Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

GİRİŞİMCİLİK YÖNELİMİ VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN BELİRLENMESİ: TARIMSAL MEKANİZASYON İMALATÇISI İŞLETMELER BAĞLAMINDA BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 17, 1 - 23, 10.07.2019

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesidir. Bu amaca yönelik olarak girişimcilik yönelimi boyutlarından proaktiflik, inovatifçilik ve risk alma ile örgütsel vatandaşlık değişkenleri olarak nezaket, diğerkamlılık, centilmenlik, vicdanlılık ve yurtdaşlık erdemi arasındaki ilişkiler ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın teorik kısmında, girişimcilik yönelimi kavramı ve girişimcilik yönelimini oluşturan boyutlar hakkında bilgiler verilmiştir. Ardından örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı açıklanarak, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının boyutları hakkında teorik bilgiler verilmiştir. Çalışmanın uygulama kısmında ise ilk olarak araştırma değişkenlerinin ilişkilendirilmesi sürecinde bugüne kadar elde edilen teorik ve ampirik bulgular ortaya konulmuştur. Ardından da girişimcilik yöneliminin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve boyutları üzerine etkisi olup olmadığının belirlenmesi amacıyla Aydın ilinde tarım makinaları sektöründe saha araştırması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma kısmında hazırlanmış bulunan anket formu Aydın ili Efeler ilçesinde faaliyet gösteren 10 tarım makinaları imalatçısı işletmede görev yapmakta olan 136 mavi yakalı çalışana uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada anket yöntemiyle elde edilen verilerin analizinde, tanımlayıcı istatistikler, faktör analizi, korelasyon analizi ile tekli ve çoklu regresyon analizleri uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulguların değerlendirilmesi sonucunda, girişimcilik yönelimi boyutlarından proaktifçi yaklaşımın, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının diğerkamlık boyutunu negatif yönde, centilmenlik boyutunu da pozitif yönde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Bir başka girişimcilik yönelimi boyutunu oluşturan risk alma istekliliğinin de örgütsel vatandaşlık boyutlarından diğerkamlık boyutunu negatif yönde, centilmenlik boyutunu pozitif bir şekilde etkilediği anlaşılmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, B.S., Eshima, Y. (2013) The Influence of Firm Age and Intangible Resources On The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation And Firm Growth Among Japanese SMEs, Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 413–429.
  • Audretsch, D. (2012). Entrepreneurship research, Management Decision, 50(5), 755-764.
  • Barksdale, K., J .M. Werner (2001). Managerial Ratings of In-Role Behaviors, Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Overall Performance: Testing Different Models of Their Relationship, Journal of Business Research, 51: 145-155
  • Basım, H. N. ve H. Şeşen (2006), Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Ölçeği ve Karşılaştırma Çalışması, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 61 (4): 83-101
  • Bateman, T.S., Organ, D.W., (1983). Job Satisfaction and Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee Citizenship”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol., 26, No. 4, 587-595.
  • Becker, T.E., R. J. Vance (1993). Construct Validity of Three Types of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Illustration of the Direct Product Model with Refinements, Journal of Management, Vol., 19, No.3, 663-682.
  • Bolino, M.C., Turnley, W.H., (2003). Going the Extra Mile: Cultivating and Managing Employee Citizenship Behaviour, Academy of Management Executive, Vol.17, No.3, 60-71.
  • Brownhilder Ngek Neneh and Johan van Zyl (2017). Entrepreneurial Orientation and its Impact on Firm Growth Amongst SMEs in South Africa, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(3), 166-178.
  • Bülbül, H. (2003). Rekabet Üstünlüğü Sağlamada Ürün ve Süreç Yeniliği: Bilişim Teknolojileri Uygulaması, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Konya
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi EI Kitabı, 5. Baskı, Cantekin Matbaası, Ankara.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Pegem Yayıncılık, 2.Baskı, Ankara.
  • Chen, X. P., Lam, S. K.,Schaubroeck, J., and Naumann, S. (2002). Group Organization al Citizenship Behavior: A Conceptualization and Preliminary Test of Its Antecedents and Consequences, Academy of Management Proceedings, 10: 1-6.
  • Chiaburu D.S., Marinovar S.V., and Lim A.S., (2007). Helping and Proactive Extra-Role Behaviors: The Influence of Motives, Goal Orientation, and Social Context, Personality and Individual Differences, 43,2282-2293.
  • Choi J. N. (2007). Change Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Effects of Work Environment Characteristics and Intervening Psychological Process, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 467-484.
  • Cools, E. & Van den Broeck, H. (2007/2008). The hunt for the Heffalump continues: Can trait and cognitive characteristics predict entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18(2), 23– 41.
