Effects of organic polymer and some agricultural residue applications on some soil properties and yield in wheat plants

Öz

In this study conducted under greenhouse conditions, the effects of artificial and organic soil conditioners on some soil properties, soil organic matter and wheat plant productivity were examined. The soil samples used in the study were taken from the surface (0-20cm). In this study, which was carried out in a factorial and random plot design, wheat straw, hazelnut husk, humic acid, polyacrylamide and polyacrylamide + regulator combinations were applied to the soils in 3 different doses and in 3 repetitions. Wheat straw and hazelnut husk doses (0%, 2%, 4%), humic acid doses (0 ppm, 200 ppm, 1000 ppm) and polyacrylamide doses (0 ppm, 30 ppm, 60 ppm) were studied. After a five-month incubation period, wheat plants were grown in pots. In the evaluations made after the plant harvest, it was determined that the organic matter content in the sandy loam soil, which was 1.14% in the control, increased up to 2.43%, depending on the regulatory practices, and in the clay loam soil, the organic matter content, which was 2.37% in the control, increased up to 6.01%. When the yield results were examined, it was observed that the productivity of the wheat plant increased after humic acid, humic acid + polyacrylamide, hazelnut husk + polyacrylamide applications in sandy loam soil, while the yield increased compared to the control only with hazelnut husk + polyacrylamide applications in clay loam soil, and the yield decreased in other applications. The highest increase in organic matter content was determined in the samples where hazelnut husk 3rd dose + polyacrylamide 2nd dose was applied in sandy loam soil, and in the samples where hazelnut husk 3rd dose was applied in clay loam soil. The highest increase in yield was determined in the samples where humic acid 3rd dose + polyacrylamide 3rd dose was applied in sandy loam soil, and in the samples where hazelnut husk 3rd dose + polyacrylamide 2nd dose was applied in clay loam soil. The effectiveness of regulatory applications varied depending on the application dose and soil properties.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organic matter
• soil conditioners
• soil properties
• wheat yield

Organik polimer ve bazı tarımsal artık uygulamalarının bazı toprak özellikleri ve buğday bitkisinde verime etkileri

Öz

Sera koşullarında yürütülen bu çalışmada, yapay ve organik kökenli toprak düzenleyicilerin bazı toprak özellikleri, toprak organik maddesi ve buğday bitkisinin verimine etkileri incelenmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan toprak örnekleri yüzeyden (0-20 cm) alınmıştır. Faktöriyel düzende ve tesadüf parselleri deneme düzeninde yürütülen bu çalışmada buğday samanı, fındık zurufu, hümik asit, poliakrilamid ile poliakrilamid + düzenleyici kombinasyonları topraklara 3 farklı dozda, 3 tekrarlamalı olarak uygulanmıştır. Buğday samanı ve fındık zurufu dozları (%0, %2, %4), hümik asit dozları (0 ppm, 200 ppm, 1000 ppm), poliakrilamid dozları (0 ppm, 30 ppm, 60 ppm) olarak çalışılmıştır. Beş aylık inkübasyon periyodunun ardından saksılarda buğday bitkisi yetiştirilmiştir. Bitki hasadından sonra yapılan değerlendirmelerde kumlu tın toprakta denette %1.14 olan organik madde içeriğinin düzenleyici uygulamalarına bağlı olarak %2.43’e kadar, killi tın toprakta ise denette %2.37 olan organik madde içeriğinin ise %6.01’e kadar artış gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Verim sonuçları incelendiğinde kumlu tın toprakta hümik asit, hümik asit+poliakrilamid, fındık zurufu+poliakrilamid uygulamaları sonrasında buğday bitkisinin veriminin arttığı, killi tın toprakta yalnızca fındık zurufu+poliakrilamid uygulamaları ile denete göre verim artışının olduğu diğer uygulamalarda verimin düştüğü gözlemlenmiştir. Organik madde içeriğinde en yüksek artış kumlu tın toprakta fındık zurufu 3.doz+poliakrilamid 2.doz uygulanan örneklerde, killi tın toprakta ise fındık zurufunun 3. dozunun uygulandığı örneklerde belirlenmiştir. Verim üzerinde en yüksek artış kumlu tın toprakta hümik asit 3. doz+poliakrilamid 3. doz uygulanan örneklerde, killi tın toprakta ise fındık zurufu 3. doz+poliakrilamid 2. doz uygulanan örneklerde belirlenmiştir. Düzenleyici uygulamalarının etkinlikleri uygulama dozu ve toprak özelliklerine bağlı olarak değişim göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• organik madde
• toprak düzenleyiciler
• toprak özellikleri
• buğday verim

