BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 2009 Sayı: 2, 24 - 31, 01.03.2009

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Arıkan, Harun “Good Neibourlines Conditioanlity for EU Membership: The EU’s Policy Towards The Cprus Conflict and Its Security Implications”, Ankara Universitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.58, No.4, pp.25-47.
  • Arıkan Harun, Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate For EU Membership?, Ashgate, 2006.
  • Arıkan Harun, “The European Union: As a Civilian Power: Success or Faliure?, Suleyman Demirel Universitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , Sayı 25, Mayıs 2012.
  • Batır Kerem, “War in the Balkans: Humanitarian Intervention and Beyond”, in Haluk Kabaalioglu, Muzaffer Dartan, M.Sait Akman and Cigdem Nas (editors),
  • Fort his, see European Commission, Bosnia-Herzegovina 2011 Progress Report, SEC(2011) 1206 final, Brussels, p.6.
  • European Commission, Commission Opinion On Serbia’s Application for Membership of the European Union,
  • SEC(2011) 1208 final], Brussels, 2011, p. 8. Europenazation of South-Esatern Europe: Domestic Impacts of the Accession Process, Marmara University European Community Institute, 2005.
  • Cottey Andrew, “Europe’s New Sub-regionalism”, Journal of Strategic Studies, Volume 23, No.2, 2000, pp.23-47.
  • Dover, Robert, “The EU and the Bosnian Civil War 1992-1995: The Capabilities- Expectations Gap at the Hearth of the EU’s Foreign Policy”, European Security, Vol.14, No.3, 2005, pp.297-318.
  • European Commission, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2006 Progress Report, [COM (2006) 649 final], Brussels, 2006.
  • European Commission, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2011 Progress Report, SEC (2011), 1206 final, Brussels, 2011.
  • European Commission, Commission Opinion on Serbia’s Application for Membership of the European Union, [SEC (2011) 1208 final], Brussels.
  • European Council, Presidency Conclusions, Annex II Declaration on the Former Yugoslavia, The European Council at Birmingham, 16 October 1992, General Secretariat of the European Council, Brussels, 1992.
  • European Council, Presidency Conclusions, European Council at Corfu, 24-25 June 1994, General Secretariats of the European Council, Brussels, 1994.
  • European Council, Presidency Conclusions, European Council at Thessaloniki, 19-20 June 2003, General Secretariats of European Council, Brussels, 2003.
  • Fabry Mikulus, “International Norms of Territorial Integrity and the Balkan Wars of the 1990s”, Global Society, Vol.16, No.2, 2002, pp.145-174.
  • Friis Lykke and Murphy Anna, “Turbo Charged Negotiations: the EU and the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy”, Vol. 7, No.5, 2000, pp.767-786
  • Gleeny Misha, “Heading of War in the Southern Balkans”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.74, No.3, May-June 1995, pp.98-108.
  • Researcher M. Osland, Kari, “The EU Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina, International Peacekeeping, Vol.11, No.3, Autumn 2004, pp.544.560.
  • Sharp, M.O. Jane,” Dayton Report Card”, International Security, Vol.22, No.3, (Winter 1997-1998), pp.101-137.
  • Szasz C. Paul, “The Protection of Human rights Through the Dayton/Paris Peace Agreement on Bosnia”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.90, No.2, April 1996, pp.301-316.
  • Treaty on European Union, Official Journal of European Communities, C191, July 1992
  • Wiwel, Anders, “The Security Challenge of Small EU Member States: Interests, Identity and the Development of the EU as a Security Actor”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.43, Number 2, 2005, pp.393-412.
  • White Stephen, Batt Judy and Lewis G. Paul, (eds.), Developments in East European Politics, Macmillan, 1993.