  • Covin, J.G., Slevin, D.P. (1998). The Influence of Organization Structure on the Utility of an Entrepreneurial Top Management Style, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, 217–234.
  • Covin, J.G.,Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.
  • Cunningham, J. B., Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining Entrepreneurship, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 29, No.1, 45-61.
  • Dansereau, F.D., Graen, G. ve Haga, W.J. ( 1975). A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
  • Deluga, R. J. (1998). Leader-Member Excbange Quality and Effectiveness Ratings: The Role of Subordinate Supervisor Conscientiouiness Similarity, Group & Organization Management, 23, 189-216.
  • Deluga, R.J., (1995). The Relation Between Trust in the Supervisor and Subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Military Psychology, Vo. 7, No.1, 1-16.
  • Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T. (2005). The Role Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship, Academy of Management Executive, Vo. 19, No.1, 147-156.
  • Dreyer, B., Gronhaug, K. (2004). Uncertainty, Flexibility and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, No. 5,484–494.
  • Duobiene, J. ( 2017). Corporate Entrepreneurship in Lithuanian Mature Organizations:is it Really Working?, Inzinerine Ekonomika- Engineering Economics, Vol. 28, No.1, 56-67.
  • Duobiene, J. ( 2013). Corporate Entrepreneurship in Organizational Life-Cycle, Economics and Management, Vol. 18, No.3, 584-595.
  • Dyduch, W. (2008). Corporate Entrepreneurship Measurement for Improving Organizational Performance, Journal of Economics & Management, 4, 16-40.
  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and Procedural Justice Climate as Antecedents of Unit: Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Personnel Psychology, 57, 61-94.
  • Farh, J.L., Zhong, C.B., Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational Citizenship Behavior In The People’s Republic Of China, Organization Science, Vol.15, No.2, 241-253.
  • Fayolle, A., Basso, O., ve Legrain, T. (2008). Corporate Culture and Values: Genesis and Sources of L’oreal’s Entreprenerial Orientation, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol.21, No.2, 215-230.
  • George, J. M., Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational Spontaneity in Context, Human Performance, 10, 153-170.
  • George, D., Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Study Guide and Reference, Pearson.
  • Graham, J. W. (1989). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Construct Redefinition, Operationalization and Validation, Loyola University of Chicago.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic Econometrics, 3rd Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 838p.
  • Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting Corporate Entrepreneurship Through Human Resource Management Practices: A Review of Empirical Research, Human Resource Management Review, 15, 21-41.
  • Holmes, M., Zahra, J., Hoskisson, R., DeGhetto, K., ve Sutton, T. (2016). Two-Way Streets: The Role Institutions and Technology in Firms’ Corporate Entrepreneurship and Political Strategies, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol.30, No.3, 247-272.
  • Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Holt, D. T., & Wales, W. J. (2013). Assessing a Measurement of Organizational Preparedness for Corporate Entrepreneurship, Product Development & Management Association, 30(5), 937-955.
  • Hornsby, J.S., Kuratko D.F. and Zahra S.A. (2002). Middle Managers’ Perception of the Internal Environment for Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing a Measurement Scale, Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 253–273.
  • Hughes, M., Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance at the Embryonic Stage Of Firm Growth, Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 651-661.
  • Jalali, A., Jaafar, M., Talebi, K., and Halim, A. S. (2014). The Moderating Role of Bridging Ties between Risk-Taking, Proactiveness and Performance: The Evidence from Iranian SMEs, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.9, No.5, 74-87.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, 15. Baskı. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • Keh, H. T., Nguyen, T. M., and Ping, H. (2007). The effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Marketing Information on the Performance of SMEs, Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 592-611.
  • Khandwalla, P.N. (1977). Some Top Management Styles, Their Context and Performance, Organization & Administrative Sciences, 7, 21–51.
  • Kidder, Deborah L. (2002) The Influence of Gender on the Performance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Journal of Management Vol.28, No.5, 629–48.
  • Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1996). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities and the Replication of Technology, Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
