Ticari firmaların önerdiği organik gübre kullanım dozlarının kavun üretimindeki etkileri

Öz

Bu araştırmada, işlenmiş organik gübre üreten 4 farklı ticari firmanın, kavun üreticilerine önermiş oldukları kullanım dozlarının, kavun bitkisinin beslenmesine, meyve kalitesi ve verimine olan etkileri araştırılmıştır. Ticari firmaların önerdiği dozlarda kullanılan organik gübre uygulamalarının hepsi kavun yapraklarında bulunan azot, potasyum, demir ve mangan elementlerinin konsantrasyonlarını artırmıştır. Yapraklarda bulunan fosfor elementinin konsantrasyonu ise sadece tavuk ve küçükbaş hayvan gübresi uygulamalarında artmıştır. Organik gübre uygulamalarına bağlı olarak; meyve dış kabuk renginin L*, C* ve h değerleri ile meyve içi renginin C* değeri genellikle azalmıştır. Kavun meyvelerinin verimi incelendiğinde; ticari firmalar tarafından önerilen dozlarda uygulanan tüm organik gübre uygulamaları meyve verimini artırmıştır. En yüksek meyve verimi büyükbaş hayvan gübresi dozundan elde edilmiş olup, ticari firmalar tarafından önerilen küçükbaş hayvan gübresi dozundan %8.36, vermikompost dozundan %15.89 ve tavuk gübresi dozundan %15.13 oranında daha yüksektir. Organik gübre uygulamalarına bağlı olarak suda çözülebilir kuru madde (SÇKM) değeri ve meyve içi sertlik değeri kontrol uygulamasına oranla artırmıştır. Organik gübre uygulamalarının meyve pH değeri üzerine olan etkileri incelendiğinde ise en yüksek değer küçükbaş hayvan gübresi uygulamasından elde edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlar değerlendirildiğinde; özellikle kavun bitkisinin verim değerleri dikkate alındığında, açık tarla kavun yetiştiriciliği için en uygun organik gübre kullanım dozunun, büyükbaş hayvan gübresi üreten firma tarafından belirlendiği tespit edilmiştir. Benzer çalışmalar diğer bitkiler içinde yapılmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kavun
• bitki beslenmesi
• organik gübre
• açık tarla
• meyve verimi ve kalitesi

The effects of organic fertilizer doses recommended by commercial companies on melon production

Öz

In this study, the effects of the doses recommended to melon producers by 4 different commercial companies producing processed organic fertilizers on melon plant nutrition, fruit quality and yield were investigated. All of the organic fertilizer applications used at the doses recommended by the commercial companies increased the concentrations of nitrogen, potassium, iron and manganese elements in melon leaves. The concentration of phosphorus element in the leaves increased only in chicken and ovine manure treatments. L*, C* and h values of fruit outer skin color and C* value of fruit inner color generally decreased due to organic fertilizer treatments. When the yield of melon fruits was examined; all organic fertilizer treatments applied at the doses recommended by commercial companies increased the fruit yield. The highest fruit yield was obtained from bovine manure dose and it was 8.36%, 15.89% and 15.13% higher than the doses recommended by commercial companies such as bovine manure dose, vermicompost dose and chicken manure dose, respectively. Water soluble dry matter (WDSM) value and in-fruit firmness value increased due to organic fertilizer treatments compared to the control treatment. When the effects of organic fertilizer applications on fruit pH value were examined, the highest value was obtained from ovine manure application. When the results obtained from the research were evaluated; it was determined that the most appropriate organic fertilizer usage dose for open field melon cultivation was determined by the company producing cattle manure, especially considering the yield values of melon plant. Similar studies should be conducted for other crops.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Melon
• plant nutrition
• organic fertilizer
• open field
• fruit yield and quality

Kaynakça

1. Agustono A, Irawan E, Suci Andriani I. 2023. Organic Fertilizer and Technical Efficiency in Melon Cultivation in Wonogiri, Central Java. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(04), 2643-2648.
2. Aitbayeva AT, Zorzhanov BD, Kossanov SU, Koshmagambetova MZ, Balgabayeva RK. 2022. Effect of biological and organic fertilizers on growth processes, productivity and quality of melon fruits under Southeastern Kazakhstan. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1043, No. 1, p. 012048). IOP Publishing.
3. Anwar M, Patra DD, Chand S, Alpesh K, Naqvi AA, Khanuja SPS. 2005. Effect of organic manures and inorganic fertilizer on growth, herb and oil yield, nutrient accumulation, and oil quality of French basil. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 36(13-14), 1737-1746.
4. Ayoola OT, Makinde EA. 2007. Complementary organic and inorganic fertilizer application: influence on growth and yield of cassava/maize/melon intercrop with a relayed cowpea. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 1(3), 187-192.
5. Bagheri S, Hassandokht MR, Mirsoleimani A, Mousavi A. 2021. Effects of palm leaf biochar on the availability of soil nutrients, leaf nutrient concentration, and physiological characteristics of melon plants (Cucumis melo L.) under drought stress. Acta Agrobotanica, 73(1).
6. Bhunia S, Bhowmik A, Mallick R, Mukherjee J. 2021. Agronomic efficiency of animal-derived organic fertilizers and their effects on biology and fertility of soil: A review. Agronomy, 11(5), 823.
7. Bhunia S, Bhowmik A, Mallick R, Mukherjee J. 2021. Agronomic efficiency of animal-derived organic fertilizers and their effects on biology and fertility of soil: A review. Agronomy, 11(5), 823.
8. Black CA, 1957. Soil-plant relationships. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Newyork.

