Implications of Dayton Peace Agreement on CurrentPolitical Issues in Bosnia-Herzegovina

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Implications of Dayton Peace Agreement on Current Political Issues in Bosnia-Herzegovina

Abstract

This paper theoretically explores Bosnian conflict, past peace initiatives and current political issues in Bosnia-Herzegovina. In order to put the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) into the perspective, this paper surveys the Bosnian conflict with special emphasis on different national aspirations during the 1990s. Significant portion of this paper deals with the scope of the DPA. Besides, this paper explores and analyzes both governmental and constitutional features of the DPA. An attempt has been made to critically analyze DPA as a document that ‘ended the war’ and as a document that has been used to transform Bosnia-Herzegovina from a war torn country to a democratic state. Finally, last part of the paper surveys current political issues and various attempts at state and constitutional reforms. After thorough analysis this paper holds that although BosniaHerzegovina made significant transformation from a war torn country to a semi-functional state ethnic tensions, nationalistic rhetoric and political disagreements are still evident, which inhibit Bosnian progress towards the EU and NATO membership

Keywords

• Bosnian conflict,conflict resolution, peace plans, governance and political issues

Kaynakça

1. Almond M. Europe’s Backyard War (London: Heinemann, 1994).
2. Bardutzky, Samo. “The Strasbourg Court on the Dayton Constitution: Judgment in the case of Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, 22 December 2009” European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 6, 2010, pp. 309-333.
3. Berit Bliesman de Guevara, States of Conflict: A Case Study on Peace-Building in Bosnia and Herzegovina (London: IPPR, 2009).
4. Bringa T. Being Muslim the Bosnian Way (Princeton: Princeton New Jersey, 1995).
5. Burg, Steven L. and Shoup, Paul S. The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina (New York and London: M.E. Sharpe, 1999).
6. Carl Bildt, Peace Journey: The Struggle for Peace in Bosnia (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998).
7. Chandler, David. “The State-Building in Bosnia: The Limits of ‘Informal Trusteeship’” International Journal of Peace Studies, Volume 11, 2006, pp. 17-38.
8. Chandler, David. “Democratization in Bosnia: The Limits of Civil Society Building Strategies,” Democratization, Vol. 5, No.4, 1998, pp. 1-20.

9. Chandler, David. Bosnia: Faking democracy (London: Pluto Press, 2000).
10. Daalder, Ivo H. and Froman, Michael B. G. “Dayton’s Incomplete Peace,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 6, 1999, pp. 106-113.
11. David Chandler, “State-Building in Bosnia: The Limits of „Informal Trusteeship‟” International Journal of Peace Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2006, pp. 18-38.
12. Glenny, Misha. The Balkans: Nationalism, War, and the Great Powers, 1804-1999 (London: Penguin Books, 1999).
13. Glenny, Misha. The Fall of Yugoslavia: The Third Balkan War. London: Penguin, 1992,
14. Hudson, Kate. Breaking the South Slav Dream: The Rise and Fall of Yugoslavia (London: Pluto Press, 2003).
15. Ibrahimagic O. Constitutional Development of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Sarajevo: The Congress of Bosnian Intellectuals, 1998).
16. Imamovic M. Bosnia and Herzegovina: Evolution of Its Political and Legal Institutions (Sarajevo: Magistrat, 2006).
17. Judah T. The Serbs, Myth and the Destruction of Yugoslavia (New Heaven CT, London: Yale University Press, 1997).
18. Kulanić A. “International Political Actors and State-Building Process,” Epiphany: Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, (2011), pp. 168-184.
19. Lovrenović I. Bosnia: A Cultural History (New York: New York University Press, 2001).
20. Morrison, Kenneth. “Dayton, Divisions and Constitutional Revisions: Bosnia & Herzegovina at the Crossroads,” Defense Academy of the United Kingdom Research & Assessment Branch, Vol. 9, 2009, pp. 4-21.
21. Ramet S. Balkan Babel: Politics, Culture and Religion in Yugoslavia (Boulder, Westview Press, 1996).
22. Robinson, Guy M. and Alma Pobric, “Nationalism and Identity in Post-Dayton Accords: Bosnia- Herzegovina, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 97. No. 3, 2006, pp. 237-252.
23. Schake, Kori. “The Dayton Peace Accords: Success of Failure?” Studies in Contemporary History and Security Policy, Vol. 3, 1999, pp. 281-295.
24. Vetlese J. Arne. Evil and Human Agency: Understanding Collective Evildoing. Cambridge: University Press, 2009.
25. Victor D. Bojkov, “Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Post-1995 Political System and Its Functioning,” Southeast European Politics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2003, pp. 41-67.