Kaynakça

1. Albiach R, Canet R, Pomares F, Ingelmo F, 2001. Organic matter components, aggregate stability and biological activity in a horticultural soil fertilized with different rates of two sewage sludges during ten years. Bioresource Technology, 77, 109–114.
2. Bremner JM, 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Ed. C. A. Black. Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. Pub. Agron. Series. No: 9. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
3. De Neve S, Hofman G, 2000. Influence of soil compaction on carbon and nitrogen mineralization of soil organic matter and crop residues, Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 544–549.
4. Doran JW, 2002. Soil health and global sustainability: translating science into practice, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 88, 119-127.
5. Eriksen GN, Coale FJ, Bollero GA, 1999. Soil nitrogen and maize production in municipal solid waste amended soil, Agrononmy Journal, 91, 1009–1016.
6. Fox D, Bryan RB, 1992. Influence of polyacyrilamide soil conditioner on runoff generation and soil erosion: field test in Baringo District, Kenya. Soil Technology, 5, 101-119.
7. Gee GW, Bauder JW, 1986. Methods of soil analysis, part I: physical and minerological analysis. In: A. Klute (Ed.), Particle-Size Analysis, 1st Edn., Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 388-409.
8. Haynes RJ, Naidu R, 1998. Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 51, 123–137.

9. Hendershot WH, Lalande H, Duquette, M, 1993. Soil sampling and method of analysis for Canadian Society of Soil Science In: M.R. Carter (Ed.), Soil Reaction And Exchangeable Acidity, 1st Edn., Lewis, Florida, pp. 141-85.
10. Hendrix PF, Franzluebbers AJ, McCracken DV, 1998. Management effects on C accumulation and loss in soils of the southern Appalachian Piedmont of Georgia. Soil and Tillage Research, 47(3-4), 245-251.
11. Imbufe AU, Patti AF, Burrow D, Surapaneni A, Jackson WR, Milner AD, 2005. Effects of potassium humate on aggregate stability of two soils from Victoria, Australia. Geoderma, 125, 321-330.
12. Iqbal A, He L, Khan A, Wei S, Akhtar K, Ali I, Jiang L, 2019. Organic manure coupled with inorganic fertilizer: An approach for the sustainable production of rice by improving soil properties and nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy, 9(10), 651.
13. Kaya M, Atak M, Çiftçi CY, Ünver S, 2005. Çinko ve hümik asit uygulamalarının ekmeklik buğday (Tiriticum aestium L.)’ da verim ve bazı verim öğeleri üzerine etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 9(3).
14. Kemper WD, 1965. Aggregat Stability. İn C.A. Black (ed). Methods of soil analysis. Amer. Soc. Of Argon. Inc., Part 1. Agronomy 9.
15. Leaungvutivirog C, Sunantapongsuk V, Limtong P, Nakapraves P, Piriyaprin S, 2002. Effect of organic fertilizers on soil Improvement in Mab Bon, Tha Yang, Satuk, and Renu Series for Corn Cultivation in Thailand, 17th World Congress of Soil Science, 14-21 August 2002, Thailand, Symposium No: 57, Paper No. 1899.
16. Lentz RD, Sojka RE, 1994. Field results polyacyrilamide to manage furrow erosion and infiltration. Soil Science, 158, 274-282.
17. Madejon E, Lopez R, Murillo JM, Cabrera F, 2001. Agricultural use of three (sugar-beet) vinasse composts: effect on crops and chemical properties of a cambisol soil in the Guadalquivir river valley (SW Spain), Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 84 81), 55–65.
18. Mbagwu JSC, Lal R, Scott TW, 1984. Effects of desurfacing of Alfisols and Ultisols in Southern Nigeria: I.crop performance, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 48, 828-833.