The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States inthe Post-Cold War Era

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 2009 Sayı: 2, 24 - 31, 01.03.2009

Öz

This article analyses the EU’s approach towards the Balkan states in the post Cold War era. It argues that the EU failed to serve a credible military actor to prevent the war, even to act an effective mediator to find feasible settlement in the region. The second contention of this study is that the EU has been effective in influencing reconstruction and state building process in the Balkan region after the war through its civilian power instruments: namely the accession carrot and economic instruments

Kaynakça

  • Arıkan, Harun “Good Neibourlines Conditioanlity for EU Membership: The EU’s Policy Towards The Cprus Conflict and Its Security Implications”, Ankara Universitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.58, No.4, pp.25-47.
  • Arıkan Harun, Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate For EU Membership?, Ashgate, 2006.
  • Arıkan Harun, “The European Union: As a Civilian Power: Success or Faliure?, Suleyman Demirel Universitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , Sayı 25, Mayıs 2012.
  • Batır Kerem, “War in the Balkans: Humanitarian Intervention and Beyond”, in Haluk Kabaalioglu, Muzaffer Dartan, M.Sait Akman and Cigdem Nas (editors),
  • Fort his, see European Commission, Bosnia-Herzegovina 2011 Progress Report, SEC(2011) 1206 final, Brussels, p.6.
  • European Commission, Commission Opinion On Serbia’s Application for Membership of the European Union,
  • SEC(2011) 1208 final], Brussels, 2011, p. 8. Europenazation of South-Esatern Europe: Domestic Impacts of the Accession Process, Marmara University European Community Institute, 2005.
  • Cottey Andrew, “Europe’s New Sub-regionalism”, Journal of Strategic Studies, Volume 23, No.2, 2000, pp.23-47.
  • Dover, Robert, “The EU and the Bosnian Civil War 1992-1995: The Capabilities- Expectations Gap at the Hearth of the EU’s Foreign Policy”, European Security, Vol.14, No.3, 2005, pp.297-318.
  • European Commission, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2006 Progress Report, [COM (2006) 649 final], Brussels, 2006.
  • European Commission, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2011 Progress Report, SEC (2011), 1206 final, Brussels, 2011.
  • European Commission, Commission Opinion on Serbia’s Application for Membership of the European Union, [SEC (2011) 1208 final], Brussels.
  • European Council, Presidency Conclusions, Annex II Declaration on the Former Yugoslavia, The European Council at Birmingham, 16 October 1992, General Secretariat of the European Council, Brussels, 1992.
  • European Council, Presidency Conclusions, European Council at Corfu, 24-25 June 1994, General Secretariats of the European Council, Brussels, 1994.
  • European Council, Presidency Conclusions, European Council at Thessaloniki, 19-20 June 2003, General Secretariats of European Council, Brussels, 2003.
  • Fabry Mikulus, “International Norms of Territorial Integrity and the Balkan Wars of the 1990s”, Global Society, Vol.16, No.2, 2002, pp.145-174.
  • Friis Lykke and Murphy Anna, “Turbo Charged Negotiations: the EU and the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy”, Vol. 7, No.5, 2000, pp.767-786
  • Gleeny Misha, “Heading of War in the Southern Balkans”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.74, No.3, May-June 1995, pp.98-108.
  • Researcher M. Osland, Kari, “The EU Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina, International Peacekeeping, Vol.11, No.3, Autumn 2004, pp.544.560.
  • Sharp, M.O. Jane,” Dayton Report Card”, International Security, Vol.22, No.3, (Winter 1997-1998), pp.101-137.
  • Szasz C. Paul, “The Protection of Human rights Through the Dayton/Paris Peace Agreement on Bosnia”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.90, No.2, April 1996, pp.301-316.
  • Treaty on European Union, Official Journal of European Communities, C191, July 1992
  • Wiwel, Anders, “The Security Challenge of Small EU Member States: Interests, Identity and the Development of the EU as a Security Actor”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.43, Number 2, 2005, pp.393-412.
  • White Stephen, Batt Judy and Lewis G. Paul, (eds.), Developments in East European Politics, Macmillan, 1993.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Harun Arıkan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2009
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2009 Cilt: 2009 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Arıkan, H. (2009). The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2009(2), 24-31.
AMA Arıkan H. The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Mart 2009;2009(2):24-31.
Chicago Arıkan, Harun. “The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2009, sy. 2 (Mart 2009): 24-31.
EndNote Arıkan H (01 Mart 2009) The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2009 2 24–31.
IEEE H. Arıkan, “The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 2009, sy. 2, ss. 24–31, 2009.
ISNAD Arıkan, Harun. “The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2009/2 (Mart 2009), 24-31.
JAMA Arıkan H. The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2009;2009:24–31.
MLA Arıkan, Harun. “The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 2009, sy. 2, 2009, ss. 24-31.
Vancouver Arıkan H. The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States in the Post-Cold War Era. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2009;2009(2):24-31.

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi