Interdisciplinary Outdoor Education: Participants’ Experiences in a Science Camp

Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 271 - 293, 25.12.2025

Yusuf Yıldırım , Hüseyin Çalışkan , Turgay Öntaş

https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1633939

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine participant experiences regarding interdisciplinary outdoor education applications within the scope of a science camp project. Designed as a qualitative case study, the research involved 64 participants, including 30 students, 22 parents, and 12 project team members. Data were collected through open-ended questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and student diaries, and analyzed using descriptive analysis. The findings revealed that the outdoor science camp significantly enhanced students’ understanding and perception of science by encouraging curiosity, active engagement, and the ability to view science as an interdisciplinary and real-life process. Students’ conceptualizations evolved from abstract and technical terms to more reflective and integrated ideas, as evidenced by their use of scientific imagery in drawings, including tools, natural elements, and representations from various scientific disciplines. The camp environment promoted emotional awareness, cognitive development, and key skills such as communication, teamwork, and problem-solving through enjoyable and hands-on learning experiences. Students frequently associated science with nature and demonstrated increased environmental sensitivity. They also reported high levels of satisfaction from engaging in collaborative, play-based, and discovery-oriented learning activities. Furthermore, feedback from instructors and counsellors emphasized the program’s effectiveness in fostering student growth and professional learning for educators. The program was noted for offering authentic learning experiences and supporting interdisciplinary thinking. However, some challenges were identified, including the intensity of the activity schedule, weather conditions, and the need to address diverse student backgrounds and learning needs. Overall, the science camp provided a meaningful, engaging, and multidimensional learning experience that enriched participants’ views of science and its role in everyday life.

Keywords

Outdoor Education , Interdisciplinary Education , Participant Experiences , Science Camp

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Sakarya University Ethics Committee. Informed consent forms were collected from all participants. (Evrak Tarih ve Sayısı: 14.02.2022-105365)