19. Nelson DW, Sommers LE, 1982. Methods of soil analysis, part II: Chemical and microbiological methods. In: L.A. Page, R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (Eds.), Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter, 2nd Edn., Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 539-579.
20. Nichols JD, 1984. Relation of organic carbon to soil properties and climate in the southern Great Plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 48(6), 1382-1384.
21. Nunes MR, Van Es HM, Veum KS, Joseph P, Amsili JP, Karlen DL, 2020. Anthropogenic and inherent effects on soil organic carbon across the U.S. Sustainability, 12:5695; doi:10.3390/su12145695
22. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA, 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorous in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. Government Printing Office, Washington.
23. Olson TC, 1977. Restoring the productivity of a glacial till soil after topsoil removal, Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 32, 130-132.
24. Özdemir N, Atalay T, 2019. Effects of inorganic and organic tea farming practices on some soil quality parameters and erodibility. Anadolu Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 34(3), 397-405.
25. Özdemir N, Gülser C, Ekberli İ, Kop Ö T, 2014. Asit toprakta düzenleyici uygulamalarının bazı toprak özellikleri ve verime etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 2(1), 27-32.
26. Pacci S, Dengiz O, Saygın F, Alaboz P, 2022. SMAF Modeline Göre Çeltik Tarımı Yapılan Bafra Ovası Arazilerinin Toprak Kalite Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(2), 164-174.
27. Pinamonti F, Zorzi G, 1996. Experiences of compost use in agriculture and in land reclamation projects, Editors: de-Bertoldi, M., Sequi, P., Lammers, B., Papi, T., The science of composting, Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, 517–527.
28. Rhoades JD, 1986. Methods of soil analysis, part II: chemical and microbiological properties, In: A. Klute (Ed.), Soluble Salts, 1st Edn., Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 79- 167.
29. Schlichting E, Blume HP, 1966. Bodenkundliches praktikum. Verlag Paul Paney, Hamburg und Berlin, 121–125. Soil Survey Manual, 2017. Handbook 18. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
30. Sonmez O, Pierzynski GM, Frees L, Davis B, Leikam D, Sweeney DW, Janssen KA, 2009. A field-based assessment tool for phosphorus losses in runoff in Kansas. Journal of soil and water conservation, 64(3), 212-222.
31. Tamer N, Başalma D, Türkmen C, Namlı A, 2016. Organik toprak düzenleyicilerin toprak parametreleri ve ayçiçeği (Helianthus annuus L.) bitkisinin verim ve verim öğeleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 4(1), 11-20.
32. Tejada M, Gonzalez JL, 2003. Effects of the application of a compost originating from crushed cotton gin residues on wheat yield under dryland conditions, European Journal of Agronomy, 19, 357– 368.
33. Thomas GW, 1987. Method of soil analysis, part II: agronomy. In: C.A Clark (Ed.), Exchangeable Cations, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 59-161.
34. Yakupoğlu T, Özdemir N, 2006. Erozyona Uğramış Topraklarda Organik Atık Uygulamalarının Bazı Mekaniksel Özelliklere Etkisi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(2), 173-17.
35. Yurtsever N, 1984. Deneysel istatislik metodlar. Tarim ve Köyişleri Bak. Köy Hizmetleri Gen. Müd. Toprak ve Düzenleyici Araş. Enst. Yayınları, Teknik yayın no:56,169-181.