Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Gelişiminin Inovasyona Etkisi: IDI ve GII Kullanarak Ampirik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 101, 111 - 129, 24.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1603800

Öz

Bu çalışma, Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Gelişim Endeksi (IDI) ile Küresel Yenilik Endeksi (GII) arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırarak, dijital altyapının ve bağlantının yenilik ekosistemlerini şekillendirmedeki rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Spearman korelasyon analizi sonuçları, IDI ve GII puanları ile alt boyutları arasında güçlü ve anlamlı pozitif ilişkiler olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Toplam IDI puanı ile toplam GII puanı arasında güçlü bir korelasyon (𝑟=0.847) bulunmuş, bu da ülkelerin yenilik kapasitelerinin artırılmasında ICT gelişiminin merkezi bir rol oynadığını doğrulamaktadır. IDI alt boyutlarından Evrensel Bağlantı (𝑟=0.819) ve Anlamlı Bağlantı (𝑟=0.839) da GII ile anlamlı bir ilişki göstermiştir ve yüksek kaliteli dijital bağlantının önemini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, çalışma IDI ile GII alt boyutları arasında güçlü ilişkiler tespit etmiştir; özellikle Altyapı (𝑟=0.879), İnsan Sermayesi ve Araştırma (𝑟=0.842) ve Bilgi ve Teknoloji Çıktıları (𝑟=0.826) üzerinde belirgin etkiler gözlenmiştir. Anlamlı Bağlantı’nın yaratıcı çıktılar üzerindeki etkisinin Evrensel Bağlantı’dan daha güçlü olduğu gösterilmiş, bu da erişimden ziyade bağlantı kalitesinin önemini vurgulamıştır. Bu bulgular, dijital altyapı yatırımlarının yenilik ekosistemlerini geliştirmedeki önemini vurgulamakta, dijital bağlantıdaki eşitsizliklerin giderilmesi ve sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın teşvik edilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir. Çalışma, ICT’nin yenilik üzerindeki etkisini ampirik olarak ortaya koyarak, ekonomik büyüme ve rekabet gücü için dijital teknolojilerin nasıl kullanılacağına dair politika yapıcılara öneriler sunmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Absalyamova, S., Ivanova, N., Mukhametgalieva, C., & Khusnullova, A. (2018). Relationship between the international universities rankings and indexes of a country’s innovation development. In M. Land(Ed.), International Conference on Mathematical Modelling in Physical Sciences: Vol. 1141. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1141/1/012129
  • Arvanitis, S., Loukis, E. N. & Diamantopoulou, V. (2016). Are ICT, workplace organization, and human capital relevant for innovation? A comparative Swiss/Greek study. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 23(3),319–349. https://doi:10.1080/13571516.2016.1186385
  • Bate, A. F., Wachira, E. W., & Danka, S. (2023). The determinants of innovation performance: An income-based cross-country comparative analysis using the Global Innovation Index (GII). Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(20), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00283-2
  • Berger, M., & Diez, J. R. (2006). Technological Capabilities and Innovation in Southeast Asia. Science, Technology and Society, 11(1), 21-49. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097172180501100105
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5. baskı). Oxford University.
  • Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the co-evolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.006
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Choi, J. Y., & Kim, S. Y. (2020). The effects of ICT infrastructure and investment environment on innovation: Focused on Global Innovation Index. The Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2020.29.3.159
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5. baskı). Sage.
  • Dhar, B. K., Shaturaev, J., Kurbonov, K., & Nazirjon, R. (2023). The causal nexus between innovation and economic growth: An OECD study. Social Science Quarterly, 104(4), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13261
  • Farhadi, M., & Ismail, R. (2014). The impact of information and communication technology availability on economic growth. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(7), 1226-1231. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.410
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10. baskı). McGraw-Hill.
  • ITU (2023). Measuring digital development – ICT Development Index 2023. Retrieved Agust 23, 2024 from: https://www.itu.int/hub/publication/D-IND-ICT_MDD-2023-2/
  • Khan, A. T., Khan, S., & Khan, N. A. (2021). Bidirectional linkage between ICT infrastructure and global innovation index-A comparative study between India and China. Splint International Journal of Professionals, 8(4), 321-334.
  • Khater, A. M. (2022). African’s Information and Communications Technology (ICT), Innovations and Economic Growth-Towards region integration: Empirical Evidence of Dynamic GMM Panel Data Approach. Archives of Business Research, 10(3), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1003.9233
  • Kowal, J., & Paliwoda-Pękosz, G. (2017). ICT for global competitiveness and economic growth in emerging economies: Economic, cultural, and social innovations for human capital in transition economies. Information Systems Management, 34(4), 304-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2017.1366215
  • Lopez-Vega, H., & Tell, F. (2021). Technology strategy and MNE subsidiary upgrading in emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120709
  • Marchenko, T. (2022). Correlation-regression analysis of innovation factor influence on GDP growth. Science and innovation, 18(5), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine18.05.003
  • Morone, P., & Taylor, R. (2010). Knowledge Diffusion and Innovation: Modelling complex entrepreneurial behaviours. Edward Elgar.
  • Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs.
  • Mitra, S., Raskin, J. P., & Pansera, M. (2023). Role of ICT innovation in perpetuating the myth of techno-solutionism. arXiv.
  • Nasir, M. H., & Zhang, S. (2024). Evaluating innovative factors of the global innovation index: A panel data approach. Innovation and Green Development, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100096
  • Niebel, T. (2018). ICT and economic growth – Comparing developing, emerging, and developed countries. World Development, 104, 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.024
  • OECD. (2021). The role of digital innovation in promoting sustainable growth. OECD.
  • Ollo-López, A., & Aramendía-Muneta, M. E. (2012). ICT impact on competitiveness, innovation and environment. Telematics and Informatics, 29(2), 204-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2011.08.002
  • Oturakci, M. (2021). Comprehensive analysis of the global innovation index: statistical and strategic approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(6), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1980209
  • Pradhan, R.P., Sarangi, A.K., & Sabat, A. (2022). The effect of ICT development on innovation: evidence from G-20 countries. Eurasian Econ Rev, 12, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-021-00189-y
  • Schwap, (2019). Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Retrieved September 8, 2024, from: https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/3ITY5U7T
  • Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
  • Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
  • UNESCO. (2020). Culture in the digital transformation: Policy frameworks. UNESCO.
  • UNCTAD. (2020). Digital economy report: Digitalization as a driver of development. UNCTAD.
  • Vukoszavlyev, S. (2019). The connection between global innovation index and economic well-being indexes. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 13(3-4), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.19041/APSTRACT/2019/3-4/11
  • WIPO (2023). About the Global Innovation Index. Retrieved Agust 28, 2024, from: https://www.wipo.int/gii-ranking/en/about
  • World Bank. (2022). Digital development for sustainable growth. The World Bank.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). The ICT revolution and the future of innovation and productivity. In Global Innovation Index 2024: 16th Edition. Retrieved November, 2024, from: https://www.wipo.int
  • Yousefi, A. (2011). The impact of information and communication technology on economic growth: evidence from developed and developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(6), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2010.544470
  • Zhu, J., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0045