  • Lumpkin, GT, Cogliser, CC and Schneider, D. R. (2009. Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: An Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, January, 47–69.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental and Industry Life Cycle, Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance, Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–172.
  • Masona, C. M., Floreania, J., Miania, S., Beltramea, F., and Cappellettoa, R. (2015). Understanding the Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on SMEs’ Performance: The Role of the Financing Structure, Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1649-1661.
  • Merz, G.R., Sauber, M.H. (1995). Profiles of Managerial Activities in Small Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 551–564.
  • Meyer J.P., Stanley D.J., Herscovitch L., Topolntsky, L. (2002). Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organizations: A Meta Analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms, Management Science, 29, 770-791.
  • Miller, D., Friesen, P.H. (1982). Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.3, No.1, 1-25.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-Making in Three Modes, California Management Review, Vol.16, No.2, 44–53.
  • Monsen, E.A., Boss, R.W. (2009). The Impact of Strategic Entrepreneurship Inside The Organization: Examining Job Stress and Employee Retention, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice January, 71–104.
  • Morrish, S. C., Miles, M. P., and Polonsky, M. J. (2011). An Explotary Study of Sustainability as a Stimulus for Corporate Entrepreneurship, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 162-171.
  • Morris. M. H., Paul. G. W. (1987). The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship and Marketing in Established Firms, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.2, No.3, 247-259.
  • Morrison, E. (1994). Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Importance of The Employee's Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37, No.6, 1543-156.
  • Moorman, R.H. (1991). Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?, Journal of Applied Psychology, No.76, 845-855.
  • Moorman, R. H., Blakel Y. G. L. (1995). Individualism - Collectivism as an Individual Difference Predictor of Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 127-142.
  • Neneh, B. N. (2016). Examining the Moderating effect of Environmental Hostility on the Entrepreneurial Orientation – Performance Relationship, Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, Vol.8, No.6, 6-18.
  • Neuman, G.A., Kickul, J.R. (1998). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Achievement Orientation and Personality, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol.13, No.2, 263-279. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2. Baskı. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • O'Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, No.71, 492-499.
  • Organ D.W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, MA: Lexington Books, Lexington.
  • Özşahin, M., Sudak, M.K. (2015). The Mediating Role of Leadership Styles On The Organizational Citizenship Behavior And Innovativeness Relationship, Journal of Business, Economics & Finance, Vol.4, No.3, 443-455.
  • Parsian, M., Mobaraki, M. H. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Formation of Entrepreneurial Identity, Management Sicence Letters, 6, 627-634.
  • Pearce, J.A., II, Fritz, P., and Davis, P.S. (2010). Entrepreneurial Orientation and The Performance of Religious Congregations as Predicted by Rational Choice Theory, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.34, No.1, 219–248.
  • Peltola, S. (2013). The emergence of Entrepreneurship in Organizations: Joint Decision-Making About New Sales Practices in Management Group Meeting Interaction, Poznan University of Economics Review, Vol.13, No.1, 48-67.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., and Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of The Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research, Journal of Management, Vol.6, No.3, 513-563.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., and Bommer, W.H., (1996). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Subtitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Journal of Management, No.22, 259-298.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., (1995). An Examination of Substitutes for Leadership within a Levels of Analysis Framework, Leadership Quarterly, No.6, 289-328.
  • Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Paine J.B. and Bachrach D.G. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research Journal of Management, No. 26.
  • Podsakoff. P. M., Niehoff, B. P., MacKenzie, S. B., and Williams, M. L. (1993). Do substitutes for Leadership Really Substitute for Leadership? An Empirical Examination of Kerr and Jermier‘s Situational Leadership Model, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, No.54, 1- 44.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. (1995). An examination of Substitutes for Leadership Within a Levels of Analysis Framework, Leadership Quarterly, No. 6, 289-328.
