ATTITUDES OF TEACHERS TOWARDS L1 USE IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM IN THE CONTEXTS OF TURKEY AND KYRGYZSTAN

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 80, 57 - 71, 26.12.2019

Begimai Akulova

Öz

In an attempt to achieve perfect English language proficiency, all learners face the same issue: the inevitable use of their L1 in an English classroom. Various studies have identified different attitudes and reasons for teachers’ and students’ L1 use in English classroom. The aim of this paper is to identify teachers’ attitude towards L1 use and reveal the reason for their particular attitude through the use of the open-ended questionnaires. Teachers’ attitude was distinguished in terms of teachers’ and students’ L1 use. Apart from that teachers’ questionnaires attempted to identify activities that are best carried out through L1 and TL. As this study comprises teachers from universities of Turkey and Kyrgyzstan the difference between their attitudes has been also investigated. Qualitative data obtained from the questionnaires was collected, coded and analyzed with the help of the NVivo12 software program. The research findings revealed that overall attitude of teachers towards their own use of L1 is positive. However substantial difference has been observed between the attitudes of Turkish and Kyrgyz teachers. Results obtained from teachers’ survey revealed that majority of teachers from Turkish context tend to have positive attitude with regard to teachers’ L1 employment than their Kyrgyz colleagues. Moreover no considerable difference has been observed in terms of the teachers’ attitude towards students’ L1 use. Similarly no substantial difference has been observed between the attitudes of Turkish and Kyrgyz teachers towards students’ use of L1. Finally, activities best carried out through L1 and TL based on the teachers’ view have been listed and discussed. Research findings also revealed that teachers and students employed L1 mainly for pedagogical reasons. Results also suggest that limited and judicious use of L1 can be served as a facilitating tool to improve TL proficiency.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Attitudes, L1 (Turkish and Kyrgyz), TL (English), Reasons Advantages, Disadvantages.

Kaynakça

• Alshammari,M.M.(2011).The use ofthemothertongue in SaudiEFLclassrooms. Journal of International Education Research, 7(4), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier. v7i4.6055
• Amorim, R. (2012). Code switching in student-student interaction; functions and reasons! Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Univerdade do Porto, 7, 177 – 195.
• Atkinson, D. (1987). The Mother tongue in the classroom: A neglected resource? ELT Journal, 41(4), 241-247. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from https://academic. oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/41/4/241/356996?redirectedFrom=fulltext
• Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Re-examining English Only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9-32. doi:10.2307/3586949
• Çelik, S. (2008). Opening the door: An examination of Mother Tongue use in Foreign Language classrooms. Hacetepe University Journal of Education, 34, 75-85. Retrieved January 9, 2015, from https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/288549269_Opening_the_door_An_examination_of_mother_ tongue_use_in_foreign_language_classrooms
• Clyne, M., & Sharifian, F (2008). English as an international language: Challenges and possibilities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 28.1-28.16. doi: 10.2104/aral0828.
• Cook, V. (1999). Teachers of English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185-209. Retrieved April 18, 2019, from http://www.jstor.org/ stable/3587717
• Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2012). Own-language use in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 45(03), 271-308. doi: 10.1017/S0261444812000067
• Jingxia, L. (2010). Teachers’ Code-Switching to the L1 in EFL classroom. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 3, 10-23. Retrieved January, 9, 2015, from https:// benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOALJ/TOALJ-3-10.pdf
• Kim, Y., & Petraki, E. (2009). Students’ and Teachers’ Use of and Attitudes to L1 in the EFL Classroom. The Asian EFL Journal, 11(4), 59-89.
• Laufer,B,. & Shmueli, K.(1997). Memorizing NewWords: DoesTeaching HaveAnything To Do With It? RELC Journal, 28(89). doi: 10.1177/003368829702800106
• Mahmutoğlu, H., & Kıcır, Z. (2013). The Use of Mother Tongue in EFLClassrooms. EUL Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 49-72.
• Miles, R. (2004). Evaluating the use of L1 in the English Language classroom. (Unpublished Master’s thesis, School of Humanities of the University of Birmingham). Retrieved April 25, 2015, from https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/ documents/collegeartslaw/cels/essays/matefltesldissertations/milesdiss.pdf
• Murakami, I. (2001, November). The 'Bridging strategy': Active use of learners' First Language in second language teaching. Humanizing Language Teaching, 3(6). Retrieved January 15, 2015, from http://www.hltmag.co.uk
• Sarıçoban, A. (2010). Should native language be allowed in foreign language classes? Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 10(38), 164-178.
• Schweers, C.W. (2003). Using L1 in the L2 Classroom. English Teaching Forum, 41(4), 34-37. Retrieved April 6, 2015, from https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/ resource_files/03-41-4-e.pdf
• Sert, O. (2005, August). The functions of code switching in ELT classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal, 11(8). Retrieved December 20, 2018, from http://iteslj.org/ Articles/Sert-CodeSwitching.html
• Shuchi, I, J., & Islam, A. B. M. S. (2016). Teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards L1 use in EFL classrooms in the contexts of Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 9(12), 62-73. doi:10.5539/elt.v9n12p62
• Solhi, M., & Büyükyazı, M. (2011). The use of first language in the EFL classroom: A facilitating or debilitating device? In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on foreign language teaching and applied linguistics, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
• Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2010). Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 355–375. doi: 10.1177/1362168810375362
• Tang, J. (2002, January). Using L1in the English classroom. English Teaching Forum, 40(1), 36-43. Retrieved April 6, 2015, from https://americanenglish.state.gov/ files/ae/resource_files/02-40-1-h.pdf
• Taşkın, A. (2011). Perceptions on using L1 in language classrooms: A case study in a Turkish private university. (Unpublished Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University). Retrieved January, 15, 2015, from tez.yok.gov.tr (Thesis No: 300757)
• Thongwichit, N. (2013). L1 Use with university students in Thailand: A Facilitating tool or a language barrier in learning English? Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 13(2), 179-206. Retrieved December, 24, 2014, from http://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/SUIJ/10969032.pdf
• Timor, T. (2012). Use of the mother tongue in teaching a foreign language. Language Education in Asia, 3(1), 7-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/12/V3/I1/A02/ Timor
• Van der Walt, C. (1997). English as a Language of Learning in South Africa: Whose English? Whose Culture? Language Awareness, 6(2-3), 183-197. doi: 10.1080/ 09658416.1997.9959927
• Voicu, C-G. (2012). Overusing mother tongue in English language teaching. International Journal of Communication Research, 2(3), 212-218. Retrieved August, 16, 2018, from http://www.ijcr.eu/articole/84_30_IJCR%203-2012.pdf
• Weng, P. (2012). Code-switching as a strategy use in an EFL classroom in Taiwan. US- China Foreign Language, 10(10), 1669-1675. Retrieved January, 11, 2015, from https://www.academia.edu/5105262/2012.10_US-China_Foreign_Language.