu gelişmeler
ve değişimlerdir. Bu hızlı değişim ve gelişmelerin sonucunda hem eğitim kurumlarının
hem de diğer örgütlerin nasıl etkililiği de tartışılan önemli konular arasındadır. Bu
süreçte örgütler amaçlarını ve görevlerini gözden geçirmeye zorlanmaktadırlar. Örgütler
kendilerini bu değişim ve gelişmelere uyumlu hale getirebilirlerse gelecek için daha da
kuvvetli olabileceklerdir, ancak tam tersi bir uygulama ise örgütler için tam bir hüsran
olabilir. Bu anlamdaki değişim ve gelişmelerin en başında gelen kavramlardan birisi de
“sosyal sorumluluk” kavramıdır. Çağımızda bu kavram her geçen gün önem kazanmıştır.
Örgütlerden beklenen şey sadece kendi menfaatlerini düşünmek olmamalı, aynı zamanda
topluma karşıda sorumlu davranışlar da sergilemelidirler. Örgütlerin asıl varlık sebepleri
toplum olduğuna göre toplumu daha güçlü yapabilmek adına da sorumlulukları olmalıdır.
Toplumsal kurallara, toplumsal değerlere ve toplumsal beklentilere karşı saygılı ve
sorumlu olmak günümüzde örgütler için oldukça önemlidir. Bu davranışların sonucu
olarak toplum bu örgütlere güvenecek ve onların da daha güçlü olmaları için gayret
edecektir. Bu kazan-kazan politikaları ile birlikte hem örgütler hem de toplum gelecek
için daha güçlü olacaklardır.
Bu çalışmada sosyal sorumluluğun hem okullar için hem de diğer örgütler için ne denli
önemli olduğu kuramsal bir çerçevede daha önceden yapılmış benzer araştırmalardan da
örnekler verilerek açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgüt, Toplum, Sosyal Sorumluluk

Kaynakça

• Andriof, J. and McIntosh, M. (2001), “Introduction”, in Andriof, J. and McIntosh, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp. 13-24.
• Anshen, M. (1983), “Changing The Social Contract: A Role for business,” in Beauchamp, T.L. and Bowie, N.E. (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 97-103.
• Baxter, V. (2008). “A communitarian framework for plannin educational leadership preparation programs.” Educational Planning, 17(1), 18–26.
• Begley, T.M., Lee, C., Fang, Y., & Lie, J. (2001) Power distance as a moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 692–711.
• Bertelsmann, S. (Ed.). (2005). Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen. Detailauswertung. Dokumentation der Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung der Bertelsmann Stiftung. Gütersloh.
• Bowen, Howard R. 1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, (Harper & Row, New York).
• Branco, M. C. and Rodrigues, L. L. (2006), “Corporate social responsibility and resource based perspectives”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 69 No. 2, pp. 111–132.
• Branco, M. C. and Rodrigues, L. L. (2007), “Corporate social responsibility and resource based perspectives”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 12 No. 1, p. 9.
• Brennan Linda & Johnson E. Victoria, 2000. Seventh Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics, 2000.Proceedings Vol. 2, pp. 703–713
• Buchholz, R. A. (1991), “Corporate Responsibility and The Good Society: From Economics to Ecology”, Business Horizons, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 19–31.
• Burkman, A. (2010), ‘The Role of Social, Civic and Political Responsibility in Educational Leadership Preparation Programs’, OpenStax-CNX module: m33351
• Carl, D., Gupta, V. & Javidan, M. (2004). Power distance, in R.J House, P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman & V. Gupta (eds.) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (pp. 513–563), Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Carroll, A. B. (1979) “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 497–505.
• Carroll, Archie B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Towards the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons (July/ August), 39–48.
• Carroll, A.B. (1999), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct”, in Business Society, 38; 268, Sage Publications, pp. 268–295.
• Clarke, J. (1998), “Corporate social reporting: an ethical practice”, in Blake, J. and Gowthorpe, C. (Eds.), Ethical issues in accounting, Routledge, London & New York, pp. 184–199.
• Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995) “A Stakeholder Framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 92–117.
• Cox, P., Brammer, S. and Milligton, A. (2004). “An Empirical Examination of Institutional Investor Preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 27-43.
• David, J.L. (2009). Service learning and civic participation. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 83–84.
• Davis, Keith. 1960. Can Business Afford to Ignore Corporate Social Responsibilities? California Management Review 2, 70–76.
• Davis, Keith 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal 16, 312–322.
• Dentchev, N. (2005/284), Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility in Business Models, Hoveniersberg, Ghent University.
• Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Journal of Management, 24(3), 265–304.
• Duignan, P. (2006). Educational Leadership: Key Challenges and Ethical Tensions. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge Press.
• Enquete and Kommission. (2002). Bürgerschaftliches Engagement: auf dem Weg in eine zukunftsfähige Bürgergesellschaft, Bericht der Enquete‐Kommission “Zukunft des bürgerschaftlichen Engagements“ des Deutschen Bundestages, Deutscher Bundestag, 14. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 14/8900, Berlin.
• European Commission (EC) (2001), Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility – Green Paper, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg.
• Frederick (1986: 4) Frederick, W.C. 1986. Theories of corporate social performance: Much done, more to do. Working paper, University of Pittsburg, Graduate school of Business.
• Freeman, R.E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions, Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
• Freeman, R. E. (1998), “A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation”, in Pincus, L. B. (Ed.), Perspectives in business ethics, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, pp. 171–181.
• Friedman, M. (1998), “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”, in Pincus, L. B. (Ed.), Perspectives in business ethics, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, pp. 246–251.