  • Quaye, M. D., Acheampong, G. (2013). Are SME Owner-Managers Entrepreneurs? Evidence from Ghana, European Journal of Business and Management, Vol.5, No.23, 37-47.
  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., and Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment and Past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 761-787.
  • Robson C. (1998). Real World Research. 6. Edt. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford UK., 66-75.
  • Rutherford M. W., Holt D.T. (2007). Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Look at the İnnovativeness Dimension and its Antecedents, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol.20, No.3, 429-446.
  • Smith, C. A., Organ. D. W., and Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature and Antecedents, Journal of Applied Psychology, No.68, 655-663.
  • Tang, J., Murphy, P.J. (2012). Prior Knowledge and New Product and Service Introductions By Entrepreneurial Firms: The Mediating Role of Technological Innovation, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.50, No.1, 41–62.
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • Thompson, H. B., Werner, J. M. (1997). The Impact of Role Conflict Facilitation on Core and Discretionary Behaviors: Testing a Mediated Model, Journal of Management, Vol.23, No.4, 583-601.
  • Trott, P. (2010). Innovation Management and New Product Development. 4th Edition. England: Prentice Hall Financial Times, Harlow.
  • Vahedi, R., Asadi, A. (2013). Relationship Between Management Styles and Performance of The Managers and Staff of Tax Administration Office of Tehran, European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, Vol.2, No.3, 2975-2983.
  • Van de Ven, A. H., Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and Assessing Organizations, Wiley, New York.
  • Van de Ven, A., Garud, R. (1993). Innovation and Industry Development: the Case of Cochlear Implants, Research on Tehcnological Management and Policy, 5, 1‒46.
  • Vey, M. A., Campbell, J. P. (2004). In-role or Extra-Role Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Which are we Measuring?”, Human Performance, Vol. 17, No: 1, 119-135.
  • Voss, Z.G., Voss, G.B., and Moorman, C. (2005). An Empirical Examination of the Complex Relationships Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Stakeholder Support, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.39, No.9-10, 1132–1150.
  • Walter, A, Auer, M and Ritter, T. (2006). The Impact of Network Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Orientation on University Spin-Off Performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 542–567.
  • Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: a Configurational Approach, Journal of Business Venturing, No. 20, 71-91.
  • Williams, S., Shiaw, W. T. (1999). Mood and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Effects of Positive Affect on Employee Organizational Citizenship Behavior Intentions, The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 133, No: 6, 656-668.
  • Yazıcıoğlu, Yahşi, Erdoğan, S. (2007). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, 2. Baskı. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara,72
  • Zahra, S. A., Randerson, K., and Fayolle, A. ( 2013). The Evolution and Contributions of Corporate Entrepreneurship Research, Management, Vol.16, No.4, 357-432.
  • Zahra, S. A., Garvis, D. M. (2000). International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of International Environmental Hostility, Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 469-492.
  • Zahra, S.A., Jennings, D.F., and Kuratko, D.F. (1999). The Antecedents and Consequences of Firm-Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 24, No.2, 45–65.
  • Zahra, S. A., Nielsen, A. P., and Bogner, W. C. (1999). Corporate Entrepreneurship Knowledge and Competence Development, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 169-189.
  • Zahra, S.A., Neubaum, D.O. (1998). Environmental Diversity and the Entrepreneurial Activities of New Ventures, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol.3, No.2, 123–140.
  • Zehir, C., Müceldidi, B. and Zehir, S. (2012). The Impact of Corporate Entrepreneurship on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Organizational Commitment: Evidence from Turkey SMEs, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences No. 58, 924 – 933.
Toplam 98 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Finans ve Yatırım (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Hüseyin Yılmaz Bu kişi benim

Atila Karahan Bu kişi benim

Emine Arslan Bu kişi benim

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 24 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 10 Temmuz 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Sayı: 17

Kaynak Göster

APA Yılmaz, H., Karahan, A., & Arslan, E. (2019). GİRİŞİMCİLİK YÖNELİMİ VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN BELİRLENMESİ: TARIMSAL MEKANİZASYON İMALATÇISI İŞLETMELER BAĞLAMINDA BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi(17), 1-23.

 Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.