THE ROLE OF ICT DEVELOPMENT IN DRIVING INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS USING IDI AND GII

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 101, 111 - 129, 24.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1603800

Öz

This study investigates the relationship between the Information and Communication Development Index (IDI) and the Global Innovation Index (GII), emphasizing the role of digital infrastructure and connectivity in shaping innovation ecosystems. Using Spearman correlation analysis, the findings reveal strong and significant positive relationships between IDI and GII scores, as well as their sub-dimensions. The total IDI score demonstrates a robust correlation with the total GII score (𝑟=0.847), confirming the pivotal role of ICT development in enhancing innovation capacities across countries. Sub-dimensions of IDI, Universal Connectivity (𝑟=0.819) and Meaningful Connectivity (𝑟=0.839), are also significantly associated with GII, highlighting the importance of high-quality digital connectivity. Moreover, the study identifies strong correlations between IDI and GII sub-dimensions such as Infrastructure (𝑟=0.879), Human Capital & Research (𝑟=0.842), and Knowledge & Technology Outputs (𝑟=0.826), underscoring the critical role of ICT in fostering technological innovation and knowledge production. Meaningful Connectivity is shown to have a stronger impact on creative outputs than Universal Connectivity, emphasizing the significance of quality over mere access. These findings underscore the importance of digital infrastructure investments to enhance innovation ecosystems, addressing disparities in digital connectivity and fostering sustainable development. The study contributes to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence of ICT’s influence on innovation, offering valuable insights for policymakers aiming to leverage digital technologies for economic growth and competitiveness.

