EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MOTHERS: A DESCRIPTIVE CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS STUDY

Yıl 2024, , 319 - 337, 28.06.2024

Zila Özlem Kırbaş

https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.vi.1370864

Öz

This study aimed to examine quality of life in children with special needs and affecting factors
from the perspective of mothers. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with
mothers (n=99) of children with special needs between the ages of 5-18 living in a province in
the Eastern Black Sea Region of Türkiye. Personal Information Form and QI-Disability-Parent
Form were used to collect data. A significant difference was found between children’s QI-Disability-
Parent Form total scores and their diagnosis and verbal communication ability (p<0.05).
Multiple linear regression analysis showed that verbal communication ability was a statistically
significant negative predictor of QI-Disability-Parent Form scores, meeting personal needs of
positive emotions, verbal communication ability of social interaction, and verbal communication
ability and ability to use one’s hands of independence (p<0.01, p<0.05). Verbal communication
ability was a particularly important factor affecting quality of life.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Child, special needs, quality of life

ÖZEL GEREKSİNİMLİ ÇOCUKLARIN YAŞAM KALİTESİNİN ANNE PERSPEKTİFİNDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: TANIMLAYICI BİR KESİTSEL ANALİZ ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Bu çalışma annelerin bakış açısından özel gereksinimi olan çocukların yaşam kaliteleri ve
etkileyen faktörleri incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Tanımlayıcı kesitsel tipteki çalışma, Türkiye’nin
Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde bulunan bir ilde yaşayan 5-18 yaş arasındaki özel gereksinimli
çocukların anneleri (n=99) ile yürütüldü. Veriler, Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve QI-Disability-Parent
Form ile toplandı. QI-Disability-Parent Form toplam puanları ile çocuğun tanısı, sözlü iletişim
durumu arasında anlamlı bir fark bulundu (p<0,05). Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi ile
çocuğun sözlü iletişim durumunun QI-Disability-Parent Form, çocuğun kişisel ihtiyaçlarının
karşılanması durumunun Pozitif duygular, çocuğun sözlü iletişim durumunun Sosyal etkileşim,
çocuğun sözlü iletişim ve ellerini kullanabilme durumunun Bağımsızlık alt boyutlarını
negatif yönde istatiksel olarak anlamlı yordadığı belirlendi (p<0,01, p<0,05). Özellikle
çocuğun sözlü iletişim durumu yaşam kalitesini etkileyen önemli faktörlerden biriydi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çocuk, özel gereksinim, yaşam kalitesi

Kaynakça

• Acarlar, F. (2013). Kaynaştırma modeli ve özel gereksinimli çocukların özellikleri. B. Sucuoğlu ve H. Bakkaloğlu (Ed.). Okul öncesinde kaynaştırma: Ne, ne zaman, nerede, neden, nasıl, kim? (Birinci basım). (p. 26). Kök Yayıncılık.
• Blick, R. N., Saad, A. E., Goreczny, A. J., Roman, K., and Sorensen, C. H. (2015). Effects of declared levels of physical activity on quality of life of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 37, 223-229.
• Caldwell, J. A., Jones, J. L., Gallus, K. L., and Henry, C. S. (2018). Empowerment and resilience in families of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(5), 374-388.
• Çivi, S., Kutlu, R., and Çelik, H. H. (2011). Depression status and the factors affecting the quality of life in the relatives of the patients with cancer. Gülhane Tip Dergisi, 53(4), 248-253
• Downs, J., Jacoby, P., Leonard, H., Epstein, A., Murphy, N., Davis, E., Reddihough, D., Whitehouse, A., and Williams, K. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability) measure. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 28(3), 783-794.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education Limited.
• Jacoby, P., Williams, K., Reddihough, D., Leonard, H., Whitehouse, A., and Downs, J. (2022). Modelling quality of life in children with intellectual disability using regression trees. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 64(9), 1145-1155.
• Leonard, H., Whitehouse, A., Jacoby, P., Benke, T., Demarest, S., Saldaris, J., Wong, K., Reddihough, D., Williams, K., and Downs, J. (2022). Quality of life beyond diagnosis in intellectual disability–Latent profiling. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 129, 104322.
• Sakiz, H., Sart, Z. H., and Ekinci, A. (2016). Investigating the difficulties in learning disability within an educational perspective. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Education, 1(40), 240-56.
• Sarıçam, H., İşcen Karasu, F., and Seçil Karamuklu, E. (2023).Turkish adaptation of the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability): Validity and reliability study. Dicle University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 32, 805-22.
• Top, E., and Akıl, M. (2017). The effect of 10-week swimming exercise on life qualities of individuals with mild intellectual disability and their families. Journal of Sports and Performance Researches. 8(1), 53-61.
• van Heijst, B. F., and Geurts, H. M. (2015). Quality of life in autism across the lifespan: a meta-analysis. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 19(2), 158- 167.
• Wallander, J. L., and Koot, H. M. (2016). Quality of life in children: A critical examination of concepts, approaches, issues, and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 131-143.
• Williams, K., Jacoby, P., Whitehouse, A., Kim, R., Epstein, A., Murphy, N., Reid, S., Leonard, H., Reddihough, D., and Downs, J. (2021). Functioning, participation, and quality of life in children with intellectual disability: an observational study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 63(1), 89-96.