Effect of soil conditioner applications on phosphorus of corn plant in acidic soils

Öz

This research was carried out to determine the effects of lime, organic and inorganic (waste sludge- WS; zeolite- ZEO; polyacrylamide-PAM) based soil conditioner applications on phosphorus nutrition of corn plant. In the research carried out under greenhouse conditions, lime was applied in three different doses and the conditioner were applied in four different doses. The research soil has a clayey texture, initially strongly acidic reaction (pH, 5.2) and moderate organic matter content. Soils were incubated for 56 days in the factorial design study. After incubation, periods corn plants were grown in pots. It has been determined that the applications made caused a change in the P nutrition of the corn plant grown depending on the variety, application level and pH value of the soil. It was determined that the conditioners were ranked as WS>ZEO> PAM in terms of their effects on the P nutrition of the maize plant. WS was found to be effective at different pH levels, whereas PAM and Zeolite were effective only at neutral pH levels. The 6.0% dose of WS was determined as the most effective application for P nutrition in slightly acid soil.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Soil conditioners
• Lime
• pH
• Zeolit
• PAM

Asit toprakta düzenleyici uygulamalarının mısır bitkisinin fosfor beslenmesine etkileri

Öz

Bu araştırmada asit yapılı toprağa kireç ile organik ve inorganik (atık çamuru-AÇ; zeolit- ZEO; polyacrylamide-PAM) kökenli toprak düzenleyici uygulamalarının mısır bitkisinin fosfor beslenmesine etkileri incelenmiştir. Sera koşullarında yürütülen araştırmada kireç üç, düzenleyiciler dört farklı dozda uygulanmışlardır. Araştırma toprağı killi tekstüre, başlangıçta kuvvetli asit reaksiyona (pH, 5.2) ve orta seviyede organik madde kapsamına sahiptir. Faktöriyel düzende yapılan çalışmada topraklar 56 gün süre ile inkübasyona tabi tutulmuştur. İnkübasyon sonrasında saksılarda mısır bitkisi yetiştirilmiştir. Yapılan uygulamaların çeşit, uygulama düzeyi ile toprağın pH değerine bağlı olarak yetiştirilen mısır bitkisinin P beslenmesinde değişime neden olduğu belirlenmiştir. Düzenleyicilerin mısır bitkisinin P beslenmesi üzerindeki etkileri bakımından AÇ>ZEO>PAM şeklinde sıralandıkları saptanmıştır. AÇ'nin farklı pH seviyelerinde, PAM ve Zeolitin ise sadece nötr pH düzeylerinde etkili oldukları görülmüştür. AÇ'nin % 6.0 dozu hafif asit yapılı toprakta P beslenmesinde en etkili uygulama olarak belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• toprak düzenleyicier,
• Kireç
• pH
• Zeolit
• PAM

Kaynakça

1. Agro B. 2003. Understanding pH management and plant nutrition Part I: Introduction. Available from URL: http://www.mans.edu.eg/projects/heepf/ilppp/cources/12
2. Azzam RA. 1983. Polymeric conditioner gels for desert soils. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 14: 739- 760.
3. Bender D, Erdal İ, Dengiz O, Gürbüz M, Tarakçıoğlu C. 1998. Farklı organik materyallerin killi bir toprağın bazı fiziksel özellikleri üzerine etkileri. International Symposium on Arid Region Soil, 506-510, September, 21-24. Ed.; M. Şefik Yeşiloy, Menemen, İzmir.
4. Binder DL, Dobermann A, Sander DH, Cabsman KG. 2002. Biosolids as N source for irrigated maize and rainfed sorghum. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66: 531-543.
5. Candemir F, Gülser C. 2010. Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes in clay and loamy sand fields. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 42(1), 13-28.
6. Demir Z, Gülser C. 2015. Effects of rice husk compost application on soil quality parameters in greenhouse conditions. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 4(3), 185-190.
7. Demiralay İ. 1993. Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 143, Erzurum.
8. El-Hayd O A, Tayel MY, Lotfy AA. 1981. Super Gel as a soil conditioner. II: Its effects on plant growth, enzymeactivity, water use efficiency and nutrient uptake. Acta Horticulturae, 119: 257- 2265.