Supporting Institution

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

Project Number

122B667

References

• Ahrenkiel, L., & Worm-Leonhard, M. (2014). Offering a forensic science camp to introduce and engage high school students in interdisciplinary science topics. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(3), 340-344. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400321a
• Akin, Y., & Bakar, R. A. (2023). The effectiveness of outdoor education on student creativity. JUARA: Jurnal Olahraga, 8(1), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v8i1.2417
• Asfeldt, M., Purc-Stephenson, R., & Zimmerman, T. (2022) Outdoor education in Canadian post-secondary education: Common philosophies, goals, and activities. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 25, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-022-00102-4
• Auer, M. R. (2008). Sensory perception, rationalism and outdoor environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.2167/irgee225.0
• Avraamidou, L. (2015). Reconceptualizing elementary teacher preparation: A case for informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 108-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.969358
• Ayotte-Beaudet, J. P., Berrigan, F., Deschamps, A., L’Heureux, K., Beaudry, M. C., & Turcotte, S. (2023). K-11 teachers’ school-based outdoor education practices in the province of Québec, Canada: From local initiatives to a grassroots movement. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2164787
• Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23-28. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfed/issue/46796/586804
• Bentsen, P., & Jensen, F. S. (2012). The nature of udeskole: Outdoor learning theory and practice in Danish schools. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning 12(3), 199–219. oi.org/10.1080/14729679.2012.699806
• Bunting. C. J. (2006). Interdisciplinary teaching through outdoor education. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetics.
• Cottrell, J. R., & Cottrell, S. P. (2020). Outdoor skills education: What are the benefits for health, learning and lifestyle? World Leisure Journal, 62(3), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2020.1798051
• Çalışkan, H. & Yıldırım, Y. (2024). Social studies education in out-of-school settings- concept-, skill-, and value-oriented. [Okul dışı ortamlarda sosyal bilgiler eğitimi-Kavram, Beceri ve Değer Odaklı] Pegem Akademi.
• Çalışkan, H., & Yıldırım, Y. (2022). Values education in out-of-school settings. [Okul dışı ortamlarda değerler eğitimi]. Pegem Akademi.
• Çalışkan, H., Yıldırım, Y., & Demirhan, E. (2021). The evaluation of values education project which is conducted by the context of nature education. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 44-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.21.53.8.3
• Davies, R., & Hamilton, P. (2016). Assessing learning in the early years’ outdoor classroom: Examining challenges in practice, Education 3-13. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 46(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1194448
• Dawidowicz, P. (2011). With scholarship & practice in mind: The case study as research method. The Journal of Instructional Design, 1(2), 5-12. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/facpubs/165/
• Demirhan, E. (2018). Opinions of gifted students and prospective teachers on nature education program based on mentoring approach. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(3), 175-188. https://dx.doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.483536.
• Dettweiler, U., Gerchen, M., Mall, C., Simon, P., & Kirsch, P. (2023). Choice matters: Pupils' stress regulation, brain development and brain function in an outdoor education project. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 152-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12528
• Dikmenli, Y. (2017). Preservice teachers’ perception levels concerning consumer environmental consciousness. Journal of Education in Scıence Environment and Health, 3(2), 157-164. https://dx.doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.326741.
• Ertaş, H., Şen, A. İ., & Parmasızoğlu, A. (2011). The effects of out-of school scientific activities on 9th grade students’ relating the unit of energy to daily life, Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-198. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/balikesirnef/issue/3373/46558
• Fang, W. T., Hassan, A. A., & LePage, B. A. (2022). Outdoor education. In the living environmental education: Sound science toward a cleaner, safer, and healthier future (pp. 229- 260), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4234-1
• Gerber, B. L., Marek, E. A., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (2001). Development of an informal learning opportunities assay. International Journal of Science Education 23(6), 569-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116959
• Gülcan, C. (2021). A qualitative data collection tool: A study on the application and validity of focus group technique. Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences of Mersin University, 4(2), 94-109. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/meusbd/issue/63193/866942
• Gürdal, A., & Öztuna, A. (2010). Project-based learning [Proje tabanlı öğrenme]. In Y. Ersoy, G. Uzal, A. Erdem (Eds.) Science/Physics Education I – Perspectives, Developments, and New Approaches (pp. 145-157). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Gürsoy, G., & Yıldırım-Polat, S. N. (2023). Systematic review of theses on out-of-school learning environment in science education. Journal of Research in Informal Learning Environments, 8(1), 1-20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jrinen/issue/78626/1162800
• Hırça, N. (2013). Summer science camp experiences of gifted students. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 1(1), 22-30. http://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423937373.pdf
• Holland-Smith, D. (2022) Habitus and practice: Social reproduction and trajectory in outdoor education and higher education, Sport, Education and Society, 27(9), 1071-1085, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1964460
• Isgren Karlsson, A., Alatalo, T., Nyberg, G., & Backman, E. (2023). Exploring physical education teachers’ perceptions and attitudes towards digital technology in outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(4), 510-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2054835
• İnce, S., & Akcanca, N. (2021). Parents’ views on out-of-school learning environments in preschool education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 58, 172-197. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.886446
• Laçin-Şimşek, C. (2004). Ethical and aesthetic values in environmental education in science education curriculum and textbooks. Journal of Value Education, 2(7), 127-146. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ded/issue/36881/312464
• Lakin, L. (2006). Science beyond the classroom. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 8890. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656021
• Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
• Melber, L. H., & Abraham, L. M. (1999). Beyond the classroom: Linking with informal education. Science Activities, 36, 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368129909601027
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Nielsen, M. K., Dyg, P. M., & Wistoft, K. (2020). Outdoor taste education: Danish perspectives on potentials and challenges for taste education in school gardens and outdoor education. Food, Culture & Society, 23(4), 523-541 https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2020.1776013
• Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and behavior, 41(5), 715-740. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177
• Oğurlu, I., Alkan, H., Unal, Y., Ersin, M. O., & Bayrak H. (2013). Contributions of environment and nature training to geography education: IDE projects case study, The 3rd Internatinal Geography Semposium-GEOMED 2013, Kemer-Antalya-Turkey, 2013, Symposium Proceedings, ISBN:978-605-62253-8-3 Pages 498-508.
• Ordin, Y. S., Bilik, Ö., Damar, H. T., & Çelik, B. (2018). The learning experiences of nursing students in surgical clinics reflected in reflection reports. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education., 6(3), 106-120. https://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c3s5m
• Paris, S. G., Yambor, K. M., & Packard, B. W. (1998). Hands-on biology: amuseum, school, university partnership for enhancing students interest and learning in science. Elementary School Jaurnal, 98(3), 267-288. https://doi.org/10.1086/461894
• Puhakka, R. (2023). Effects of outdoor adventures on emerging adults’ well-being and connection with nature. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2023.2220836
• Ramey-Gassert, L. (1997). Learning science beyond the classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1086/461875
• Remmen, K. B., & Iversen, E. (2023). A scoping review of research on school-based outdoor education in the Nordic countries. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(4), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2027796
• Saban, A. (2009). Prospective teachers’ mental images about the concept of student. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences. 7(2), 281-326. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/256272
• Samsudin, S., Kamalden, T. F. T., Aziz, A., Ismail, M. H., Yaakob, S. S. N., & Farizan, N. H. (2021). The impact of outdoor education camp program in building resilience among university students. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16185
• Saraç, H. (2017). Researches related to outdoor learning environments in Turkey: content analysis study. Journal of Research in Educational Theory and Practice, 3(2), 60-81. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/339611
• Seyhan, A. (2020). Effectiveness of out-of-school learning in social studies course according to prospective teachers. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 7(3), 27-51. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/919270
• Sjöblom, P., Eklund, G., & Fagerlund, P. (2023) Student teachers’ views on outdoor education as a teaching method−two cases from Finland and Norway, Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 23(3), 286-300, https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.2011338
• Sönmez, V. (2020). Science Philosophy. Anı.
• Stevens, S., Shin, N., Delgado, C., Cahill, C., Yunker, M., & Krajcik, J. (2007, April). Fostering students’ understanding of interdisciplinary science in a summer science camp. In annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
• Stevenson, A. D., & Casler-Failing, S. L. (2023). How clean is my water? A culturally responsive, project-based interdisciplinary summer camp. Afterschool Matters, 36, 28-36. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1389924.pdf
• Şeker, P. T., & Savaş, Ö. (2023). Okul dışı öğrenme ortamlarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(1), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1118257
• Tatar, N., & Bağrıyanık, K. (2012). Examination of teachers' views on out-of-school learning environments. Elementary Education Online, 14(4), 883-896 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/90533
• Waite, S., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Comparing apples and pears: A conceptual framework for understanding forms of outdoor learning through comparison of English forest schools and Danish udeskole. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 868–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1075193
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin.
• Yıldırım, Y. (2019). The effect of an out-of-school activity-based values education program on active citizenship values. [Unpublished Phd Dissertation, Sakarya Üniversitesi].
• Yıldız, E. (2022). An evaluation of preschool teachers' use of out-of-school learning environments. Bayburt Journal of Education Faculty, 17(33), 94-127. https://dx.doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.826566
• Yin, R. K. (2013) Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.