Dijital Obezite ve Çocukluk: Psikosomatik Etkiler ve Dijital Yükü Azaltmaya Yönelik Politika İhtiyacı Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu çalışma, dijitalleşmenin çocuklar üzerindeki etkilerini inceleyerek, son yıllarda artış gösteren dijital obezite olgusunu çok boyutlu biçimde analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Dijital obezite, bireylerin dijital cihazlara aşırı maruz kalmaları sonucu oluşan fiziksel, zihinsel ve sosyal sağlık sorunlarını kapsayan yeni bir teknolojik bağımlılık biçimi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Özellikle 9–15 yaş arası çocuklarda ekran süresinin artışı, uyku ve beslenme düzensizlikleri, dikkat eksikliği, sosyal izolasyon ve akademik başarıda düşüş gibi birçok olumsuz duruma neden olmaktadır. Bu kapsamda araştırmada, Dünya Sağlık Örgütü’nün belirlediği dijital bağımlılık kriterleri temel alınarak yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla nitel veri toplanmıştır. Tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 15 çocukla yapılan görüşmeler, NVivo yazılımı kullanılarak tematik analiz yoluyla değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, çocukların dijital cihazlarla kurdukları ilişkinin büyük ölçüde bağımlılık düzeyine ulaştığını ve bu durumun fiziksel sağlık, psikolojik denge, sosyal ilişkiler ve akademik performans üzerinde belirgin etkiler yarattığını ortaya koymuştur. Aynı zamanda, dijital medya kullanımında denge kurabilen çocukların daha sağlıklı dijital alışkanlıklar geliştirdiği gözlemlenmiştir. Araştırma, dijital obezitenin yalnızca bireysel bir sorun olmadığını, aynı zamanda yapısal, sosyokültürel ve teknolojik faktörlerle beslenen bütüncül bir sağlık meselesi olduğunu göstermektedir. Elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda, ailelerin, eğitimcilerin ve sağlık profesyonellerinin dijital medya okuryazarlığı konusunda farkındalıklarının artırılması ve çocuklar için sağlıklı dijital kullanım stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital obezite
• dijital bağımlılık
• dijital medya
• aile ve dijital denetim
• ergenlik ve dijitalleşme
• dijital okuryazarlık
• yeni medya.

Digital Obesity and Childhood: A Qualitative Study on Psychosomatic Effects and the Need for Policies to Reduce Digital Load

Öz

This study examines digital obesity, a growing phenomenon among children, by analyzing its effects on physical, mental, and social well-being. Digital obesity, defined as dependency on digital devices due to excessive use, leads to various health issues. In children aged 9 to 15, increased screen time is linked to disrupted sleep, poor nutrition, attention deficits, social isolation, and decreased academic performance. Using the World Health Organization's criteria for digital addiction, this qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 children selected through random sampling. The data were analyzed thematically with NVivo software. Findings show that children’s relationships with digital devices often become dependent, negatively impacting physical health, emotional balance, social relationships, and academic performance. However, those who maintained balanced media use exhibited healthier habits. The study concludes that digital obesity is a complex health issue shaped by structural, sociocultural, and technological factors. It highlights the importance of increasing digital media literacy among parents, educators, and healthcare professionals and developing strategies for healthier media consumption among children.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital obesity
• digital addiction
• family and digital supervision
• adolescence and digitalization
• digital literacy
• new media.

Kaynakça

1. Akkoyun, F. & Taş Arslan, B. (2025). Ebeveynlerin dijital farkındalık düzeylerinin çocukların dijital alışkanlıklarına etkisi. Çocuk ve Medya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 45-62.
2. Anderson, M.& Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media and technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
3. Bayrak, T., & Cihan, B. (2021). Yeni Medyada Bağımlılık Sonucu Gelişen Dijital Obezite Olgusu. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 5(1), 78-94. https://izlik.org/JA76EH82DE
4. Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. Sage Publications.
5. Benítez-Andrades, J. A., Arias, N., García-Ordás, M. T., Martínez-Martínez, M., & García-Rodríguez, I. (2020). Feasibility of Social-Network-Based eHealth Intervention on the Improvement of Healthy Habits among Children. Sensors, 20(5), 1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051404
6. Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A. & Pantic, I. (2015). Internet use, facebook intrusion, and psychological functioning: A survey study of Polish adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.022
7. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
8. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