9. Garcıa-Orenes F, Guerrero C, Mataix-Solera J, Navarro-Pedre ̃no J, G ́omez I, Mataix-Beneyto J. 2005. Factors controlling the aggregate stability and bulk density in two different degraded soils amended with biosolids. Soil Till Res. 82: 65–76.
10. Gondal AH, Hussain I, Ijaz AB, Zafar A, ChBI, Zafar H, Usama M. 2021. Influence of soil pH and microbes on mineral solubility and plant nutrition: A review. International Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 5(1), 71-81.
11. Havlin JL, Beaton JD, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL. 2014. Soil fertility & Fertilizers "An Introduction to Nutrient Management "8th Ed Prentice Hall. New J.514 pp.
12. İbrahim HI, Juma SS. 2021. Effect of Mineral Fertilization and Humic Acids on Availability of NPK in Soil and Maize Growth. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(6), 11414-11418.
13. Ippolito JA, Tarkalson DD, Lehrsch GA. 2011. Zeolite soil application method affects inorganic nitrogen, moisture, and corn growth. Soil science, 176(3), 136-142.
14. Kacar B. 1972. Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri: II, Bitki Analizleri. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınları, No: 453, Ankara.
15. Kacar B. 1994. Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri: III, Torak Analizleri. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Eğitim Araş. ve Geliş. Vakfı Yayınları, No: 3, Ankara.
16. Kant C, Barik K, Aydın A. 2006. Asidik topraklara uygulanan farklı kireçleme materyallerinin bazı toprak özellikleri ile mısır bitkisi (Zea mays L.)’nin gelişimi ve mineral içeriğine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 161-167.
17. Katkat AV, Çil N, 1996. Bitki Besleme Uygulama Kılavuzu. Uludağ Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınları, Uygulama Kılavuzu No: 8, Bursa.
18. Kavoosi M. 2007. Effects of zeolite application on rice yield, nitrogen recovery, and nitrogen use efficiency. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 38(1-2), 69-76.
19. Klute A. 1986. Water retention: Laboratory methods. In a Klute (Ed.) Method of Soil Analysis Part I, Second edition, Argon. Monog. No 9 ASA Madison WI, 635- 662.
20. Kowaljow E, Mazzarino MJ, Satti P, Jim ́enez-Rodr ́ıguez C. 2010. Organic and inorganic fertilizer effects on a degraded Patagonian rangeland. Plant Soil. 332: 135–145.
21. Laboski CA. 2016. Posted on June 29, 2016 (https://ipcm.wisc.edu/blog/2016/06/plant-analysis-are- yousing-it-and-interpreting-the-resultscorrectly/)
22. Mamedov AI, Beckmann S, Huang C, Levy GJ. 2006. Aggregate stability as affected by polyacrylamide molecular weight, soil texture, and water quality. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71:1909- 1918.
23. Moraghan JT, Mascagni HJ, 1991. Environmental and Soil Factors Affecting Micronutrient Deficiencies and Toxicities. In Micronutrients in Agriculture, 2nd Ed.;Luxmoore, R.J., Ed.; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, 371-425.
24. Mossa AW, Bailey EH, Usman A, Young SD, Crout NM. 2020. The impact of long-term biosolids application (> 100 years) on soil metal dynamics. Science of the Total Environment, 720, 137441.
25. Mullins G, Hansen DJ. 2009. Chapter 4. Basic Soil fertility. http://www.mawaterquality.org/ Publications/ manmh/chapter4.
26. Özdemir N, Horuz A, Özkaptan S. 2004. Düzenleyici uygulamalarının bazı toprak özellikleri ve mısırda N kapsamına etkileri. OMÜ Zir. Fak. Dergisi, 19(3) : 24- 30.
27. Özdemir N, Gülser C, Ekberli İ, Özkaptan S. 2005. Toprak düzenleyicilerinin asit toprakta strüktürel dayanıklılığa etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(2), 151-156.
28. Ros M, Hernandez MT, Garcia C, 2003. Bioremediation of degraded soils with sewage sludge: effects on soil properties and erosion losses. Environ. Manage. 31: 741-747.
29. Rowell DL. 1996. Soil Science Methods & Applications. Wesley Longman Limited, Harlow.
30. Shuman LM. 1986. Effect of liming on the distribution of manganase, copper, iron and zinc among soil fractions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50: 1236-1240.
31. Sikka R, Kansal BD. 1995. Effect of fly-ash applicationon yield and nutrient composition of rice, wheat and on pH and available nutrient status of soils. Bioresource Technoly, 51(2-3): 199-203.
32. Sims JL, Patrick Jr WH. 1978. The distribution of micronutrient cations in soil under conditions of varying redox potential and pH. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42: 258- 262.
33. Torri S, Lavado R. 2009. Fate of cadmium, copper, lead and zinc on soils after the application of different treated sewage sludge in soils of the Pampas region. In Stephens A, Fuller M (eds.) Sewage Treatment: Uses, Processes and Impact. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge. pp. 95–123.
34. Tuna AL, Girgin AR, 2005. Mısırda (Zea mays L.) gelişme, mineral beslenme ve ağır metal içeriği üzerine termik santral uçucu küllerinin etkisi. Ekoloji, 14(57): 7-15.
35. Verplancke H, De Boodt M. 1990. Effect of syntheticpolymers on water use efficiency for crop production on sandy soils in Suidi Arabia, Soil Tech. 3: 45-55.
36. von Tucher S, Hörndl D, Schmidhalter U. 2018. Interaction of soil pH and phosphorus efficacy: Long-term effects of P fertilizer and lime applications on wheat, barley, and sugar beet. Ambio, 47(1), 41-49.
37. Wallace A, Wallace GA. 1986. Effects of soil conditioners on emergence and growth of tomato, cottonand lettuce seedlings. Soil Sci. 141: 313-316.
38. Walter I, Cuevas G, Garcia S, Martinez F. 2000. Biosolid effects on soil and native plan production in a degraded semiarid ecosystem in central Spain. Waste Manage. Res. 18: 259–263.
39. Yang X, Feng Y, Zhang X, Sun M, Qiao D, Li J, Li X. 2020. Mineral soil conditioner requirement and ability to adjust soil acidity. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–12.