Kaynakça

  • Absalyamova, S., Ivanova, N., Mukhametgalieva, C., & Khusnullova, A. (2018). Relationship between the international universities rankings and indexes of a country’s innovation development. In M. Land(Ed.), International Conference on Mathematical Modelling in Physical Sciences: Vol. 1141. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1141/1/012129
  • Arvanitis, S., Loukis, E. N. & Diamantopoulou, V. (2016). Are ICT, workplace organization, and human capital relevant for innovation? A comparative Swiss/Greek study. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 23(3),319–349. https://doi:10.1080/13571516.2016.1186385
  • Bate, A. F., Wachira, E. W., & Danka, S. (2023). The determinants of innovation performance: An income-based cross-country comparative analysis using the Global Innovation Index (GII). Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(20), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00283-2
  • Berger, M., & Diez, J. R. (2006). Technological Capabilities and Innovation in Southeast Asia. Science, Technology and Society, 11(1), 21-49. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097172180501100105
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5. baskı). Oxford University.
  • Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the co-evolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.006
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Choi, J. Y., & Kim, S. Y. (2020). The effects of ICT infrastructure and investment environment on innovation: Focused on Global Innovation Index. The Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2020.29.3.159
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5. baskı). Sage.
  • Dhar, B. K., Shaturaev, J., Kurbonov, K., & Nazirjon, R. (2023). The causal nexus between innovation and economic growth: An OECD study. Social Science Quarterly, 104(4), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13261
  • Farhadi, M., & Ismail, R. (2014). The impact of information and communication technology availability on economic growth. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(7), 1226-1231. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.410
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10. baskı). McGraw-Hill.
  • ITU (2023). Measuring digital development – ICT Development Index 2023. Retrieved Agust 23, 2024 from: https://www.itu.int/hub/publication/D-IND-ICT_MDD-2023-2/
  • Khan, A. T., Khan, S., & Khan, N. A. (2021). Bidirectional linkage between ICT infrastructure and global innovation index-A comparative study between India and China. Splint International Journal of Professionals, 8(4), 321-334.
  • Khater, A. M. (2022). African’s Information and Communications Technology (ICT), Innovations and Economic Growth-Towards region integration: Empirical Evidence of Dynamic GMM Panel Data Approach. Archives of Business Research, 10(3), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1003.9233
  • Kowal, J., & Paliwoda-Pękosz, G. (2017). ICT for global competitiveness and economic growth in emerging economies: Economic, cultural, and social innovations for human capital in transition economies. Information Systems Management, 34(4), 304-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2017.1366215
  • Lopez-Vega, H., & Tell, F. (2021). Technology strategy and MNE subsidiary upgrading in emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120709
  • Marchenko, T. (2022). Correlation-regression analysis of innovation factor influence on GDP growth. Science and innovation, 18(5), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine18.05.003
  • Morone, P., & Taylor, R. (2010). Knowledge Diffusion and Innovation: Modelling complex entrepreneurial behaviours. Edward Elgar.
  • Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs.
  • Mitra, S., Raskin, J. P., & Pansera, M. (2023). Role of ICT innovation in perpetuating the myth of techno-solutionism. arXiv.
  • Nasir, M. H., & Zhang, S. (2024). Evaluating innovative factors of the global innovation index: A panel data approach. Innovation and Green Development, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100096
  • Niebel, T. (2018). ICT and economic growth – Comparing developing, emerging, and developed countries. World Development, 104, 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.024
  • OECD. (2021). The role of digital innovation in promoting sustainable growth. OECD.
  • Ollo-López, A., & Aramendía-Muneta, M. E. (2012). ICT impact on competitiveness, innovation and environment. Telematics and Informatics, 29(2), 204-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2011.08.002
  • Oturakci, M. (2021). Comprehensive analysis of the global innovation index: statistical and strategic approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(6), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1980209
  • Pradhan, R.P., Sarangi, A.K., & Sabat, A. (2022). The effect of ICT development on innovation: evidence from G-20 countries. Eurasian Econ Rev, 12, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-021-00189-y
  • Schwap, (2019). Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Retrieved September 8, 2024, from: https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/3ITY5U7T
  • Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
  • Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
  • UNESCO. (2020). Culture in the digital transformation: Policy frameworks. UNESCO.
  • UNCTAD. (2020). Digital economy report: Digitalization as a driver of development. UNCTAD.
  • Vukoszavlyev, S. (2019). The connection between global innovation index and economic well-being indexes. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 13(3-4), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.19041/APSTRACT/2019/3-4/11
  • WIPO (2023). About the Global Innovation Index. Retrieved Agust 28, 2024, from: https://www.wipo.int/gii-ranking/en/about
  • World Bank. (2022). Digital development for sustainable growth. The World Bank.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). The ICT revolution and the future of innovation and productivity. In Global Innovation Index 2024: 16th Edition. Retrieved November, 2024, from: https://www.wipo.int
  • Yousefi, A. (2011). The impact of information and communication technology on economic growth: evidence from developed and developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(6), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2010.544470
  • Zhu, J., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0045
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Bilim, Teknoloji ve Mühendislik Eğitimi ve Programlarının Geliştirilmesi, Ekonomi, İşletme ve Yönetim Müfredatı ve Öğretimi, Kültür Sosyolojisi, Sosyoloji (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Melih Engin 0000-0002-4953-6119

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 4 Mart 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Aralık 2024
Kabul Tarihi 23 Şubat 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 101

Kaynak Göster

APA Engin, M. (2025). Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Gelişiminin Inovasyona Etkisi: IDI ve GII Kullanarak Ampirik Bir Analiz. EKEV Akademi Dergisi(101), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1603800