9. Chassiakos, Y. L. R., Radesky, J. S., Christakis, D., Moreno, M. A. % Cross, C. (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162593. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2593
10. Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (S. B. Demir, Çev.). Eğiten Kitap.
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row.
13. Çelebi, E. (2023). Teachers’ and Parents’ Views on the Psychosocial Effects of Children’s Technology Addiction. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, 27(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5152/JSSI.2023.2275208
14. Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). The network society: Social aspects of new media. Sage Publications.
15. Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D. & Hall, B. J. (2016). The relationship between text message-related stress and depressive symptoms: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.009
16. Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E. & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
17. Keles, B., McCrae, N. & Grealish, A. (2020). A systematic review of the impact of social media use on mental health in adolescents and young adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061866
18. Koçak, H. (2022). Çocuklarda dijital obezite ve akademik başarı ilişkisi. Çocuk Gelişimi Dergisi, 7(1), 77-94.
19. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Internet addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 18(18), 4907–4918.
20. Lemenager, T., Graf, M. & Ritter, B. (2021). Digital addiction and the new workplace: A review of challenges and implications. Journal of Business Research, 132, 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.020
21. Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(4), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0257
22. Montag, C. & Diefenbach, S. (2018). Digital addiction: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings. In Digital Addiction, 1-11. Springer.
23. Montag, C., Marek, R. & Wegmann, E. (2017). Online social networking and addiction: A review of the empirical literature. (2), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.024
24. Montag, C. & Walla, P. (2016). Carpe diem instead of losing your social mind: Beyond digital addiction and why we all suffer from digital overuse. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1157281.
25. OECD. (2024). Children in the digital age: Well-being, education and skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264981234-en
26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
27. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R. & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
28. Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2014). An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning. Educational Psychology, 34(5), 524-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.890704
29. Rumpf, H. J., Achab, S., Billieux, J. & Griffiths, M. D. (2022). The link between digital addiction and physical health: Findings from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 731023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.731023
30. Sheppard, A. L., & Wolffsohn, J. S. (2018). Digital eye strain: Prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 3(1), e000146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000146
31. Sieberg, D. (2011). Digital diet: The 4-step plan to break your tech addiction and regain balance in your life. John Wiley and Sons.
32. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
33. Sliney, D. H. & Wolbarsht, M. L. (2005). Safety with lasers and other optical sources: A comprehensive review. Springer Science and Business Media.
34. Smith JA, Osborn M (2008) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, ed. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage, 53–80.
35. Tarhan, N. & Nurmedov, S. (2015). Bağımlılık Sanal veya Gerçek. Timaş Yayınları.
36. Tiggemann, M. & Slater, A. (2014). NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47(6), 630-643. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22307
37. The Times. (2025, January 12). Why phone ban in schools spells end for classroom bullies. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/why-phone-ban-in-schools-spells-end-for-classroom-bullies-gxn67506b
38. The Times. (2025, February 22). Estonia’s curriculum is one of the best — what can it teach us? https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/estonias-curriculum-is-one-of-the-best-what-can-it-teach-us-5f9zjvktn
39. Twenge, J. M. & Campbell, W. K. (2018). The age of anxiety: How technology and social media are changing the human brain. Oxford University Press.
40. Virilio, P. (2003). The Vision Machine. B. Rose (Trans.). Indiana University Press.
41. World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Digital addiction: The need for public health action. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health
42. World Health Organization. (2018). Digital addiction and children: An overview. World Health Organization.
43. Yengin, D. (2014). Yeni Medya ve Dokunmatik Toplum. Derin Yayınları.
44. Yeşilay. (2023). Çocuklarda ekran süresi ve akademik başarı ilişkisi. https://www.yesilay.org.tr/tr/makaleler
45. Yılmaz, F. ve Çavuşoğlu, S. (2020). The relationship between digital game addiction and sleep disorders in children. Turkish Journal of Child Health, 17(4), 45-53.
46. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
47. QSR International. (2021). NVivo 12 for Windows. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home