9. Black CA, 1965. Methods of soil analysis Part 2. Amer. Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher Madisson, Wilconsin. Bouyoucos GJ, 1955. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of the soils. Agron. J. 4(9): 434.
10. Bower CA, Wilcox LL, 1965. Soluble salt methods of soil analysis, Methods of soil analysis Part 2, Am. Soc. Agron., No: 9, Madison, pp: 933-940, Wilconsin.
11. Dishri M, Thakur N. 2024. Melon. Nutraceuticals from Fruit and Vegetable Waste, 349-402.
12. Enujiugha VN, Adeyemo MB, Adisa AM. 2023. Nutritional and safety implications of consuming melon seeds and impacts on international trade: A review. Food and Humanity, 1, 241-249.
13. Evliya H. 1964. Kültür Bitkilerinin Beslenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, 36: 292-294.
14. Gurjar PS, Berwal MK, Samadia DK, Ram H, Verma AK. 2024. Optimizing snap melon (Cucumis melo var. momordica) puree processing, sustainable long-term preservation and value addition. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 1-11.
15. Jackson MC, 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private’Limited, New Delhi.
16. Jones JB Jr, Wolf B, Mills HA. 1991. Plant analysis handbook. Mikro-Makro Publishing, Inc. Georgia 30607, USA.
17. Kacar B, 1972. Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri II. Bitki Analizleri Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fak. Yayınları: 453, Ders Kitabı, Ankara.
18. Kacar B, İnal A, 2008. Bitki Analizleri. Nobel Yayınları, Yayın no:1241, Ankara.
19. Kadifeci H, Dikici H, Demir ÖF. 2024. Effect of Active Lime on the Availability of Metal Micronutrients. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(2), 347-356.
20. Kalkan H, Gözükara G, Kaplan M. 2017. Sera güzlük domates yetiştiriciliğinde yeni eğilim: sıvı organik gübre tüketimi. Academia Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2(3): 92-100.
21. Kuang X, Si K, Song H, Peng L, Chen A. 2021. Lime-phosphorus fertilizer efficiently reduces the Cd content of rice: physicochemical property and biological community structure in Cd-polluted paddy soil. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 749946.
22. Kumar R, Reddy KM. 2021. Impact of climate change on cucurbitaceous vegetables in relation to increasing temperature and drought. Advances in Research on Vegetable Production Under a Changing Climate Vol. 1, 175-195.
23. Lija M, Beevy SS. 2021. A Review on the diversity of Melon. Plant Science Today, 8(4), 995-1003.
24. Maltaş AŞ. 2023. Kompostlaştırılmış büyükbaş hayvan gübresinin aşısız karpuz üretimindeki kullanım etkinliği. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi 11(2) 75 - 81.
25. Maltaş AŞ, Kaya İ, Kaplan M. 2018. Organik Gübre Kalitesine Genel bir Bakış: Yabancı Ot Varyasyonu. Akademia Disiplinlerarası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi 4 (1), 1-7
26. Mamatha S. 2016. Studies on Genetic Diversity Using Morphological Characters and Health Beneficial Components in Muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Horticulture Sciences).
27. Manchali S, Murthy C, Vishnuvardana KN, Patil BS. 2021. Nutritional composition and health benefits of various botanical types of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Plants, 10(9), 1755.
28. Mcguire RG. 1992. Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience, 27: 1254-1255.
29. Moreno-Delafuente A, Morales I, Garzo E, Fereres A, Viñuela E, Medina P. 2021. Changes in melon plant phytochemistry impair Aphis gossypii growth and weight under elevated CO2. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 2186.
30. Negi YK, Sajwan P, Uniyal S, Mishra AC. 2021. Enhancement in yield and nutritive qualities of strawberry fruits by the application of organic manures and biofertilizers. Scientia Horticulturae, 283, 110038.
31. Olsen SR, Sommers EL, 1982. Phosphorus. In:Page, A.L, Ed., Methods of soil analysis Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp. 404-430.
32. Rolim PM, Seabra LMAJ, de Macedo GR. 2020. Melon by-products: Biopotential in human health and food processing. Food Reviews International, 36(1), 15-38.
33. Sudhakara T, Manchali S. 2016. Characterization of muskmelon local types of Karnataka for growth and yield attributing traits. Res. Environ. Life Sci, 9, 1210-1214.
34. Weng J, Rehman A, Li P, Chang L, Zhang Y, Niu Q. 2022. Physiological and transcriptomic analysis reveals the responses and difference to high temperature and humidity stress in two melon genotypes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(2), 734.