Re-creating the doppelganger in Peter Ackroyd’s The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 34, 131 - 142, 20.04.2015

Mustafa Kırca , Hazal Munar

Öz

Peter Ackroyd in his 2008 novel The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein establishes a freeplay intertextual world through adopting Mary Shelley’s canonical novel Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus (1818) as his palimpsest where he reworks the tradition of the doppelganger (evil twin) whose depiction has its roots in the Gothic. In Ackroyd’s version, the doppelganger changes into the inventive incarnation of the repressed desires of his pivotal character, Victor Frankenstein, and the novelist is able to offer his “genuine” narrative of a postmodernist serial murderer gothic—this time given in the form of a casebook that psychologically disturbed Victor keeps. In The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein, Ackroyd manages to give way to a new weltanschauung satisfying the intellectual needs of the twenty-first century by problematizing the relationship between the real and the hallucinatory, and also between the author and the text to question the role of the author as the creator.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ackroyd, the doppelganger, Gothic-postmodernism, intertextuality

Peter Ackroyd’un Victor Frankenstein’in Vaka Defteri Adlı Romanında doppelganger

Öz

İngiliz çağdaş romancılarından Peter Ackroyd, Victor Frankenstein’in Vaka Defteri (2008) adlı eserinde, Mary Shelley’nin 1818’de yazdığı ve artık kanon olarak kabul edilen İngilizce adıyla Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus romanını yeniden kaleme alarak gotik eserlerde karşımıza çıkan kötücül ikiz karakterler (doppelganger) yaratma geleneğine yeni bir yorum getirmiştir. Bu kötücül ikiz, Ackroyd’un eserinde roman kahramanı olan Victor Frankenstein’ın bastırılmış dürtülerinin bir dışa vurumu olarak kendisini gösterir. Psikolojik sorunları olan kahramanının yaşadıklarının anlatıldığı bir vaka defteri olarak sunulan bu eserinde romancı, post-modern döneme ait gotik cinayet romanı örneği sunmaktadır. Bu yönüyle, Ackroyd’un romanı gerçek ile kurmaca arasındaki ilişkiyi sorunsallaştırması bakımından günümüz okurunun beklentilerini karşılayan ve bilinen bir öykünün yeniden yorumlanması da olsa “özgün” kabul edebileceğimiz bir eserdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ackroyd, doppelganger, Gotik-postmodernizm, metinlerarasılık

Kaynakça

• ACKROYD, Peter. The House of Doctor Dee. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1993.
• ——. The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein. London: Vintage, 2008.
• BÉNYEI, Tamás. “Reconsidering the Novels of Peter Ackroyd.” British Fiction Today. Ed. Philip Tew and Rod Mengham. New York: Continuum, 2006. 55-66.
• BEVILLE, Maria. Gothic-postmodernism: Voicing the Terrors of Postmodernity. New York: Rodopi, 2009.
• CHALUPSKY, Petr. “Crime Narratives in Peter Ackroyd’s Historiographic Metafictions.” European Journal of English Studies 14.2 (2010): 121-131.
• ——. “Frankenstein as an historical, urban Gothic-psycho-thriller –Peter Ackroyd’s rendering of Mary Shelley’s classic in The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein.” Ars Aeterna: Who is Afraid to be Afraid? Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University, 2011. 19-34.
• CHARNICK, David. “Peter Ackroyd’s Imaginary Projections: A Context for the Creature of The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein.” Modern Language Review 108 (2013): 52-67.
• FINNEY, Brian. “Peter Ackroyd, Postmodernist Play and Chatterton.” Twentieth Century Literature 38.2 (1992): 240-61.
• ——. English Fiction Since 1984: Narrating A Nation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
• GENETTE, Gerard. Palimpsests. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997.
• ——. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
• GIBSON, Jeremy and Julian Wolfreys. Peter Ackroyd: The Ludic and Labyrinthine Text. London: Macmillan, 2000.
• HUTCHEON, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1989.
• JACKSON, Rosemary. Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. New York: Routledge, 1981.
• MOTION, Andrew. “Frankenstein Frigging Monster.” Guardian Review Supplement 13 September 2008: 10.
• ONEGA, Susana. Metafiction and Myth in the Novels of Peter Ackroyd. Columbia: Camden House, 1999.
• RAFFERTY, Terrence. “Raising the Dead.” New York Times Book Review 1 November 2009: 17.SHELLEY, Mary. Frankenstein. Ankara: Engin Yayinevi, 2012.
• TEW, Philip and Rod Mengham, ed. British Fiction Today. New York: Continuum, 2006.
• WOMACK, Philip. “Book Review: The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein.” New Humanist 8 September 2008: 48.