• Gazdar, K., & Kirchhoff, K.R. (2003). Unternehmerische Wohltaten: Last oder Lust? Von Stakeholder Value, Corporate Citizenship und Sustainable Development bis Sponsoring. Munich: Unterschleißheim.
• Habisch, A. (2003). Corporate citizenship: Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen in Deutschland. Berlin: Springer.
• Hansen, U., & Schrader, U. (2005). Corporate social responsibility als aktuelles Thema der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. In Die Betriebswirtschaft DBW, 65(4), 373–395.
• Hart, D., Youniss, J., & Atkins, R. (2007). High school community service as a predictor of adult voting and volunteering. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 197–219.
• Henderson, D.: The Case Against 'Corporate Social Responsibility'. Policy vol. 17, no. 2, 2001
• Heinze, K.L. (2005), In the Mood to Give: How and Why Positive Affect Increases the Importance of CSR to Prospective Employees, Northwestern University.
• Hess, D., Rogovsky, N. and Dunfee, T. W. (2002) “The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives”, California Management Review, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 110–125.
• Hess, F. M. & Kelly, A.P. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal preparation programs. Teachers College Record, 109(1), 244–274.
• Husted, B. W. (2000), “A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance”, Business and Society, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 24–48.
• Johnson, Harold. L. 1971. Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues. Belmont, Ca.: Wadsworth.
• Jones, Thomas. M. 1980. Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review 22(2), 59–67.
• Kangas, E. J. (1983). Journal of Business Ethics 2 127–133
• Lantos, G. P. (2001) “The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 595–630.
• Lantos, G. P. (2002) “The ethicality of altruistic corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 205–230.
• Lynch, W. (2000). A task of leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(3), 241–242.
• Maaß, F., & Clemens, R. (2002). Corporate citizenship: Das Unternehmen als “guter Bürger”. Wiesbaden: Jossey-Bass.
• Marrewijk, M. V. (2003) “Conceptions and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44 No. 2/3, pp. 95–105.
• Matten, D. and Crane, A. (2003), Corporate Citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualisation, Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham University.
• Matten, D., Crane, A. and Chapple, W. (2003) “Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 45 No. 1/2, pp. 109–120.
• Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2004), ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe, Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham University.
• Mbare, O.(2007). ‘The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the New Economy’ Electronic Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 12, No. 2
• Mescon, M., Bovée, L.B. and Thill, J.V. (1999), Business Today, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
• Mutz, G. (2002). Corporate Citizenship in Deutschland: Annäherung an ein zivilgesellschaftliches Konzept? Retrieved 13 April, 2004,fromhttp://fesportal. fes.de/pls/portal30/docs/FOLDER/BUERGERGESELLSCHAFT/MUTZ. HTML
• Osburg, T. (2006): Grundlagen und Arten des Hochschulsponsoring. In A. Bagusat & A. Hermanns (Eds.), Management-Handbuch Bildungssponsoring. Grundlagen, Ansätze und Fallbeispiele für Sponsoren und Gesponserte (pp. 93–109). Berlin: Soringer.
• Osburg, T. (2009): Nachhaltigkeit durch Fokussierung. In American Chamber of Commerce FAZ-Institut (Eds.),
• Owen, J. (2007). Getting your political bearings. Principal Leadership (Middle School Edition), 8(2), 46–50.
• Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2002) “The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80 No. 12, pp. 56–68.
• Reichenau, J. (2003). Corporate volunteering: Neue Wege für Unternehmen in der Bürgergesellschaft. Stiftung & Sponsoring, 3, 35–37.
• Schrader, U. (2003). Corporate Citizenship: Die Unternehmung als guter Bürger? Berlin: Springer.
• Schreuder, H. (1978), “The Social Responsibility of Business”, in Dam, C.V. and Stallaert, L.M. (Eds.), Trends in Business Ethics. Implications for Decision Making, H.E. Stenfert, Kroese, B.V.
• Schwartz, M. S. and Carroll, A. B. (2003) “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three- Domain Approach”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 503–530.
• Sethi, S. P. (1979) “A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 63-74.
• Smith, A. (1991), “The Wealth of Nations”, David Campbell Publishers Ltd, London. Smith, A. (2002), “The Wealth of Nations”, in Hartman, Perspectives in Business Ethics, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, pp. 237–241.
• Smith, N. C. (2003) “CSR: Whether or How?”, California Management Review, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 52–76.
• Solomon, R.C. (1999), “Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues. An Aristotelean Approach to Business Ethics”, in Donaldson, T. and Werhane, P.H. (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Business. A Philosophical Approach, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp. 81–93.
• Valor, C. (2005) “CSR and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability”, Business and Society Review, Vol. 110 No. 2, pp. 191–212.
• Waldman, D.A., de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N., & House, R.J. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 823–837.
• Walker, S.F. & Marr, J.W. Stakeholder Power, A Winning plan for building stakeholder commitment and driving corporate growth (2002) Wartick, S. L. and Cochran, P. L. (1985) “The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 758– 769.
• Werhane, P. H. and Freeman, R. E. (1999) “Business ethics: the state of the art”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1–16.
• Windsor, D. (2001), “The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility”, The International Journal of Organisation Studies, 9 (3), 225–256.
• Wood, D. J. (1991) “Corporate Social Performance Revisited”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 691–718.
• Wood, D. J. and Jones, R. E. (1995) “Stakeholder mismatching: a theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance”, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 229–267.
• World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), (2000,2002) WEBSİTES
• athttp://www.eauc.org.uk/documents/News/HE%20Benchmarking%20Project%20Repo rt%20Final.pdf (23.02.15) 1
• http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/57494/saswati-paper.pdf (23.02.15)2