Thermal Efficiency Comparison of Flat Plate and Evacuated Tube Solar Water Collectors
Öz
Flat plate and evacuated
tube solar water collectors are widely used for supplying hot water for
domestic and industrial applications in the world. However, there is no enough
information regarding thermal efficiencies of different type solar water
collectors for various environmental and climatic conditions. Therefore, in
this work; thermal efficiencies of different types of flat plate solar water
collector panels such as aluminum,
copper, 304 chromium and evacuated tube have been compared.
It was seen from the results that the
efficiencies of aluminum and copper collector panels are changing between 56%...68%
while the efficiencies of 304 stainless steel chromium panels are varied between
67%...88. In addition, evacuated tube type solar
water collectors have less heat loss but lower absorber surface area to gross
area ratio (about 70%) when compared with flat plate solar water collectors.
Based on absorber surface area, evacuated tube type solar water collectors have
more efficiency than equivalent flat plate collectors. However in practical
applications, gross area of any solar water collector should be considered for
comparison. In this case, the efficiencies of evacuated tube type solar water
collectors are changing between 50%...70%. Besides, it should be kept in mind
that evacuated tube type solar water collectors can be preferred for cold
environmental and climatic conditions because of their less heat loss and cold
resistant.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Anonymous, 2003. EN (European Norms) 12972-2. Thermal solar systems and components-Solar collectors-Part 2: Test Methods, April, 2003.
- Duffie J.A., and W.A. Beckman, 1991. Solar engineering of thermal process. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York.
- Eames P.C., and P.W. Griffiths, 2006. Thermal behaviour of integrated solar collector/storage unit with 65 0C phase change material. Energy Conversion and Management, (47): 3611–3618
- Enibe S.O., 2003 Thermal analysis of a natural circulation solar air heater with phase change material energy storage. Renewable Energy, (28): 2269–2299.
- Hazami M., S. Kooli, M. Lazaar, A. Farhat and A. Belghith, 2005. Performance of a solar storage collector. Desalination, (183): 167-172.
- Hussein H.M.S., H.H. El-Ghetany and S.A. Nada, 2008. Experimental investigation of novel indirect solar cooker with indoor PCM thermal storage and cooking unit. Energy Conversion and Management, (49): 2237–2246.
- Kim Y., T. Seo, 2007. Thermal Performances Comparisons of the Glass Evacuated Tube Solar Collectors with Shapes of Absorber Tube. Renewable Energy, (32), 772-795.
- Koyuncu T., 2002. Eğim Açılarının Düz Yüzeyli Hava Isıtıcı Güneş Kollektörlerinin Verimleri Üzerine Etkileri (in Turkish), O.M.Ü. Zir. Fak. Dergisi, 17 (3), 33-42.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Turhan Koyuncu
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
26 Aralık 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
13 Mayıs 2017
Kabul Tarihi
3 Ağustos 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3